Bug#1008733: python-clickhouse-driver: FTBFS with Python 3.10 as default

2022-03-31 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: python-clickhouse-driver Version: 0.2.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 Hi Maintainer As can be seen on reproducible builds [1], python-clickhouse-driver FTBFS with Python 3.10 as the default version. I've copied what I hope is

Bug#1008731: python-pcl: FTBFS in unstable and testing

2022-03-31 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: python-pcl Version: 0.3.0~rc1+dfsg-11 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hi Maintainer Since sometime around the end of January, python-pcl started to FTBFS in unstable and testing [1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#1008640: scikit-fmm: FTBFS: /usr/include/python3.10/object.h:133:33: error: lvalue required as increment operand

2022-03-31 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: tags -1 + patch Patch available in ubuntu [1]. scikit-fmm (2019.1.30-1ubuntu1) jammy; urgency=medium * Cythonize at build time to fix FTBFS with Python 3.10 * Call dh --with numpy3 to pick up dependency on numpy-abi -- Graham Inggs Mon, 31 Jan 2022 13:30:41 + [1] https

Bug#1008694: kdevelop-python: Build-Depends: python3.9-dev

2022-03-30 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: kdevelop-python Version: 5.6.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Forwarded: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438206 User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 Hi Maintainer kdevelop-python has a hardcoded build-dependency on python3.9-dev. Changing this to the generic

Bug#1008680: scipy: FTBFS with Python 3.10 as default

2022-03-30 Thread Graham Inggs
ON 1.7.3) make[2]: *** [Makefile:122: html-build] Error 2 Description: Ignore distutils deprecation warnings in doc build Author: Graham Inggs Last-Update: 2022-03-30 --- a/doc/source/conf.py +++ b/doc/source/conf.py @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ r"OpenSSL\.rand is deprecated", # OpenSSL package in

Bug#1006836: transition: python3.10 as default

2022-03-29 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Markus On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 at 20:01, Graham Inggs wrote: > I don't think anything is needed right now, thanks. I will schedule a > rebuild of opm-common once graphviz has built, and then retry > opm-simulators. It seems opm-simulators FTBFS in much the same way now after opm-common

Bug#1006836: transition: python3.10 as default

2022-03-28 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Markus On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 at 17:30, Markus Blatt wrote: > I just took a look at the tracker and noticed that opm-common is level 3 and > opm-simulators is level 2. If build attempts for level 3 come after level 2 > that migth explain the failure in the logs [1] and opm-common should be in a

Bug#1007906: transition: mutter

2022-03-28 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: tags -1 confirmed On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 17:21, Simon McVittie wrote: > The GNOME team is ready for this transition now. As usual, lots of Shell > extensions are affected by API changes and will need porting or removal, > but as usual, I think removing the affected Shell extensions from

Bug#1008259: mypy: FTBFS in unstable and testing

2022-03-25 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: mypy Version: 0.931-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hi Maintainer Since sometime around mid-March, mypy started to FTBFS in unstable and testing [1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#1006836: transition: python3.10 as default

2022-03-25 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: tags -1 confirmed On Sun, 6 Mar 2022 at 15:03, Matthias Klose wrote: > Please setup a transition window for python 3.10 as the default python3 > version. > A tracker is setup at > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.10-default.html > > Thanks to many Debian and

Bug#1008254: salmon: FTBFS with glibc 2.34

2022-03-25 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: salmon Version: 1.6.0+ds1-1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs Hi Maintainer Your package uses a vendored copy of catch.hpp. It will FTBFS once glibc is upgraded to 2.34 due to MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ no longer being defined as constants. You could take this opportunity to switch to

Bug#1008252: salmon: FTBFS in unstable and testing

2022-03-25 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: salmon Version: 1.6.0+ds1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hi Maintainer Since sometime around the end of January, salmon started to FTBFS in unstable and testing [1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#1008177: yt: python3.9 is hardcoded

2022-03-23 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: yt Version: 4.0.2-1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer The debian/rules of yt contains the line: rm debian/python3-yt/usr/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/yt/frontends/gdf/tests/test_outputs.py* This will

