Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 07:49:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#978261: fixed in swiglpk 4.65.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #978261,
regarding swiglpk: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i
python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13
to be marke
Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 07:35:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#930990: fixed in pybluez 0.23-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #930990,
regarding python*-bluez includes unusuable ble module
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 07:18:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982347: fixed in litecli 1.5.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #982347,
regarding litecli: description refers to pgcli instead of litecli
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 06:04:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981231: fixed in gdisk 1.0.6-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #981231,
regarding gdisk: autopkgtest regression
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 05:48:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982273: fixed in libbsd 0.11.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #982273,
regarding libbsd0-udeb: depends on libmd0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 04:36:28 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#982023: gimp-gmic: prevents gimp from loading
has caused the Debian Bug report #982023,
regarding gimp-gmic: prevents gimp from loading
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 03:03:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982323: fixed in pcp 5.2.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #982323,
regarding pcp-export-pcp2{graphite,influxdb}: missing Breaks+Replaces: pcp (<<
5.2.5)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Mon, 8 Feb 2021 21:45:04 -0500
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#981845: Please update cgit package, it's 4 years old
already
has caused the Debian Bug report #981845,
regarding Please update cgit package, it's 4 years old already
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 02:22:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981906: fixed in pyfuse3 3.2.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #981906,
regarding pyfuse3 FTBFS on 32bit
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 02:23:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982047: fixed in wordwarvi 1.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #982047,
regarding wordwarvi: invalid Uploaders field: missing comma between Ricardo
Mones & Joseph Nahmias
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Mon, 8 Feb 2021 21:07:00 -0500
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#980248: cgit: kernel regression breaks cgit's
sendfile()
has caused the Debian Bug report #980248,
regarding cgit: kernel regression breaks cgit's sendfile()
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 943871 1.0.3-1
Bug #943871 [src:wordwarvi] wordwarvi FTCBFS: uses the build architecture
pkg-config
Marked as fixed in versions wordwarvi/1.0.3-1.
Bug #943871 [src:wordwarvi] wordwarvi FTCBFS: uses the build architecture
pkg-config
Marked
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 23:50:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981978: fixed in jnr-enxio 0.32.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #981978,
regarding jnr-enxio: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17: module java.base does not "opens
java.io" to unnamed module
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 23:50:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970122: fixed in man-db 2.9.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #970122,
regarding lexgrog: NAME section: does not recognize the \[...] form for a "dash"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 23:50:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969072: fixed in man-db 2.9.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #969072,
regarding man: seccomp filter breaks groff on armel/mipsel/hppa/powerpc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 23:33:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981986: fixed in libcommons-jexl3-java 3.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #981986,
regarding libcommons-jexl3-java: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17: module java.xml does
not export com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 18:28:23 -0500
with message-id <6217793.MKYA3XikQm@t450>
and subject line #977863: please package new upstream release 2.2.26
has caused the Debian Bug report #977863,
regarding please package new upstream release 2.2.26
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 23:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#868550: fixed in gnupg2 2.2.27-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #868550,
regarding still some remaining agent startup race (probability 10^-3 ?)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 23:18:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981945: fixed in gs-collections 5.1.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #981945,
regarding gs-collections: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17: module java.base does not
"opens java.lang" to unnamed module
to be marked as
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 23:18:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#972525: fixed in gnupg2 2.2.27-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #972525,
regarding buildd: sbuild randomly fails to sign changes file despite valid
signature keys
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 23:18:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966313: fixed in lxterminal 0.4.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #966313,
regarding lxterminal: Setting "Select by word characters" has no effect
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 22:35:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963392: fixed in r-cran-rstanarm 2.21.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #963392,
regarding r-cran-rstanarm: FTBFS: error: (converted from warning) TBB library
not found.
