Bug#352557: suggest

2006-02-23 Thread Andrew Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I don't think we still need this package for Chinese desktop environment, I suggest to remove this package from archive. - -Andrew -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

Bug#328209: [Vserver] Re: Bug#328209: [PATCH] Fix syscall number detection

2005-10-28 Thread Andrew Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 found 328209 0.30.204-5sarge2 tags +patch thanks Ola Lundqvist wrote: I'm aware of this problem. Not really sure that it should be considered grave but as we have a solution to it I do not really bother. I considered it as grave beause

Bug#328209: util-vserver: Wrong vserver syscall on powerpc

2005-10-26 Thread Andrew Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 reopen #328209 severity #328209 grave retitle #328209 util-vserver: built with wrong vserver syscall thanks Hi, I found the util-vserver from sarge doesn't work on powerpc as well, and it works after rebuilt on a patched vserver kernel. My tests

Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does

2005-10-13 Thread Andrew Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Micah, Thank you for your tests, I have downloaded the testfs-0.11.sh and did the similar tests as yours to help confirm the results. Test #1 Using all debian sarge componants: kernel-source: 2.4.27-10 (debian sarge) util-vserver:

Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does

2005-10-02 Thread Andrew Lee
Hi Ola,在 2005/10/3 上午 1:54 時,Ola Lundqvist 寫到:How did you tested and found what kind of security problem?I assume you found you couldn't pass the test 109,121 of testfs.sh  script, right? Actually I run the rootesc program and saw that it was possible toescape.I think the rootesc program is only

Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does

2005-10-02 Thread Andrew Lee
Hi Ola, 在 2005/10/3 上午 3:39 時,Ola Lundqvist 寫到: Now I have run the entire test suite... zircone:/srv/vservers/labradorit/root# ./testfs.sh -l -t -D /dev/ loop4 -M /mnt/t Linux-VServer FS Test [V0.09] Copyright (C) 2005 H.Poetzl Linux 2.4.27-mppe+ctx+vlan-686-smp i686/0.30.204 VCI: none

Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does

2005-10-02 Thread Andrew Lee
在 2005/10/2 上午 5:52 時,Ola Lundqvist 寫到: I have now tested on one of my systems and that I have a security problem there. On the other system (2.4.26 + grsec) the problem do not exist. So I'm not sure if I can confim or deny this. How did you tested and found what kind of security

Bug#328209: util-vserver: Does not work on powerpc

2005-09-30 Thread Andrew Lee
在 2005/9/30 上午 4:03 時,Micah 寫到: This sounds like a mismatched toolchain problem. I had this same problem when I had a kernel installed that was compiled with an older version of gcc, and then installed util-vserver_0.30.208-2 which had been compiled with the newer gcc4.0. Does that

Bug#329087: kernel-patch-vserver: be able to do chroot escape

2005-09-30 Thread Andrew Lee
Dear Micah, Thank you for your replies, I merged the three replies in one here for you. :) 在 2005/9/30 上午 5:36 時,Micah 寫到: Please tell me how you run this script and what failures you get, also this is a destructive test, correct? The test require a loopback file or an empty partition, I

Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does

2005-09-28 Thread Andrew Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ola Lundqvist wrote: I do not have access to a 2.6 kernel patched with vserver but I can check on a patched 2.4 kernel with old style patch. Okay, I have a machine running 2.6 kernel patched with vserver 2.0, so what can I help you on 2.6 kernel

Bug#328209: To buildd admin: requests for some files of util-vserver on powerpc.

2005-09-28 Thread Andrew Lee
Dear buildd admin(s), I wrote this email for request more files for inverstage why buildd built a binary with wrong syscall number in buildd log which made the binary doesn't work at all on powerpc still. Could you please send me the the config.log and also /usr/include/{linux,asm} as a

Bug#328209: To buildd admin: requests for some files of util-vserver on powerpc.

2005-09-28 Thread Andrew Lee
Sorry, I forgot to mention the files from builds of util-vserver package. -Andrew Andrew Lee 提到: Dear buildd admin(s), I wrote this email for request more files for inverstage why buildd built a binary with wrong syscall number in buildd log which made the binary doesn't work at all

Bug#274201: irssi-text: Displays incorrect Chinese characters on input bar.

2005-09-27 Thread Andrew Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi David and Timothy, I have tested irssi-text 0.8.9-6 on en_US.UTF-8 with screen, it works fine for me. And I found the problem might be the screen was not started in en_US.UTF-8 locale, cause if the screen was started in en_US.UTF-8, you don't need

Bug#328209: util-vserver: Does not work on powerpc

2005-09-26 Thread Andrew Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Ola, Ola Lundqvist 提到: The error message: vc_new_s_context(): Function not implemented When runnign what command? I found the error message after I run newvserver script. And vserver vserver start reports that as well. The problem has

Bug#328209: util-vserver: Does not work on powerpc

2005-09-26 Thread Andrew Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Ola, Thanks for the upload. I have found util-vserver 0.30.208-2 on incoming.d.o, I will give it a try on my powerpc right now. - -Andrew -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does

2005-09-26 Thread Andrew Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ola Lundqvist wrote: Is util-vserver from sid necessary for this or is it just the kernel patch that is needed to fix it? Not sure yet, I have successed passed the test of testfs.sh script on powerpc with util-vserver from sid(applied the fix02

Bug#328209: util-vserver: Does not work on powerpc

2005-09-26 Thread Andrew Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Lee wrote: Dear Ola, Thanks for the upload. I have found util-vserver 0.30.208-2 on incoming.d.o, I will give it a try on my powerpc right now. -Andrew Very unfortunately, I tested failed with this: http://incoming.debian.org/util

