Bug#1000292: Why was libpython3.10-dev not available in the test build?

2021-11-24 Thread Graham Inggs
HI Neil On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 21:45, Neil Williams wrote: > pyhst2 build-depends on python3-dev which currently brings in > libpython3.9-dev and it is this package which provides Python.h which > pyhst2 requires. > > https://packages.debian.org/unstable/python3.10-dev depends on >

Bug#1000186: ecflow: silently fails to build python extension if boost is missing

2021-11-21 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: severity -1 serious The second binNMU of ecflow seems to have built correctly now. Please make sure build errors are trapped correctly. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#error-trapping-in-makefiles

Bug#1000308: pycuda: FTBFS with Python 3.10

2021-11-21 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: pycuda Version: 2021.1~dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 Hi Maintainer I tried to do a manual binNMU of pycuda to add Python 3.10 as a supported version (#996584), but it failed. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of

Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3

2021-11-20 Thread Graham Inggs
It might be easier to upgrade to 1.2.4 first, then 1,3,x later.

Bug#1000186: ecflow: silently fails to build python extension if boost is missing

2021-11-19 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: ecflow Version: 5.7.2-1 Severity: normal Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer ecflow build-depends on python3-all-dev and normally builds for all supported python versions correctly. However, in a recent rebuild [1] for

Bug#1000178: llvmlite: FTBFS with Python 3.10

2021-11-18 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: llvmlite Version: 0.37.0-1 Severity: serious User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 Hi Maintainer llvmlite FTBFS with Python 3.10 as a supported version [1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#999836: pcre2: please enable JIT on s390x

2021-11-17 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: pcre2 Version: 10.39-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi Maintainer Please enable JIT on s390x. It has already been enabled upstream [1]. I've confirmed on zelenka.d.o. that 10.39-2 builds and passes its tests with the change below, whereas 10.36-2 fails. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#999832: mrgingham: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-11-17 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: mrgingham Version: 1.20-2 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions. This is seen on

Bug#999364: libseccomp ftbfs with Python 3.10

2021-11-10 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: tags -1 + patch Patch at: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/568282351/libseccomp_2.5.2-2ubuntu1_2.5.2-2ubuntu2.diff.gz

Bug#998838: h5py: FTBFS on armhf

2021-11-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: tags -1 + patch Patch at: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/567918549/h5py_3.3.0-4_3.3.0-4ubuntu1.diff.gz

Bug#998838: h5py: FTBFS on armhf

2021-11-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: h5py Version: 3.3.0-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hi Maintainer As can be seen on reproducible builds [1], h5py FTBFS on armhf with the following error: build/h5py/_debian_h5py_serial/tests/test_dtype.py::TestVlen::test_compound_vlen_bool Fatal Python error: Bus error The cause is

Bug#997942: tomboy-ng: FTBFS with fpc 3.2.2

2021-11-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi David Apologies for the delayed response. On Sat, 30 Oct 2021 at 06:57, David Bannon wrote: > Thanks Graham. I noticed the same problem myself a few days ago. Its a > very simple fix but as I am very close to releasing a new version > anyway, maybe we can wait until them ? Sure, there's no

Bug#998686: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#998686: apparmor: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-11-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 20:58, intrigeri wrote: > I understand that somehow, debian/rules should figure out that Python > 3.10 is supported too. Correct? > If so: where can it find this information? Apologies, I should have mentioned I was testing a local build with python3-defaults from

Bug#998821: automake-1.16: AM_PATH_PYTHON does not support Python 3.10

2021-11-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: automake-1.16 Version: 1:1.16.5-1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs patch User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 Hi Maintainer AM_PATH_PYTHON does not support Python 3.10. The simple patch below worked for me. I'm filing this bug with severity important, but it will be

Bug#998476: autoconf-archive: AX_PYTHON_DEVEL version checks fail with Python 3.10

2021-11-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: tags -1 + patch Patches in Fedora [1][2]. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/autoconf-archive/c/17bded5ffdcb567a090fa8184a08eeea143b8a88 [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/autoconf-archive/c/b36f98e5a2343229452be02bece700af2defd65b

