I submitted this bug about two weeks ago and have yet to hear from anyone
about it.
--
Jason Smith
Once you become Real, you can't become Unreal again. It lasts for always!
reopen: 707226
If you install the wine package instead of wine-bin, you will get the
wine64-bin package,
Yes, that is also what the bug title says and exaclty what happened by
installing a package that depends on wine.
which will present the above helpful info to the
user.
Unfortunately
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
to get #703047 in odbc-postgresql (src:psqlodbc) fixed, libiodbc2
needs to become aware of the location of the multi-arched ODBC
drivers. (Note that this does not mean to multi-arch
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:28:48AM +0200, email@arcor.de wrote:
The dependecy is actually only fullfilled by providing the true wine
functionality.
Thus the suggestion to let the wine64-bin package execute a post-inst script
or similar,
to install the 32bit version, instead of
Package: gimp-ufraw
Version: 0.18-2
Severity: important
When trying to import a .CR2 image produced with a Canon EOS 5D camera
like this:
% gimp IMG_1803.CR2
I receive a segmentation fault. The message on stderr is:
/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/ufraw-gimp: fatal error: Segmentation fault
and
Le 31 mai 2013 14:39, Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org a écrit :
Package: release-notes
Tags: patch
Hi Michael
For reference, this is from http://bugs.debian.org/594273#54
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:11:06PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
I'm not sure it is the right place - the RM
Hi Bastien
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:58:49AM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
Le 31 mai 2013 14:39, Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org a écrit :
Package: release-notes
Tags: patch
Hi Michael
For reference, this is from http://bugs.debian.org/594273#54
On Wed, May 29, 2013
When trying to import a .CR2 image produced with a Canon EOS 5D camera
like this:
% gimp IMG_1803.CR2
I receive a segmentation fault. The message on stderr is:
I just raised this severity to grave and tagged it as upstream since,
according to the README of version 0.19.2, this seems to be
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:4.1.0~beta1-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
As stated in the bug subject, the .desktop files for all of the LibreOffice
applications are missing.
As such, LibreOffice applications do not appear in the GNOME Shell overview,
and I imagine this means they
Package: wmctrl
Version: 1.07-6
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Just a wishlist. Would it be possible to have a more informative
wmctrl -l with these info:
#define WIN_TITLE MyProgramm
#define WIN_NAME PROGWIN
#define WIN_CLASS progwin
Thanks
kind regards,
Happy Tux
-- System Information:
Debian
Hi Thierry,
I was wondering if you could help me here. I'm worried about this new
bug in Debian:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708515
I tried applying the patch, though it was already applied in the Sid
version of keystone.
But also, there is this issue which I already
Hello,
thanks for your answer.
It is impossible for a package to install another from its postinst;
dpkg has a lock to prevent multiple simultaneous invocations, and
postinst scripts are run under the dpkg lock. Perhaps the postinst
could enable i386 multiarch,
If selecting a package for
This topic was discussed with LSB maintainers on #683654. Maybe these
two bugs should be merged, but I don't know if the discussion will be
preserved.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683654
2013/6/1 Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org:
The attached git patch makes the log_*
I believe, this bug is no more relevant.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Control: block 685355 by 696332
2013/5/21 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org:
Even if your log confirms that, I can't reproduce this behaviour on jessie.
I cant test on „jessie/testing” but this affects at least
unattended-upgrades on „wheezy/stable”. See bug #685355 for details.
Cheers
--
Package: xfce4-session
Version: 4.8.3-3
Followup-For: Bug #706425
When this package will be available in testing? This bug affect me as well.
Is there any workaround?
When I tried to upgrade xfce4-session from testing to unstable version, that's
what I got:
The following NEW packages will be
Package: stterm
Version: 0.4.1+20130526+gitb514410-1
Reason for close:
debian/upstream.changelog synched with upstream
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: php-horde-dav,php-sabre-vobject
Version: php-horde-dav/1.0.0~beta1-1
Version: php-sabre-vobject/2.0.7-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2013-06-01
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that
Package: php-horde-dav,php-sabre-dav
Version: php-horde-dav/1.0.0~beta1-1
Version: php-sabre-dav/1.7.6+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2013-06-01
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a
Source: allegro4.4
Version: 2:4.4.2-2.1
Severity: normal
The name of the dev package liballegro4.2-dev was kept in the 4.2 - 4.4
transition following advice from the release team.
