Hi,
Sorry to bother you again, but I am wondering if you have chance to look at
this bug.
Thank you,
Breno
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Thank you Kurt. The package builds fine on ppc64el.
On 08/11/2014 06:57 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the openssl package:
>
> #745657: openssl: support ppc64el architecture
>
> It has been closed by
Source: popt
Version: 1.16-8
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Dear Maintainer,
Currently popt fails to build on ppc64el platform because it fails to recognize
that ppc64el supports ppc64el platform. The root cause is that libtool and
configure
Thank you!
Now the package is built on ppc64el, as follows:
dpkg-genchanges -sa
>../freerdp_1.1.0~git20140809.1.b07a5c1+dfsg-2_ppc64el.changes
dpkg-genchanges: including full source code in upload
dpkg-source --after-build freerdp-1.1.0~git20140809.1.b07a5c1+dfsg
dpkg-buildpackage: full uploa
Thank you!
Now the package is built fine on ppc64el as shown:
dh_md5sums
dh_builddeb
dpkg-deb: building package `liblqr-1-0-dev' in
`../liblqr-1-0-dev_0.4.2-2_ppc64el.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package `liblqr-1-0' in `../liblqr-1-0_0.4.2-2_ppc64el.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package `liblqr-1-0-dbg'
Source: freerdp
Version: 1.1.0~git20140809.1.b07a5c1+dfsg
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Dear Maintainer,
Currently freerdp doesn't build (FTBFS) in ppc64el because the POWER processor
doesn't support the SSE instructions, causing a different
Source: libopenraw
Version: 0.0.9-3.5
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Dear Maintainer,
This package FTBFS in the ppc64el platform because of the mismatch in the
symbols, follow:
http://ftp.unicamp.br/pub/ppc64el/debian/buildd-upstream/build_lo
Source: liblqr
Version: 0.4.1-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported on the
Hi Simon,
First of all, thanks for accepting the patch.
On 08/10/2014 07:37 PM, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> "Breno Leitao" writes:
>
>> I created this patch that call autoreconf to updates the autotool files
>> during
>> the build, as suggest by the following w
Source: tcpcrypt
Version: 0.2+git20140723-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Daniel,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported
Hi Debian Libidn Team.
Sorry to bother you, but did you folks have a chance to look at this issue?
At this moment, this is the most important patch missing in ppc64el
architecture,
so, I would appreciate if you give any feedback about it.
You can find the ppc64el top bugs at https://wiki.debian
Source: exiv2
Version: 0.23-1.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Dear Maintainer,
Bug#727295 was fixed with autotools_dev instead of autoreconf, which mean that
it doesn't update libtool files, so, this package continues to FTBFS in the
ppc64el
Source: judy
Version: 1.0.5-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported on the ou
Control: reopen -1 =
Hi Jörg,
I believe that this bugs is not closed.
> Source: uriparser
> Source-Version: 0.8.0.1-1
>
> We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
> uriparser, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
> - Update Build-Depends
Control: reopen -1 bugnumber
Hi Kurt,
Unfortunately the version you release (1.0.1i-1) doesn't contain the code
patches
that enable ppc64el. So, it continue to FTBFS in ppc64el.
In order to have Openssl compiled properly in ppc64el, Openssl needs to have the
committed patches in the code. (vers
On 07/28/2014 06:52 PM, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not a DD so cannot sponsor your package. I haven't tried to build
> the package, but a couple of comments.
Thank you, I addressed you concerns and I just uploaded a new package:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/aafigure
--
To UNSUBSC
Hi,
I am planning to do a sponsored NMU for this bug. This is an important fixes
that
we would like to have on ppc64el architecture.
Any suggestion or recommendation?
Thank you,
Breno
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Source: proftpd-dfsg
Version: 1.3.5-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Dear Maintainer,
Currently proftpd-dfsg fails to build on ppc64el building system because it
fails to detect that ppc64el supports shared library. This is a fault in the
conf
On 08/05/2014 07:08 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> forcemerge 756315 757169
> thanks
>
> Thanks Breno, but please check the previous filled bugs, this one is already
> filled.
Right. sorry about it.
Thank you
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debia
Source: qtdeclarative-opensource-src
Version: 5.3.1-3.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Dear Maintainer,
Currently qtdeclarative-opensource-src doesn't build on ppc64el machines
because it fails to compare the expected symbols.
The full build
Control: retitle -1 "healpy FTBFS on arm64, ppc64 and ppc64el test failure"
Hi,
The same problem happen on ppc64el, as the following log shows:
http://ftp.unicamp.br/pub/ppc64el/debian/buildd-upstream/build_logs/logs/healpy_1.8.1-1_ppc64el.build
I created the following upstream bug also:
https
Package: libwnck3
Version: 3.0_3.4.7-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported
Control: tag -1 patch
This is a problem that we are facing on ppc64el build also.
