Source: python-whoosh
Version: 2.7.4+git6-g9134ad92-7
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-whoosh fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: nose
Version: 1.3.7-9
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
nose fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: mutagen
Version: 1.46.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
mutagen fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: pyro4
Version: 4.82-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
pyro4 fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: dh-virtualenv
Version: 1.2.2-1.3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
dh-virtualenv fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: libtext-markup-perl
Version: 0.24-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
libtext-markup-perl fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of
which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: python-taskflow
Version: 5.1.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-taskflow fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: cherrypy3
Version: 18.8.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
cherrypy3 fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: ns3
Version: 3.39-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
ns3 fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[6]: Entering
Source: bottleneck
Version: 1.3.5+ds1-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
bottleneck fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: lazr.config
Version: 2.2.3-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
lazr.config fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: celery
Version: 5.3.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
celery fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-django
Version: 3:3.2.20-1.1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-django fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: pypy3
Version: 7.3.12+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
pypy3 fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: python-gjson
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-gjson fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: tox
Version: 3.28.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
tox fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: python-drizzle
Version: 1.13.4-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-drizzle fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: sphinxcontrib-bibtex
Version: 2.5.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
sphinxcontrib-bibtex fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of
which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: glue
Version: 0.13-6
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
glue fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: chemps2
Version: 1.8.12-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
chemps2 fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: pympress
Version: 1.7.1-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
pympress fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: case
Version: 1.5.3+dfsg-5
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
case fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: emscripten
Version: 3.1.6~dfsg-5
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
emscripten fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: factory-boy
Version: 2.11.1-5
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
factory-boy fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: mopidy
Version: 3.4.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
mopidy fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: horizon
Version: 3:23.1.0-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
horizon fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: musicbrainzngs
Version: 0.7.1-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
musicbrainzngs fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: python-secretstorage
Version: 3.3.3-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-secretstorage fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of
which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: flufl.i18n
Version: 3.0.1-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
flufl.i18n fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: pygame
Version: 2.1.2+dfsg-6
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
pygame fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: sphinx-autoapi
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
sphinx-autoapi fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: lazr.delegates
Version: 2.0.4-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
lazr.delegates fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pydicom
Version: 2.3.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
pydicom fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-intbitset
Version: 2.3.0-3.2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-intbitset fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: libsass-python
Version: 0.22.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
libsass-python fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: brian
Version: 2.5.4-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
brian fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: flask-babel
Version: 2.0.0-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
flask-babel fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: behave
Version: 1.2.6-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
behave fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: sphinxcontrib-mermaid
Version: 0.9.2-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
sphinxcontrib-mermaid fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of
which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: openshot-qt
Version: 2.6.1+dfsg1-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
openshot-qt fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: harp
Version: 1.18-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
harp fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering
Source: calcium
Version: 0.4.1-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
calcium fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]:
Source: sphinx-notfound-page
Version: 0.8.3-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
sphinx-notfound-page fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of
which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: terminaltables
Version: 3.1.10-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
terminaltables fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: sphinx-panels
Version: 0.6.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
sphinx-panels fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: hackrf
Version: 2023.01.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
hackrf fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]:
Source: python-apt
Version: 2.6.0
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-apt fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: imexam
Version: 0.9.1-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
imexam fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-pkginfo
Version: 1.8.2-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-pkginfo fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: python-amqp
Version: 5.1.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-amqp fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: python-gevent
Version: 22.10.2-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-gevent fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: sphinxcontrib-jquery
Version: 4.1-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
sphinxcontrib-jquery fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of
which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: flufl.lock
Version: 5.0.1-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
flufl.lock fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: pg8000
Version: 1.10.6-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
pg8000 fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: django-session-security
Version: 2.6.6+dfsg-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
django-session-security fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both
of which
are currently available in experimental.
Source: python-tornado
Version: 6.3.2-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-tornado fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: sphinx-tabs
Version: 3.4.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
sphinx-tabs fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: fmtlib
Version: 9.1.0+ds1-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
fmtlib fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: sphinx-rst-builder
Version: 0.0.3-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
sphinx-rst-builder fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of
which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: python-flask-marshmallow
Version: 0.15.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-flask-marshmallow fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both
of which
are currently available in experimental.
Source: python-i3ipc
Version: 2.2.1-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-i3ipc fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: rocfft
Version: 5.5.0-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
rocfft fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Hi,
Richard Lewis wrote (Sun, 30 Jul 2023
11:10:10 +0100):
> in [0] the '#' is meant to indicate 'run this as root', but the rst has
> '.. code-block:: shell' so the commands are being formatted as a
> comment.
