Control: tag -1 - wontfix
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 06:21:14AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
>
> 2021, നവംബർ 22 11:12:36 PM IST, Antonio Terceiro ൽ എഴുതി
> >Control: tag -1 + wontfix
> >
> >On S
Source: libpod
Version: 3.4.1+ds1-2
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Recent podman upstream releases provide a new podman-remote binary, but
the Debian package does not even build it.
I'm used to packages providing binaries without a manpage, but this is
the first time I have seen the
Control: tag -1 + wontfix
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 11:51:22PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Package: gem2deb
> Version: 1.7
> Severity: wishlist
>
> should we really honor <= constraint in gemspecs? in ruby-google-fog
> upstream wants fog-core <= 2.1.0 it will never be satisfied in debian
>
>
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:01:17AM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 11/18/21 09:49, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 11/18/21 06:51, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> > > On 11/16/21 14:23, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > I'm planning to upload python3-defaults later tonight, adding 3.10 as a
> > >
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Control: affects -1 src:pinpoint
I'm orphaning the pinpoint package.
The package description is:
Pinpoint is a simple presentation tool that uses a plain text file as input.
It supports specifying the text position, styling the text, using images or
videos as
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Antonio Terceiro
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: ruby-rantly
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : Ana María Martínez Gómez, Howard Yeh, Anthony Bargnesi,
Eric Bischoff
* URL : https://github.com/rantly
Control: retitle -1 ruby-moneta: FTBFS: mysqld fails to start on tmpfs
Control: severity -1 important
I perceived that this is triggered by my sbuild/schroot setup building
packages with a tmpfs overlay (union-overlay-directory=/dev/shm), so
this does not happen always. I'm thus downgrading the
Source: ruby-moneta
Version: 1.0.0-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
ruby-moneta fails to build from source. This is a recurring problem. We
have a ton of scritps to start mysql for running tests, they are all
Source: ruby-omniauth-shibboleth
Version: 1.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby-omniauth-2.0
Hi,
I would like to upload ruby-omniauth 2.0.4 to unstable soon. During a test
rebuild, ruby-omniauth-shibboleth was
Source: ruby-omniauth-saml
Version: 1.10.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby-omniauth-2.0
Hi,
I would like to upload ruby-omniauth 2.0.4 to unstable soon. During a test
rebuild, ruby-omniauth-saml was found to fail
Source: ruby-omniauth-salesforce
Version: 1.0.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby-omniauth-2.0
Hi,
I would like to upload ruby-omniauth 2.0.4 to unstable soon. During a test
rebuild, ruby-omniauth-salesforce was
Source: ruby-omniauth-remote-user
Version: 0.1.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby-omniauth-2.0
Hi,
I would like to upload ruby-omniauth 2.0.4 to unstable soon. During a test
rebuild, ruby-omniauth-remote-user was
Source: ruby-omniauth-openid
Version: 1.0.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby-omniauth-2.0
Hi,
I would like to upload ruby-omniauth 2.0.4 to unstable soon. During a test
rebuild, ruby-omniauth-openid was found to
Source: ruby-omniauth-openid-connect
Version: 0.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby-omniauth-2.0
Hi,
I would like to upload ruby-omniauth 2.0.4 to unstable soon. During a test
rebuild,
Source: ruby-omniauth-azure-oauth2
Version: 0.0.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby-omniauth-2.0
Hi,
I would like to upload ruby-omniauth 2.0.4 to unstable soon. During a test
rebuild, ruby-omniauth-azure-oauth2
Source: ruby-omniauth-cas3
Version: 1.1.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby-omniauth-2.0
Hi,
I would like to upload ruby-omniauth 2.0.4 to unstable soon. During a test
rebuild, ruby-omniauth-cas3 was found to fail
Source: ruby-omniauth-oauth
Version: 1.1.0-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby-omniauth-2.0
Hi,
I would like to upload ruby-omniauth 2.0.4 to unstable soon. During a test
rebuild, ruby-omniauth-oauth was found to
Source: ruby-omniauth-multipassword
Version: 0.4.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby-omniauth-2.0
Hi,
I would like to upload ruby-omniauth 2.0.4 to unstable soon. During a test
