Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Hi,
We (David Miller and I) are already working on this. We finally got some info
dump from a debugging patched kernel and I expect we will have a fix within
the
next 3/4 weeks.
From our first look it seems like a futex bug and some users have reported
that
the
Josip Rodin wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 06:16:05AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
#433187 is the bug that has killed the buildds on lebrun and spontini,
right?
AIUC, yes. at least i can reproduce that on my buildd.
Hi guys,
We (David Miller and I) are already working on this. We
Josip Rodin wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 10:17:33AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
I should mention that lebrun.d.o is still dead since the last attempt
(ssh unresponsive since 2007-08-30 ~21:25), when it was running a 2.6.22.5
with one davem patch applied (one line in kernel
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
On Tue Sep 04, 2007 at 10:17:33 +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
Josip Rodin wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 06:16:05AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
#433187 is the bug that has killed the buildds on lebrun and spontini,
right?
AIUC, yes. at least
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 10:17:33AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
anyway we were able to reproduce the problem by doing some fancy building on
Niagara and that already isolate the problems to a more generic bit of the
code
rather than CPU specific.
I'm able
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 11:07:32AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
Bastian Blank wrote:
But with 2.6.23-rc4 this dies with the niagara problem but the futex one.
What Niagara problem?
It dies on a T2000 within 30 minutes, depending on the load. You said
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
On Tue Sep 04, 2007 at 00:09:53 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
Hi,
#433187 is the bug that has killed the buildds on lebrun and spontini, right?
AIUC, yes. at least i can reproduce that on my buildd.
Greetings
Martin
Hi guys,
We (David Miller and I) are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop wrote:
(Contributors to silo-installer BCC'ed.)
We were recently alerted to the fact that the source for silo-installer
udeb did not include a copyright file. After checking with Ben Collins,
the original author, I have added a
Hi guys,
I had a long conversation with Frans on IRC about this bug and the applied
patch.
I am seeing different issues such as:
1) take a fresh disk with no lvm
2) install using automatic lvm setup and it will work
3) install on it again this time not using lvm and it will work
4) install
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Package: libapache-mod-auth-radius
Severity: serious
Version: 1.5.7-6
Hi there!
Due to the recent removal of apache (including it's accompanied
packages of apache-common, apache-dbg, apache-dev, apache-doc,
apache-perl and apache-ssl) and
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 10:48:28AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: mozilla-browser
Version: 2:1.3-4
Severity: important
Hi all,
the problem is farly simple. open mozilla. access the server.
change the ip/dns entry on server
Mike Hommey wrote:
Okay, I could reproduce half of the problem, but things evolved a few
months after you filed your bug, according to upstream CVS.
They changed their DNS service so that it would only cache DNS entries
for 60 seconds (which you can change if you set the
Traduz - Portuguese Translation Team wrote:
Package: libpam-radius-auth
Version: 1.3.16-4.3
Tags: l10n, patch
Severity: wishlist
Portuguese translation for libpam-radius-auth's debconf messages.
Translator: Ricardo Silva ardoric _at_ gmail.com
Feel free to use it.
For translation
Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
Package: libpam-radius-auth
Version: 1.3.16-4.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Please find the initial German debconf translation for libpam-radius-auth
attached.
Please go ahead and upload. I don't mind direct NMU for translations.
Thanks
Fabio
--
I'm
Brice Goglin wrote:
Hi,
A couple years ago, you both reported a bug to the Debian BTS about IPv6
support in the XFree86 server. It was suppose to work with Xorg. Did you
actually get it to work nowadays. If so, I will close this bug.
Brice
go ahead and close. it works with Xorg.
Fabio
Hi guys,
Javier Ruano wrote:
Package: libpam-radius-auth
Priority: minor
Tags: patch l10n
Attached is the first spanish translation for this package's templates.
Javi.
Don't wait for me, just NMU the package and get the translation in.
Fabio
--
I'm going to make him an offer he
Christine Spang wrote:
Package: libpam-radius-auth
Version: 1.3.16-4.1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hey,
The NMU diff file for libpam-radius-auth 1.3.16-4.1 is
attached here. Thanks!
Hi Christine,
thanks for the wonderful job.
Fabio
--
I'm going to make him an offer he can't
Julien Danjou wrote:
Package: libpam-radius-auth
Version: 1.3.16-4
Severity: important
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
Automatic build of libpam-radius-auth_1.3.16-4 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
Build started at 20060723-1917
Toni Mueller wrote:
Hello,
I'd say that making a LAMP package that includes a lot of PHP stuff
and not much else is sort of hijacking a good name for a bad purpose.
If anything, packages like
lamp-python (best language)
lamp-perl (original definition of LAMP)
lamp-php
(in
Thom May wrote:
I don't see there's any benefit in doing this _at all_, to be honest. It'll
just turn into a whine fest when people don't get exactly what they want
installed, and it then just becomes an unmaintainable mess.
-Thom
That's exactly why i don't want it in apache, and somebody can
Hi guys,
I strongly suggest to give .17 from git a shot. David did push
hell of a lot of smp fixes together with the Niagara support into
mainline.
