Package: node-ltx
Version: 2.4.2-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I tried using node-node-xmpp, and trying with the examples leads to this
error:
/tmp $ nodejs echo_bot.js
(node) sys is deprecated. Use util instead.
module.js:327
throw err;
^
Error: Cannot find module 'ltx'
Package: hexchat
Version: 2.12.3-4
Followup-For: Bug #848615
Hi
So this is still an apparent issue with latest sid from today (19/Dec/2016).
The problem is this bug
https://github.com/hexchat/hexchat/commit/4c178782a779f013fafab476506f7d4dae372b8a
which is caused by this bug:
Package: hexchat
Version: 2.12.3-4
Followup-For: Bug #848615
This is an addendum to my previous submission. Confirming that downgrading
libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0
to 2.36.0-1 (from stretch) fixes the missing icons problem.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
Package: clusterssh
Version: 4.08-2
Severity: normal
Hi.
I would love to see specify fixed number of rows or columns, and the
screen (offset from first screen) where to start laying out terminal
windows.
I have multipl monitor support, and lack of xinerama support, makes them
go over all
I tried with
Package: wicd
Version: 1.7.4+tb2-2
Now I use WICD I can see that it detects the wireless networks, but
when I try to connect, the system freezes again.
I think that maybe the problem is in Atheros firmware,
It's just a guess
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Am 19.12.2016 um 22:10 schrieb gome:
> Package: network-manager
> Version: 1.4.2-3
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
>
>* What led up to the situation?
>* What exactly
Hi Balint,
On 19 December 2016 at 13:57, Bálint Réczey wrote:
| Hi Dirk,
|
| 2016-12-19 0:30 GMT+01:00 Dirk Eddelbuettel :
| >
| > On 10 November 2016 at 13:22, Balint Reczey wrote:
| > | Control: reassign -1 gsl 2.2.1+dfsg-1
| > | Control: affects -1 ruby-gsl
| > |
| > |
| > |
Lucas,
Thanks for running the checks.
I filed a RM request. Time to retire this package.
Dirk
On 19 December 2016 at 22:35, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
| Source: pgapack
| Version: 1.1.1-3
| Severity: serious
| Tags: stretch sid
| User: debian...@lists.debian.org
| Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa
On 2016-12-19 17:44, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Do you use the features of ikiwiki that use jquery-tmpl? (I believe
> that means the attachment plugin.)
I'm not using a wiki at all. My message was just a "heads-up".
I was investigating where the library is already used, because
I need it as a
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 09:21:42PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> If people (by mistake, by lack of understanding) overwrite
> /etc/gosa/gosa.conf on d-e-c bin:package upgrade, they have a gosa.conf as
> found in debian-edu-config, i.e. the template file containing the $GOSAPWD
> variable. So...
Package: src:snakemake
Version: 3.9.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: file-roller
Version: 3.22.2-1
Severity: important
Hi,
When opening a .zip file when running wayland, all the widgets and menus
are disabled and when exiting it crashes:
Stack trace of thread 14199:
#0 0x7f863faca19c g_action_map_lookup_action
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
pgapack is a really old package; I used similar code over 25 years ago.
Around 2008 I adopted and refreshed it, and also became upstream
caretaker. It is barely used, has no reverse depends -- but now fails to
build because of OpenMPI 2.0 changes.
It is
After testing 100 times, sbuild no longer hangs, which is good news.
But there are still failing tests. I'll report them in a different
bug report.
Thanks.
Package: xterm
Version: 327-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1
Dear Maintainer,
The ctlseqs.txt file is not built from ctlseqs.ms if it is modified
(which it should be, since it is wrong in a few places).
The command to bytewise-reproduce the existing file is:
$ groff
Am Mon, 19 Dec 2016 08:11:45 +0100
schrieb Christian Hofstaedtler :
> Control: reopen -1
> Control: severity -1 important
>
> For stretch this is worked around by using libssl1.0, for stretch+1
> this needs a proper fix. By then, we hopefully don't need to
> traverse 5000 lines
Hello Arturo,
Thanks for your reply.
> CTRL+Shift+E is ignored.
Could you send me the following things:
1. ${HOME}/.config/terminator/config
2. Reproduce the problem with the "-d" debug option and attach the
output to the bug report.
