Package: apt-listchanges
Version: 3.22
Severity: low
Dear Maintainer,
As unattended-upgrades updated python (between 06:27:18 and 06:28:21),
the output behaviour of apt-listchanges changed in the subsequent run
(starting 06:28:21):
Log started: 2020-03-03 06:27:18
apt-listchanges: Readi
Package: debsecan
Version: 0.4.20.1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
As unattended-upgrades was doing its thing, my regularly-running
debsecan-exploitive monitoring suite started throwing these errors on
regular debsecan invocations:
$ debsecan > /dev/null
/usr/bin/debsecan:95: Deprecat
Package: grep
Version: 2.5.3~dfsg-6
Severity: normal
File: /bin/egrep
Hello grep maintainer,
This fails on both etch and sid, and the following bash-snippet should provoke
it. Basically, the problem is that having a ')' inside a #-comment in a pattern
file that is then included with `grep -f` ca
Hi,
Going over my TODO, this came up. I did try to set up a such
repository-hosting machine, but had no success whatsoever.
- I wasn't able to have apache use postgresql for authentication. I
tried a fresh install, and used mostly the guide's configuration.
- I don't know whether my previous de
On 200708262315, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> I played a bit with mod_authn_dbd but couldn't get it to work, though
> it didn't segfault either (but it is i386, not amd64, that could make
> a difference).
>
> There seem to be some known problems with mod_dbd, some of which are
> fixed in apache's tr
On 200707281645, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Anders Breindahl wrote:
> > `gdb /usr/sbin/apache2 core` gives:
> > This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux-gnu"...BFD:
> > /usr/sbin/apache2: don't know how to handle OS specific section
>
Hello,
On 200707242336, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Maybe you can post the relevant config file sections and provide a
> backtrace:
> - install libapr1-dbg libaprutil1-dbg gdb
> - add "CoreDumpDirectory /tmp" to your apache config
> - do:
> /etc/init.d/apache2 stop
> ulimit -c unlimited
> /etc/init.d
Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.3-5
Severity: normal
Seemingly, apache2.2-common does not bundle any file apr_dbd_pgsql.so
(which I gather [0] is needed when specifying DBDriver pgsql).
The above is guesswork on my part why my apache2.2 server segfaults upon
configuration file reading (and
On 200707041514, Seo Sanghyeon wrote:
> > Nevertheless, on request, I'll research what I must have been doing
> > wrong.
>
> I'm just guessing, but the most likely cause is that you didn't have
> ml-yacc installed.
>
> If you saw this instead, I think you would have figured it out easily.
>
> Er
On 200707012023, Kari Pahula wrote:
> Could you please send in an strace dump of what you did to cause this
> error? What command did you run, in the first place?
>
> There's no easy way to avoid having the build path included within the
> built binaries, but it shouldn't matter if the compiler a
Package: smlnj
Version: 110.62-1
Severity: normal
When compiling a certain program, this error occurs. I believe that
qualifies as an error.
Regards, skrewz.
Error: (stable) $/ml-yacc-lib.cm: unable to find
$SMLNJ-ML-YACC-LIB/ml-yacc-lib.cm
(/home/kaol/deb/smlnj/smlnj-110.62/sml.boot.x86-uni
I'll just add that my VPS (which I believe is running on a UML-system)
was also suffering from this bug. The emulated UML-kernel was a 2.4.
Apr 13 22:48:40 slovener postfix/master[641]: fatal: epoll_create: Function not
implemented
Regards, skrewz.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tc and /usr pointed me in these directions:
/usr/share/i18n/locales/en_DK
/etc/environment
/etc/default/locale
However, you're correct that en_DK does not appear in
/usr/share/X11/locale/locale.alias. I can't say if that is an error.
Regards,
Anders Breindahl.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reciate if you confirm that fail2ban
functions as desired on your system.
Sorry for the late response. I wasn't subscribed to the bug all along.
I too confirm that the bug seems squished.
Regards,
Anders Breindahl.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 200609130947, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anders Breindahl wrote:
> > `aptitude install dia` gives the following output:
> > - snip -
> > The following packages are BROKEN:
> > dia
> > - snip -
> > The following packages have unmet dependencie
Package: dia-common
Version: 0.95.0-4
Severity: minor
`aptitude install dia` gives the following output:
- snip -
The following packages are BROKEN:
dia
- snip -
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
dia: Depends: dia-common (= 0.95.0-4) but 0.95.0-4.1 is to be installed.
Resolving
raise ValueError, 'unknown locale: %s' % localename
ValueError: unknown locale: en_DK
skrewz:10:49:~$ LANG=en_US ./yaroslavscript
'en_US'
(1900, 5, 31, 9, 30, 1, 3, 151, -1)
skrewz:10:49:~$ cat yaroslavscript
#!/usr/bin/python2.3
import locale
import time
print `locale.setlocale(locale.L
to ``verify'' a locale setting. The
fact is, that I have set my system locale to en_DK (which should be
stated under ``System information'' of the bug report).
Now, when fail2ban sees en_DK it refuses to do its job. That's the
problem, AFAICT.
Regards, skrewz.
--
On 2006-05-31 1218, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 31 May 2006, Anders Breindahl wrote:
> > On 2006-05-31 1032, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > > Hi Anders,
>
> > > No, fail2ban doens't try every locale possible... you must have en_DK
> > > se
Package: fail2ban
Version: 0.6.1-3
Severity: normal
When a more-or-less unconfigured fail2ban installation is started on this
system, it fails to set up its rules, while
putting this in its log:
2006-05-31 12:06:48,705 WARNING: Verbose level is 1
2006-05-31 12:06:48,732 INFO: Fail2Ban v0.6.1 is
am pretty sure I'm doing the
right thing, be gentle on me. :)
Regards, Anders Breindahl.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked
owingly breaking the SI, I know. But -- Industries have had a tendency
to derive defacto units from the SI, which fits their needs.
And by the way, I apologize, if my last post was rude. Reading through it
myself, I realized that it might actually be just that.
Regards, Anders Breindahl.
aud. This
is knowingly breaking the SI, I know. But -- Industries have had a tendency
to derive defacto units from the SI, which fits their needs better than
And by the way, I apologize, if my last post was rude. Reading through it
myself, I realized that it might actually be just that.
Regards,
bibytes, abbreviated "KiB"; one kibibyte equals
> 2**10 bytes.
While the discussion's on, I'd too like to see APT move towards 2^(10*n) for
units. I don't know if that would pose a problem -- but, I've said it.
To summarize, I strongly oppose this move -- even to t
24 matches
Mail list logo