rebuild,
Source: ruby-omniauth-ldap
Version: 2.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby-omniauth-2.0
Hi,
I would like to upload ruby-omniauth 2.0.4 to unstable soon. During a test
rebuild, ruby-omniauth-ldap was found to fail
Source: ruby-omniauth-jwt
Version: 0.0.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby-omniauth-2.0
Hi,
I would like to upload ruby-omniauth 2.0.4 to unstable soon. During a test
rebuild, ruby-omniauth-jwt was found to fail
Source: ruby-omniauth-google-oauth2
Version: 0.6.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby-omniauth-2.0
Hi,
I would like to upload ruby-omniauth 2.0.4 to unstable soon. During a test
rebuild, ruby-omniauth-google-oauth2
Source: ruby-omniauth-github
Version: 1.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby-omniauth-2.0
Hi,
I would like to upload ruby-omniauth 2.0.4 to unstable soon. During a test
rebuild, ruby-omniauth-github was found to
Source: ruby-omniauth-crowd
Version: 2.4.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby-omniauth-2.0
Hi,
I would like to upload ruby-omniauth 2.0.4 to unstable soon. During a test
rebuild, ruby-omniauth-crowd was found to
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 09:10:32AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Source: ruby-localhost
> Version: 1.1.8-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: ruby3.0
>
> I was looking at the testing migration excuses for
Control: tag -1 + patch
Control: forwarded https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/mypy/-/merge_requests/2
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 09:25:57AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Antonio,
>
> Am Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 02:14:21PM -0300 schrieb Antonio Terceiro:
> > typeshed is now in unsta
Source: mypy
Version: 0.910-3
Severity: normal
typeshed is now in unstable. Please use python3-typeshed as build
dependency so we can remove the individual python3-types-* packages in
favor of typeshed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
APT prefers testing-debug
APT policy:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
Please remove src:django-restricted-resource. It used to be a lava
dependency, but lava moved away to somethind else a while ago, and it's
now unused and unmaintained.
$ dak rm -Rn django-restricted-resource
Will remove the following packages from
Source: ruby-localhost
Version: 1.1.8-2
Severity: serious
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
I was looking at the testing migration excuses for puma, which brought
me to ruby-localhost. spec/localhost/protocol_spec.rb very often, but
not always, fails.
Source: libguestfs
Version: 1:1.44.2-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch bookworm sid
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Dear Maintainer,
debian/rules currently employs a flawed way of detecting which ruby
versions to build for: it looks for /usr/bin/ruby[12], what doesn't work
Source: libpod
Version: 3.4.1+ds1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
The libpod autopkgtest curently fails in unstable. I have seen #993532,
but I don't know if it's the same issue.
See the log below, slightly edited
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 11:53:46AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: ruby-eventmachine
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> FTBFS on IPV6-only buildds:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ruby-eventmachine=amd64=1.3~pre20201020-b50c135-3=1633500476=0
>
Package: hub
Version: 2.14.2~ds1-1+b4
Severity: normal
$ hub clone geemus/excon
Cloning into 'excon'...
fatal: remote error:
The unauthenticated git protocol on port 9418 is no longer supported.
Please see
https://github.blog/2021-09-01-improving-git-protocol-security-github/ for more
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 11:43:35AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Those have been scheduled. Note that a bunch of them have only built and
> installed the extension for the default ruby version, e.g.,
> ruby-debug-inspector and libprelude.
Yes. Please amend the ben file like this:
Control: reopen -1
Control: retitle -1 ruby3.0: Segmentation fault on ppc64el when compiled with
gcc-11
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 08:50:10AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 30/10/21 at 00:13 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > ruby 3.0
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 07:46:30AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Control: tags -1 help
>
> Hi,
>
> any hint from debian-ci list how to solve this?
