Why i am on this list? How can i unsubscribe!? On Aug 6, 2017 17:33, "Debian Bug Tracking System" <ow...@bugs.debian.org> wrote:
> Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 12:28:52 -0400 > with message-id <20170806162852.hpshgltvttk7u...@xanadu.blop.info> > and subject line Re: Bug#870981: netdde: should netdde be removed from > unstable? > has caused the Debian Bug report #870981, > regarding netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable? > to be marked as done. > > This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. > If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the > Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. > > (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this > message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system > misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org > immediately.) > > > -- > 870981: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870981 > Debian Bug Tracking System > Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> > To: sub...@bugs.debian.org > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2017 09:50:12 -0400 > Subject: netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable? > Source: netdde > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch > > Hi, > > Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that > missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package > from > unstable, because: > > it was in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze > but wasn't part of stretch > AND > it was in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze > but it wasn't part of jessie > AND > it is still not in testing > AND > it was not uploaded since the beginning of 2017. > > If you disagree and think that this package should remain in unstable, feel > free to just close this bug. > > If this bug is still open one month from now (on 2017-09-06), it will be > turned > into a removal request, using: > > reassign -1 ftp.debian.org > retitle -1 RM: netdde -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch > thanks > > - Lucas, for the QA team. > > > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2017/07/msg00021.html > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> > To: Svante Signell <svante.sign...@gmail.com> > Cc: 870981-d...@bugs.debian.org > Bcc: > Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 12:28:52 -0400 > Subject: Re: Bug#870981: netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable? > On 06/08/17 at 18:16 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Sun, 2017-08-06 at 09:50 -0400, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > Source: netdde > > > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > > > Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages > that > > > missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this > package > > > from > > > unstable, because: > > > > > > it was in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze > > > but wasn't part of stretch > > > AND > > > it was in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze > > > but it wasn't part of jessie > > > AND > > > it is still not in testing > > > AND > > > it was not uploaded since the beginning of 2017. > > > > > > If you disagree and think that this package should remain in unstable, > feel > > > free to just close this bug. > > > > > > If this bug is still open one month from now (on 2017-09-06), it will > be > > > turned > > > into a removal request, using: > > > > > > reassign -1 ftp.debian.org > > > retitle -1 RM: netdde -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch > > > thanks > > > > > > - Lucas, for the QA team. > > > > > > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2017/07/msg00021.html > > > > > > > The same applies as for bug #870985. It is currently used for hurd-i386 > only, > > but is essential for that architecture. Please close this bug too. > > Done, but you know you can do it, too? :-) > > OTOH, with Hurd living on debian-ports, shouldn't hurd-specific packages > live only on debian-ports too? > > Lucas >