Bug#998682: libgetdata: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-11-07 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Alastair On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 14:31, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > Investigating locally this fails because numpy does not yet support > python3.10. > Some form of tracking is needed as I think multiple packages are in this > situation, and the ben tracker in transitions.debian.org is

Bug#998686: apparmor: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-11-06 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: apparmor Version: 3.0.3-5 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions. This is seen on

Bug#998682: libgetdata: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-11-06 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: libgetdata Version: 0.10.0-11 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions. This is seen

Bug#997126: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#997126: nipype test issue reported upstream

2021-11-04 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Étienne On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 00:03, Étienne Mollier wrote: > From Andreas Tille's discussion with upstream, this might be > caused by numpy or scipy, possibly Debian specific. This sounds a lot like #994457 which was due to a change in lapack 3.10. Regards Graham

Bug#998476: autoconf-archive: AX_PYTHON_DEVEL version checks fail with Python 3.10

2021-11-04 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: autoconf-archive Version: 20210219-2 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 Hi Maintainer AX_PYTHON_DEVEL version checks fail when Python has a two-digit minor version [1], as it has in 3.10. I'm filing this bug with severity important,

Bug#998473: unittest2: not compatible with Python 3.10

2021-11-04 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: unittest2 Version: 1.1.0-7 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 Hi Maintainer unittest2 1.1.0 is not compatible with Python 3.10 because it uses collections.MutableMapping, which has been removed [1]. I'm filing this bug

Bug#998472: jcc: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-11-04 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: jcc Version: 3.6-1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions. This is seen

Bug#998471: gpgme1.0: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-11-04 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: gpgme1.0 Version: 1.16.0-1.1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions. This is seen on

Bug#998470: vtk9: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-11-04 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: vtk9 Version: 9.0.3+dfsg1-3 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions. This is seen on

Bug#998469: avogadrolibs: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-11-04 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: avogadrolibs Version: 1.95.1-5 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Control: affects 995981 src:avogadrolibs Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all

Bug#998467: numpy-stl: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-11-04 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: numpy-stl Version: 2.9.0-1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions. This

Bug#998465: faiss: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-11-04 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: faiss Version: 1.7.0-1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions. This is seen on the

Bug#998464: python-libzim: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-11-04 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: python-libzim Version: 0.0.3-2 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions.

Bug#998463: pytaglib: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-11-04 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: pytaglib Version: 0.3.6+dfsg-2 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions.

Bug#998457: pysvn: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-11-04 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: pysvn Version: 1.9.12-2 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions. This is

Bug#998456: duplicity: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-11-04 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: duplicity Version: 0.8.20-1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions. This is seen on

Bug#998455: regina-normal: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-11-04 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: regina-normal Version: 6.0.1-4 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions.

Bug#998454: python-cbor: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-11-04 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: python-cbor Version: 1.0.0-1.1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions.

Bug#998453: python-axolotl-curve25519: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-11-04 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: python-axolotl-curve25519 Version: 0.4.1.post2-2 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported

Bug#998442: link-grammar: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-11-04 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: link-grammar Version: 5.10.2~dfsg-1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions. This is

Bug#998443: sugar-datastore: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-11-04 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: sugar-datastore Version: 0.118-2 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions.

Bug#998441: reprozip: FTBFS on 2nd reproducible build

2021-11-04 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: reprozip Version: 1.0.16-1 Severity: normal Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 Hi Maintainer As can be seen on reproducible builds [1], the second builds of reprozip always fail. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log

Bug#998440: macs: will FTBFS when python3.10 is added

2021-11-04 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: macs Version: 2.2.7.1-4 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs patch User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 Hi Maintainer When python3.10 is added as a supported version, macs 2.2.7.1-4 will FTBFS with the following error: I: pybuild base:232: python3.10 setup.py config

