Your message dated Sun, 27 Jan 2019 11:25:48 +0000 with message-id <e1gnizq-0000tk...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#920570: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #917382, regarding Should stunserver be removed? to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 917382: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=917382 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: stunserver Severity: serious Should stunserver be removed from the archive? - It's unmaintained (last maintainer upload in 2015) - Dropped from testing over a year ago - Marginal popcon - RC-buggy (one of the handful of remaining packages blocking the removal of OpenSSL 1.0) Cheers, Moritz
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 1.2.7-1.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package stunserver has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/920570 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
