Source: python-geotiepoints
Version: 1.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pigx-rnaseq
Version: 0.1.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> input:
>
Source: pyninjotiff
Version: 0.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: objenesis
Version: 3.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
>
Source: jackd2
Version: 1.9.21~dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-mrcfile
Version: 1.4.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: sphinx-autorun
Version: 1.1.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: wxmplot
Version: 0.9.49-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: xraylarch
Version: 0.9.58+ds1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: distro-info
Version: 1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: python-glyphsets
Version: 0.5.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: python-signedjson
Version: 1.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: vedo
Version: 2022.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
>
Source: python-pynetbox
Version: 6.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: gftools
Version: 0.5.2+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: bustle
Version: 0.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld:
Source: pydispatcher
Version: 2.0.5-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: libopengl-perl
Version: 0.7000+dfsg-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: python-hdf5storage
Version: 0.1.18-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: php-elisp
Version: 1.24.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: python-httpsig
Version: 1.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-django-simple-history
Version: 3.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: dask.distributed
Version: 2022.02.0+ds.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pychromecast
Version: 9.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: trollimage
Version: 1.19.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: stressant
Version: 0.6.0
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: termbox
Version: 1.1.2+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-moreorless
Version: 0.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pyspectral
Version: 0.12.3+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: libzypp
Version: 17.25.7-2.3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd
Source: pygac
Version: 1.7.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pytools
Version: 2022.1.14-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pytest-datadir
Version: 1.4.1+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: junixsocket
Version: 2.0.4-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: akuma
Version: 1.10-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh
Source: libquartz-java
Version: 1:1.8.6-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pyorbital
Version: 1.7.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: libncl
Version: 2.1.21+git20210811.b1213a7-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: defcon
Version: 0.10.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
Source: python-django-tagging
Version: 1:0.5.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: user-mode-linux
Version: 6.0um1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: python-xmlrunner
Version: 3.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: jgit
Version: 4.11.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
>
Source: easymock
Version: 4.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
>
Source: sccache
Version: 0.4.0~~pre3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: navarp
Version: 1.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: dask
Version: 2022.02.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: libslow5lib
Version: 0.7.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: colord
Version: 1.4.6-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: libhibernate3-java
Version: 3.6.10.Final-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Package: lvm2
Version: 2.03.16-2
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i patch
Dear Maintainer,
Whilst attempting to resize some LVM on LUKS partitions using
lvreduce/lvextend from the current Debian 11 installer in rescue mode,
I received the following error when using the `-r` option to resize the
control: clone 1028660 -1
control: reassign -1 src:piuparts
control: retitle -1 piuparts.py, doc and tests need to learn about
non-free-firmware too
thanks
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 11:12:07AM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> theano has been mostly abandoned upstream since 2018. (The Aesara fork is
> not abandoned, but includes interface changes including the import name, so
> would break reverse dependencies not specifically altered for it.)
>
>
Package: piuparts.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
piuparts.d.o should test new non-free-firmware sections for the suites that
got that section added in 2022.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP:
Hi
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 03:18:55PM +0100, Christian Herzog wrote:
>on our storage servers, we employ LVM filters to hide data partitions
>from the OS (since they're iSCSI exported to the frontend
>fileserver). With bookworm, lvm does not activate the root VG when
>filters are
Package: angband-audio
Version: 1:3.1.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal
X-Debbugs-CC: p...@debian.org
Hi,
I did find the package angband-audio in a QA list I am cleaning up.
It seems like angband is a packaged that is still maintained.
This made
theano has been mostly abandoned upstream since 2018. (The Aesara fork
is not abandoned, but includes interface changes including the import
name, so would break reverse dependencies not specifically altered for it.)
Its reverse dependencies are keras, deepnano and invesalius.
It is
Package: pushpin
pushpin build-depends on librust-clap+derive-dev and librust-clap+term-size,
librust-clap+default-dev is both an uninstallable cruft physical package, and a
virtual package provided by both librust-clap-dev, librust-clap-3-dev.
librust-clap+term-size-dev is both an uninstallable
Control: found -1 0.4.16-1
Control: notfound -1 0.4.15-15
I tried various versions of libproxy from snapshot.debian.org and could
find the crash to be introduced by version 0.4.16-1 exactly.
Package: netavark
Severity: serious
netavark build-depends on librust-clap+derive-dev, this is both an uninstallable
cruft physical package, and a virtual package provided by both librust-clap-dev
and librust-clap-3-dev. Depending on which one is selected when installing
build-dependencies your
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, Debian Perl Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: libstring-license-perl
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Contact: Jonas Smedegaard
* URL
Package: mdevctl
Severity: important
mdevtcl build-depends on librust-clap-derive-dev, librust-clap-complete-dev
and librust-clap+strsim-dev. There are a few issues here, firstly it seems you
are depending on clap-derive when your cargo.toml depends on the clap feature
of the derive crate.