Bug#995981: rules-require-build-prerequisite gives bogus advice

2021-11-03 Thread Graham Inggs
On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 at 19:06, Felix Lechner wrote: > > Control: affects -1 src:python-boto3 > > Isn't that bug closed? By "that bug", do you mean #998396? codesearch.debian.net reveals even more affected packages:

Bug#952396: Strange pydist warning about cysignals package not being found

2021-11-03 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Julien > while building pplpy, I noticed the following warning: > > I: dh_python3 pydist:228: Cannot find package that provides cysignals. > Please add package that provides it to Build-Depends or add "cysignals > python3-cysignals" line to debian/py3dist-overrides or add proper > dependency

Bug#998406: cysignals: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions

2021-11-03 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: cysignals Version: 1.10.2+ds-7 Severity: important Control: affects -1 src:fpylll src:pplpy User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Hi Maintainer This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build extensions/libraries for all supported

Bug#995980: FTBFS: very wrong python dependency

2021-11-03 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: severity -1 important Control: tags -1 + ftbfs Control: clone -1 -2 Control: retitle -2 FTBFS: very wrong python dependency Control: tags -2 = ftbfs Control: clone -2 -3 -4 -5 Control: reassign -2 src:google-auth-httplib2 0.1.0-1 Control: reassign -3 src:python-boto3 1.18.53+dfsg-1

Bug#995981: rules-require-build-prerequisite gives bogus advice

2021-11-03 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: affects -1 src:google-auth-httplib2 Control: affects -1 src:python-boto3 Control: affects -1 src:python-botocore Control: affects -1 src:python-imgviz

Bug#994443: [R-pkg-team] Bug#994443: Bug#994443: marked as done (r-bioc-deseq2: autopkgtest regression)

2021-11-03 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: reopen -1 Hi Nilesh On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 at 21:15, Nilesh Patra wrote: > I think this has got nothing to do with our changes in unstable -- I'd be > very surprised if so, > since essentially atleast stable is disconnected, unless some other package > has been on-purpose updated there.

Bug#998215: h5py: FTBFS without network access

2021-11-01 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: h5py Version: 3.3.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hi Maintainer As can be seen on reproducible builds [1], h5py FTBFS without network access during one of its tests. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#997947: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#997947: doublecmd FTBFS: Fatal: (10022) Can't find unit ExtCtrls used by uCmdBox

2021-10-28 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: tags -1 + unreproducible Hi Adrian On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 15:54, Adrian Bunk wrote: > (10028) Recompiling ExtCtrls, checksum changed for > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/fpc/3.2.2/units/x86_64-linux/rtl/system.ppu > /build/1st/doublecmd-0.9.10/components/CmdLine/ucmdbox.pas(66,25) Fatal:

Bug#997942: tomboy-ng: FTBFS with fpc 3.2.2

2021-10-27 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: tomboy-ng Version: 0.32-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid Hi Maintainer tomboy-ng fails to build from source since fpc 3.2.2 was uploaded to unstable. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. Regards Graham make[1]: Entering directory

Bug#997940: view3dscene: FTBFS with fpc 3.2.2

2021-10-27 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: view3dscene Version: 3.18.0-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid Hi Maintainer view3dscene fails to build from source since fpc 3.2.2 was uploaded to unstable. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. Regards Graham fpc -k"-z relro -z now" -dRELEASE

Bug#997802: ddnet: autopkgtest regression on armhf: output to stderr

2021-10-26 Thread Graham Inggs
On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 at 22:30, Paul Gevers wrote: > I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report. It seems that > the actual test passes, but there's output on stderr and the default > behavior of autopkgtest is to fail on output to stderr. If in general > output to stderr is harmless

Bug#996960: scipy: FTBFS in unstable

2021-10-24 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Sandro On Sat, 23 Oct 2021 at 17:35, Sandro Tosi wrote: > pydata-sphinx-theme 0.7.1 (which contains that fix) has just been > uploaded to unstable Great, thanks! I see you temporarily disabled building the docs. Would it be possible to temporarily drop the Build-Depends on