That's confusing and should be changed to liballegro4-dev. We can set for that
package Provides: liballegro4.2-dev,
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org writes:
Am 30.05.2013 12:24, schrieb Ansgar Burchardt:
gcj-4.8 build-depends on gcc-4.8-source, but does not indicate so via
Built-Using.
Alternatively include the source in gcj-4.8 itself as was done in the
upload that passed NEW[1], but was reverted in the
Hello.
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 20:47, Tino Keitel wrote:
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 07:58:13 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 22:25 +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
Thanks. Is syncevo-local-sync related to the DBus interface, or more
related to the syncevolution binary? I wonder what
Package: debootstrap
Version: Wheezy
When installing using netboot package downloaded from here:
ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/wheezy/main/installer-i386/current/imag
es/netboot/
In expert install mode there is a debootstrap error:
debootstrap: E: NOSCRIPT
debootstrap: EA:
Am 31.05.2013 15:53, schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
This is probably caused by the apache 2.4 transition (#661958)
The package is build after the wiki page about 2.4 transition.
But looking into the log reveals, that although the package depends
on apache2, the package apache2 gets not installed,
Package: pymongo
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream patch
Hi,
the following vulnerability was published for pymongo.
CVE-2013-2132[0]:
null pointer when decoding invalid DBRef
See [1] for details and upstream bugreport including reproducer for
the issue. A patch was applied upstream in
Package: alex4
Version: 1.1-5
Severity: normal
Control: block 710595 by -1
Hi,
this package has a versioned build dependency on liballegro4.2-dev. This dev
package is really the dev package of Allegro 4.4 for some time now and we plan
to rename it to liballegro4-dev to avoid confusion. Please
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package exactimage
* Package name: exactimage
Version : 0.8.8-2
Upstream Author : Rene Rebe r...@exactcode.de
* URL : http://dl.exactcode.de/oss/exact-image/
* License
* email@arcor.de:
which will present the above helpful info to the user.
Unfortunately not, and it was't helpfull.
Are you saying that the following message was never displayed to you?
,
| This is the wine64-bin helper package, which does not provide wine itself,
| but instead
Source: rafkill
Version: 1.2.2-3.3
Severity: normal
Control: block 710595 by -1
Hi,
this package has a versioned build dependency on liballegro4.2-dev. This
dev package is really the dev package of Allegro 4.4 for some time now
and we plan to rename it to liballegro4-dev to avoid confusion.
Source: wing
Version: 0.7-27.1
Severity: normal
Control: block 710595 by -1
Hi,
this package has a versioned build dependency on liballegro4.2-dev. This
dev package is really the dev package of Allegro 4.4 for some time now
and we plan to rename it to liballegro4-dev to avoid confusion. Please
* Christoph Anton Mitterer:
libguestfs0 depends on vim-tiny,... would it be possible to allow the
alternatives like vim, vim-gnome, vim-gtk, vim-nox, vim-athena as well
so that people using these mightier versions can remove vim-tiny?
supermin(8) does not support alternatives, so I am not
Source: libdumb
Version: 1:0.9.3-5.4
Severity: normal
Control: block 710595 by -1
Hi,
this package has a versioned build dependency on liballegro4.2-dev. This
dev package is really the dev package of Allegro 4.4 for some time now
and we plan to rename it to liballegro4-dev to avoid confusion.
Source: overgod
Version: 1.0-1.1
Severity: normal
Control: block 710595 by -1
Hi,
this package has a versioned build dependency on liballegro4.2-dev. This
dev package is really the dev package of Allegro 4.4 for some time now
and we plan to rename it to liballegro4-dev to avoid confusion. Please
Are you saying that the following message was never displayed to you?
Correct, the message was never displayed.
As reported, I installed a frontend that depends on wine, and strange error
messages popped up instead, caused by all kinds of missing files.