Yes, there are different methods for including quoted material, and they are
Nicolas Schier wrote:
>-while (<>) {
>+while () {
That gets rid of all the dangerous and bizarre behaviour. It is `safe'
in that sense. However, it would leave the program still accepting
extraneous arguments (and now ignoring them). If I were patching the
program I'd want to also change it to
>> can you please explain how I can recreate the files *.tiktoken?
>> There seem to be some sources missing ...
>
> The two files in question are 50k lines of ASCII text that seem to be
> some kind of index / vocabulary, and I have no idea how they were
> created.
Perhaps there is some clues to
Package: vnlog
Tags: patch, ftbfs, hppa
Version: 1.36-2
The file test/test_python3_parser.sh misses a trailing shebang
which makes the package fail to build on qemu based buildds.
Please add:
#!/bin/bash
to the top of test/test_python3_parser.sh to fix it.
(for example the test/test_c_api.sh
Hi Bo,
Quoting Bo YU (2023-07-30 18:40:01)
> I have updated the symbols file to fix the issue, could you apply it on
> next upload?
Thanks a lot. I will apply now.
If you are generally interested in SASS tools and want to help maintain
them in Debian, then you are very welcome to join the team
package release.debian.org
tags 1039020 = bullseye pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: schleuder
Version:
Source: libsass
Version: 3.6.5+20220909-1
Followup-For: Bug #1037736
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
I have updated the symbols file to fix the issue, could you apply it on
next upload?
BTW, The issue should be the same with #1042201
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042201
--
Source: openjdk-19
Version: 19.0.2+7-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=openjdk-19
openjdk-19 build-depends on missing:
- openjdk-18-jdk-headless:mipsel
On 7/30/23 18:12, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
* clean debian bookworm install
* install icingaweb2 and the other icinga packages
* trying to configure mysql via the web-interface
* get tons of deprecation warnings that make the web-interface unusable:
situation:
* clean debian bookworm install
* install icingaweb2 and the other icinga packages
* trying to configure mysql via the web-interface
* get tons of deprecation warnings that make the web-interface unusable:
https://vanheusden.com/permshare/debian-icinga2.png
Package: fwupd
Version: 1.9.3-1
Followup-For: Bug #945203
Dear Maintainer,
A warning displayed each time I login the system (Lenovo IdeaPad 340) says
there is an update available. After ignoring it for a few weeks, I tried
updating the firmware, specifically the UEFI dbx device (217 --> 371),
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: uwsgi-plugin-...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:uwsgi-plugin-php
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Please do the following binNMU:
nmu
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: uwsgi-plugin-mo...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:uwsgi-plugin-mongo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Please do the following binNMU:
nmu
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: uwsgi-plugin-lua...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:uwsgi-plugin-luajit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Please do the following binNMU:
nmu
Package: aerc
Version: 0.15.2-2
Severity: wishlist
Dear aerc maintainer,
There's no address book completion for the Reply-To field in the header when
composing emails.
To reproduce:
* Enable address book completion in aerc.conf: `address-book-cmd=abook
--mutt-query %s`
* Add the
Package: vokoscreen-ng
Version: 3.5.0-1
Severity: important
I have an old installarion of vokoscreen V2.5 in the HDD that can be
started and used.
Installing this debian package V3.5 it crashes when trying to start.
Here is the console output:
$ vokoscreenNG
[vokoscreenNG] Desktop session is
Package: sway-notification-center
Version: 0.9.0-1
Severity: normal
Dear Sway notification centre maintainer,
When a notification is displayed in swaync, there's a seemingly irrelevant
error displayed alongside it:
Failed to run script: example-script
Output:
To reproduce:
* Run
Package: guvcview
Version: 2.0.8-2
Severity: normal
In previous releases of Debian GuVCView was always a good tool for easy
video recording with an webcam.
In Debian 12 everything works except the recording of a video.
The recorded file only contains the sound and no video!
Every option has
Control: severity -1 important
On Sun, 18 Jun 2023 at 14:52:18 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jun 2023 at 14:47:00 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > I rebuilt librsvg in bookworm on the s390x porterbox zelenka, and can
> > confirm that 2.54.5+dfsg-1 now fails in bookworm too. So
Package: ftp.debian.org
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
Control: affects -1 src:theano src:deepnano src:keras
Control: reopen 1026539
Control: reopen 1027215
theano has been mostly abandoned upstream since 2018. (The Aesara fork
is not abandoned, but includes
Hi Tobias,
thanks for your report and other notes.