Quoting Paul from
https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autodep8/-/merge_requests/10#note_279588,
I think the right way to solve this is:
> Maybe
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 12:42:19AM +0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> reopen 991678
> notfixed 991678 1:4.0.10-1
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> Le vendredi 29 octobre 2021 à 00:31:06+0200, Diederik de Haas a écrit :
> > Version: 1:4.0.10-1
> >
> > On 30 Jul 2021 09:47:14 +0200 Harald Dunkel
> >
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:34:28PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 2021-10-20 09:45:10 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 03:46:11PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 03:39:25PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Source: localslackirc
> Version: 1.13-1
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: fails-always
>
> Dear maintainer(s),
>
> You recently added an autopkgtest to your
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 02:52:53PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Update here, there's a package here made by terceiro:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/terceiro/typeshed/
>
> Reading this post:
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2021/10/msg4.html
>
> it seems like the only
Source: xapian-bindings
Version: 1.4.18-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, xapian-bindings was found to fail to build in
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 12:25:23PM +0200, jacobkoch...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello Stephan,
>
> > Possibly relevant:
> > - Are you using X11 or Wayland?
> Wayland
>
> > - Do you have proprietary graphics drivers installed?
> $ lspci -v | grep -A 10 VGA
> 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 06:28:09PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> I just uploaded version 0.0.44-2 to unstable and it built fine against both,
> ruby2.7 and ruby3.0. Build log attached.
did you forget to push to git?
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-ftw/-/commits/master does not
have any
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 03:12:17PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/20/21 2:45 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 03:46:11PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> >> On 2021-10-15 06:44:36 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Oc
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 03:46:11PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> On 2021-10-15 06:44:36 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 03:14:39PM -0300, Antonio Te
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 01:22:25PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 10/18/21 13:16, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > I don't think we are on the right track here. I need to read the failing
> > test correctly. this "test case" alone is bogus, as
> >
>
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 12:59:35PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 10/18/21 12:51, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> >> So, we need a backtrace to see where the crash actually happens. I assume
> >> it's in one
> >> of the build dependencies.
> >
>
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:00:42AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On 10/17/21 21:50, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > Ah, so the last successful build was 3.0.2-2 and the first failure was in
> > 3.0.2-3,
> > the only difference being the mipsel patch to fix an
Source: ruby3.0
Version: 3.0.2-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
I'm copying the debian-powerpc list to see if anyone can help.
ruby3.0 fails to build on ppc64el. 4 test cases results in Segmentation
faults.
I was
Source: ruby-enumerable-statistics
Version: 2.0.7+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Forwarded: https://github.com/mrkn/enumerable-statistics/issues/31
This is caused by the test suite comparing floating point numbers for
equality, what is not really feasible.
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 03:14:39PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> We would like to add support for ruby3.0 in ruby-defaults.
>
> Ben file:
&
Source: yard
Version: 0.9.24-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, yard was found to fail to build in that situation.
To
Source: vagrant
Version: 2.2.14+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, vagrant was found to fail to build in that
Source: test-kitchen
Version: 1.23.2-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, test-kitchen was found to fail to build in that
Source: sup-mail
Version: 1.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, sup-mail was found to fail to build in that situation.
Source: rubygems
Version: 3.2.27-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, rubygems was found to fail to build in that situation.
Source: ruby-xmlrpc
Version: 0.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-xmlrpc was found to fail to build in that
Source: ruby-whitequark-parser
Version: 2.7.1.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-whitequark-parser was found to fail
Source: ruby-websocket
Version: 1.2.8-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-websocket was found to fail to build in that
Source: ruby-vips
Version: 2.0.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-vips was found to fail to build in that situation.