Bug#1004870: python-xarray: autopkgtest regression on s390x

2022-03-23 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Rajendra On Sun, 6 Mar 2022 at 12:42, Rajendra Kharat1 wrote: > Could you please share the steps to reproduce the issue. > As when I am trying to reproduce I ran into different problem of segmentation > fault. > Below are the steps that I followed. > 1. Install python3-xarray on debian on

Bug#1008171: python-confluent-kafka: FTBFS on big-endian

2022-03-23 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: python-confluent-kafka Version: 1.7.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-CC: debian-s...@lists.debian.org, ol...@debian.org Hi Maintainer Since the upload of 1.7.0-1, python-confluent-kafka FTBFS on s390x and some other big-endian architectures (e.g. powerpc, ppc64) [1]. I've

Bug#1008105: ecflow: PY3VERSIONS is hardcoded

2022-03-22 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: ecflow Version: 5.8.3-1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer The debian/rules of ecflow contains: PY3VERSIONS:=python3.10 python3.9 This will cause ecflow to FTBFS once python3.9 is no longer a supported

Bug#1006139: RM: libdeflate [armhf] -- ROM; does not seem suitable for armhf 'baseline'

2022-02-23 Thread Graham Inggs
There is a patch [1] in Ubuntu for this. The link is also on libdeflate's tracker page [2] (bottom right). [1] https://patches.ubuntu.com/libd/libdeflate/libdeflate_1.8-1ubuntu1.patch [2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libdeflate

Bug#1006212: transition: trilinos

2022-02-21 Thread Graham Inggs
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team I would like to transition trilinos from 12.18 to 13.2. Trilinos 13.2.0-1~exp1 has already cleared NEW, the auto-trilinos tracker [1] is correct, and I have tested

Bug#1000336: numba: FTBFS with Python 3.10

2022-02-20 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Diane On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 at 05:39, Diane Trout wrote: > It would... except numpy 1.22 just hit experimental on the 18th. and > numba isn't compatible with numpy 1.22. I tried adding this to > d/control, > > python3-numpy (<< 1.22), > > but my sbuild resolver still picked up numpy from

Bug#1005805: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1005805: Bug#1005805: insighttoolkit4: FTBFS with glibc 2.34

2022-02-19 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Étienne On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 at 21:06, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Thank you for keeping track of these things. I consider pushing > castxml 0.4.4 to unstable, as after some basic testing I did not > see it requiring changes in reverse (build) dependencies. Great! I think you should go ahead.

Bug#1005962: dask: FTBFS in testing

2022-02-18 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: dask Version: 2021.09.1+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Control: affects -1 src:python-sparse Hi Maintainer Python-sparse was removed from testing in order to advance the Python 3.10 transition (#996584). Dask has a build-dependency on python3-sparse, so currently FTBFS in

Bug#1005883: dxvk: Please make autopkgtests cross-test-friendly

2022-02-16 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: dxvk Version: 1.9.4+ds1-1 Hi Maintainer dxvk has an autopkgtest dependency on wine-development, which is an arch:all package that Depends: wine64-development | wine32-development. When dxvk's autopkgtests are run in a pure i386 environment, wine64-development is not installable, and

Bug#1004870: python-xarray: autopkgtest regression on s390x

2022-02-16 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Rajendra Thanks for taking a look! Unfortunately, that cannot be the solution, as that commit is already present in the version of pandas in the archive [1]. Regards Graham [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/pandas/-/blob/debian/pandas/core/arrays/datetimelike.py#L462 On Sun, 13

Bug#1001595: src:gcc-defaults-mipsen: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2022-02-16 Thread Graham Inggs
Dear MIPS Porters Could somebody take a look a this issue please? > Hi YunQiang, > > On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 21:51:28 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: > > Your package src:gcc-defaults-mipsen has been trying to > > migrate for 62 days [2]. Hence, I am filing this bug. > > Any progress? It has been 1.5

Bug#1003165: scikit-learn in unstable FTBFS on arm64, armel, armhf, i386, ppc64el and s390x

2022-02-16 Thread Graham Inggs
Dear Arm Porters Is anyone able to help with the bus error on armhf please? On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 09:33, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Control: tags -1 upstream > Control: forwarded -1 > https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/22503 > also sent another bug report >