Bug#997061: minieigen: FTBFS with sphinx 4.2.0

2021-10-23 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: minieigen Version: 0.50.3+dfsg1-12 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid Hi Maintainer As can be seen in reproducible builds [1], minieigen FTBFS with sphinx 4.2.0. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#996960: scipy: FTBFS in unstable

2021-10-23 Thread Graham Inggs
This was caused by a change in jinja and fixed in pydata-sphinx-theme upstream, see https://github.com/pydata/pydata-sphinx-theme/pull/395

Bug#997029: pysph: FTBFS in testing and unstable

2021-10-22 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: pysph Version: 1.0~b0~20191115.gite3d5e10-5 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hi Maintainer As can be seen in reproducible builds [1], pysph sometimes FTBS in both testing and unstable. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#997028: python-gsd: FTBFS with sphinx 4.2.0

2021-10-22 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: python-gsd Version: 2.4.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hi Maintainer As can be seen in reproducible builds, python-gsd FTBFS since sphinx 4.2.0 was uploaded. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#997027: python-vispy: FTBFS with sphinx 4.2.0

2021-10-22 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: python-vispy Version: 0.6.6-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs patch Hi Maintainer python-vispy FTBFS with sphinx 4.2.0 since add_stylesheet was deprecated. It can be fixed by the simple patch below. Regards Graham --- a/doc/conf.py +++ b/doc/conf.py @@ -349,9 +349,9 @@ def

Bug#997026: libgpuarray: FTBFS with sphinx 4.2.0

2021-10-22 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: libgpuarray Version: 0.7.6-6 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs patch Hi Maintainer libgpuarray FTBFS with sphinx 4.2.0 since add_stylesheet was deprecated. It can be fixed by the simple patch below. Regards Graham --- a/doc/conf.py +++ b/doc/conf.py @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ html_theme =

Bug#994443: [R-pkg-team] Bug#994443: marked as done (r-bioc-deseq2: autopkgtest regression)

2021-10-21 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: reopen -1 r-bioc-deseq2's autopkgtests started to again pass in testing on 2021-09-29, once r-bioc-tximportdata migrated. However, the autopkgtests in stable continue to fail [1]. I think you are doing something wrong if a change in a package in unstable affects a package in testing and

Bug#996960: scipy: FTBFS in unstable

2021-10-21 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: scipy Version: 1.7.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hi Maintainer Sometime between 2021-08-18 and 2021-10-16, scipy 1.7.1-1 started to FTBFS in unstable [1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#962794: r-cran-stanheaders: breaks r-cran-rstanarm autopkgtests

2021-10-20 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Nilesh On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 at 11:45, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Is this still valid with the new versions, or can this be marked as fixed and > closed? > > I see evrything green at ci.d.n page It seems r-cran-rstanarm's autopkgtests started to pass sometime around 2021-02-10, so no reason to

Bug#995858: r-cran-testthat: FTBFS with glibc 2.34

2021-10-20 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Nilesh On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 at 11:57, Nilesh Patra wrote: > This is probably fixed in the newer version of testthat -- 3.1.0 > with this PR merged: https://github.com/r-lib/testthat/pull/1403 > > Could you confirm if it's still an issue? r-cran-testthat 3.1.0-2 recently built in Ubuntu [1],

Bug#968266: gsfonts-x11: Please mark as Multi-Arch: foreign

2021-10-16 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: reassign -1 src:gsfonts-x11 0.27 Control: affects -1 src:inventor Control: retitle -1 gsfonts-x11: Please mark as Multi-Arch: foreign

Bug#996642: csh: FTBFS with glibc 2.32

2021-10-16 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: csh Version: 20110502-6 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs patch bookworm sid Hi Maintainer As can be seen in reproducible builds [1], csh FTBFS since glibc 2.32 was uploaded. I've attached a patch from Ubuntu where this was fixed already. Regards Graham [1]

Bug#996584: (some kind of) transition: add python3.10 as a supported python3 version

2021-10-16 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.10-add.html On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 21:39, Matthias Klose wrote: > Please setup a tracker to add python3.10 as a supported python3 version. This > is > non-blocking, as packages can migrate on their own once built. I'm not

