Your message dated Sat, 7 May 2005 22:57:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308095: udev: *1394 devices are not present, a default
override would be nice.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2005 20:40:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 07 13:40:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp3.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.28]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DUW6M-0001Tm-00; Sat, 07 May 2005 13:40:42 -0700
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf0307.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 6471B1C00212
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 7 May 2005 22:40:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pegasos (AStrasbourg-251-1-60-207.w82-126.abo.wanadoo.fr
[82.126.128.207])
by mwinf0307.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 301801C001E4;
Sat, 7 May 2005 22:40:11 +0200 (CEST)
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from luther by pegasos with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DUW5F-0004Mz-3K; Sat, 07 May 2005 22:39:33 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: udev: *1394 devices are not present, a default override would be nice.
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11
Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 22:39:32 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: udev
Version: 0.056-2
Severity: important
Hello,
As said, the /dev/raw1394 and /dev/video1394/0 devices are not existent in a
udev context. I understand this is because the ieee1394 driver doesn't yet
export the correct sys/hotplug magic.
In the meantime, it would be nice to have those devices added per default in
links.conf, and the correct permissions set in permissions.rules.
The ubuntu udev package has the first one right, but lacks some permissions
for /dev/raw1394.
The way it is configured to work is :
$ cat /etc/udev/permissions.d/udev.permissions
...
raw1394:root:video:0660
# When the kernel gets proper support for 1394, change this to a wildcard:
video1394/0:root:video:0660
...
$ cat /etc/udev/linux.conf
...
# Ubuntu fix - only here until the kernel gets real ieee1394 support
M raw1394 c 171 0
D video1394
M video1394/0 c 171 16
...
I would clasify this a RC, but as we are so late in the game, i keep it as
important and let it up to you. Having firewire webcams and DV digicams
working out of the box in debian/sarge would be a nice thing though.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- Package-specific info:
-- /etc/udev/rules.d/:
/etc/udev/rules.d/:
total 0
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 20 2005-05-05 13:05 020_permissions.rules ->
../permissions.rules
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 19 2005-05-05 13:05 cd-aliases.rules ->
../cd-aliases.rules
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 13 2005-05-05 13:05 udev.rules -> ../udev.rules
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 12 2005-05-05 13:04 z_hal-plugdev.rules -> ../hal.rules
-- /sys/:
/sys/block/hda/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda10/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda11/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda12/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda13/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda1/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda2/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda3/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda4/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda5/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda6/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda7/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda8/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda9/dev
/sys/block/hdc/dev
/sys/block/ram0/dev
/sys/block/ram10/dev
/sys/block/ram11/dev
/sys/block/ram12/dev
/sys/block/ram13/dev
/sys/block/ram14/dev
/sys/block/ram15/dev
/sys/block/ram1/dev
/sys/block/ram2/dev
/sys/block/ram3/dev
/sys/block/ram4/dev
/sys/block/ram5/dev
/sys/block/ram6/dev
/sys/block/ram7/dev
/sys/block/ram8/dev
/sys/block/ram9/dev
/sys/block/sda/dev
/sys/block/sdb/dev
/sys/block/sdc/dev
/sys/block/sdd/dev
/sys/class/drm/radeon/dev
/sys/class/graphics/fb0/dev
/sys/class/input/event0/dev
/sys/class/input/event1/dev
/sys/class/input/event2/dev
/sys/class/input/mice/dev
/sys/class/input/mouse0/dev
/sys/class/input/mouse1/dev
/sys/class/input/ts0/dev
/sys/class/input/ts1/dev
/sys/class/misc/nvram/dev
/sys/class/misc/psaux/dev
/sys/class/misc/rtc/dev
/sys/class/sound/audio/dev
/sys/class/sound/controlC0/dev
/sys/class/sound/controlC1/dev
/sys/class/sound/controlC2/dev
/sys/class/sound/controlC3/dev
/sys/class/sound/dmmidi/dev
/sys/class/sound/dsp/dev
/sys/class/sound/midiC0D0/dev
/sys/class/sound/midi/dev
/sys/class/sound/mixer/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D0c/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D0p/dev
/sys/class/sound/timer/dev
-- Kernel configuration:
isapnp_init not present.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-powerpc
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages udev depends on:
ii hotplug 0.0.20040329-22 Linux Hotplug Scripts
ii initscripts 2.86.ds1-1 Standard scripts needed for bootin
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii makedev 2.3.1-78 creates device files in /dev
ii sed 4.1.4-2 The GNU sed stream editor
-- debconf information:
udev/devfs-warning:
* udev/reboot-warning:
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 308095-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2005 20:57:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 07 13:57:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from attila.bofh.it [213.92.8.2] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DUWMh-0003Uc-00; Sat, 07 May 2005 13:57:36 -0700
Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 6DC465F775; Sat, 7 May 2005 22:57:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 069681C2E1; Sat, 7 May 2005 22:57:25 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 22:57:25 +0200
To: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#308095: udev: *1394 devices are not present, a default
override would be nice.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J/dobhs11T7y2rNN"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--J/dobhs11T7y2rNN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On May 07, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the meantime, it would be nice to have those devices added per default=
in
> links.conf, and the correct permissions set in permissions.rules.
I think you did not notice the disclaimer at the top of the file, nor
the half dozen of reassigned or closed bugs about this issue.
Anyway, this is obviously not a big problem or the kernel or lib1394
maintainers would have fixed this by now.
--=20
ciao,
Marco
--J/dobhs11T7y2rNN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCfSu1FGfw2OHuP7ERAtwNAJ0e1gIqDGf2KM8I75zffN8Z/LSMAACeMecZ
WX56mhFfMA1EPPIwQ8oHWGM=
=NkQ4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--J/dobhs11T7y2rNN--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
