Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 10:56:37 -0400
with message-id <20170806145637.ep6c76c3hbvvg...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#842829: UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to 
avoid some failures
has caused the Debian Bug report #842829,
regarding UDD/uscan: devscripts needs to be upgraded to avoid some failures
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
842829: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842829
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd

Hi,

(filing as a bug)

On 01/10/16 at 13:21 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi (I'm not on this list, so CC to me please),
> 
>  Those 3 packages got uscan error in Maintainer Dashboard page
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > fonts-kanjistrokeorders     debian/watch: uscan returned an error: In 
> > debian/watch no matching files for watch line http://www.nihilist.org.uk/ 
> > http://www.nihilist.org.uk/KanjiStrokeOrders_v[-_](\d[\-+\.:\~\da-zA-Z]*)(?i)\.(?:tar\.xz|tar\.bz2|tar\.gz|zip)\?attredirects=0
> >  debian uupdate
> > 
> > fonts-ricty-diminished      debian/watch: uscan returned an error: In 
> > debian/watch no matching files for watch line 
> > http://www.rs.tus.ac.jp/yyusa/ricty_diminished.html 
> > ricty_diminished/ricty_diminished-[-_](\d[\-+\.:\~\da-zA-Z]*)(?i)\.(?:tar\.xz|tar\.bz2|tar\.gz|zip)
> > 
> > gawk-doc    debian/watch: uscan returned an error:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>  However, it works fine on my box. I guess it may be caused by use version 4
>  syntax for debian/watch file.
> 
> > $ uscan --verbose
> > (snip)
> > uscan info: Matching target for downloadurlmangle: 
> > https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gawk/gawk-4.1.4.tar.xz
> > uscan info: Upstream URL (downloadurlmangled):
> >    https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gawk/gawk-4.1.4.tar.xz
> > uscan info: Newest upstream tarball version selected for download 
> > (uversionmangled): 4.1.4
> > uscan info: Download filename (filenamemangled): gawk-4.1.4.tar.xz
> > uscan info: Newest version of gawk-doc on remote site is 4.1.4, local 
> > version is 4.1.4
> > uscan info:    => Package is up to date for from
> >       https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gawk/gawk-4.1.4.tar.xz
> > uscan info: Scan finished
> 
>  Can anyone can look into it, please?

I tried with the first package listed.  It works fine with devscripts
2.16.8 (in testing), but not with 2.16.4~bpo8+1 (in stable-bpo, and
installed on ullmann.debian.org).

To fix that, an update of that backport is needed.

Lucas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 29/05/17 at 08:12 -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 03:09:55PM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> > On Nov 1, 2016 11:33, "Lucas Nussbaum" <lu...@debian.org> wrote:
> > > I tried with the first package listed.  It works fine with devscripts
> > > 2.16.8 (in testing), but not with 2.16.4~bpo8+1 (in stable-bpo, and
> > > installed on ullmann.debian.org).
> > >
> > > To fix that, an update of that backport is needed.
> > 
> > I've yet to do that because it would require a backport of the licensecheck
> > package, too, since that was split out of devscripts.
> 
> Thanks to fsfs backporting licensecheck, I've updated devscripts'
> backport to 2.17.5~bpo8+1.

Thanks!

As a result, the uscan output is now fine for the packages that had
issues previously, so I'm closing this bug.

https://udd.debian.org/dmd/?email1=&email2=&email3=&packages=fonts-kanjistrokeorders+fonts-ricty-diminished+gawk-doc&ignpackages=&format=html#todo

Lucas

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to