Bug#1005805: insighttoolkit4: FTBFS with glibc 2.34

2022-02-15 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: insighttoolkit4 Version: 4.13.3withdata-dfsg2-1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs Forwarded: https://github.com/InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITK/issues/2827 Control: affects -1 src:castxml Hi Maintainer insighttoolkit4 FTBFS when built with glibc 2.34, currently in experimental. I've copied

Bug#1005706: sunpy: FTBFS when built with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck

2022-02-13 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: sunpy Version: 3.1.3-1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs Hi Maintainer Sunpy FTBFS when built with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck due to missing files. chmod a-x debian/python*-sunpy/usr/lib/python*/dist-packages/sunpy/data/test/*.fts chmod: cannot access

Bug#1005149: ansible: misbuilds with two supported Python versions

2022-02-09 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: reassign -1 src:ansible 2.10.7+merged+base+2.10.8+dfsg-1 Control: severity -1 serious Control: affects -1 + src:dh-python Control: tags -1 + ftbfs Control: retitle -1 ansible: misbuilds with two supported Python versions Reassigning to src:ansible.

Bug#1005149: pybuild not cleanly removing /usr/lib/python3.10/dist-packages

2022-02-08 Thread Graham Inggs
I see the same in a debian unstable chroot with sbuild.

Bug#1005068: transition (unplanned?): libwacom9

2022-02-07 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Timo I've scheduled binNMUs for cinnamon-settings-daemon and wacomtablet. Please remember that libwacom needs a source-only upload for migration. Regards Graham

Bug#1004970: pcapy: builds for all python versions, but only tests default

2022-02-04 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: pcapy Version: 0.11.5-1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer pcapy builds its extension for all Python versions, but only tests against the default version. This issue will become serious once Python 3.10

Bug#1004907: psi4: incorrect location for Python extension?

2022-02-03 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: psi4 Version: 1:1.3.2+dfsg-2 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 Hi Maintainer I noticed psi4 has a build-dependency on python3-dev, and will require a rebuild for Python 3.10 to build core.cpython-310-x86_64-linux-gnu.so instead of

Bug#1004870: python-xarray: autopkgtest regression on s390x

2022-02-02 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: python-xarray Version: 0.21.0-1 X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, debian-s...@lists.debian.org Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Hi Maintainer python-xarray's autopkgtests are failing on the big-endian s390x architecture [1]. I've copied what

Bug#1004869: python-xarray: autopkgtest regression on i386

2022-02-02 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: python-xarray Version: 0.21.0-1 X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Hi Maintainer python-xarray's autopkgtests are failing on the i386 architecture [1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log

Bug#1004706: opentsne: FTBFS on i386, test failure

2022-01-31 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: opentsne Version: 0.6.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hi Maintainer opentsne FTBFS on i386 [1] and this currently blocks migration to testing. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#1004702: libtorrent-rasterbar: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2022-01-31 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: libtorrent-rasterbar Version: 2.0.5-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions. This is

Bug#1001291: binoculars: autopkgtest tests for all supported python3 versions but vtk7 extensions don't exist for all

2022-01-31 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: reopen -1 debian/tests/control still contains: Test-Command: set -efu ; cp -r tests examples "$AUTOPKGTEST_TMP" ; for py in $(py3versions -r 2>/dev/null) ; do cd "$AUTOPKGTEST_TMP" ; echo "Testing with $py:" ; $py -m unittest discover -s tests -v ; done ...and the test still

Bug#1004663: tkrzw-python: only builds for default python3; tests for all versions

2022-01-31 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: tkrzw-python Version: 0.1.28-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer tkrzw-python only builds for the default python3 version, but then attempts to run atuopkgtests against all versions. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#1004416: link-grammar: FTBFS with Python 3.10 as default

2022-01-26 Thread Graham Inggs
package in the archive affected by it, it may be quickest just to work around it here for now. The attached patch worked for me. Regards Graham Description: Avoid broken version check in ax_python_devel.m4 Author: Graham Inggs Last-Update: 2022-01-26 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -304,7

