Your message dated Tue, 8 Aug 2017 20:42:58 +0530
with message-id <18d84bc6-3846-0b9c-28b9-1a3adf5ef...@amaram.name>
and subject line Re: Bug#870926: calendarserver: should calendarserver be
removed from unstable?
has caused the Debian Bug report #870926,
regarding calendarserver: should calendarserver be removed from unstable?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
870926: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870926
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: calendarserver
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch
Hi,
Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that
missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package from
unstable, because:
it was in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze
but wasn't part of stretch
AND
it was in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze
but it wasn't part of jessie
AND
it is still not in testing
AND
it was not uploaded since the beginning of 2017.
If you disagree and think that this package should remain in unstable, feel
free to just close this bug.
If this bug is still open one month from now (on 2017-09-06), it will be turned
into a removal request, using:
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
retitle -1 RM: calendarserver -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch
thanks
- Lucas, for the QA team.
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2017/07/msg00021.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
I am currently the maintainer for Debian calendarserver. I do intend on
maintaining it. Actually for both jessie and stretch, I had prepared the
releases, but right before the freeze, something came-up and it got
pushed out of testing. However, it always was in the right shape with no
blockers during Ubuntu LTS releases and hence has always managed to get
into Ubuntu LTS.
The reason why it is currently not in testing is because calendarserver
depends on sqlparse library, which had been updated to 0.2.x series and
the then released calendarserver version (9.0) was not compatible with
it. I see that a newer version of calendarserver (9.1) has been released
which is compatible with the latest sqlparse library.
I will work on updating the package this month.
Thanks,
Rahul.
On Sunday 06 August 2017 07:20 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: calendarserver
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch
Hi,
Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that
missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package from
unstable, because:
it was in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze
but wasn't part of stretch
AND
it was in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze
but it wasn't part of jessie
AND
it is still not in testing
AND
it was not uploaded since the beginning of 2017.
If you disagree and think that this package should remain in unstable, feel
free to just close this bug.
If this bug is still open one month from now (on 2017-09-06), it will be turned
into a removal request, using:
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
retitle -1 RM: calendarserver -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch
thanks
- Lucas, for the QA team.
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2017/07/msg00021.html
--
http://rahul.amaram.name
--- End Message ---
