On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 05:34:08PM -0400, Michael Lueck wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 07:27:52 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
In my opinion, this is a case of garbage in, garbage out, and not a bug.
So if I was never asked for this info through the user interface, where did
the
install script
Package: dhcp3-client
Severity: wishlist
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:10:31PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Andrew Pollock wrote:
So, before we go doing this and breaking things, I thought it best to give
people a bit of notice. My understanding is that dhcp3-client is too large,
so maybe
Package: dhcp3-client
Severity: wishlist
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 02:38:09PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:10:31PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Andrew Pollock wrote:
So, before we go doing this and breaking things, I thought it best to give
people a bit of notice. My
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 05:52:33PM -0400, Michael Lueck wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 07:43:36 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
How old is the Debian installation on this
computer?
As long as it took to get it off of the CD... clean box.
Hmm.
I start the dhcpd manually (removed startup links
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 06:09:28PM -0400, Michael Lueck wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 08:01:19 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
Just rename /etc/rc?.d/S20dhcp3-server to S40dhcp3-server.
That would fix the PCMCIA + dhcpd at bootup issue, deleting the links makes it
a manual service which is what
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:18:41AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Andrew Pollock wrote:
I'm fiddling with dhcp3, and I changed the
ln -s /sbin/dhclient3 $(DESTDIR)/sbin/dhclient
invocation in debian/rules to
dh_link sbin/dhclient3 sbin/dhclient
however Lintian is still barfing
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 03:31:28PM -0800, Chuan-kai Lin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 07:34:34PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 05:40:18PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
Sure, I'll take this.
What's the status of this?
Well, if all else fails, my offer to
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 07:31:56PM -0400, Michael Lueck wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 08:20:22 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
Did you install the package via apt-get, or during the actual Debian
installation?
I selected it with dselect after the initial installation
You can use
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 10:31:15AM -0400, Michael Lueck wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:50:47 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
So if the user
entered an IP address instead of an interface name, then sure, they're going
to wind up with an IP address in /etc/default/dhcp3-server and have a bad
time
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 05:20:57PM -0500, Tim Riker wrote:
I get the same results with a really small dhclient.conf. Note that my
eth1 is a cisco wireless card (from kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686). script
log attached.
Thanks for the log.
I've just tested this with 3.0.2, and it appears to be
Package: flashybrid
Version: 0.002
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi Joey,
I noticed a small typo in the package description of flashybrid. I've
attached a patch to correct it.
regards
Andrew
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 06:05:33PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Package: dhcp3-client
Severity: wishlist
Tags: security patch
Hi!
dhclient currently runs as root, which is much more than necessary.
Similarly to the derooting of dhcpd (I filed a separate bug about
this) I minimized the
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 06:03:06PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Package: dhcp3-server
Severity: wishlist
Tags: security patch
Hi!
dhcpd currently runs as root, which is much more than necessary. To
confine the impact of security holes, I minimized the privileges of
the server to a minimum:
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 10:09:43PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Package: argus-server
Severity: minor
When installing argus-server (with DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive)
I get the following errors:
Setting up argus-server (2.0.6.fixes.1-3) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/argus-server.config: line
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:36:42AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:30:31AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 10:09:43PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Package: argus-server
Severity: minor
When installing argus-server
Package: kernel-patch-skas
Version: 3-9.1
Followup-For: Bug #281554
As Jonas reports in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=281554msg=14
this patch does not apply to the 2.6.8 kernel in Sarge. I realise this
is way late for Sarge now, but it would be rather good if one could
build a
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 11:43:36AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Since a couple of days, qa.debian.org/developer.php displays
in red GPG key id not found! under general information,
for all developers. I guess something's broken in the routine
that
Hi Sven,
You've orphaned kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27 and kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8,
and I'm a bit confused by the text of #303024 and #303021
Who in your mind should be listed as the maintainer of these packages if not
either yourself or the Debian Kernel Team?
They've been orphaned for nearly
Package: kernel
Severity: wishlist
Could you please add the kernel-patch-mppe patch to the patches that are
made against the upstream kernel source for future Debian kernel-image
packages?
Thanks
Andrew
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900,
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 07:49:44AM +1000, Horms wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:12:48PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
Package: kernel
Severity: wishlist
Could you please add the kernel-patch-mppe patch to the patches that are
made against the upstream kernel source for future Debian
retitle 301561 RM: openwebmail -- RoQA; RC bugs, vulnerable code
reassign 301561 ftp.debian.org
thanks
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 12:07:06PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 11:20:22PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
openwebmail is orphaned, but has only been so for 32 days
Package: mpage
Version: 2.5.3-1
Severity: wishlist
http://www.mesa.nl/pub/mpage/mpage-2.5.4.tgz appears to have been
available since May last year
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686
retitle 279817 RM: vreng -- RoQA; orphaned, RC bug
reassign 279817 ftp.debian.org
thanks
I think we should remove vreng because:
- it is orphaned for 173 days
- it has a release critical bug #286861, which is 126 days old
- arguably due to the above bug, it doesn't work
- it has no reverse
Hi,
I wouldn't mind seeing NoCatAuth get into Debian. Are you still in need of a
sponsor?
regards
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 303526 + confirmed upstream
thanks
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:12:37AM +0200, Modesto Alexandre wrote:
Package: dstat
Version: 0.5.9-1
Severity: normal
dstat --help
show help.. but kill my bash screen
i've made en reset
but.. bash screen is show strange things
Hi Modesto,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:25:12PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
Now that 0.5.9 has been released, can all of you check if the reported
problems with various terminal emulators and TERM settings are completely
solved ?