I am providing a patch that fixes the problem acorrding to the accepted way[1]
[1] -
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2014-01-21_using_dh-autoreconf_during_the_build
Index: libmimic-1.0.4/debian/rules
=
Package: libcutl
Version: 1.8.0+ds1-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Dear Maintainer,
After applying the autoreconf patches (bug# 757018), the libcutil fails to
build because the symbols file doesn't consider other architectures.
Causing failu
Package: libcutl
Version: 1.8.0+ds1-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
After applying the autoreconf patches (bug# ), the libcutil fails to build
because the symbols file doesn't consider other architectures.
Causing failures like:
dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some new symbol
Package: libcutl
Version: 1.8.0+ds1-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported o
Hi Daigo,
Do you need something else before accepting this patch?
I have been using google-perftools on ppc64el architecture and I confirm what
Steve said, i.e, the package runs fine.
Thank you,
Breno
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
Package: pktools
Version: 2.5.2+20140505-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not suppor
Patch also sent upstream:
http://devel.mplayer2.org/ticket/267
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: mplayer2
Version: 2.0-728-g2c378c7-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Dear Maintainer,
Currently mplayer2 doesn't built on ppc64el because this architecture/processor
is not known by the configure script, causing the following failure:
Thank you!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Thank you!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: gstreamer0.10
Version: 0.10.36-1.3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Dear Maintainer,
During gsrreamer0.10 build, the autoreconf is invoked, but not the libtoolized,
as the following command is executed during the beginning of the /debia
Package: xastir
Version: 2.0.4-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported on the
Package: xastir
Version: 2.0.4-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Dear Maintainer,
During the build of xastir, the build-stamp rule runs twice, which causes the
same process to find some problems, mainly when applying the dh-autoreconf
patch (dh
Package: gst-plugins-bad0.10
Version: 0_0.10.23-7.2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Dear Maintainer,
The package gst-plugins-bad0.10 doesn't build on the ppc64el architecture
because it doesn't recognize new architecture as supporting shared ob
On 07/30/2014 11:50 AM, Jesse Smith wrote:
> I am adding this patch to the upstream project and will include it in
> the next Search And Rescue release.
Thanks Jesse!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
Source: searchandrescue
Version: 1.5.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Dear Maintainer,
At the moment, searchandrescue FTBFS in ppc64el architecture with the following
error:
proc.c: In function 'PConfCheckDepends':
proc.c:10
Hi Bas,
On 07/29/2014 07:00 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> I've applied your patch for both gdal 1.10.1 in unstable and 1.11.0 in
> experimental. Updated packages were built, and sponsorship requested
> (#756447 & #756448).
Great. Thank you!!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-req
That is right Manuel, I agree with you.
Libgc built fine on our buildd, as the builg log shows:
http://ftp.unicamp.br/pub/ppc64el/debian/buildd-upstream/build_logs/logs/libgc_7.2d-6.1_ppc64el.build
Thank you,
Breno
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Hi Yves-Alexis,
On 07/29/2014 04:57 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>> So, I am going to ask you to patch the configure and aclocal.m4 files
>> to add
>> ppc64el as an architecture that supports shared objects.
>>
>> I got this patch from Canonical and it works fine on Debian/ppc64el.
>
> Well, we'l
Package: tablix2
Version: 0.3.5-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported on th
I saw the same problem on ppc64el:
http://ftp.unicamp.br/pub/ppc64el/debian/buildd-upstream/build_logs/logs/seed_3.8.1-1_ppc64el.build
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: xfconf
Version: 4.10.0-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Dear Maintainer,
Currently xfconf doesn't build on ppc64el because the package fail to identify
ppc64el as a platform that support shared object.
dh_install --fail-missi
Source: menu-cache
Version: 0.5.1-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported on
Source: adasockets
Version: 1.8.11-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
First of all, thanks for solving 755009, it worked fine! :-)
Now, this package FTBFS when compiled i
Source: gdal
Version: 1.10.1+dfsg
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Dear Maintainer,
Gdal doesn't build on ppc64el at the moment, because the autotools files are
outdate, causing it to fail because ppc64el is not know by the config files.