Bug#993324: libgsl25: ABI breakage: removed symbol gsl_linalg_QR_TR_decomp

2021-10-15 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Dirk > Yes. And I follow upstream. They didn't change :-/ Right, so please speak to your upstream. Dropping (or renaming) a symbol is changing the ABI in a backward-incompatible way, and they need to bump the SONAME (or revert the change). This is not something Debian-specific, this is how

Bug#995737: pytest breaks pytest-doctestplus autopkgtest: pytest.PytestAssertRewriteWarning: Module already imported so cannot be rewritten: pytest_doctestplus

2021-10-15 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: notfound -1 pytest/6.2.5-1

Bug#996374: python-nanoget: autopkgtest regression

2021-10-13 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: python-nanoget Version: 1.12.2-4 Severity: serious Tags: sid bookworm User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear Maintainer Sometime around 2021-10-05, python-nanoget's autopkgtests started to fail in testing. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log

Bug#995858: r-cran-testthat: FTBFS with glibc 2.34

2021-10-07 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: r-cran-testthat Version: 3.0.4-1 Severity: important Hi Maintainer Your package uses a vendored copy of catch.hpp. It will FTBFS once glibc is upgraded to 2.34 due to MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ no longer being defined. You could take this opportunity to switch to using the catch package

Bug#995689: python-reportlab breaks autopkgtest of python-biopython

2021-10-04 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: python-reportlab, python-biopython Control: found -1 python-reportlab/3.5.67-2 Control: found -1 python-biopython/1.78+dfsg-5 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: breaks needs-update Hi Maintainers The recent upload of

Bug#995346: ruby-chef-utils: depends on the Internet during build

2021-10-03 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: severity -1 serious Per Debian Policy 4.9, packages in main must not attempt network access during the build.

Bug#995571: boost1.74: autopkgtest failure on !amd64 architectures

2021-10-02 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: boost1.74 Version: 1.74.0-10 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Hi Maintainer The 'context' autopkgtest of boost1.74 fails on non-amd64 architectures [1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant output below.

Bug#994753: boost1.74: boost.mpi Python module not installed

2021-09-20 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: boost1.74 Version: 1.74.0-10 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi Maintainer After #992223 was fixed, I noticed that the mpi-python autopkgtest still fails. I found that mpi.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so was not installed in the libboost-mpi-python1.74.0 package. I was able to fix this

Bug#994443: r-bioc-deseq2: autopkgtest regression

2021-09-16 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: r-bioc-deseq2 Version: 1.30.1+dfsg-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Hi Maintainer The autopkgtests of r-bioc-deseq2 regressed in testing sometime after 2021-09-07 11:35:05 UTC [1]. E: Package

Bug#992223: autopkgtests test packages from boost1.71

2021-09-10 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: severity -1 serious The autopkgtest always fails in testing [1] but passes in unstable, where the boost1.71 packages are still available. [1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/b/boost1.74/testing/amd64/

Bug#980692: dask: FTBFS: dh_sphinxdoc: error: debian/python-dask-doc/usr/share/doc/python-dask-doc/html/_static/js/html5shiv.min.js is missing

2021-09-08 Thread Graham Inggs
The entry below was dropped from debian/changelog and I think it's the reason why the BTS thinks this bug is not fixed in 2021.08.1+dfsg-2 in unstable. dask (2021.01.0+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium [ Diane Trout ] * New upstream release * Fix fake http proxy url as dask's build system

Bug#993770: dazzdb: autopkgtest failure with glibc 2.32

2021-09-06 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: dazzdb Version: 1.0+git20201103.8d98c37-1 Severity: serious Forwarded: https://github.com/thegenemyers/DAZZ_DB/issues/41 X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: needs-update Hi Maintainer Since the upload of glibc 2.32-1 to unstable, dazzdb's

Bug#993516: dolfin: FTBFS with glibc 2.34

2021-09-02 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: dolfin Version: 2019.2.0~git20201207.b495043-5 Severity: important Hi Maintainer Your package uses a vendored copy of catch.hpp. It will FTBFS once glibc is upgraded to 2.34 due to MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ no longer being defined. You could take this opportunity to switch to using the