I still haven't found the ultimate way to do ANSI/VT100 manipulation using
retitle 216879 RM: roleplaying -- RoQA; broken, long-term orphan
reassign 216879 ftp.debian.org
thanks
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 09:34:50AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
As per the follow-up you just got (see bug 246486 for complete
context), I have requested that ftpmaster drop
retitle 298388 RM: enbd -- orphaned, RC bug, upstream uncontactible
reassign 298388 ftp.debian.org
thanks
I think we should remove enbd because:
* it has a (questionable) RC bug
* the previous maintainer was the upstream author, and that upstream author
is now uncontactible (mail bounces,
retitle 231457 RM: limewire -- orphaned, RC security bugs, in contrib
reassign 231457 ftp.debian.org
thanks
I think we should remove limewire because:
It has unsatisfiable build-dependencies, making it difficult to make a QA
upload
It has been orphaned for 409 days
It has a RC security bug
It
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 04:59:54AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Justification: mail bounces, plenty of NMU's and some RC bugs, no activity
in ~ 9 months
You sure about all of this? The changelog doesn't suggest any NMUs or
uploads fixing RC bugs. Just wondering if you've got the
If this package develops any serious bugs, it should probably be removed, as
the last maintainer was the upstream author, and if they've gone MIA, then
the package is probably dead upstream as well.
regards
Andrew
--
linux.conf.au 2005 - http://linux.conf.au/ - Birthplace of Tux
April
Package: cinepaint
Version: 0.18.3-8
Severity: important
libtool1.4 is no longer maintained and will be removed from the
archive after sarge is released. Please upgrade your package to use a
newer, ideally the latest, version of libtool, and make sure this gets
integrated in upstream.
-- System
Hi,
As I documented in my blog[1], I struck some problems building the latest
ipw2200 module against the kernel headers provided with 2.6.10. I also
couldn't rebuild older versions (that had successfully built in the past).
Is this a problem with the kernel headers or with the ipw2200 module?
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 02:57:00PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 12:47:34AM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote:
Hi,
I think ibcs is probably worth getting rid of:
* orphaned (#279770)
* only really relevant for 2.0 and 2.2 kernels it seems (linux-abi seems
severity 265021 grave
thanks
Hi,
I just got bitten by this bug again. My bad for not putting the package on
hold after this happened last time.
I'm raising the severity because, frankly, it's causing data loss.
I'll put some thought into how this can be handled better.
regards
Andrew
--
Hi,
I was having ntpd (1:4.2.0a+stable-2) segfault consistently on startup on a
2.6.8 kernel, until I realised that lo was down. Once I fixed this, ntpd ran
fine.
Not sure if it is at all relevant to this bug, but I was reading all the
follow ups to it when I was scratching my head.
regards
Hi Simon,
You mention you're prepared to adopt gnu-standards and upload it to
non-free.
Are you still planning on doing this, or shall I go ahead with a QA upload
orphaning this package?
regards
Andrew
--
linux.conf.au 2005 - http://linux.conf.au/ - Birthplace of Tux
April 18th to 23rd
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 12:11:37AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Package: dstat
Version: 0.5.7-1
Severity: normal
As in subject. Upgrade of python to 2.3.4-5 solved the problem.
Is it possible to know what exactly was requiring a
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:38:31AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: dstat
Version: 0.5.7-1
Severity: normal
As in subject. Upgrade of python to 2.3.4-5 solved the problem.
Right, after a not inconsequential amount of dicking around with my chroots
(my bad for mounting the wrong
tags + upstream confirmed
thanks
Hi,
I recently brought all the open bugs in html2ps to the upstream author's
attention. With respect to this bug, he said:
Definitely a bug. I hacked up the option parsing a long time ago, when
I was unable to find a good getopt module - now the scene is
retitle 213940 display: none only works inside div.noprint
severity 213940 wishlist
tags + upstream
thanks
Hi,
I recently brought all the open bugs in html2ps to the attention of the
upstream author. With respect to this bug, he said:
Actually, it works exactly as the documentation says:
reassign 266146 imagemagick
retitle 266146 Shared object loading problem
thanks
Hi,
I'm just going through all the open bugs in html2ps as I am preparing a QA
upload, and this one doesn't look like a bug with html2ps per se. I can't
see anything relevant in the BTS for imagemagick or in
Package: ibcs
Severity: normal
Justification: Useless
According to the package description, ibcs is for 2.2 kernels only. As
sarge isn't shipping with any 2.2 kernels (at least on i386) this
package is of no use any longer.
regards
Andrew
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT
Hi Dan,
I see you've recently orphaned kernel-patch-redhat. Maybe you're better off
just requesting its removal from the archive, given that it has a release
critical bug filed against it, which suggests it's going to be useless in
Sarge anyway?
Just my $AUD 0.05 worth.
regards
Andrew
--
Hi Eloy,
Any chance this bug can be resolved (no pun intended) before the release of
sarge? I've personally been bitten by it.
regards
Andrew
--
linux.conf.au 2005 - http://linux.conf.au/ - Birthplace of Tux
April 18th to 23rd - http://linux.conf.au/ - LINUX
Canberra, Australia
Package: argus-server
Severity: grave
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 01:14:31PM -0600, Jason Wohlford wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I'm having some trouble uninstalling argus-server from Sarge. Here's my
aptitude output. Any ideas?
Cheers,
Jason
(Reading database ... 45960 files and directories
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 09:39:15PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
Package: wnpp
Hi,
anyone who wants to work on iproute is greatly welcome, perhaps also as
co-maintainer (and I'm also willing to sponsor people). The reason I
intend to give the package away is that I'm not really the great
501 - 547 of 547 matches
Mail list logo
