we do not have a
> regression once after the DSA is released?
I'm working on it this week end. It is a major release upgrade. I hope
to release it at the beginning of next week.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
diff -Nru slurm-wlm-contrib-22.05.8/debian/changelog
slurm-wlm-contrib-22.05.8/debian/chang
.
Please let me know if I can be of any further help.
I take this opportunity to wish you and to all the security team members
a successful and prosperous new year.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 06:21:05AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Source: slurm-wlm
> V
changes are documented in the d/changelog
[x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
[x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
unblock slurm-wlm-contrib/22.05.8-4
--
Gennaro Oliva
]
[x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
[x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
[x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
unblock slurm-wlm/22.05.8-4
--
Gennaro Oliva
diff -Nru slurm-wlm-22.05.8/debian/changelog slurm-wlm-22.05.8/debian/changelog
--- slurm-wlm-22.05.8
Hi Sebastian,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:00:23PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Feasible yes, but with the caveat that mpich is a key package. So if
> there are any issues with the transition, we'll ask for a revert.
sure.
> Gennaro, please go ahead.
thanks!
Best regards,
--
faces, but I did not tested it
thoroughly since I want a solution that works out of the box.
Therefore I decided to patch the slurm code that is failing in order to
retry getaddrinfo before giving up starting daemons.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
|3
5 files changed, 248 insertions(+)
debdiff attached
unblock munge/0.5.14-6
[1] https://github.com/dun/munge/commit/0c37cc03b649d8861c2d9e8d172bff736bfd9ea4
--
Gennaro Oliva
diff -Nru munge-0.5.14/debian/changelog munge-0.5.14/debian/changelog
--- munge-0.5.14/debian
es
> spuriously blocks package migrations (that used to block hwloc, but a
> rebuild fixed it).
autopkgtest sometimes fails upon mariadb installation:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977114
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
as emerged here:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2020/12/msg00187.html
and patch Britney if it's the case or document how to handle this kind
of situations.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
. Starting from version 20.02.6-1
the suffix is also purged from the configuration directories.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
/8577097/log.gz
This doesn't happen for any other architecture:
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=slurm-wlm
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
d doesn't build the corresponding plugin.
I'm fixing this.
Thank you both for your report.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
4 mpirun mympiprogram ...
or
sbatch -n 4 mympiprogram.sh
where mympiprogram.sh is something like:
#!/bin/sh
mpirun mympiprogram ...
Notice you don't need to specify the number of processes to mpirun, as
it takes it from SLURM.
[1] https://www.open-mpi.org/faq/?category=slurm
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
+, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> Just to note: pmix is already packaged in Debian, but needs to be enabled.
Thanks for pointing this out Alastair.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
etc/systemd/system/slurmd.service.d
man systemd.unit(5) for details.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
---
2 files changed, 17 deletions(-)
Regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
diff -Nru slurm-llnl-16.05.9/debian/changelog
slurm-llnl-16.05.9/debian/changelog
--- slurm-llnl-16.05.9/debian/changelog 2019-05-27 09:48:30.0 +0200
+++ slurm-llnl-16.05.9/debian/changelog 2019-02-12 23:34:26.0 +0100
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 03:23:45PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2019-05-27 11:23, Gennaro Oliva wrote:
> > I have prepared an updated version of the package available here:
> >
> > https://people.debian.org/~oliva/slurm-llnl-16.05.9-1+deb9u4/
>
> I
org/~oliva/slurm-llnl-16.05.9-1+deb9u4/
debdiff attached, diffstat follows:
changelog |6 --
patches/CVE-2019-6438 | 11 ---
2 files changed, 17 deletions(-)
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
diff -Nru slurm-llnl-16.05.9/debian/changelog
slurm-llnl-16.05.9/debian/change
ld make
services fail to start.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
.
debdiff attached, diffstat follows:
changelog |7 +
patches/CVE-2019-6438 | 67 ++
patches/series|1
3 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
Thanks
--
Gennaro Oliva
diff -Nru slurm-llnl-16.05.9/debian/changelog
slurm-llnl
nks for your work, I'm sorry I didn't see the merge request. The
patch looks fine although I haven't tested it yet. Unfortunately there
is not enough time to include this feature in buster. I will add it
right after buster is released.
Best Regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
Hi Yuri,
thanks for using the slurm package.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 01:06:10PM +0200, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> Dear maintaner, it would be nice to have the new slurm 18 version
> available in Debian.
I'm working on it.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
m-llnl will fix it.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
nu/libpmi2.so.1
libpmix2: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpmi2.so.1.0.0
What do you think?
Regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
ther package
> libpmix-pmi-dev ? (name?)
> (2) Shipping only one pmi-dev package ?
what about using alternatives? By doing so, every resource manager and
mpi library can install it's own implementation.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
l.
thanks for your help. I saw #870829 only after filing this, that's
why I mergerd the bugs.