This p
This is also affecting ppc64el, as shown:
http://ftp.unicamp.br/pub/ppc64el/debian/buildd-upstream/build_logs/logs/gstreamer0.10_0.10.36-1.2_ppc64el.build
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
I think so, I just look at the powerpc documentation and those instructions
seems
to work on powerpc.
http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/app_note/AN2540.pdf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
Thanks Dimitri,
FWIW, LLVM version 3.5 has accepted the support for the ppc64el architecture
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Just create a RFS today:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756331
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
4 to 3.9.5
* Transition to dh_python2
-- Breno Leitao Mon, 28 Jul 2014 19:27:41 +
Regards,
Breno Leitao
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Jakub,
I am going to be the maintainer for this package. How do I get permission to
update the repository?
Thank you
Breno
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: ufraw
Version: 0.19.2-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported on the
FWIW, this bug is also found during ppc64el bootstrap.
http://ftp.unicamp.br/pub/ppc64el/debian/buildd-upstream/build_logs/logs/wmcoincoin_2.5.1e-1_ppc64el.build
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li
Package: mmdb
Version: 1.25.5-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported on the
On 07/26/2014 06:01 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi
>
> In that case I will simply apply the patch and upload. It is about the same as
> sponsoring.
That is right, thank you,
Breno
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
Hi Ola,
On 07/25/2014 06:54 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi Breno
>
> Thanks a lot for the patch. If you have the possibility a NMU is welcome. If
> not
> I'll try to do this as soon as I can get some spare time.
I am not a Debian developer, I can do it if you help me being the sponsor. How
does i
hi Reto,
On 07/24/2014 06:20 PM, Reto Buerki wrote:
> On 07/24/2014 10:21 PM, Breno Leitao wrote:
>> This is a bug that is impacting ppc64el bootstrap also.
>>
>> My recomendantion is to keep just a build-depend on gnat, unless you have
>> strict
>> dependency
hi Adrian-Ken,
On 07/24/2014 06:25 PM, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
> On 07/24/2014 10:25 PM, Breno Leitao wrote:
>> this is a bug that is impacting ppc64el bootstrap also.
>
> Thanks for reporting.
>
>> My recomendantion is to keep just a build-depend on gnat, un
On 07/24/2014 05:44 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 16:07:58 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
>
>> hi Julien,
>>
>> How do you want to handle this bug? Do you want me a patch for configure?
>>
> Now applied your patch in git. Not sure when the
Source: ppl
Version: 1.1-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported on the outda
this is a bug that is impacting ppc64el bootstrap also.
My recomendantion is to keep just a build-depend on gnat, unless you have strict
dependency of version 4.6, which is not the case in 90% of the packages that
depends on version 4.6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists
This is a bug that is impacting ppc64el bootstrap also.
My recomendantion is to keep just a build-depend on gnat, unless you have strict
dependency of version 4.6, which is not the case in 90% of the packages that
depends on version 4.6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists
As said by Mauricio, this is an import bug for ppc64el, It is tracked as one of
ten the most important bugs for the ppc64el platform on the following wiki page:
https://wiki.debian.org/ppc64el/topBugs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
Hi Keith,
As said by Mauricio, this is an import bug for ppc64el, It is tracked as one of
ten the most important bugs for the ppc64el platform on the following wiki page:
https://wiki.debian.org/ppc64el/topBugs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
hi Julien,
How do you want to handle this bug? Do you want me a patch for configure?
This is a bug that is part of the top priority bugs for ppc64el platform as
shown in:
https://wiki.debian.org/ppc64el/topBugs
Thank you,
Breno
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debi
Hi Maintainer,
I am wondering if you have chance to look at this bug. I would like to say that
his bug is one of the most important bugs that are affecting ppc64el
architecture
right now according to the ppc64el top priority bugs[1].
Since this is a bug that shouldn't cause any regression, I wou
Hi Andreas,
I am wondering if you have chance to look at this bug. I would like to say that
his bug is one of the most important bugs that are affecting ppc64el
architecture
right now according to the ppc64el top priority bugs[1].
Since this is a bug that shouldn't cause any regression, I would
Hi Maintainer,
I am wondering if you have chance to look at this bug. I would like to say that
his bug is one of the most important bugs that are affecting ppc64el
architecture
right now according to the ppc64el top priority bug[1].