Source: ruby-vcr
Version: 6.0.0+really5.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-vcr was found to fail to build in that
Source: ruby-varia-model
Version: 0.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-varia-model was found to fail to build in
Source: ruby-vagrant-cloud
Version: 3.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-vagrant-cloud was found to fail to build
Source: ruby-typhoeus
Version: 1.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-typhoeus was found to fail to build in that
Source: ruby-tty-command
Version: 0.9.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-tty-command was found to fail to build in
Source: ruby-toml-rb
Version: 2.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-toml-rb was found to fail to build in that
Source: ruby-tilt
Version: 2.0.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-tilt was found to fail to build in that situation.
Source: ruby-terrapin
Version: 0.6.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-terrapin was found to fail to build in that
Source: ruby-stackprof
Version: 0.2.15-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-stackprof was found to fail to build in that
Source: ruby-spy
Version: 0.4.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-spy was found to fail to build in that situation.
Source: ruby-sprockets
Version: 3.7.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-sprockets was found to fail to build in that
Source: ruby-spring
Version: 2.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-spring was found to fail to build in that
Source: ruby-slop
Version: 4.6.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-slop was found to fail to build in that
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 11:06:52AM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On 7 Oct 2021 18:35:18 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> > This seems to be exactly the same issue that was reported in #995448,
> > which is marked as affecting package apt-listbugs.
> >
> > However, I see that you are using
Source: ruby-sassc-rails
Version: 2.1.2-5+rebuild1633394876
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ruby3.0 /usr/bin/gem2deb-test-runner
>
>
Source: ruby-rails-controller-testing
Version: 1.0.5-1+rebuild1633392495
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ruby3.0
Source: ruby-sigar
Version: 0.7.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-sigar was found to fail to build in that
Source: ruby-shadow
Version: 2.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-shadow was found to fail to build in that
Source: ruby-sham-rack
Version: 1.4.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-sham-rack was found to fail to build in that
Source: ruby-serialport
Version: 1.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-serialport was found to fail to build in that
Source: ruby-semantic-puppet
Version: 1.0.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-semantic-puppet was found to fail to
Source: ruby-seamless-database-pool
Version: 1.0.20-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-seamless-database-pool was
Source: ruby-sanitize
Version: 5.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-sanitize was found to fail to build in that
Source: ruby-rspec
Version: 3.9.0c2e2m1s3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-rspec was found to fail to build in that
Source: ruby-safe-yaml
Version: 1.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-safe-yaml was found to fail to build in that
Source: ruby-rspec-retry
Version: 0.6.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-rspec-retry was found to fail to build in
Source: ruby-rspec-rails
Version: 4.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-rspec-rails was found to fail to build in
Source: ruby-roxml
Version: 4.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-roxml was found to fail to build in that
Source: ruby-roo
Version: 2.8.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-roo was found to fail to build in that situation.
Source: ruby-rgen
Version: 0.8.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-rgen was found to fail to build in that situation.
Source: ruby-responders
Version: 3.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-responders was found to fail to build in that
Source: ruby-remcached
Version: 0.4.1-3
Severity: important
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-remcached was found to fail to build in that situation.
To
Source: ruby-regexp-parser
Version: 1.7.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-regexp-parser was found to fail to build
Source: ruby-recursive-open-struct
Version: 1.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-recursive-open-struct was found to
Source: ruby-rbpdf
Version: 1.20.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-rbpdf was found to fail to build in that
Source: ruby-raindrops
Version: 0.19.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-raindrops was found to fail to build in that
Source: ruby-rack
Version: 2.2.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-rack was found to fail to build in that situation.
Source: ruby-rack-timeout
Version: 0.5.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-rack-timeout was found to fail to build in
Source: ruby-rabl
Version: 0.13.1-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-rabl was found to fail to build in that
Source: ruby-rack-oauth2
Version: 1.16.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-rack-oauth2 was found to fail to build in
Source: ruby-process-daemon
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0
Hi,
We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-process-daemon was found to fail to build
301 - 400 of 1996 matches
Mail list logo