Thus my suggestion you use a high
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 03:20:23AM -0400, Alex Vanderpol wrote:
As stated in the bug subject, the .desktop files for all of the LibreOffice
applications are missing.
Sorry, but this is not true completely.
$ for i in *beta1-2*deb; do dpkg --contents $i | grep \.desktop$; done
-rw-r--r--
Package: gpk-update-viewer
Version: minor gpk-update-viewer unable to connect to NL ftp server
Severity: minor
Tags: upstream
gpk-update-viewer unabler to connect to NL ftp server
E: Error ftp://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/ jessie/main libattr1 amd64 1:2.4.47-1
Unable to connect to :ftp:
Hi,
Yvo a écrit , Le 01/06/2013 07:48:
Package: navit
Version: 0.5.0~svn5126+dfsg.1-3
Followup-For: Bug #710494
navit.xml attached
The error message says it all:
navit:xml_parse_text:FATAL: No XML data supplied (looks like incorrect
configuration for internal GUI).
This bug is a
Source: pybik
Version: 0.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -pthread
Source: calligra
Version: 1:2.4.4-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering
Source: ruby-gnome2
Version: 1.1.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[4]: Entering
Source: spring
Version: 88.0+dfsg1-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
It's a problem in boost which is
Source: pandas
Version: 0.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
It's a cython problem, need 0.17.1 or more.
Source: qutecom
Version: 2.2.1+dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
It's a problem in boost which is
Source: rapicorn
Version: 13.03.0~ds0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
ldconfig deferred
Source: csound
Version: 1:5.17.11~dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: libvirt-glib
Version: 0.0.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
It's a vala bug and is fixed in 0.20,
Source: bip
Version: 0.8.8-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./src
Source: libappindicator
Version: 0.4.92-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
It's a vala bug and is fixed in
Source: openvrml
Version: 0.18.9-5
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: comedilib
Version: 0.10.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash ../libtool
Source: openmeeg
Version: 2.0.0.dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering
Source: ccbuild
Version: 2.0.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -g -O2 -fPIE
Source: telepathy-logger-qt
Version: 0.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Problem is related with bison
Source: ruby-passenger
Version: 3.0.13debian-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
It's a problem in boost which
Source: gnuplot-iostream
Version: 0~20130424.gita9d3e31-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: libtorrent-rasterbar
Version: 0.15.10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]:
Source: gmpc
Version: 11.8.16-6
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash ../libtool
Source: natlog
Version: 0.91.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc -E VERSION.h | grep -v
Source: webkit
Version: 1.8.1-3.4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: fauhdlc
Version: 20120707-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -Wall -Wextra
Source: most
Version: 5.0.0a-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc
Source: mysql-workbench
Version: 5.2.40+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
checking for
Source: performous
Version: 0.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
It's a problem in boost which is fixed
Source: blobby
Version: 1.0~rc3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering
Source: open-vm-tools
Version: 2:9.2.2-893683-6
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash
Source: pynac
Version: 0.2.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc: fatal error: no input
Source: player
Version: 3.0.2+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
It's a problem in boost which is fixed
Source: mididings
Version: 0~20120419~ds0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
It's a problem in boost which is
Source: mongodb
Version: 1:2.4.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
It's a problem in boost which is fixed in
Source: libapache2-mod-python
Version: 3.3.1-9
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: orafce
Version: 3.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc -g -O2 -fstack-protector
Source: libosl
Version: 0.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
It's a problem in boost which is fixed in
Source: ibus
Version: 1.5.1.is.1.4.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[5]: Entering
Source: gltron
Version: 0.70final-10
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
Source: sipwitch
Version: 1.2.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash ../libtool
Source: libldm
Version: 0.2.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Starting with 2.35, glib2.0 deprecated the
Hi Emilien,
On 2013-03-03 18:33:48, Emilien Klein wrote:
Is there someone on the Python Apps Team that would be willing to
upload the NMU I prepared? It's uploaded to mentors.d.n [0]?
+Emilien
[0] http://mentors.debian.net/package/subdownloader
Thanks for your work on this bug.