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 17:13:07 -0500
with message-id <87pn1a6wek@svladcjelli.uhoreg.ca>
and subject line Re: Bug#537670: noweb: examples/whitespace: trailing white
space in chunk name is not chopped
has caused the Debian Bug report #537670,
regarding noweb: examples/whitespace:
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 22:05:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#979526: fixed in roundcube-plugins-extra 1.4.10+1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #979526,
regarding roundcube-plugins-extra: Call to undefined function Q()
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 22:04:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982313: fixed in grub2 2.04-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #982313,
regarding grub-common: excessive dependency on mtools
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Mon, 8 Feb 2021 22:54:17 +0100
with message-id <359e5ad5-a0b4-f5e9-d540-75213d50c...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: using bash instead if sh in mysql-common?
has caused the Debian Bug report #526464,
regarding mysql-common uses /bin/bash in postrm (and preinst) script
unnecess
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:39:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982218: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #967544,
regarding jackeq: depends on deprecated GTK 2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:39:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982218: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #957382,
regarding jackeq: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:39:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982218: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #829945,
regarding jackeq: Uses deprecated gnome-common macros/variables
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:39:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982218: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #753432,
regarding FTBFS with clang instead of gcc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:39:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982218: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #748563,
regarding Conflicting return types of getSettings
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:38:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982218: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #982218,
regarding RM: jackeq -- RoQA; dead upstream, RC-buggy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:38:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982216: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #982216,
regarding RM: gtkperf -- ROM; dead upstream, depends on GTK 2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:38:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982215: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #982215,
regarding RM: ansible-tower-cli -- ROM; dead upstream
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:38:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982216: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #967498,
regarding gtkperf: depends on deprecated GTK 2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:38:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982216: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #933725,
regarding gtkperf: core dump when using 1000 rounds
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:37:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982110: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #894837,
regarding plotdrop FTCBFS: uses build architecture build tools
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:37:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982110: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #967196,
regarding plotdrop: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:38:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982216: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #575494,
regarding gtkperf: files in orig.tar.gz removed in make clean
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:38:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982216: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #912837,
regarding gtkperf: broken, oudated, embedded copy of PKG_CHECK_MODULES
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:38:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982216: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #932533,
regarding gtkperf: Uses manual dh sequence operations that are going to be
removed
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:38:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982117: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #982117,
regarding RM: gdpc [i386 s390x armel armhf mipsel] -- ROM; test failures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:37:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982110: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #967705,
regarding plotdrop: depends on deprecated GTK 2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:37:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982110: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #967883,
regarding plotdrop: depends on deprecated libglade2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:38:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982216: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #848546,
regarding RFA: gtkperf -- GTK+ performance benchmark
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:38:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982211: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #982211,
regarding RM: python-pynetstring -- ROM; unused, no reverse depends
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:38:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982141: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #982141,
regarding RM: golang-procfs -- RoQA; source package was renamed to
golang-github-prometheus-procfs
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:37:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982110: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #982110,
regarding RM: plotdrop -- ROM; not ported to Python3 and no upstream activity
in almost 5 years
to be marked as done.
This me
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:37:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982104: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #982104,
regarding RM: agda [mips64el mipsel] -- RoQA; package no longer builds on mips*
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:35:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981863: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #981863,
regarding RM: ruby-autoprefixer-rails -- RoQA; binary package moved to
src:node-autoprefixer
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:36:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981916: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #981916,
regarding RM: apertium-ukr -- ROM; RC Buggy, obsolete by apertium-rus-ukr now
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:35:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981839: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #981839,
regarding RM: 3dldf-doc -- RoM; dead upstream
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:34:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981811: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #981811,
regarding RM: openjdk-8 -- ROM; legacy openjdk version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:35:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981844: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #981844,
regarding RM: python-igraph [mips64el] -- RoQA; build dependency igraph no
longer builds on mips64el
to be marked as done.