Fabio
--
I'm going to make him an offer he can't refuse.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Roberto Pariset wrote:
Package: apr-util
Version: 1.2.2-3
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source
Hi,
apr-util seems to FTBFS on everything but i386 because dependencies
cannot be satisfied: E: Couldn't find package libapr1-dev.
Maybe you should replace libapr1-dev with
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006, Mattia Dongili wrote:
Hello!
As I said, customizing the MaxSpeed/MinSpeed/AccelFactor helps (I
discovered this by reading the synaptics manual page) so this README
certainly gives a working config.
Oh, actually it seems they are affected by
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
David N. Welton wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Hi,
Do you mind if a NMU is done to fix this issue?
No, go ahead - thanks!
Perhaps waiting an answer from the maintainer would be better.
Aren't you one of the maintainers?
Yes
David N. Welton wrote:
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
David N. Welton wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Hi,
Do you mind if a NMU is done to fix this issue?
No, go ahead - thanks!
Perhaps waiting an answer from the maintainer would be better.
As Adam already said it is in his tree/queue
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
There are five maintainers listed in the maintainers field. Are you
saying that none of them had time to post a reply that none of them have
time to work on most of the bugs for the past/next year?
Since i don't dig into the other 4 maintainer private lifes and I can
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
There are five maintainers listed in the maintainers field. Are you
saying that none of them had time to post a reply that none of them
have time to work on most of the bugs for the past/next year?
Since i
David N. Welton wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Hi,
Do you mind if a NMU is done to fix this issue?
No, go ahead - thanks!
Perhaps waiting an answer from the maintainer would be better.
As Adam already said it is in his tree/queue for the next upload.
Thanks
Fabio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi,
apparently there are plenty of files like that one with more desperate
notes/copyrights in them.
grep You are not allowed to change this file * -ril | wc -l shows at least 33
files with
such statement.
Fabio
--
I'm going to make him an offer he can't refuse.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
severity 304785 wishlist
stop
Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
Package: apache
Version: 1.3.33-4
Severity: important
Please convert
Include /etc/apache/conf.d
to the:
Include /etc/apache/conf.d/*.conf
The files in this directory are handled
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Leo,
Leo Costela wrote:
| Package: libpam-radius-auth
| Version: 1.3.16-3
| Severity: wishlist
|
| I just got the idea that libpam-radius could use some debconf questions
| (taking the least intrusive path) about automatic integration with PAM,
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bjørn Mork wrote:
| Package: apache-ssl
| Version: 1.3.33-3
| Severity: important
|
| When I just upgraded apache-ssl, the postinst script did these modifications
| without asking me:
This is sounds quite impossible because apache uses debconf via ucf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bjørn Mork wrote:
| Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
|
|Bjørn Mork wrote:
|| Package: apache-ssl
|| Version: 1.3.33-3
|| Severity: important
||
|| When I just upgraded apache-ssl, the postinst script did these modifications
|| without
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bjørn Mork wrote:
| Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
|Bjørn Mork wrote:
|
|| Anything else I should check?
|
|If you can efford to do a test break it would be great if you can rever the
changes
|to the old config and do:
|
|dpkg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bjørn Mork wrote:
| Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
|
|Ah hold on.. one more test please.. i forgot about the md5sum check.
|
|Put the old config in place and edit (very carefully!) /var/lib/ucf/hashfile
|with the proper md5sum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
JpL wrote:
| Package: apache
| Version: 1.3.33-3
| Severity: grave
| Justification: renders package unusable
|
|
| Unclear if this is a package mismatch issue or whether something more
| serious is going on. Can provide an strace on request.
|
It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
| Joost De Cock wrote:
| | On Tuesday 11 January 2005 10:02, you shoved this in my mailbox:
| |
| |Joost De Cock wrote:
| || Package: libpam-radius-auth
| || Version: 1.3.16-2
| || Severity: important
| ||
| ||
| || I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tag 291312 wishlist
tag 291312 upstream
tag 291312 wontfix
merge 291312 156972
thanks
JOZJAN.net wrote:
| Package: apache
| Version: 1.3.33-2 i386
|
| I tryed download 3GB file from my webserver but it returned wrong filesize.
| It looks like int
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Schulze wrote:
| Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
|
|The package was not released with woody. I am working right now to check sid.
|
|
| What about the attached patch?
|
| Regards,
|
| Joey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joost De Cock wrote:
| Package: libpam-radius-auth
| Version: 1.3.16-2
| Severity: important
|
|
| I'm trying to set up Radius authentication on a stock Debian Sarge
| installation.
| The PAM Radius module sends out the loopback IP address as the 'NAS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joost De Cock wrote:
| On Tuesday 11 January 2005 10:02, you shoved this in my mailbox:
|
|Joost De Cock wrote:
|| Package: libpam-radius-auth
|| Version: 1.3.16-2
|| Severity: important
||
||
|| I'm trying to set up Radius authentication on a stock
41 matches
Mail list logo