Bug#329087: kernel-patch-vserver: be able to do chroot escape

2005-09-19 Thread Andrew Lee
Package: kernel-patch-vserver Severity: critical Tags: sarge Justification: root security hole Dear maintainer(s), I found the kernel-patch-vserver and util-vserver in sarge can not pass the testfs.sh script[1] which provide by upstream author. After some more tests, upstream author discoveryed

Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does

2005-09-19 Thread Andrew Lee
Package: util-vserver Version: 0.30.204-5sarge2 Severity: critical Tags: sarge Justification: root security hole Dear Ola, I found the util-vserver in sarge can not pass the test 109 and 121 of testfs.sh script[1] which provide by upstream author. After more tests, upstream author discoveried

Bug#328209: util-vserver: Does not work on powerpc

2005-09-14 Thread Andrew Lee
Package: util-vserver Version: 0.30.208-1 Severity: important Hi Ola, I found util-vserver does not work on my ibook. The error message: vc_new_s_context(): Function not implemented Running kernel is vserver2 patched: $ ls -ld /proc/virtual dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Sep 14 14:35 /proc/virtual

Bug#328222: im-switch breaks m17n-env

2005-09-14 Thread Andrew Lee
Package: im-switch Version: 1.2 Severity: normal Dear maintainer, Scim with m17n-env used to work fine on my system until I upgrade scim-anthy which depends on im-switch. Seems im-switch breaks m17n-env. And I tried to follow up the steps which mentioned by README.Debian file, but im-switch

Bug#319856: newvserver script needs /etc/vservers/util-vserver-vars

2005-08-30 Thread Andrew Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Lundqvist, Ola Lundqvist wrote: If you want to have better features you have to wait until I have uploaded a fixed version of vserver-debiantools to unstable or you have to upgrade both vserver-debiantools and util-vserver to the ones in

Bug#319856: newvserver script needs /etc/vservers/util-vserver-vars

2005-07-31 Thread Andrew Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ola, # ls /etc/init.d/rebootmgr -l -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1421 May 25 04:22 /etc/init.d/rebootmgr It exist in all of my other machines too. Interesting. I have to check. It may be so that it still exist in sarge but has been removed

Bug#319856: newvserver script needs /etc/vservers/util-vserver-vars

2005-07-27 Thread Andrew Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ola Lundqvist wrote: I actually do not think this is a problem. The util-vserver-vars file exist in /usr/lib/util-vserver (as far as i remember) and it can be used for building. To determine the exact cause of this error. I need more information,

Bug#319856: newvserver script needs /etc/vservers/util-vserver-vars

2005-07-27 Thread Andrew Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Ola, Ola Lundqvist wrote: Restarting rebootmgr. Stopping the reboot manager Starting the reboot manager Seems like you have upgraded from an earlier release. I do not think the reboot manager is here still. Do you mean this reboot

Bug#319856: newvserver script needs /etc/vservers/util-vserver-vars

2005-07-25 Thread Andrew Lee
Package: util-vserver Version: 0.30.204-5sarge2 Severity: important Hi Ola, I found the old sarge has /etc/vservers/util-vserver-vars And the new one(fresh installed sarge) does not. It cause the newvserver script failed on build new vserver, because has no /etc/vservers/util-vserver-vars.

Bug#301496: tasksel: Please refine chinese-t and chinese-t-desktop and add an important input method

2005-03-26 Thread Andrew Lee
Package: tasksel Version: 2.24 Severity: important Dear maintainer(s), Since sarge is frozen, I know it's bacome difficult to make this change. But this is an important input method - scim-chewing[1], people mostly in Taiwan would like to see it into Sarge. Fortunately, scim-chewing package got

Bug#301501: scim-chewing: Not installable

2005-03-26 Thread Andrew Lee
Package: scim-chewing Version: 0.2.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: Policy 4.2 Not installable by depends on libatk1.0-0 (= 1.9.0) which is non exist in sid. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686)

Bug#300692: scim: Incomplete dependency

2005-03-20 Thread Andrew Lee
Package: scim Version: 1.0.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Policy 5.6.9. Dear maintainer(s), I knew only one DD for help uploading package is not enought, and I am very appreciate that he has done so much for scim package. I hope more DD will stand up for helping on pkg-ime

Bug#298532: qemu: Fails to build from source

2005-03-08 Thread Andrew Lee
Package: qemu Version: 0.6.1-1 Severity: important Justification: fails to build from source Dear maintainers, Thanks for your work. I tried to build this package from source by debuild on several machines. But it failed on all the machines, I am not sure, maybe something missed in control

Bug#237723: Please fix the gateway between debian-chinese-* lists.

2005-01-26 Thread Andrew Lee
Hi guys, I am so sorry to remind this again, but this outstanding bug has been listed *319 days*. Does anyone can give me some hits that how can we do for solving this problem? [ Taiwan Linux Users Group ] Andrew Lee () http://wiki.debian.org.tw Winkler Partners

Bug#291943: maint-guide: The example has description-synopsis-starts-with-a-capital-lettet

2005-01-23 Thread Andrew Lee
Package: maint-guide Version: 1.2.2 Severity: minor In the control file example: Description: A fully GUI configurable X file manager using GTK+ It should be: Description: fully GUI configureable X file manager using GTK+ This has mentioned in developers-reference 6.2.2. -- System

Bug#218232: (forw) Re: APT translation to zh_TWy

2005-01-13 Thread Andrew Lee
How about these: Get = Igr = Hit = -Andrew Ambrose Li wrote: Hi sorry for not having responded earlier. I did not initially respond because I live in Canada and is not very in touch with actual correct terms, so I hesitated in responding with a suggestion (and then forgot about it...). However,

<    1   2   3   4