Source: umap-learn
Version: 0.5.4+dfsg-1
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
Your package has a dependency, build-dependency or autopkgtest
dependency on python3-numba. Numba is currently not compatible with
Python 3.12, although support is
Source: spopt
Version: 0.5.0-4
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
Your package has a dependency, build-dependency or autopkgtest
dependency on python3-numba. Numba is currently not compatible with
Python 3.12, although support is expected
Source: resampy
Version: 0.4.2+ds-3
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
Your package has a dependency, build-dependency or autopkgtest
dependency on python3-numba. Numba is currently not compatible with
Python 3.12, although support is expe
Source: python-xarray
Version: 2023.11.0-2
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
Your package has a dependency, build-dependency or autopkgtest
dependency on python3-numba. Numba is currently not compatible with
Python 3.12, although support
Source: python-sparse
Version: 0.14.0-1
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
Your package has a dependency, build-dependency or autopkgtest
dependency on python3-numba. Numba is currently not compatible with
Python 3.12, although support is
Source: python-qmix
Version: 1.0.6-5
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
Your package has a dependency, build-dependency or autopkgtest
dependency on python3-numba. Numba is currently not compatible with
Python 3.12, although support is exp
Source: python-pynndescent
Version: 0.5.8-2
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
Your package has a dependency, build-dependency or autopkgtest
dependency on python3-numba. Numba is currently not compatible with
Python 3.12, although support
Source: python-loompy
Version: 3.0.7+dfsg-2
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
Your package has a dependency, build-dependency or autopkgtest
dependency on python3-numba. Numba is currently not compatible with
Python 3.12, although support
Source: python-epimodels
Version: 0.4.0-2
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
Your package has a dependency, build-dependency or autopkgtest
dependency on python3-numba. Numba is currently not compatible with
Python 3.12, although support i
Source: python-disptrans
Version: 0.0.1-2
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
Your package has a dependency, build-dependency or autopkgtest
dependency on python3-numba. Numba is currently not compatible with
Python 3.12, although support i
Source: python-cogent
Version: 2023.2.12a1+dfsg-4
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
Your package has a dependency, build-dependency or autopkgtest
dependency on python3-numba. Numba is currently not compatible with
Python 3.12, although s
Source: pynpoint
Version: 0.11.0-1
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
Your package has a dependency, build-dependency or autopkgtest
dependency on python3-numba. Numba is currently not compatible with
Python 3.12, although support is expec
Source: poliastro
Version: 0.17.0-2
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
Your package has a dependency, build-dependency or autopkgtest
dependency on python3-numba. Numba is currently not compatible with
Python 3.12, although support is expe
Source: libpysal
Version: 4.9.2-1
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
Your package has a dependency, build-dependency or autopkgtest
dependency on python3-numba. Numba is currently not compatible with
Python 3.12, although support is expect
Source: hyperspy
Version: 1.7.3-1
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
Your package has a dependency, build-dependency or autopkgtest
dependency on python3-numba. Numba is currently not compatible with
Python 3.12, although support is expect
Source: gubbins
Version: 3.3.0-3
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
Your package has a dependency, build-dependency or autopkgtest
dependency on python3-numba. Numba is currently not compatible with
Python 3.12, although support is expecte
Source: genx
Version: 3.6.22-2
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
Your package has a dependency, build-dependency or autopkgtest
dependency on python3-numba. Numba is currently not compatible with
Python 3.12, although support is expected
Source: ffcv
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
Your package has a dependency, build-dependency or autopkgtest
dependency on python3-numba. Numba is currently not compatible with
Python 3.12, although support is expected i
Source: esda
Version: 2.5.1-1
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
Your package has a dependency, build-dependency or autopkgtest
dependency on python3-numba. Numba is currently not compatible with
Python 3.12, although support is expected i
Source: epigrass
Version: 3.0.3+dfsg-2
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
Your package has a dependency, build-dependency or autopkgtest
dependency on python3-numba. Numba is currently not compatible with
Python 3.12, although support is e
Source: bioxtasraw
Version: 2.2.1-1
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
Your package has a dependency, build-dependency or autopkgtest
dependency on python3-numba. Numba is currently not compatible with
Python 3.12, although support is expe
Source: pandas
Version: 1.5.3+dfsg-9
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
Your package has a dependency, build-dependency or autopkgtest
dependency on python3-numba. Numba is currently not compatible with
Python 3.12, although support is exp
Source: numpy
Version: 1:1.24.2-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Hi Maintainer
Numpy's autopkgtests fail on some architectures, e.g. arm64 [1], when
tested with Python 3.12 (i.e. with python3-defaults 3.11.6-1 from
unstable). I've copied what I hope is
Source: prody
Version: 2.3.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Hi Maintainer
The autopkgtest of prody 2.3.1+dfsg-3 is failing when tested with
numpy 1:1.24.2-2 [1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of
the log below.