Bug#1004340: pitivi: FTBFS in unstable and testing

2022-01-25 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: pitivi Version: 2020.09.2-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid Hi Maintainer Since sometime around January 15, pitivi started to FTBFS in unstable [1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#1004337: glade: FTBFS in unstable and testing

2022-01-25 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: glade Version: 3.38.2-6 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid Hi Maintainer Since sometime around January 13, glade started to FTBFS in unstable [1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#1004331: pytorch: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2022-01-24 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: pytorch Version: 1.8.1-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions. This is seen on the

Bug#1001168: hkl: FTBFS on mipsel: FAIL: trajectory.py

2022-01-22 Thread Graham Inggs
On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 at 10:45, YunQiang Su wrote: > Sure. I will. Thank you!

Bug#1001168: hkl: FTBFS on mipsel: FAIL: trajectory.py

2022-01-22 Thread Graham Inggs
On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 at 10:12, YunQiang Su wrote: > Let's have a try to build matplotlib with -O3, and try to build hkl with it. > If it works, we can workaround it for now. > I will continue to dig the real problem of gcc (maybe). To be clear, will you try building matplotlib with -O3 and if it

Bug#1001168: hkl: FTBFS on mipsel: FAIL: trajectory.py

2022-01-21 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi YunQiang Su Have you been able to make any progress with this issue? If not, then we should consider asking ftp-master for temporary removal of the affected mips64el packages from testing. We'd like to move the python3-defaults transition along. Regards Graham

Bug#985011: golang-github-go-redis-redis: autopkgtest regression

2022-01-20 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: severity -1 serious Bumping severity since we are no longer in freeze.

Bug#1004077: node-pbkdf2: autopkgtest regression on s390x

2022-01-20 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: node-pbkdf2 Version: 3.1.1-1 X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, debian-s...@lists.debian.org Severity: important User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Hi Maintainer Since 3.1.1-1, node-pbkdf2's autopkgtests have been failing on the big-endian s390x architecture

Bug#1002521: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#999730: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#1002360: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#1002143: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#1002192: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#1001841: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#1000896: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#999249: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#999037: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#998999: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#998516: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#997763: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#997652: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#997601: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#997406: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#997367: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#997287: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#997194: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#993882: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#993716: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#993350: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#993033: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#991541: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#991449: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#984953: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#984714: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#984272: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#984366: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#978926: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#971783: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#965883: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#965865: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#948739: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#965613: Package will now be considered for auto-removal

2022-01-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Maintainer The release team no longer [1] considers popcon a criterion for inclusion in the list of key packages [2]. This email is a courtesy reminder of this bug, and should prevent instant auto-removal once the rule is changed in britney. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#1003043: kicad: b-d on libpython3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2022-01-03 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: kicad Version: 6.0.0+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on libpython3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions. This is seen

Bug#967275: Bug#967582: libgtkdatabox: depends on deprecated GTK 2

2022-01-02 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: tags -1 + pending fixed-in-experimental Control: block 967275 by -1 Control: severity 967275 important Control: block 967831 by -1 Control: severity 967831 important Hi Felipe On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 at 23:42, Felipe Castro wrote: > Hi, I'm the new upstream maintainer of GtkDatabox and we

Bug#997029: pysph: FTBFS in testing and unstable

2022-01-01 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Antonio On Fri, 31 Dec 2021 at 14:27, Antonio Valentino wrote: > Do you have an updated pointer to a build failure? > ... or can we consider to close or at least reduce the severity of this > issue? builds failed again on amd64 yesterday in both testing and unstable see

Bug#1002924: yabasic: input and line input throw syntax errors

2022-01-01 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Jude On Sat, 1 Jan 2022 at 10:51, Jude DaShiell wrote: >* What led up to the situation? >Wrote a line of code for interpretation. >* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or > ineffective)? > ran yabasic ty.bas. line of code was > input "enter

Bug#998827: openorienteering-mapper: FTBFS with GDAL 3.4.0

2021-12-28 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Adrian Thanks for the NMU. I'm going to cherry-pick upstream's commit [1] instead. No need to cancel though, as your upload should just be superseded. Regards Graham [1] https://github.com/OpenOrienteering/mapper/commit/e247f7270fc36ac9c62abe2f179a891d1df98616