The mentioned configuration file (modsecurity.conf(.recommended))
is part of ModSecurity2. But the package itself
(modsecurity-apache) depends on modsecurity-crs, and this package
uses the same directory (/etc/modsecurity), so there is a strong
Le dimanche 30 juillet 2023 à 15:00 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit :
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 12:58:07PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > The problem that I am trying to fix is the following: the AVX512 kernel
> > (nicknamed
> > “SkylakeX”) is miscompiled in openblas 0.3.13+ds-3, so that
>> > Can/should this bug be closed?
>
> Yes, I think it could be.
Uhhmm... sorry, now I reviewed the whole issue and realised that
the first and second posts are about different problems.
PCRE2 dependency (second post) has been solved, but I think the
first one is not about the package
On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 at 21:13:38 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> The following vulnerability was published for librsvg.
>
> CVE-2023-38633[0]:
> | A directory traversal problem in the URL decoder of librsvg before
> | 2.56.3 could be used by local or remote attackers to disclose files
> | (on
Hi,
thanks for report and the patch. I've picked up your modification
and added it to package's Git repository. The next version of the
package will build with that method:
https://salsa.debian.org/modsecurity-packaging-team/modsecurity-apache/-/blob/master/debian/rules#L19
Thanks,
a.
Package: scrub
Version: 2.6.1-1+b1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
- This application is out of date. Since 2014, many changes have occurred.
- The homepage is out of date. Should refer to
https://github.com/chaos/scrub
- Version +b1 is confusing.
- Consider downloading source direct from
Package: claws-mail
Version: 4.1.1-2~bpo11+1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I'm using claws-mail on Debian Bullseye. Update fails because of a
plugin version mismatch in bullseye-backports repository:
* claws-mail-bsfilter-plugin is still on version 4.1.0-2~bpo11+1
* claws-mail-pgpcore
Control: close -1
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 12:17:09 +0100 Tj wrote:
> I wonder if Debian systemd maintainers can add some weight to the
importance of the issue being
> tackled by the devs (seeing as they are responsible for shipping the
failing code) ?
Sure, I'll add some weight: you appear to be
> I guess this is fixed, isn't it?
Yes, I think we can close this.
a.
> has this been fixed indeed?
yes:
https://salsa.debian.org/modsecurity-packaging-team/modsecurity-apache/-/blob/master/debian/rules#L19
modsecurity-apache is shipped with `--with-pcre2` since
2.9.7.
> Can/should this bug be closed?
Yes, I think it could be.
a.
Control: tags 1037698 + patch
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for j4-dmenu-desktop (versioned as 2.16-1.1). The diff
is attached to this message.
Regards.
Jochen
diff -Nru j4-dmenu-desktop-2.16/debian/changelog j4-dmenu-desktop-2.16/debian/changelog
---
Package: glasscoder
Version: 2.0.1-2
Severity: normal
Dear glasscoder maintainer,
I use SoX to generate a WAV file. When I try to stream it over HLS with
Glasscoder, it crashes.
```
$ sox -n out.wav synth 60
$ glasscoder --server-url="http://localhost:8080; --server-type=HLS
Package: gpg
Version: 2.2.40-1.1
Followup-For: Bug #1022702
X-Debbugs-Cc: alexandru.chirita4...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
gpg version 2.2.40-1.1 doesn't include TPM 2.0 support and I believe it
should be included in Debian.
In my opinion Debian should support TPM 2.0 more, including at least a
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 12:58:07PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> The problem that I am trying to fix is the following: the AVX512 kernel
> (nicknamed
> “SkylakeX”) is miscompiled in openblas 0.3.13+ds-3, so that openblas gives
> incorrect numerical results in the
Package: ippsample
Version: 0.0~git20220607.72f89b3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
In spite of having the printing system wiped out (Bug#1040699) I installed
this package to try out ippserver.
brian@test-new:~$ /usr/sbin/ippserver -c $HOME/pdfsave -f application/pdf
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 08:37:28AM +0400, Yadd wrote:
> Sorry, here is the new debdiff
Please go ahead.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R:
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 08:30:09AM +0400, Yadd wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> On 7/25/23 21:02, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > Control: tag -1 moreinfo
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 11:36:54AM +0400, Yadd wrote:
> > > diff --git a/debian/changelog
Package: tp-smapi-dkms
Version: 0.43-3
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: andrey.spit...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
Dkms module fails to build for 6.4 kernel. Please update debian package to
upstream release of tp-smapi.
https://github.com/linux-thinkpad/tp_smapi/pull/45
-- System Information:
101 - 200 of 246 matches
Mail list logo