I just
Source: xen-api
Version: 1.3.2-15
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: qtwebkit
Version: 2.2.1-5
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -c -m64 -pipe -Wall
Source: kdepimlibs
Version: 4:4.8.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[4]: Entering
Source: swt-gtk
Version: 3.8.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
According to
Source: foundry
Version: 0.0.20100226-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -g -Wall -W
Source: gnupg
Version: 1.4.12-7
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory
Source: sitplus
Version: 1.0.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
It's a problem in boost which is fixed in
Source: listaller
Version: 0.5.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering
Package: w3c-markup-validator
Version: 1.3+dfsg-1
Followup-For: Bug #670973
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was
Package: gnome-panel
Version: 3.4.2.1-4
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/gnome-desktop-item-edit
Dear Maintainer,
it took me 10min just to figure out via the www how to create a desktop-
launcher. ( Debian 7 + gnome )
In order to keep things easy for me, I created a desktop-launcher which can
Hi,
please make sure to package libburn-1.3.0.pl01.tar.gz
and not libburn-1.3.0.tar.gz.
A nasty regression has been found in cdrskin-1.2.8 and cdrskin-1.3.0:
Option -msinfo on DVD and BD reported identical numbers for the start
of the most recent session and the predicted start of the next
block 698843 by 704587
thanks
Hello,
Just an update: libtcod is almost ready, and I have a working package
for brogue. The (small) remaining problems are :
- copyright review needs to be finished but so far, so good
- the tarball needs repacking because of embedded binaries
- it needs a
Control: tags 707350 + patch pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for indicator-messages (versioned as 0.6.0-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards
--
Sebastian Ramacher
diff -Nru indicator-messages-0.6.0/debian/changelog
Package: libjpeg8-turbo-dev
Version: 1.2.90-1
Severity: serious
libjpeg8-turbo-dev Provides libjpeg-dev. That is wrong. And broken.
Only one package gets to Provide that virtual package name, and right
now that is libjpeg8-dev. Please fix this ASAP (and probably remove
libjpeg8-dev while
Package: reportbug
Version: 6.4.4
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
It is realy annoying that you cannot go back to the first pages to e.g. change
some properties of the bug.
Instead, you have to save your text somewhere else, press quit and do the
whole procedure again.
We could make
in-line :-
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Shirish
Hello Daniel,
Thank you at the outset for the prompt response.
On 1 June 2013 11:29, shirish शिरीष shirisha...@gmail.com wrote:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.9.1-1
Severity: normal
Can you
This change is no more relevant to upstream GTKTerm.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.13
Severity: normal
The apache2-deprecated-auth-config should not be triggered if the
deprecated authentication configuration directives are wrapped in
IfVersion 2.3
..
/IfVersion
(this is explicitly suggested by the Apache2 packaging team at
severity 707024 serious
thanks
Apache 2.4 is not supposed to enter Testing yet. That breaks lots of
stuff. Let's rather rush in once much more modules are ported.
Hence, making this bug serious so that Britney does not consider letting
us in.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper
Package: collectd
Version: 5.1.0-3
Severity: normal
Hi Sebastian!
I first thought this to be a duplicate of bug #657122, but I applied the
configuration change in there.
The df plugin is producing lots of log messages like even after fresh
install on two VMware ESX hosted virtual machines:
Jun
Source: gnutls26
Version: 2.12.20-6
Severity: important
Tags: security
Hi,
When using gnutls-cli to talk to apache with mod_ssl, I
always get this when testing with SSL v3.0 to TLS v1.2:
- Key Exchange: DHE-RSA
- Cipher: AES-128-CBC
- MAC: SHA1
When talking to it with TLS 1.2, I really would
On 31/05/13 00:31, Arno Töll wrote:
On 30.05.2013 21:02, Arno Töll wrote:
Thus, I'm raising the severity of this bug. I did NMU mod-dnssd however,
so that all your reverse dependencies are available.
Oh, one more thing: The apache2.2-bin transitional package we uploaded
today which is
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
The version of pristine-tar in jessie creates files which cannot be
used with the version of pristine-tar in wheezy. This means that wheezy users
cannot use a repository which stores an
1 - 100 of 384 matches
Mail list logo
