Your message dated Mon, 9 Apr 2018 01:20:51 -0400
with message-id <20180409052051.l2fglguq6hr3k...@curie.anarc.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#892494: diceware: "diceware" name violates trademark
has caused the Debian Bug report #892494,
regarding diceware: "diceware" name violates trademark
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
892494: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892494
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: diceware
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1

As stated in the footer of http://world.std.com/%7Ereinhold/diceware.html the 
original creator of diceware claims a trademark on the name. I've filed a bug 
with upstream here: https://github.com/ulif/diceware/issues/48

Upstream does not have permission from Arnold Reinhold to use the trademark, 
but is aware of the issue and has reached out to Reinhold with no response. 
This package should probably be removed or renamed if upstream does not get a 
response soon.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Control: forwarded 892494 https://github.com/ulif/diceware/issues/48

On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 12:27:19PM -0500, Simon Fondrie-Teitler wrote:
> As stated in the footer of http://world.std.com/%7Ereinhold/diceware.html the 
> original creator of diceware claims a trademark on the name. I've filed a bug 
> with upstream here: https://github.com/ulif/diceware/issues/48
> 
> Upstream does not have permission from Arnold Reinhold to use the trademark, 
> but is aware of the issue and has reached out to Reinhold with no response. 
> This package should probably be removed or renamed if upstream does not get a 
> response soon.

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 02:17:48PM +0100, Uli Fouquet wrote:
> this issue can be closed. I got a message from Mr. Reinhold granting me
> use of "diceware" explicitly, given that I keep the Python system as
> default source of randomness.

After reviewing the above issue, I agree this should be resolved, and
have (hopefully) done so in this message.

This should let the package trickle back down into testing from here on.

A.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to