3. What desktop / window manager are you using?
Thanks in
Control: tags -1 +pending
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> wrote:
> Source: syslog-ng
> Version: 3.8.1-8
> Severity: serious
> Tags: stretch sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
> Ju
stretch sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > Stokhos = 15.38
The upstream URL should be
https://github.com/citation-style-language/locales . Sorry for the
confusion.
Wait, there is still a golang source package in sid? It should be removed.
On 20 December 2016 at 10:32, Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> wrote:
> Source: golang
> Version: 2:1.6.1-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: stretch sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Userta
@debian-release: please
piuparts-ignore gitlab/8.13.6+dfsg2-2
and let's see if we can improve the situation on piuparts' side for the
next upload.
On 2016-12-19 17:33, Holger Levsen wrote:
> [tarball/sid]
> piuparts-flags =
> %(flags-default)s
>
> [tarball/stretch]
> piuparts-flags =
>
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
Please decruft arch:any binaries for aterm and aterm-ml (both from
src:aterm) -- the package has switched to arch:all.
Meow!
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:15:31PM +0100, Alex ARNAUD wrote:
> Dear Mr. Borowski,
>
> Thanks you very much for pointing out this issue :). We'll resolve this
> issue ASAP. It looks like we need to integrate a configuration inside the
> package.
>
> For now, you need to install the package
2016-12-19 20:51 GMT+01:00 Niels Thykier :
> Control: severity -1 normal
>
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:44:58 +0100 Mathieu Parent
> wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: serious
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
ta allocated during
> > SSL_load_error_strings
> > |sk_SSL_COMP_free (SSL_COMP_get_compression_methods());
> > |
> > | // CRYPTO_mem_leaks_fp(stderr);
> > |cerr << "HELLO" << endl;
> > | delete [] mMutexes;
> > | }
> &
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/pysal/pysal/issues/896
Control: tags -1 pending
On 12/19/2016 10:23 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> IndexError: only integers, slices (`:`), ellipsis (`...`), numpy.newaxis
>> (`None`) and integer or boolean arrays are valid indices
Gotta love the numpy
Package: dgit
Version: 2.11
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I have the following config on my ~/.gbp.conf:
[buildpackage]
export-dir=/tmp/build-area
This ensures builds happen in a tmpfs which is a lot faster. However,
dgit expects by default the result to be on the parent directory.
Source: ccdproc
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: cwltool
Version: 1.0.20160209222805-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: diffoscope
Version: 63
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: trafficserver
Version: 7.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: fleet
Version: 0.13.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: ginkgocadx
Version: 3.8.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: linux-grsec
Version: 4.8.11-1+grsec201612062306+1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: golang
Version: 2:1.6.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: dvdisaster
Version: 0.72.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: blacs-mpi
Version: 1.1-37
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: gammaray
Version: 2.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: gnutls28
Version: 3.5.7-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: nifti2dicom
Version: 0.4.11-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: pgapack
Version: 1.1.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: mpi-defaults
Version: 1.7
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: kvmtool
Version: 0.20161024-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: slof
Version: 20160223+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: swift
Version: 2.10.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: gdcm
Version: 2.6.6-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: strace
Version: 4.13-0.1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Hi Rock,
Here are my comments, I must say I don't use the software so I only
checked the building and the packaging. I trust you are testing that
once installed all four packages perform as expected :).
Thanks for the review!
I'll comment below.
> libArcus
>
>
> debian/changelog
>
I have been troubled by this bug for (perhaps) months.
It is easy enough to reproduce, and I can figure out how to stop things
while leaving cups functional.
I am running a current sid system
ii cups-daemon 2.2.1-3
amd64Common UNIX Printing
The bug report for clonezilla where I went first is here:
https://sourceforge.net/p/clonezilla/discussion/Clonezilla_live/thread/4c57bfb1/
but they (likely correctly) directed me towards the linux distribution.
This is debian.
The issue occurs on all current versions and is 100% reproducible.
For the avoidance of doubt, this is probably fixed by adding tzdata to
Build-Depends?
On 20 December 2016 at 10:20, Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> wrote:
> Source: snapd
> Version: 2.16-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: stretch sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Use
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 09:21:42PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> If people (by mistake, by lack of understanding) overwrite
> /etc/gosa/gosa.conf on d-e-c bin:package upgrade, they have a gosa.conf as
> found in debian-edu-config, i.e. the template file containing the $GOSAPWD
> variable.
