Matthias Klumpp writes ("Bug#727708: multiple init systems - formal
resolution proposal - Don't like software, don't use it.
Absolutely."):>> What would be the effecr if we decided to drop GNOME, because it >> depends on systemd? >In this hypothetical scenario: >It would be fairly easy for a downstream of Debian to mandate systemd >for their users, and provide Gnome. >It would not be anywhere near as easy for a downstream of Debian to >undo the assumption by Debian (de facto or de jure) of systemd as the >one true init system. >If it comes down to it I would prefer to drop Gnome than to make >systemd mandatory for all of Debian's users and downstreams just >because Gnome had introduced a hard dependency on systemd. >Luckily this is all hypothetical. >Ian. Hi Ian, I know that you are a respected Debian developer, but who are you to decide alone what kind of software which may be dropped from the archive? (I'm refering to ...I would prefer to drop Gnome...). Also, as far as I know Debian cares a lot about its users, who, according to popcon, seem to appreciate GNOME. Don't you care about them? Are you a proponent of a caste system in Debian, where all project that don't follow your precepts and vision risk to be kicked outside of Debian? As you have been pretty harsh against people maintaining those, again according to your precepts, second zone projects in Debian, please permit me to be as well, and let me tell you that you're a tiny despot, and you look worse than people you're trying to fight against! Have a good day, Bastien PS: I know that I'll probably undergo your ire, thus be banned from the list; as it seems you can grant you all the rights!
