Your message dated Thu, 01 Dec 2016 12:50:17 +0000
with message-id <e1ccqob-000fna...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#842431: fixed in iptraf-ng 1.1.4-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #842431,
regarding iptraf-ng: maintainer's address doesn't accept mail from the BTS
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
842431: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842431
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: iptraf-ng
Version: 1.1.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.3

Hi!
I'm afraid that the maintainer's address for this package is set to "Ubuntu
Developers <ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com>", which doesn't accept
mail from the BTS, as required by the Policy.

This also seems to be a medium-traffic general list for a derived
distribution whose packaging policies differ from those of Debian, thus
mails related to non-Ubuntu packaging of a specific package are probably out
of place.


Meow!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), 
(150, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-rc2-debug+ (SMP w/6 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages iptraf-ng depends on:
ii  libc6         2.24-5
ii  libncursesw5  6.0+20160917-1
ii  libtinfo5     6.0+20160917-1

iptraf-ng recommends no packages.

iptraf-ng suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: iptraf-ng
Source-Version: 1.1.4-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
iptraf-ng, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 842...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Aron Xu <a...@debian.org> (supplier of updated iptraf-ng package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 20:25:22 +0800
Source: iptraf-ng
Binary: iptraf-ng
Architecture: source
Version: 1.1.4-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Aron Xu <a...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Aron Xu <a...@debian.org>
Description:
 iptraf-ng  - Next Generation Interactive Colorful IP LAN Monitor
Closes: 842431
Changes:
 iptraf-ng (1.1.4-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Restore correct maintainer address (Closes: #842431)
Checksums-Sha1:
 7c4ea972ae658f3b32647f3314ba9fd9788d98cb 1594 iptraf-ng_1.1.4-4.dsc
 0e6b019fda2cc870bc165b618fc2c11026ebfd74 3100 iptraf-ng_1.1.4-4.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 f31e841ac927d2d002fbdc593b6524b781f089f1b33cfc204d84fc6342f30c4e 1594 
iptraf-ng_1.1.4-4.dsc
 e74496d858031dd5ae47a73acc7b84d4a6bb9e20c42e8717fac54de333974972 3100 
iptraf-ng_1.1.4-4.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 f4d29894e6ea22e645b2083bb7166837 1594 net optional iptraf-ng_1.1.4-4.dsc
 a9459ffe5c1c5e6cd9d3690fae442a1a 3100 net optional 
iptraf-ng_1.1.4-4.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYQBbrAAoJEPbsVcVkKA0eP5UIAJwuyuvrmH4jyFVRU0k4DBjh
2qbIgDlZvEzaYA3VkjPQo9WcnD/SOU6D/t7CES9NLknohtX1ueERiKx+e6pMP+Nj
P3twR+CORDOzoEjwfUkhdFhoXWy8oG+y0NZq/6iXZQZiG992IMBgRlOcDv2LuKre
bGtpH7rdQzGx9Qm/1dkahpmvoo1K0Bh2iQYKoIYtvVZC4lhoUbR8s66SVeOneL9/
eoATeHRU4yh+oDf54sF0HA1XLSDoLjFAQB4ra0Tdln1IPJLukzgvJ70jL5DJQkC6
YEXXAvtvqoiocikJmz0WMyyeIpGOq2rkaLBtH5MOH4T0EXi7NU3DQZ21b9tBKXU=
=6xXT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to