Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2016 18:13:29 +0200
with message-id <83614d27-e62d-1757-b997-dbd5bb7c3...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: libclutter-gtk-1.0-dev: should conflict against 
libclutter-gtk-0.10-dev as provide the same include but different API
has caused the Debian Bug report #648560,
regarding libclutter-gtk-1.0-dev: should conflict against 
libclutter-gtk-0.10-dev as provide the same include but different API
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
648560: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648560
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libclutter-gtk-1.0-dev
Version: 1.0.4-1
Severity: normal

libclutter-gtk-0.10-dev provides
/usr/include/clutter-1.0/clutter-gtk/clutter-gtk.h
as libclutter-gtk-1.0-dev pkgconfig incirectly drag
/usr/include/clutter-1.0 then when a program has
<clutter-gtk/clutter-gtk.h> the 0.10 one comes before
the 1.0 /usr/include/clutter-gtk-1.0/clutter-gtk/clutter-gtk.h>
whatever one can attempt.

Could 1.0 dev package conflict again the 0.10 one to avoid one compiling
evolution 3.4 wondering why everything looks good but still gcc
complains of :

e-mail-notebook-view.c: In function ‘create_gtk_actor’:
e-mail-notebook-view.c:453:3: erreur: implicit declaration of function
‘gtk_clutter_actor_new’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
e-mail-notebook-view.c:453:3: attention : nested extern declaration of
‘gtk_clutter_actor_new’ [-Wnested-externs]
e-mail-notebook-view.c:453:13: attention : assignment makes pointer from
integer without a cast [enabled by default]
e-mail-notebook-view.c:454:3: erreur: implicit declaration of function
‘gtk_clutter_actor_get_widget’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
e-mail-notebook-view.c:454:3: attention : nested extern declaration of
‘gtk_clutter_actor_get_widget’ [-Wnested-externs]
e-mail-notebook-view.c:454:3: erreur: implicit declaration of function
‘GTK_CLUTTER_ACTOR’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
e-mail-notebook-view.c:454:3: attention : nested extern declaration of
‘GTK_CLUTTER_ACTOR’ [-Wnested-externs]
e-mail-notebook-view.c:454:7: attention : assignment makes pointer from
integer without a cast [enabled by default]
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

Best regards
Alban

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0test0 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libclutter-gtk-1.0-dev depends on:
ii  gir1.2-gtkclutter-1.0  1.0.4-1
ii  libclutter-1.0-dev     1.8.2-1
ii  libclutter-gtk-1.0-0   1.0.4-1
ii  libgtk-3-dev           3.2.1-1
ii  pkg-config             0.26-1 

libclutter-gtk-1.0-dev recommends no packages.

Versions of packages libclutter-gtk-1.0-dev suggests:
ii  libclutter-gtk-1.0-doc  1.0.4-1

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:03:58 +0100 Alban Browaeys <pra...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Package: libclutter-gtk-1.0-dev
> Version: 1.0.4-1
> Severity: normal
> 
> libclutter-gtk-0.10-dev provides
> /usr/include/clutter-1.0/clutter-gtk/clutter-gtk.h
> as libclutter-gtk-1.0-dev pkgconfig incirectly drag
> /usr/include/clutter-1.0 then when a program has
> <clutter-gtk/clutter-gtk.h> the 0.10 one comes before
> the 1.0 /usr/include/clutter-gtk-1.0/clutter-gtk/clutter-gtk.h>
> whatever one can attempt.
> 
> Could 1.0 dev package conflict again the 0.10 one to avoid one compiling
> evolution 3.4 wondering why everything looks good but still gcc
> complains of :

This concerns versions before oldstable, so I guess this ship has sailed
long ago.


-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to