Th
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:34:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981836: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #981836,
regarding RM: igraph [mips64el] -- ROM; FTBFS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:34:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981796: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #981796,
regarding RM: bintray-client-java -- ROM; Not used, service discontinued
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:34:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981795: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #981795,
regarding RM: kboot-utils -- ROM; RC-buggy, unmaintained, low popcon
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:33:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981617: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #981617,
regarding RM: exe-thumbnailer -- ROM; superseded by icoextract
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:33:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981557: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #981557,
regarding RM: libjcalendar-java -- ROM; No longer used, abandoned upstream
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:33:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981532: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #981532,
regarding RM: angelscript [arm64] -- NBS; no longer built on arm64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:33:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981526: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #981526,
regarding RM: libopenusb -- RoQA; unmaintained, obsolete
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:34:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981795: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #979641,
regarding src:kboot-utils: invalid maintainer address
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:33:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981498: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #981498,
regarding RM: nanoblogger -- RoQA; upstream dead, unmaintained
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:34:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981811: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #978519,
regarding openjdk-8: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-9)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:34:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981811: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #977448,
regarding "Received fatal alert: handshake_failure" when java connects to
Google smtp servers using SSL/TLS
to be marked as do
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:34:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981811: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #968705,
regarding avr32studio exits with exit code 13 (wrong java version)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:34:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981811: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #967671,
regarding openjdk-8: depends on deprecated GTK 2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:33:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981557: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965649,
regarding libjcalendar-java: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in
bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:33:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981498: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #964518,
regarding nanoblogger: replace transitional bsdmainutils dependency
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:33:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981526: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #955863,
regarding libopenusb: unnecessarily Build-Depends on deprecated dbus-glib
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:34:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981811: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #929653,
regarding java.vendor change breaks applications checking java.vendor (like
LibreOffice)
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:34:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981811: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #953067,
regarding openjdk-8-jre: JFrame is not garbage collected.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:33:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981526: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #502320,
regarding libopenusb0: race condition
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:33:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981526: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #584108,
regarding RFA: libopenusb -- alternative userspace USB programming library
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:34:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981811: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #760982,
regarding openjdk-8 needs time zone data
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:33:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981526: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #492691,
regarding Does libopenusb-dev package actually work?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:33:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981498: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #689809,
regarding Content of DESC field not put into meta-description tag
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:34:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981811: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #929650,
regarding openjdk-8 is staying in unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:33:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981498: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #847507,
regarding O: nanoblogger -- Small weblog engine for the command line
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:33:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981498: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #795655,
regarding nanoblogger: markdown hang while generating atom 1.0 feed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:33:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981526: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #810442,
regarding libopenusb: please switch to libusb 1.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:33:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981498: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #690393,
regarding cal behaviour changed leading to output issues creating webcalendar
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:33:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981498: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #689834,
regarding Please don't remove archives _during_ re-creating - better replace
the directory after recreating the files
to be ma
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:33:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981498: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #689833,
regarding Calendar links in month archives broken (duplicating archives
directory in link)
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:32:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981497: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #981497,
regarding RM: geronimo-ejb-3.0-spec -- ROM; No longer used, replaced by
geronimo-ejb-3.2-spec
to be marked as done.
This mean
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:32:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981471: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #981471,
regarding RM: filepp -- ROM; unmaintained upstream, low popcon score
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:31:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981214: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #981214,
regarding RM: gettext-lint -- RoQA; Depends on Python 2, unmaintained, dead
upstream
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:31:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981169: Removed package(s) from experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #981169,
regarding RM: liblarch/experimental -- RoQA; removed from unstable as well
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:32:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981497: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #979222,
regarding src:geronimo-ejb-3.0-spec: invalid maintainer address
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:32:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981497: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965547,
regarding geronimo-ejb-3.0-spec: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6
in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:31:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981214: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #943098,
regarding gettext-lint: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:32:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981471: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #819366,
regarding RFA: filepp -- generic perl-based file pre-processor for text files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:32:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981460: Removed package(s) from experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #981460,
regarding RM: php-phpseclib/experimental -- ROM; Superseded by php-phpseclib3
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:31:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981430: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #981430,
regarding RM: arduino [all] -- ROM; arduino-core abandoned, melted into arduino
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:32:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981445: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #981445,
regarding RM: ruby-parser -- RoM; replaced by ruby-ruby-parser
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:31:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981214: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #627762,
regarding gettext-lintl: POFileClean does not work (pb with the python
interpreter)
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:31:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981426: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #981426,
regarding RM: cu2qu -- ROM; merged to fonttools
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:31:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981246: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #981246,
regarding RM: geronimo-jta-1.1-spec -- ROM; No longer used, replaced by
geronimo-jta-1.2-spec
to be marked as done.
This mean
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:31:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981214: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #943098,
regarding gettext-lint: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Mon, 08 Feb 2021 21:31:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981214: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #810292,
regarding gettext-lint: Only check spellings against installed dictionaries
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
1 - 100 of 252 matches
Mail list logo
