On 2020-07-04 01:07:15 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Jul 2020 at 00:54:53 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > I suppose that's
> >
> > wait_for_dropbear() {
> > […]
> > }
> >
> > Couldn't it also check whether the user has typed the passphrase,
> > and quit in this case?
>
> That
Sebastian,
Maybe it is good idea to rename that tool upstream to bd_list_titles.
Jean-Baptiste, what do you think of it? If you are fine with it, please make a
new tag as usual :)
--
Vasyl Gello
==
Certified SolidWorks Expert
Mob.:+380 (98) 465
Hi,
On Sun, 05 Jul 2020 11:42:08 +0200, rpnpif wrote:
> The command hubicfuse /mnt/hubic -o noauto_cache,sync_read
> get the result :
> hubicfuse: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.1.0.0: cannot
> open shared object file: No such file or directory
>
> but libssl1.1 was needed.
Hi,
Am 04.07.20 um 18:53 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
>> openclipart-libreoffice will probably need updates as well to no longer
>> ship these files (or rename them), it's probably easiest if you fix and
>> upload that QA maintained package, too.
>
> No. I don't care, actually :-) That's why it is QA
Source: mlpack
Version: 3.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mlpack
...
dh_missing -a -O--buildsystem=cmake -O--max-parallel=1
dh_missing: warning:
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/mlpack/mlpack-targets-none.cmake exists in
debian/tmp but is not
Control: tags 962653 + patch
Control: tags 962653 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for davical (versioned as 1.1.9.3-1.1) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru davical-1.1.9.3/debian/changelog
Package: hubicfuse
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
The command hubicfuse /mnt/hubic -o noauto_cache,sync_read
get the result :
hubicfuse: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.1.0.0: cannot open
shared object file: No such file
Hi Nils, Vasyl,
On 2020-07-05 09:30:26 +, Vasyl Gello wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 964242
> Control: owner -1 !
>
> Hi Nils,
>
> I am building the fix locally, however please note that ANY clean-room build
> (be it pbuilder / cowbuilder / sbuild) targeting unstable will end up failing
>
As it says in the error, the problem is with the object `manager`
being `None`. I was able to bypass this issue by adding an `if` case
to check whether `manager` is `None` or not. With that, `gnome-music`
runs.
On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 09:41:45AM +0200, Teus Benschop wrote:
>
> We could be doing nothing just now and leave the bug number as it is.
>
> We also could, say, write patches, that either disable the dependency on
> dbus-glib.
>
> Or perhaps there's other ways to deal with it.
>
> What do you
Control: block -1 by 964242
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Nils,
I am building the fix locally, however please note that ANY clean-room build
(be it pbuilder / cowbuilder / sbuild) targeting unstable will end up failing to
resolve a broken dependency of bsdmainutils on bsdextrautils (Bug #964242).
To
On Sun, 05 Jul 2020 09:58:46 +0800
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-07-04 at 18:08 +0200, richard lucassen wrote:
>
> > Rereading it, I don't know if this issue was present in 2.9 or
> > earlier. I just noticed it while testing the new version.
>
> Would you mind downgrading to 2.9 and testing
On Sun, 05 Jul 2020 09:58:46 +0800
Paul Wise wrote:
> > Rereading it, I don't know if this issue was present in 2.9 or
> > earlier. I just noticed it while testing the new version.
>
> Would you mind downgrading to 2.9 and testing it?
> You can install it from Debian buster or snapshot.d.o
No
Great. I released 1.26.2 now so that the package here can be updated.
pgpXAEbLMdip3.pgp
Description: Firma digital OpenPGP
On Mi, 10 iul 19, 13:16:27, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Package: release-notes
> Severity: normal
>
> For bullseye, the security suite is now named bullseye-security
> instead of buster/updates and users should adapt their sources.list
> accordingly when upgrading.
>
> People should probably use
On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:24 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Hi Sao,
>
> On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 04:26:36PM +0900, Sao I Kuan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm looking for a sponsor for the package:
> > * idseq-bench (#956033)
> >
> > The package is on:
> >
Source: goldencheetah
Version: 1:3.5~DEV1903-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
goldencheetah fails to build from source in unstable. The relevant
failure is:
| In file included from Metrics/PowerProfile.cpp:20:
| Metrics/PowerProfile.h:77:37: error: field ‘values’ has incomplete type
‘QMap >’
|
Am 05.07.20 um 07:48 schrieb Ryutaroh Matsumoto:
> Package: systemd-container
> Version: 245.6-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I installed
> # dpkg-query -W | grep qemu-user-static
> qemu-user-static 1:5.0-5
>
> Then I built a root directory as
>
> # mmdebstrap
For unstable the plan is to upload MariaDB 10.5 soon, and therefore
uploads of MariaDB 10.3 are already discontinued. Since we already
have MariaDB 10.4 in Debian experimental, it is not even possible to
do any uploads of MariaDB 10.3 because of triggering the NEW queue and
version
Dear Рowerful high authority redirеct dоfоllоw seо link building:
https://coupemoi.la/akqWs
Thank you for your recent response to the Fotomuseum blog. Please click on the
link below to verify your email address and authorize your comment on the
fotomuseum.ch site. This allows us to discourage
On Sun, 5 Jul 2020 at 08:57, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 08:17:23AM +0200, Teus Benschop wrote:
>
> > Question to the Debian developers:
> > Should we just disable the dbus functionality in Xiphos?
>
>
> What Debian Developers do:
> * Find a way to enable full functionality
Hi John Scott,
> On Wednesday, September 11, 2019 4:03:59 AM EDT Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> > I just ACCEPTed minder from NEW but noticed it was missing attribution
> > for at least Tomáš Mráz.
>
> This bug is against crypto-policies, but it appears you accepted minder too
> the same day. Did you mean
On Sun, 2020-07-05 at 09:59 +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> mariadb-10.1 (10.1.45-0+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=high
>
> * SECURITY UPDATE: New upstream version 10.1.45. Includes fixes for
> the
> following security vulnerabilities:
> - CVE-2020-2752
> - CVE-2020-2812
> -
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
> Tagging your bug "moreinfo" means that it's not ready for processing by
> SRM. Is that what you intended?
Thanks for a quick response. I just copied the previous stable update
email I've sent without realizing that it wasn't directly suited.
Sorry for the mistakes.
Cool, looking forward to next pv release =)
I was thinking, it seems most command line tools which display ETA
like wget for example exhibit very simple behavior by default:
ETA is displayed every second and average rate used to compute it is
simply average rate during last second (hence wild ETA
Control: severity -1 normal
On Sun, 2020-07-05 at 09:59 +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: serious
No. p-u bugs (and basically all release.d.o bugs) are (still) normal at
most. Please don't inflate severity like that. It may be RC for your
individual package,
Package: lintian
Severity: normal
Submitter: Paul Gevers
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Hi Paul,
It's a bug. I filed this report on your behalf.
I will be on top of it after I resolve something time sensitive early
this week. Thank you for your patience!
Kind regards
Felix Lechner
* * *
It was closed because the changelog of the new upload had this bug number,
whereas it should have been another bug number to close. So yes, it's
correct to reopen this bug again.
It was forwarded upstream.
Question to the Debian developers: Should we just disable the dbus
functionality in
201 - 228 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