Regar
Source: gammapy
Version: 1.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
gammapy FTBFS [1] with Python 3.12 as a supported version. I've
copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below.
Regards
Graham
[1] https://buildd.debi
Source: pymatgen
Version: 2023.06.23+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
pymatgen FTBFS [1] with Python 3.12 as a supported version. I've copied
what I hope is the relevant part of the log below.
Regards
Graham
[1] http
Source: cctbx
Version: 2022.9+ds2+~3.11.2+ds1-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs sid trixie
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
cctbx FTBFS [1] with Python 3.12 as a supported version. I've copied
what I hope is the relevant part of the log below.
Regards
Graha
Control: severity -1 important
This was worked around in 0.5.8-4.1. Downgrading severity for now.
Source: python-grpc-tools
Version: 1.14.1-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs sid trixie
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
python-grpc-tools FTBFS [1] with Python 3.12 as a supported version.
I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below.
Regards
Source: pygame
Version: 2.5.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
pygame FTBFS [1] with Python 3.12 as a supported version. I've copied
what I hope is the relevant part of the log below.
Regards
Graham
[1] https://buildd.debi
Source: pyferret
Version: 7.6.5-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12 python3-all-dev
Hi Maintainer
This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build
extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions. This is seen
on the t
Source: pybj
Version: 0.2.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs sid trixie
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
pybj FTBFS [1] with Python 3.12 as a supported version. I've copied
what I hope is the relevant part of the log below.
Regards
Graham
[1] https://build
Hi Bas
On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 at 16:16, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> FWIW, all except two hopelessly broken packages now have patches to use
> cython3-legacy for the time being.
Thanks for your work on this!
Regards
Graham
For reference, there are still quite a number of packages (84
unclassified, right now) [1], that FTBFS with cython 3.0.
[1]
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=cython3;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Hi Andreas
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 at 07:21, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I have no idea how to work around this.
I found a workaround; demote pandoc from a Depends to a Recommends in
the r-cran-rmarkdown package. It seems that pandoc is not used for
building, at least for r-bioc-biovizbase, -degnorm, -io
Hi Rebecca
On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 at 07:03, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> If they are all crashes rather than wrong answers (which I think they
> are), I intend to ignore them for now to unblock this, but still
> consider them bugs.
That sounds good, thank you!
Regards
Graham
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tags -1 + ftbfs
Hi Rebecca
We've reached the point in adding Python 3.12 as a supported version
[1] where these test failures should easily be reproducible in
unstable now.
Regards
Graham
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2023/12/msg0.html
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 10:03, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> wait until 3.12.1 is in the archive. 3.12.0+ isn't well handled as a
> version by some third party libraries.
binNMUs are now in progress with python3.12 3.12.0-7 in unstable.
python3.12 (3.12.0-7) unstable; ur
Source: pynormaliz
Version: 2.18+ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Hi Maintainer
As can be seen in reproducible builds [1], pynormaliz currently FTBFS
in testing and unstable. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part
of the log below.
Regards
Graham
[1] https://tests.reproducible-builds.
Source: pymupdf
Version: 1.22.5+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Hi Maintainer
As can be seen in reproducible builds [1], pymupdf currently FTBFS in
testing and unstable. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of
the log below.
Regards
Graham
[1] https://tests.reproducible-builds.org
Source: cctools
Version: 9.9-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev
Hi Maintainer
This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build
extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions. This is seen
on the tran
Source: unrardll
Version: 0.1.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Hi Maintainer
The package unrardll requires a binary upload since it is in contrib
and cannot be built on the buildds [1].
Please upload the binary package python3-unrardll_0.1.7-1+b1_amd64.deb to
the archive. There is no need for
Source: mapclassify
Version: 2.6.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Hi Maintainer
mapclassify has a build-dependency on python3-libpysal which is no
longer in testing.
Please drop this build-dependency or help get python3-libpysal back
into testing.