Bug#1002688: ceph: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-12-27 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: ceph Version: 16.2.6+ds-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions. This is seen on the

Bug#981623: [R-pkg-team] Bug#981623: r-cran-glmmtmb: needs a rebuild when r-cran-tmb is updated

2021-12-27 Thread Graham Inggs
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 11:06, Graham Inggs wrote: > It would be nice if we had some automated way of detecting when > r-cran-glmmtmb needs a rebuild. Upstream included such a check in version 1.1.0 [1]. r-cran-glmmtb's autopkgtests have been complaining since 2021-09-23 16:13:22

Bug#1001764: More info

2021-12-20 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Dima On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 22:40, Dima Kogan wrote: > I installed python3.10, and asked the build system to use it. Instead of > the error you're reporting, I get a build error: it can't find the numpy > headers because python3-numpy is built for python3.9. This makes sense. numpy

Bug#1001934: tkrzw-python: b-d on libpython3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-12-19 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: tkrzw-python Version: 0.1.28-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on libpython3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions. This is seen

Bug#1001764: mrgingham: autopkgtest failure with python3.10 as a supported version

2021-12-15 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: mrgingham Version: 1.20-3 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: needs-update User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Control: affects -1 src:python3-defaults Hi Maintainer mrgingham's

Bug#1001538: python-hypothesis: test failures with python3.10

2021-12-11 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: python-hypothesis Version: 5.43.3-1 Severity: serious Tag: bookworm sid ftbfs X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: needs-update User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 Control: affects -1 src:python3-defaults Hi Maintainer

Bug#1001535: busco: (autopkgtest) needs update for python3.10

2021-12-11 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: busco Version: 5.2.2-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: needs-update User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 Control: affects -1 src:python3-defaults Hi Maintainer As can be seen [1], the autopkgtests

Bug#998057: transition: r-api-bioc-3.14

2021-12-01 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Nliesh On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 23:00, Nilesh Patra wrote: > But we should make a list of all such packages and ping for Graham/Sebastian > to propagate the hints accordingly. Probably that's what Graham wanted to say > in the first place. I've already added hints marking

Bug#998057: transition: r-api-bioc-3.14

2021-12-01 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Nilesh On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 13:03, Nilesh Patra wrote: > One i386 autopkgtest failure for r-bioc-biocparallel is stalling the entire > migration. Rest stuff looks okay. There's at least one more regression; in gffread, caused by r-bioc-gviz [1]. Please check that each r-bioc* package is

Bug#1000864: python-skbio: FTBFS with Python 3.10

2021-11-30 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: python-skbio Version: 0.5.6-5 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs patch User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 Hi Maintainer Now that scikit-learn has at least built on amd64 [1], we can now see a new failure in python-skbio [2]. I have copied part of the log below. This

Bug#1000852: aspcud: FTBFS with glibc 2.34

2021-11-30 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: aspcud Version: 1:1.9.5-1 Severity: important Hi Maintainer Your package uses a vendored copy of catch.hpp. It will FTBFS once glibc is upgraded to 2.34 due to MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ no longer being defined. You could take this opportunity to switch to using the catch2 package [1] in

Bug#1000851: segyio: FTBFS with glibc 2.34

2021-11-30 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: segyio Version: 1.8.3-1.1 Severity: important Forwarded: https://github.com/equinor/segyio/issues/520 Hi Maintainer Your package uses a vendored copy of catch.hpp. It will FTBFS once glibc is upgraded to 2.34 due to MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ no longer being defined. You could take this

Bug#998441: reprozip: FTBFS on 2nd reproducible build

2021-11-30 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: reopen -1 For some reason, this package runs the tests from debian/tests/test_reprozip.py [1], instead of from upstream. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/reprozip/-/blob/master/debian/tests/test_reprozip.py#L236

Bug#992676: python-skbio: fixed upstream

2021-11-29 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: tags -1 + patch fixed-upstream Both of these issues are fixed in: https://github.com/biocore/scikit-bio/commit/357c7fe847187bc540c4914c3ffd607d9432857d

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >