On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 19:05:51 -0400 Michael Gilbert
mgilb...@debian.org wrote:
A recent version of the package updates /etc/lightdm/lightdm.conf, but
if the user elects to not use the new maintainer conffile, this
problem will occur.
Dear all,
sorry for the delayed reply. I could indeed
Package: lightdm
Version: 1.10.2-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Hello,
I cannot start lightdm on my system with Intel graphics since yesterday's
upgrade from 1.10.1-3 to 1.10.2-1.
The service fails with:
root@nostromo:~# systemctl start lightdm
Job for
Package: libwebkitgtk-1.0-0
Version: 2.4.5-1
Severity: important
Hello,
I was trying to start pytrainer and I had the following crash:
jack@nostromo:~$ pytrainer
running pytrainer from egg installation
data_path: /usr/share/pytrainer/
gettext_path: /usr/share/locale
site_path:
Package: thinkfan
Version: 0.9.2-1
Followup-For: Bug #747501
Dear Carsten, dear Evgeni,
I also have the same problem. I have added the option in /etc/modules and
rebuilt my initrd, but upon a reboot the error still persists and:
jack@vasquez:~$ cat
Dear Matias, dear Jay,
I previously reported that the issue was fixed, but apparently it's not
that easy.
I am now struggling with the following software versions:
(1) hplip 3.13.4 from Sid
(2) libtiff4 3.9.6-11 from Sid
(3) hplip 3.12.6 from testing
(4) libtiff4 3.9.4 from squeeze (!)
At first
Package: hplip
Version: 3.13.4-1
Followup-For: Bug #605589
Hello,
since the update to 3.13.4 I cannot seem to print with my P1005.
When sending a job to the printer, a window pops up asking to install the
plugin. When following the dialogs, they end saying that the plugin is
installed, followed
Package: libtiff4
Followup-For: Bug #671396
Hello everyone, I used to observe the same behaviour on my P1005 printer and I
had locked libtiff4 to 3.9.6-2. However I just noticed that the libtiff4
installed is 3.9.6-11 and the printer works.
So I'm not sure if going from -10 to -11 fixed the issue
Package: gnome-shell
Followup-For: Bug #670097
Hello everybody,
after upgrading to gnome-shell 3.4.1-1 (from experimental) I don't seem to
observe this behaviour anymore. I suggest you try upgrading and confirm if it
fixes the problem for you as well.
On a related note the window decoration is
Dear Victor, dear all,
I just installed a couple of extensions (dock and alternate menu) and
they work perfectly on my system (debian Sid kept up-to-date).
If you need to test stuff please let me know.
Thanks for packaging the extensions!
--
laser, n.: Failed death ray.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Am I correct in assuming that anyone with that line in their sources.list
will
have a failed upgrade?
Assumption is correct.
I had the same errors and corrected them manually in /var/lib/dpkg/available.
Dear Aurelien, dear all,
for unrelated reasons I had to reinstall my system and now everything
works fine with the latest libc6.
I suppose there was some sort of horrible conflict somewhere.
Hopefully it won't be reproducible anywhere else.
As far as I'm concerned, case closed.
--
To
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-rc8-amd64
Version: Please enable GL860
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
since 2.6.32 a new webcam driver has been included in the gspca suite.
This driver manages webcams based on the gl860 usb chipset by Genesys Logic,
found in many laptops.
I have helped the developers in
Package: nvidia-kernel-source
Version: 190.42-3
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source
Hello,
I upgraded my kernel to 2.6.32rc8 from unstable and I tried to build the
latest nvidia driver against it. The build failed with the following
problem:
[snip]
LD [M]
Dear Aurelien, dear all,
I was trying once more the upgrade to libc6-2.10.2-2 and I have noticed
that when dpkg configures libc6, it spits out a message like:
dpkg: considering deconfiguration of libc6, which would be broken by
installation of libc-bin ...
dpkg: yes, will deconfigure libc6
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 19:28 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Are you using libpam-mount?
Hello Aurelien,
thanks for keeping up with this.
I have upgraded my desktop system to 2.10.1-5 and everything works fine,
while the laptop still gives the same problem when upgrading to this
version.
I also
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 15:41 +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
Do you have /var/log/dpkg.log? Even if it does not contain the action
that failed first, the lines before the failure may show if packages
were being installed in an unexpected order.
Hi Gabor,
thanks for helping out.
Here it is, I can't
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 08:10 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Do you have the list of packages that have been upgraded?
I wish I did, but as soon as debconf asked would you like to upgrade
libc6 now? and I answered yes, the system became completely unusable.
However, my desktop has not been
Ok, I took a shortcut.
I booted a livecd and I mounted the / partition of the laptop.
Then I downloaded the following files:
libc6_2.9-27_amd64.deb
libc6-dev_2.9-27_amd64.deb
libc6-i386_2.9-27_amd64.deb
and unpacked them in the newly mounted directory:
$ dpkg-deb -X
Hello everyone,
180.44-2 still does not build against 2.6.28, but it does build fine
against 2.6.29, both debian stock kernels and headers.
linux-kbuild are homemade since they seem to be missing from unstable
and they are built according to:
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 14:42 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Could you try changing the line in
/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel/conftest.h that says:
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,29)
to
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,27)
And then doing module-assistant again
Sorry, I sent twice the bug report.
Please close this one.
--
The Consultant's Curse: When the customer has beaten upon you long
enough, give him what he asks for, instead of what he needs. This is
very strong medicine, and is normally only required once.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Sjoerd Simons wrote:
Which hack ?
This one:
In file /etc/udev/hal.rules change
ENV{SEQNUM}==[0-9]*, ENV{UDEVD_EVENT}==1,
RUN+=/usr/lib/hal/hal.hotplug
with
ENV{SEQNUM}==[0-9]*, ENV{UDEVD_EVENT}==1,
RUN+=/usr/lib/hal/hal.hotplug $env{SUBSYSTEM}
Debian Sid on AMD64, hal 0.5.6-2 and udev
I'd like to confirm that hal 0.5.6-2 doesn't handle mounting properly.
I started hald like this:
# hald --daemon=no --verbose=yes
and plugging in a USB thumbdrive (/dev/sdc as I have two SATA drives)
does not trigger *any* events.
The device is correctly created by udev:
nostromo:~# ls -l
Christian Perrier wrote:
So, this may be summarized to name resolution not working after the base
system install, right ?
Yes, I guess yes.
So far, we haven't seem much of such reports, so getting access to
more information about the installation process itself, and especially
the logs
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc3/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
downloaded on May 28th, 2005.
uname -a: N/A
Date: May 28th, 2005
Method: CD burned correctly using cdrecord (via GnomeBaker) on a Fedora
Core 3
Package: kernel-source
Version: 2.6.11-1
Hi there,
yesterday I have tried to compile debianized kernel 2.6.11-1 but every
try failed with this error message:
ld: drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/built-in.o: No such file: No such file or directory
Adding that file from vanilla kernel tree works just fine, so
26 matches
Mail list logo