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 22:11:17 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> wrote:
> Source: opendkim
> Version: 2.11.0~alpha-8
> Severity: serious
> Tags: stretch sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
On 2016-12-19 12:18:43 -0700, Jaimos Skriletz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2016-12-19 17:31:59 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 04:03:04PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> >Hi Harald,
> >>
> >> Ping?
> >
> >
Package: beignet
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
On December 8 I reported bug # 847447, which I transcribe:
--
Dear Maintainer,
After the last update, when I try to open some blender job the system closes.
I copy the
Package: lshw
Version: 02.18-0.1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Running lshw with sudo or as root will cause a strange crash - the command
prints a long bugcheck output stating "kernel memory exposure attempt detected"
and causes user input to become impossible for some time. Eventually,
Package: nvidia-legacy-304xx-driver
Version: 304.134-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I am trying to use nvidia propietary drivers in Debian Testing. Nvidia-legacy-
304xx-driver was removed from Testing branch but added to unstable 2016-12-17,
version
Just remove it in git (unfortunately immediately after uploading 16.1, sorry).
But next time, feel free to just push a change!
The repo is in collab-maint for a reason.
Package: dgit
Version: 2.12
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Now that the debian/ tag is always generated, and placed on the branch
you upload from, it is a bad idea to upload from the quilt-cache dgit
view rather than the sponsee's view, even if you used the quilt-cache
view to review. Patch
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 02:47:22PM -0600, VastOne wrote:
> Bug resolved with update today to version 2.12.3-4
oh, seriously?
I really did nothing about this!
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about
OK now there is only the directory
/etc/kernel/signed_postinst.d/
left behind.
Source: syslog-ng
Version: 3.8.1-8
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: pysal
Version: 1.13.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: petsc
Version: 3.7.4+dfsg1-7
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
I said:
> I'm testing version 3.9.0+dfsg-1 as we speak and there are still build
> failures. I'll attach them here in a while.
No, I was mistaken. I was testing the version in stretch.
I'll test version 3.9.0+dfsg-1 in unstable and will let you know
about the results.
Thanks.
Source: ifrit
Version: 4.1.2-5
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: pyrit
Version: 0.4.0-7
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Traceback (m
Source: tiledarray
Version: 0.4.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/
Source: memtest86+
Version: 5.01-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -W
Source: contextfree
Version: 3.0.5+dfsg1-2.2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: pyfits
Version: 1:3.4-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: gnupg-pkcs11-scd
Version: 0.7.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: freebsd-buildutils
Version: 10.3~svn296373-5
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: python-skbio
Version: 0.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: astroml
Version: 0.3-5
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: pbdagcon
Version: 0~20160325+ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: opendkim
Version: 2.11.0~alpha-8
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /
Source: nipy
Version: 0.4.0+git26-gf8d3149-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: zshdb
Version: 0.92-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> check
Source: blockdiag
Version: 1.5.3+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> F
Source: libmateweather
Version: 1.16.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: at
Version: 3.1.20-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -Wl,-z,re
Source: biojava4-live
Version: 4.2.4+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: heat
Version: 1:7.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: ibus-table-others
Version: 1.3.9-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
On Sat, 3 Dec 2016, Kevin Murray wrote:
> Thanks for the bug report. I've reported this issue to upstream[1]. In the
> mean
> time, I've recently packaged the newest upstream release. Could you please
> re-run your tests (or advise me how to) for this new version.
>
> FWIW, I have experienced
Source: getdns
Version: 1.1.0~a2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> config
Source: mccs
Version: 1:1.1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -Wall
Source: fped
Version: 0.1+201210-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: numexpr
Version: 2.6.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: theano
Version: 0.8.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: healpy
Version: 1.10.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ruby-rails-admin
Version: 0.8.1+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: trilinos
Version: 12.10.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Stok
Source: reel
Version: 0.6.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Fail
Source: ovito
Version: 2.8.0+dfsg2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pydl
Version: 0.5.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> f
Source: freeipa
Version: 4.3.2-5
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/b
Source: ibus-table-chinese
Version: 1.8.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
101 - 200 of 509 matches
Mail list logo