On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 14:38 +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
Hi,
The /usr/bin/bundle binary supplied by the bundler package uses
#!/usr/bin/env ruby as its shebang line. This means that when I run
`bundle install` with a non-system ruby enabled, and I don't have the
bundler gem
Package: bundler
Version: 1.1.4-6
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The /usr/bin/bundle binary supplied by the bundler package uses
#!/usr/bin/env ruby as its shebang line. This means that when I run
`bundle install` with a non-system ruby enabled, and I don't have the
bundler gem separately
Just to confirm that this bug still exists: I've just done an ordinary
(non-expert) installation toa Thinkpad T420 with the wheezy netinst iso
written to a USB drive with unetbootin, and grub was told to install to
/dev/sda (the USB drive) rather than /dev/sdb (the installation target),
which
Package: ruby-build
Version: 20120524-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
On a stock wheezy vm, I ran:
$ apt-get install ruby-build
$ apt-get build-dep ruby1.8
$ mkdir ~/.rubies
$ ruby-build 1.8.7-p302 ~/.rubies/1.8.7-p302
This failed with the following output:
Downloading
On 25/09/12 19:02, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:25:04PM +0100, Alex Young wrote:
snip
The work was done to repackage jruby-1.6.7.2 in June:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/2012-June/039090.html
Yeah, I saw this message. Well
On 25/09/12 13:31, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:09 PM, James Healyji...@deefa.com wrote:
JRuby 1.6.3 is available upstream and includes official support for ruby
1.9 syntax. Are there any plans to package 1.6.x?
yes, but every helping hand is welcome!
Is
I found that removing the iceweasel adblock plugin and installing the debian
package (mozilla-firefox-adblock) corrected the behavior and probably leaves
your system in a better place. Just a thought.
7 matches
Mail list logo