Bug#993515: catch: FTBFS with glibc 2.34

2021-09-02 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: catch Version: 1.12.1-1.1 Severity: important Hi Maintainer Catch will FTBFS once glibc is upgraded to 2.34 due to MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ no longer being defined. This was fixed Catch2's upstream [1]. I'm not sure if this can be adapted for Catch(1). Another approach is to simply

Bug#993513: ensmallen: FTBFS with glibc 2.34

2021-09-02 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: ensmallen Version: 2.17.0-1 Severity: important Hi Maintainer Your package uses a vendored copy of catch.hpp. It will FTBFS once glibc is upgraded to 2.34 due to MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ no longer being defined. You could take this opportunity to switch to using the catch2 package [1]

Bug#993512: openmsx: FTBFS with glibc 2.34

2021-09-02 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: openmsx Version: 17.0-1 Severity: important Hi Maintainer Your package uses a vendored copy of catch.hpp. It will FTBFS once glibc is upgraded to 2.34 due to MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ no longer being defined. You could take this opportunity to switch to using the catch2 package [1] in

Bug#993511: spdlog: FTBFS with glibc 2.34

2021-09-02 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: spdlog Version: 1:1.8.5+ds-2 Severity: important Hi Maintainer Your package uses a vendored copy of catch.hpp. It will FTBFS once glibc is upgraded to 2.34 due to MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ no longer being defined. You could take this opportunity to switch to using the catch2 package [1]

Bug#993510: dolfinx: FTBFS with glibc 2.34

2021-09-02 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: dolfinx Version: 2019.2.0~git20210130.c14cb0a-5 Severity: important Hi Maintainer Your package uses a vendored copy of catch.hpp. It will FTBFS once glibc is upgraded to 2.34 due to MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ no longer being defined. You could take this opportunity to switch to using the

Bug#993043: ensmallen: autopkgtest regression on arm64/i386/ppc64el

2021-08-31 Thread Graham Inggs
This appears to be fixed, at least on arm64 and ppc64el, by the upload of armadillo/1:10.6.2+dfsg-1.

Bug#983758: python-xarray: autopkgtest regression on several architectures

2021-08-31 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: reopen -1 Hi Alastair This same test also fails on i386 [1]. tests/test_dataarray.py::TestDataArray::test_pad_constant FAILED [ 56%] Regards Graham [1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/python-xarray/testing/i386/

Bug#993355: haskell-hgettext: autopkgtest regressed in August 2020

2021-08-31 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: haskell-hgettext Version: 0.1.31.0-5 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org Hi Maintainer Some time in August 2020, haskell-hgettext's autopkgtests regressed in testing [1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant

Bug#993214: mpi4py: autopkgtest regression around 2021-08-25

2021-08-30 Thread Graham Inggs
On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 at 00:22, Drew Parsons wrote: > Graham, when I run autopkgtest, it skips the dummy test, which is what > we want, but it does so with the message > >SKIP unknown restriction hint-testsuite-triggers > > > "unknown restriction", is this normal? If so it's a bit misleading >

Bug#993214: mpi4py: autopkgtest regression around 2021-08-25

2021-08-29 Thread Graham Inggs
Even better would be to add the following section to debian/tests/control: # Dummy test so that changes to other packages trigger our autopkgtests # on ci.debian.net Test-Command: /bin/true Depends: libpmix-dev, libucx-dev [amd64 arm64 ppc64el], Restrictions: hint-testsuite-triggers Refer

Bug#993214: mpi4py: autopkgtest regression around 2021-08-25

2021-08-29 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Drew I followed the discussion on the upstream issue. What do you think of adding some extra test dependencies to mpi4py's debian/tests/control? Depends: python3-mpi4py, +libpmix-dev, +libucx-dev [amd64 arm64 ppc64el], python3-cffi, python3-dill, python3-distutils,