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.21.17
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: loongarch64
Hi maintainers,
- I have added loongarch64 architecture GNU triplet to match the change in
gcc-12.
This patch can fix problems when cross-building and ensure gcc and dpkg use
On 12/01/23 12:14, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 05:11:05PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
Try this patch:
Does this fix things for you? This is one of the few things that hold me
back from uploading.
Yes it does (tested with a fresh autopkg-lxc installation).
Thanks Marc,
--
Gioele
Dear Maintainer,
I am a normal Debian desktop user. But my ip 175.41.46.121 has been blocked
for months now. It would be helpful if my ip is to be whitelisted since it
is restraining me from looking up in the Wiki. Also note that, in my
country (BD), there are very few Debian users (GNU/Linux
Hello legal team,
I am trying to update the Tuxguitar package from version 1.2 to 1.5.6.
The new version includes the soundfont "Magic Sound Font v2.0". While Tuxguitar
is licensed under LGPL-2.1+, the license of the soundfont file
(MagicSFver2.sf2) is not 100% clear.
The issue was discussed
Package: elan
Severity: serious
01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789
elan build-depends on a number of unversioned clap feature packages. Some of
these are virtual packages provided by multiple versions of clap. Some of them
are also cruft physical
Package: gnumeric
Version: 1.12.53-1.1+b1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer!
The inadmissibility of the black background color for cells is explained as
follows: The highlighting of the active cell is done by means of a fine double
frame with a transparent center. If cells are formatted with
Quoting m...@freemail.hu (2023-01-14 10:13:49)
> you're thinking about swapping to this repo? sounds good here... :)
Yes, though only suggesting: I don't own any dahdi devices so do not
plan on fixing this bug myself, just raising awareness of that more
active fork of the upstream code.
- Jonas
Package: r-base-core
Version: 4.2.2.20221110-1
Tags: patch
`r-base-core.postinst` uses Perl to set `$papersize` as a default
fallback in `Renviron`.
Such simple processing can be achieved also with a very similar `sed`
invocation.
Using sed instead of Perl reduces the number of packages
Package: snort
Version: 2.9.15.1-6
Tags: patch
Dear maintainers of snort,
`snort.preinst` uses Perl to get the value of options in
`etc/snort/snort.common.parameters`. Such simple processing can be
achieved also with a very similar grep invocation and without cat.
A patch to fix this issue
Quoting m...@freemail.hu (2023-01-14 09:46:18)
> would be nice, this is the package that provides support for my factory new
> osmocom e1 usb dongle...
> but if you cannot, then proceed removing the package, as you see
> appropriate...
Seems there is some recent work for kernel 6.1 likely
hi,
you're thinking about swapping to this repo? sounds good here... :)
thanks,
cs
On 1/14/23 10:11, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting m...@freemail.hu (2023-01-14 09:46:18)
would be nice, this is the package that provides support for my factory new
osmocom e1 usb dongle...
but if you cannot,
Package: python3-pystemd
Version: 0.7.0-5+b2
Severity: normal
I'm open to the possibility I'm doing something wrong, but either way, I'm
pretty sure it shouldn't result in SEGV. Hopefully not an abusable buffer
overflow or similar?
michael@joyola:~$ python3
Python 3.10.9 (main, Dec 7
Package: aardvark-dns
Severity: serious
aardvark-dns build-depends on librust-clap+derive-dev, this is a virtual package
provided by both librust-clap-dev and librust-clap-3-dev, it is also a cruft
physical package which I would like to see decrufted as I belive is it the cause
of spurious
hi,
would be nice, this is the package that provides support for my factory new
osmocom e1 usb dongle...
but if you cannot, then proceed removing the package, as you see appropriate...
thanks,
cs
On 1/14/23 09:39, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi,
According to
Hi,
According to
https://github.com/asterisk/dahdi-linux/issues/16#issuecomment-1354772551
dahdi-linux upstream is basically absent. The base for src:dahdi-dkms
is as well quite old. Does it still make sense to ship dahdi-linux in
bookworm?
Regards,
Salvatore
Package: python3-stem
Version: 1.8.1-1.1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: ce...@oziosi.org
Hello,
when I try to start nyx the following error is raised:
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/nyx", line 33, in
sys.exit(load_entry_point('nyx==2.1.0', 'console_scripts',
Package: mate-utils
Version: 1.26.0-1
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n
X-Debbugs-Cc: kisaragi.effect...@gmail.com
The window shows "サーバ" for save button when take screen-capture.
This has fixed in upstream [1].
Reproduction steps:
1. Press [PrtScr].
2. (window appears)
3. See the most-right bottom
301 - 379 of 379 matches
Mail list logo