In addition, if any of mapclassify's build-dep
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi Andreas
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 at 09:31, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I confirm this might be a fast solution. However, this would mean to
> restrict the functionality of the package for architectures where the
> package is used just to work around a compilation error where th
Hi Andreas
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 at 07:21, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Charles Plessy and I uploaded r-bioc-* packages until level 11.
> Unfortunately building of some packages seems to be blocked for
>
> A: some pandoc dependency reason
> pandoc depends on missing:
> - pandoc-data:amd64
Hi Andreas
I see the following in #1042548 [1]:
> On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 10:02:08 +0530 Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > New version of rhdf5filters enables vbz and zstd compression as well but
> > these have been ignored with a debian specific patch. As a result it
> > enables only lz, blosc and bzip2.
>
>
Hi Andreas
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 at 06:48, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I have a totally different question concerning the transition.
I see you have also asked this in #1054657 [1]. That is a better place.
Regards
Graham
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054657#241
Source: r-bioc-rhdf5filters
Version: 1.12.1+dfsg2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
A commit on 2023-08-01 [1] added a build-dependency on
libvbz-hdf-plugin-dev, which is not available on big-endian
architectures, and prevents r-bioc-rhdf5fil
Hi Dirk
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 00:51, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Ping squared.
>
> If I don't hear from you I may just close this. I believe this (non-, to me)
> issue has been taken care of. If you think I am wrong please let me know.
I closed it on 2023-11-24 [1]. Where do you see it still o
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Hi Andreas
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 13:50, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Looks good. So if I understood correctly we are now rather waiting for
> some infrastructure issues to start the transition and we should simply
> sit-n-wait for the green light, right?
Please go ahead
Source: mumps
Version: 5.6.2-1
Severity: minor
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-lto
Hi Maintainer
MUMPS currently fails to build (at least on the amd64
architecture) with link time optimizations enabled. For a background
for LTO please see
https://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/LTO
Hi All
I'm catching up after some AFK time, so I will just fill in some
details where I can.
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 08:31, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > I have no idea why r-cran-seurat is not profiting from reduced waiting
> > time for the transition.
>
> Because its tests fail on armel. The reduction
Hi Andreas
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 13:07, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Since I have no idea what the failures in r-cran-seurat test
> log[6] mean I would prefer to wait until we can upload the latest
> version.
>
>
> [6] https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/r-cran-seurat/unstable/amd64/40043272/
I had a lo
With cython 0.29, there are test failures, as can be seen in the
upstream bug report:
https://github.com/scikit-bio/scikit-bio/issues/1897
Control: tags -1 + patch
The attached patch, cherry-picked from upstream, works for me.
Description: locale.format --> locale.format_string
locale.format was deprecated in Python 3.7, see
https://docs.python.org/3/library/locale.html#locale.format
Origin: upstream, https://github.com/biocore/bio
Source: python-biom-format
Version: 2.1.12-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs sid trixie
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
python-biom-format FTBFS with Python 3.12 as a supported version.
I've copied below what I hope is the relevant part of the log.
Regards
Hi Andreas
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 06:59, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > We liked the change you made to r-cran-tmb [2], as this allows the
> > affected packages to be binNMU'd and gain a versioned dependency on
> > r-cran-matrix. Would you please apply this to the other affected
> > packages (only r-c
Hi Dirk
On Sun, 19 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> So it contains a patch by Mikael which had been applied _permitting Matrix
> 1.6-2_ to get to CRAN. So for this particular pair it was the other way
> around.
Great, thanks for clearing that up.
> So I leave this in your hands. I
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Andreas
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 at 09:10, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Thanks to the hint from Charles I found that SparseArray is not new in
> Bioconductor and we can build the previous version with the current
> packages in unstable which I did and uploaded to new.
Thanks
Hi Andreas
On Sat, 18 Nov 2023 at 19:18, Andreas Tille wrote:
> We need some means to follow ABI changes. In Debian we could use
> something like r-matrix-abi-VERSION.
Indeed, this is one solution. As you saw in [1], upstream now provide
an ABI version and a way to extract it:
> Matrix will co
Hi Dirk
On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 12:42, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Doesn't 'normal' do that?
No, only serious and above are considered RC [1] and also for migration.
This week, Paul Gevers and I spent some time discussing ways to move
this transition forward.
Referring back to some of your previ
Source: skimage
Version: 0.22.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Hi Maintainer
As can be seen on reproducible builds [1], skimage currently FTBFS in
testing and unstable. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of
the log below.
Regards
Graham
[1] https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/deb
Hi Matthias
Are you sure that cython 3.0.x is required for Python 3.12?