My apologies for this useless report.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
sing-build-dependency-for-dh-addon autotools_dev => autotools-dev
But if I add the autotools-dev dependency to the Build-Depends I get the
following warning:
useless-autoreconf-build-depends autotools-dev
This problem is very similar to #869541
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
nux-gnu/security/libpam_slurm.so
>
> So something in the multi-arch renaming incorrectly moves it to
> libpam_slurm.so.
did you experienced this bug in a more recent version of libpam-slurm?
I was never able to reproduce it.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
. The diffstat is:
changelog |7 +
patches/CVE-2016-10030 | 198 +
patches/series |1
3 files changed, 206 insertions(+)
Thanks
--
Gennaro Oliva
diff -Nru slurm-llnl-14.03.9/debian/changelog
slurm-llnl-14.03.9/debian/changelog
tags 850891 + wontfix
Hi Rémi and Karl,
since the discussion about this possible feature is over I'm tagging
this old bug with wontfix.
Thanks for your contribution
--
Gennaro Oliva
mentFile) but indeed I need to check upstream
more regularly.
Thanks again for your help
--
Gennaro Oliva
ropriate, so I submitted the simpler change first!
I think that a package for the user creation is a bit excessive.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
since previous version of the package added user
without specifying "/nonexistent", therefore when updating from those
releases we need to modify this information.
[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.2.2
[2]
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-debian-maint-scripts
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
Hi Ryan,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 02:02:52PM -0800, Ryan Lovett wrote:
> Please pass
> --enable-multiple-slurmd to the first dh_auto_configure line.
multiple slurmd support will be added in the next upcoming release of
the package.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
coming release of the package.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
Hi Frederik,
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 12:27:40PM +0100, Frederik Himpe wrote:
> I needed to install libswitch-perl to make qstat work.
thanks for pointing this out.
I will include this dependency in the next package release.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
/share/doc/slurm-wlm/README.Debian
please find it attached for your convenience.
I will make the slurmd binary package provide a copy of the
README.Debian in the next release.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
Configuration Instructions
==
In order to use SLURM you need a prop
much for this report!
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
/acct_gather_energy_rapl.so
This is due to a missing build depends on libipmimonitoring-dev.
Thank you very much for this report!
Regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Hi Jan,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 01:48:00AM +0200, Jan Braun wrote:
Thank you for maintaining munge.
Thank you for reporting and for the patch.
Regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
option outputs nothing I can find. I haven't straced sshd
yet.)
Please let me know, if you find out why it is not working or help me to
replicate your situation.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
will to find a
better solution for the next release.
Best regards,
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Dear Ana and Remi,
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:26:30PM +0200, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote:
I've prepared an NMU for munge (versioned as 0.5.11-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
this patch is perfect for me.
Thanks for your help
--
Gennaro
already incorporated the patch in the new source, but I still
need some days to release the new version.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
is a 25M package, I do not think it's worth it.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
is
already in the upload queue as you can see from this page:
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
Any new upload will remain there until Wheezy is out.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.0~rc3
Severity: important
Hi,
in a manual page of my package there is this sentence:
The number of microseconds that the slurmctld daemon requires to process
an epilog completion message from the slurmd dameons.
and lintian complain about:
slurm-llnl:
Hi Julien,
thank you very much for your parch.
--
Gennaro Oliva
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 04:16:55PM +0100, Julien-externe BLACHE wrote:
tags 575822 + patch
thanks
Hi,
The attached patch adds binary packages for the Perl modules and Torque
wrappers.
Patch is against 2.2.1-1 from Sid
The problem of building the package more than once have been fixed,
but I'm not closing the bug till I don't overhaul the package as
suggested. Thanks for your help
--
Gennaro Oliva
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:40:17PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Source: slurm-llnl
Version: 2.2.1-1
Severity
processing:
slurm-llnl-slurmdbd
this problem was definitely fixed in version 2.1.11-1squeeze3
that has already been uploaded to testing-proposed-updates.
Check #604207. Thanks for your report.
Best Regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
is not essential, the postrm cannot rely on it being available during
purge even with the dependency.
A new packages that fix this bug has been prepared and is about to be
uploaded.
Thank you very much for your feedback.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ
) is not explained.
Maybe you should consider to write an advice in the Debian.README (the
first file anybody reads when trying to configure a new package) where
you clearly state that you need the mrtg package if you want the
LogFormat: rrdtool.
Best regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Package: mrtg-rrd
Version: 0.7-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
mrtg-rrd should depend on the package rrdtool because it cannot
work without it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (800, 'testing'), (700, 'stable'),
already has a function
named getline(), which now conflicts with glibc's. You need to rename
your function to something else.
This problem will be fixed in release 2.0.8 that should be available in
a week. I'm waiting for it since it also fix some other warnings.
Regards
--
Gennaro Oliva
blcr-util,
build-dep libcr-dev and then adding --with-blcr=/usr/lib to the ./configure
line in debian/rules.
I was already planning to add this feature in the next release.
Thank you
--
Gennaro Oliva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi, thanks for your patch it will be included in the next package
release.
--
Gennaro
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 09:19:06PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Hi. Any hope of having this fixed soon? Let me know if I should not
NMU to get a fix into the archive.
Note that some code is probably
56 matches
Mail list logo
