Bug#920020: marked as done (javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Jan 2019 19:36:49 +0100 with message-id <8f5eee56-c32c-7295-25a2-c5a4aa7b6...@debian.org> and subject line closing issues, the change is intentional has caused the Debian Bug report #920020, regarding javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages

Bug#920020: marked as done (javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2019 18:30:36 +0100 with message-id <20190125173036.ge26...@rene-engelhard.de> and subject line Re: Bug#919883: libreoffice arch all FTBFS, javadoc: error - The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5/docs/api/

Bug#920020: marked as done (javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:42:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#920020: fixed in openjdk-11 11.0.2+9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #920020, regarding javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module to be marked

Bug#920020: marked as done (javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:42:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#919798: fixed in openjdk-11 11.0.2+9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #919798, regarding javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module to be marked