The changelog from cython 0.29.36-1 has:
* New upstream release.
- Includes Python 3.12 support (Closes: #1004725)
and upstream's changelog [1] mentions Python 3.12 a couple of times.
Please also see my message [2] i
Hi
FWIW, I recently did a test rebuild of packages in Ubuntu Mantic [1]
(so packages are ~2.5 months behind unstable) against Cython 3.0.5.
Of the 279 source packages I identified as having a build-dependency
on src:cython, 163 built successfully, 115 FTBFS and one (qutip) FTBFS
on amd64 only and
Hi Dirk
On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 12:01, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Well that seems to be a) the wrong severity and b) the wrong package.
Both are correct. We do not want rmatrix to migrate and break
packages in testing.
However, in this case, I only set the severity to match reality;
rmatrix is
Source: rmatrix
Version: 1.6-2-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: debia...@lists.debian.org
Hi Dirk
I'm opening this bug as a place for discussion and to track the
affected packages. It can be closed once rmatrix and its
reverse-dependencies are ready to migrate.
I've copied your email to the de
Source: cfgrib
Version: 0.9.10.4-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Hi Maintainer
The upload of cfgrib 0.9.10.4-2 is failing its own autopkgtest [1].
I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below.
Regards
Graham
[1] https://ci.debian.net/p
Source: python-sparse
Version: 0.14.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Hi Maintainer
The upload of python-sparse 0.14.0-1 is failing its own autopkgtest on
arm64 and s390x [1][2]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part
of the log below.
Regards
Gra
Source: matplotlib
Version: 3.6.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Hi Maintainer
matplotlib has a build-dependency on python3-xarray which is no longer
in testing.
Please drop this build-dependency or help get python3-xarray back into testing.
Regards
Graham
Source: pandas
Version: 1.5.3+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Hi Maintainer
pandas has a build-dependency on python3-xarray which is no longer in testing.
Please drop this build-dependency or help get python3-xarray back into testing.
Regards
Graham
Source: python-pyproj
Version: 3.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Hi Maintainer
python-pyproj has a build-dependency on python3-xarray which is no
longer in testing.
Please drop this build-dependency or help get python3-xarray back into testing.
Regards
Graham
Source: spyder-kernels
Version: 2.4.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Hi Maintainer
spyder-kernels has a build-dependency on python3-xarray which is no
longer in testing.
Please drop this build-dependency or help get python3-xarray back into testing.
Regards
Graham
HI Andreas
On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 at 16:06, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Sorry, my question was probably confusing. I was not talking about the
> new packages. I was talking about the 170 r-bioc-* packages. If I
> upload these to experimental, will it be necessary to upload these to
> unstable again or
Hi Matthias
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 07:15, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please setup a tracker to add python3.12 as a supported python3 version. This
> is
> non-blocking, as packages can migrate on their own once built. I'm not yet
> starting this, just want to have an overview of affected packages.
>
Hi Andreas
On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 at 04:33, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Can you confirm that packages uploaded to experimental can be moved in
> one rush from experimental to unstable without extra uploads?
I don't think this has ever been possible. The packages would need to
be uploaded again to unsta
Control: found -1 1.9.6-2
> still depends on:
> r-cran-matrix (>= 1.6-1.1)
>
> So the version is still not correct.
Note that this is Depends, not Build-Depends.
I found that in debian/control, r-cran-tmb has Depends:
r-cran-matrix (>= 1.5-3-1~), but this is somehow replaced in the
binary packag
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Andreas
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 14:03, Andreas Tille wrote:
> The BioConductor transition will bump the virtual package
> r-api-bioc-3.17 to r-api-bioc-3.18.
>
> BTW, I'm aware that a couple of r-bioc-* packages did not yet migrated
> to testing due to some autopkgt
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Mo
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 15:36, M. Zhou wrote:
> We can start the transition for utf8proc, which recently got an
> SOVERSION bump from 2 to 3. I tested the reverse dependencies
> on ppc64el and all of them are fine. The results for amd64 should
> be the same.
Plea
Hi Alastair
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 10:34, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> Apologies for not treating this properly as a transition. Changes have
> been limited to adding new symbols to the set, I had not thought that
> this would break dependencies.
It seems that every new unicode-data upstream vers
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
The severity of this bug keeps mtink out of testing, and needs more information.
On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 at 00:27, Santiago Vila wrote:
> OTOH, if this bug is being kept open to track something
> different (what Graham Inggs called "a recurring problem"
> in a previous message), maybe it would make sense to
> retitle at least.