Since this is a bug that shouldn't cause any regression, I woul
Package: libgcrypt11
Version: 1.5.3-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported o
hi Guillem,
On 07/23/2014 10:52 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 16:22:44 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
>> Did you get a chance to look at this defect? libbsd is still failing to
>> build on ppc64el, as you can see in the following build log:
>>
&
Source: openvrml
Version: 0.18.9-7
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported on t
Source: libidn
Version: 1.28-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
The package libidn is one of the major packages (together with libbsd
(bug 748994)) that still doesn't comp
Hi Guillem,
Did you get a chance to look at this defect? libbsd is still failing to
build on ppc64el, as you can see in the following build log:
http://ftp.unicamp.br/pub/ppc64el/debian/buildd-upstream/build_logs/logs/libbsd_0.6.0-2_ppc64el.build
This package (libbsd) is currently the major offe
On 07/23/2014 03:39 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 03:32:17PM -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
>> On 07/23/2014 03:28 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 03:24:09PM -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
>>>> Hi Kurt,
>>>>
>>>
On 07/23/2014 03:28 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 03:24:09PM -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
>> Hi Kurt,
>>
>> Thank you very much. Openssl was one of the keys components that were still
>> missing in ppc64el, and now it should be ok.
>
> Please not
Hi Kurt,
Thank you very much. Openssl was one of the keys components that were still
missing in ppc64el, and now it should be ok.
Thanks again,
Breno
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.
Source: blitz++
Version: 0.10-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported on the
FWIW, we also hit the same problem on ppc64el bootstrapping.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Source: hwloc
Version: 1.9-4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported on the ou
Source: dirac
Version: 1.0.2-6
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported on the o
Hi Debian gnome maintainers,
Any status about this problem? libzapojit is still failing on ppc64el buildd.
Thank you,
Breno
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Source: liblog4ada
Version: 1.2-4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Dear Maintainer,
Currently liblog4ada build fails on ppc64el because of symbol mismatch in the
ppc64el platform and the one you have currently. Here is part of the failure:
Package: libdc1394-22
Version: 2.2.1-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported
On 07/22/2014 07:01 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 18:14:12 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
>
>> I face the same problem during ppc64el bootstrap and gregor's patch solve
>> the problem.
>> Gregor, do you mind making a NMU for it?
>
> Uploaded
Dear GStreamer maintainers,
do you have any concerns about this patch? We would like to have it accepted in
Debian in order to enable ppc4el port.
Thank you,
Breno
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...
Hi,
I face the same problem during ppc64el bootstrap and gregor's patch solve the
problem.
Gregor, do you mind making a NMU for it?
Thanks
Breno
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Source: freepops
Version: 0.2.9-8
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Dear Maintainer,
Currently freepops depends on pkg-config binaries but the package is not listed
as a build-dependency, causing the following error during the buid:
dpkg
Hi,
Any comment about this defect? The problem is still persistent, since the header
moved from libsmbclient.h to samba-4.0/libsmbclient.h, as shown:
# dpkg -L libsmbclient-dev | grep libsmbclient.h
/usr/include/samba-4.0/libsmbclient.h
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@l
Source: libgtkdatabox
Version: 0.9.2.0
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported on the outdated package autotools files, mainly because
it fails to understand that the new architectures has sup
Package: gkdebconf
Version: 1.2.68
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported on t
package from one architecture
+in a multiarch environemnt. Closes: 706185
+
+ -- Breno Leitao Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:31:57 +
+
libpam-ldap (184-8.6) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
Index: libpam-ldap-184/debian/libpam-ldap.postrm
Source: gnonlin
Version: 0.10.17-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: autoreconf
Dear Maintainer,
Currently this package FTBFS when compiled in new architectures (as ppc64el)
that is not supported on t
Hi Reinhard,
On 07/21/2014 08:53 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Hi Breno,
>
> thank you for your patch regarding allowing libav to build on
> debian/ppc64el in Debian.
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Breno Leitao wrote:
>> Source: libav
>> Version: 10.2
Source: libav
Version: 10.2-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Dear Maintainer,
Currently libav doesn't build on ppc64el because it uses altivec and it is still
failing on ppc64el, causing the package to FTBFS.
I am attaching a patch to disable
Hi Helmut,
On 07/18/2014 03:52 PM, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> While your patch moves a lot of files, it does not address the
> underlying problem. The libpam-ldap package still creates the very same
> configuration files using its postinst script and it still removes them
> in postrm.
Right. As I expl
Hi Kurt,
On 07/21/2014 02:52 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 02:33:46PM -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Any status about this bug? I would like to have it applied in order to
>> support a
>> lot of packages that depends on it.
>
Hi,
Any status about this bug? I would like to have it applied in order to support
a
lot of packages that depends on it.
Ubuntu is using these patches since 14.04 without problem.
Thank you,
Breno
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
Hi,
I played a little bit with this bug, and I find one possible solution is to have
those common config files in a -common package that becomes arch=all. Thus, they
would not be replaced or removed in the scenario reported by Andreas.
In this case, package src:libpam-ldap would generate two bina
201 - 300 of 475 matches
Mail list logo
