Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
David Diaz wrote:
Bdale Garbee wrote:
David Diaz wrote:
I personally think too if the package name is Virtual RMS it
should abide the RMS principles, just to avoid confusion to the
package's users.
I understand your point. I guess I just still hold
Bdale Garbee wrote:
David Diaz wrote:
I personally think too if the package name is Virtual RMS it should
abide the RMS principles, just to avoid confusion to the package's users.
I understand your point. I guess I just still hold out hope that the
FSF may one day again publish
Stefan Monnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I find it funny that Debian's vrms lists emacs21-common-non-dfsg
(vrms is the Virtual RMS which lists the non-free packages installed
on your system). At least if they want to keep the GFDL is not free
principle, they should either rename vrms,
3 matches
Mail list logo