It seems a similar problem
Source: satpy
Version: 0.43.0-5
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Hi Maintainer
Since the upload of python-xarray 2023.09.0-1, the autopkgtests of
satpy are failing [1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part
of the log below.
Regards
Graham
[1] https://ci.debian.n
Source: python-xarray
Version: 2023.09.0-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Hi Maintainer
There are new autopkgtest failures on s390x [1] which seem to be
related to endianness, dtype('>M8[ns]') vs dtype('https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/python-xarray/unstab
I don't think disabling LTO is the correct solution here.
At least, view3dscene 4.2.0-2 still FTBFS in Ubuntu with:
/usr/bin/ld.bfd: -f may not be used without -shared
Please consider the patch that was applied in Ubuntu [1], which
filters out -ffat-lto-objects from LDFLAGS.
--- a/debian/rules
+
Please coordinate transitions with the release team.
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions
Hi Bastian
On Wed, 20 Sept 2023 at 13:30, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Please drop doublecmd-gtk or make it a transitional package to doublecmd-qt.
I'd rather not do that. doublecmd-qt does not integrate well with the
default GNOME desktop.
Also, per popcon [1], doublecmd-gtk has almost four times
Control: found -1 1.7.0-2
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: affects -1 + nipype
The removal of the python3-dipy-lib s390x binary has caused nipype's
autopkgtest to regress in testing [1].
I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below.
[1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/n/nip
Source: setuptools
Version: 68.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Hi Maintainer
As per reproducible builds [1], setuptools started to FTBFS in trixie
and unstable sometime around 2023-08-28.
I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below.
Regards
Graham
[1] https://tests.repro
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 src:insighttoolkit5 5.3.0-5
Hi Flavien
On Mon, 18 Sept 2023 at 14:24, Flavien Bridault
wrote:
>
> My message was maybe missed during the summer, I give a new attempt... I can
> offer a hand to provide the ITK patch if that can help...
Let me try clonin
Control: reopen -1
Something went wrong and r-cran-rgdal/1.6-7+dfsg-1 migrated back into
testing on 2023-09-14.
Hi Rafael
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 09:04, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
> Bug#1050082 has been (hopefully) fixed with the upload of octave/8.3.0-2.
> Could you please confirm that this really fixes the autobuild issue in
> Ubuntu?
I confirm that octave-image builds successfully in Ubuntu, without
need
Hi
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 12:03, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Unfortunately trilinos is a key package and so cannot be removed without
> much effort from testing to complete the transition. Can you please take
> a look at fixing the current issues with trilinos?
As can be seen on salsa [1], packa
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tags -1 + ftbfs
As can be seen on reproducible builds [1], this same error causes
sarsen to FTBFS in unstable.
[1] https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/sarsen.html
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Kumar
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 07:22, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Thanks for the response. I have build the following packages
> successfully using the new Armadillo:
>
> gdal
> gnss-sdr
> phyx
> seer
> tvc
Great!
> I could not build mlpack since the build failed, but I
Source: sarsen
Version: 0.9.3+ds-2
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Hi Maintainer
Since the upload of python-xarray 2023.08.0-1, the autopkgtests of
sarsen are failing [1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part
of the log below.
Regards
Graham
[1] https://ci.debi
On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 at 18:21, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> This transition is done, but I think gnome-shell-extension-dashtodock
> is popular enough that it's helpful to hint 87+really84-1 in sooner.
I marked gnome-shell-extension-dashtodock urgent and it has migrated, thanks.
Source: intake
Version: 0.6.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Hi Maintainer
Since the upload of dask 2023.8.0+dfsg-1, the autopkgtests of intake
are failing [1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the
log below. This same fail
Hi David
On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 at 11:57, David Prévot wrote:
> Do you have a way to spot packages in Sid currently depending on
> symfony (<< 6~) in order to file bugs and eventually provide patches?
You could use a ben tracker for this.
I've set up something basic [1].
Feel free to submit MRs in
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 + unreproducible
Hi Lucas
I'm unable to reproduce this failure locally, also python-ase builds
successfully on reproducible builds [1].
Regards
Graham
[1] https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/python-ase.html
Hi Kumar
On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 at 13:48, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> I have uploaded the new Armadillo to experimental. I would like your
> permission to upload it to unstable. binNMUs should be sufficient for
> the reverse dependencies.
Have you checked that all the reverse-build-dependencies build wit
501 - 600 of 1546 matches
Mail list logo