Bug#993214: mpi4py: autopkgtest regression around 2021-08-25

2021-08-28 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: mpi4py Version: 3.0.3-8 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org Hi Maintainer Some time around 2021-08-25, mpi4py's autopkgtests regressed in testing [1]. This seems to coincide with the migration of pmix/4.1.0-3 to

Bug#992074: libvpd: FTBFS with GCC 11

2021-08-10 Thread Graham Inggs
source: libvpd Version: 2.2.7-1 Severity: normal Tags: sid bookworm User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-11 Forwarded: https://github.com/power-ras/libvpd/pull/5 [This bug is not targeted to the upcoming bullseye release] Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the

Bug#688716: cron: optionally inherit PATH from parent process

2021-08-06 Thread Graham Inggs
://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cron/+bug/1938924 Author: Graham Inggs Last-Update: 2021-08-06 --- a/crontab.5 +++ b/crontab.5 @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ .IR cron (8) daemon. SHELL is set to /bin/sh, and LOGNAME and HOME are set from the /etc/passwd -line of the crontab's owner. PATH is set to "/usr/bin

Bug#991738: unblock: gdcm/3.0.8-2 (pre-approval)

2021-08-01 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo Hi Étienne Please go ahead and upload to unstable, then remove the moreinfo tag once it has built. Regards Graham

Bug#991749: unblock: ruby-maven-libs/3.3.9+ds-2

2021-08-01 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi Praveen On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 at 21:21, wrote: > + * Bump debhelper from old 10 to 12. Please revert this change. See 'Target fixes' section of the freeze policy [1]. Regards Graham [1] https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.html#full

Bug#991636: unblock: projectm/3.1.7-1.1 (pre-approval)

2021-08-01 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo Hi Andreas On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 14:33, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > The fix is not yet uploaded, I intend to 2-day NMU it. Please go ahead and upload to unstable, then remove the moreinfo tag once it has built. Regards Graham

Bug#991423: xmltooling: autopkgtest regression since mid-July 2021

2021-07-23 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: xmltooling Version: 3.2.0-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org Hi Maintainer Sometime around mid-July 2021, xmltooling's autopkgtests started to fail in testing [1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part

Bug#991359: unblock: liquidsoap/1.4.3-3

2021-07-21 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo confirmed Hi Kyle Please go ahead and upload to unstable, then remove the moreinfo tag once it has built. Regards Graham

Bug#991270: unblock: suricata/6.0.1-3

2021-07-20 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo confirmed Hi Sascha On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 13:57, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > I have added a debdiff to this bugreport that illustrates the > situation. I could upload to unstable anytime. Please let me know if the > fix is appropriate and I will initiate an upload if

Bug#991122: unblock: varnish/6.5.2-1

2021-07-19 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: tags -1 + confirmed Hi Stig On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 13:00, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote: > Attached is the diff. Changes are the upstream bugfix, as well as two commits > in the packaging repository: Thanks. Please go ahead and upload to unstable, then remove the moreinfo tag once it

Bug#991233: unblock: apertium-apy/0.11.7-2

2021-07-18 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Kartik On Sun, 18 Jul 2021 at 10:48, Kartik Mistry wrote: > [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing It looks like you've attached a binary debdiff. We are looking for a source debdiff between the version in testing and unstable. i.e. debdiff apertium-apy_0.11.6-1.dsc

Bug#991122: unblock: varnish/6.5.2-1

2021-07-18 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi Stig Please attach a filtered debdiff to this bug. Something like: filterdiff -x '*/build-aux/*' -x '*/doc/html/*' varnish-6.5.1-1--6.5.2-1.debdiff >filtered.debdiff Please also show the command that you end up using, so we can see which parts were excluded.

Bug#991233: unblock: apertium-apy/0.11.7-2

2021-07-18 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi Kartik On Sun, 18 Jul 2021 at 08:33, Kartik Mistry wrote: > Please unblock apertium-apy (0.11.7-2) which will fix #990917 > > Let me know if any additional information is needed. Please see the 'Appropriate changes during Hard and Full Freeze' section and the

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >