Does gcc 4.1.1 support AT90PWMx?
On 4/26/07, Tobias Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1:1.4.5-3
Severity: minor
With the latest package -- though stating in the changelog that they
have been rebuilt against the newest binutils-avr -- the support for
the AT90PWMx devices
Hi,
thanx for all your patches. I'm working on updating the avr packages
and your patches will be usefull. Conserning the FreeBSD patches:
On 4/19/07, Tobias Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I applied also serveral patches from the FreeBSD pages: [1]
binutils-patch-aa.diff
This is irrelevant
Hi,
gcc-4.1-source ver 4.1.2 is still in experimental. Once it is released
to unstable, I'll make this upgrade aswell. I plan to upgrade to 4.1.1
soon...
--
Håkan Ardö
Hi,
I'll have a look at this tonight. If Matthias solution works we'll use
thatone for etch, and the gcc-src solution for unstable. Should I do
anything special to make the release go into etch?
On 3/19/07, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Håkan,
Can you give an ETA for fixing this
Hi,
thanx for the patch. A better solution however would be to
build-depend on gcc-4.1-source in order not to duplicate the gcc
sourcecode.
On 3/13/07, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: gcc-avr
Version: 1:4.1.0-1
Severity: serious
see
On 3/13/07, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
thanx for the patch. A better solution however would be to
build-depend on gcc-4.1-source in order not to duplicate the gcc
sourcecode.
For sure this would be better. (I just didn't dare try this.) I
On 3/13/07, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 06:14:51PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
On 3/13/07, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
thanx for the patch. A better solution however would be to
build-depend on gcc-4.1
Hi,
thanx for the repport. I've forwarded it upstream as bug #19060:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?19060
On 2/13/07, Terran Melconian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1.4.5-2
Severity: important
In avr/iotnx61.h, the PCMSK registers are defined as follows:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Joerg Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jan 8, 2007 2:00 PM
Subject: [bug #3485] Using float arithmetic without linking with -lm
result in incorrect code
To: Joerg Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED],
avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Update
-- Forwarded message --
From: Joerg Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 1, 2006 8:54 AM
Subject: [bug #18169] multiple definition of __fixsfsi
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Joerg Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED],
avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Update of bug #18169 (project avr-libc):
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bob Paddock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 1, 2006 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #3485] Using float arithmetic without
linking with -lm result in incorrect code
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrea Baldoni [EMAIL
On 11/1/06, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Added suggest gdb-doc (closes: #392961)
This surely didn't remove the GFDL'ed texi files from the source as
done in the gdb source package.
Nope, I'll rectify that...
--
Håkan Ardö
Hi,
I've forwarded this upstream:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?18169
On 10/19/06, Stephan Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1:1.4.4-2
Compiling the following program with avr-gcc gives an error about
multiple definition of __fixsfsi
// program code
Hi,
thanx for your repport. This is probably an upstream problem. I'll
upgrade the lib to 1.4.5 and if that dosn't help I'll forward the
problem upstream.
On 10/19/06, Stephan Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1:1.4.4-2
Compiling the following program with avr-gcc
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 1:1.0.2-7
Severity: minor
The xorg.conf man page referes to a mouse(4) manpage. It is provided by the
manpages but it is not the xorg mouse man page.
-- Systeh Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture:
Hi,
Daniel Widenfalk has placed a lot of work into getting this pkg into
shape with the intention of adopting it. Please coordinate with him,
I'm more or less out of the loop...
On 10/16/06, Itzhak Ben-Akiva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Hakan and all,
I'm looking for an interesting project to
Package: toolchain-source
Version: 3.2-8
-- Forwarded message --
From: Vasek Stodulka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 11, 2006 9:25 AM
Subject: Problem with toolchain-source
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am using Debian Etch and I tried to run
TPKG_SERVER=ftp.cz.debian.org
Hi,
thanx for the repport. Would you consider doing a formal upstream bug
repport as desribed here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
and reply to this mail with the upstream bugreport number.
Thanx!
On 5/11/06, Philipp Marek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18
X-Debbugs-Cc:
Hi,
I'v forwarded this upstream as bug 2626:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2626
On 4/13/06, Terran Melconian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: binutils-avr
Version: 2.15-3
The attiny26 supports some forms of the LPM (load program memory)
instruction, but under certain
Hi,
thanx for the patch, I'll apply it later today.
On 4/29/06, Aaron M. Ucko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: xfaces
Version: 3.3-25
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Greetings.
As you may have heard, Debian is in the midst of a transition to
X11R7. One
]
Action: failed
Status: 5.2.0
Remote-MTA: dns; taket.barbanet.com (81.224.104.166)
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Relay access denied
--- Forwarded Message
To: Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#362537: picon-unknown: New upstream
On 4/14/06, Bill Wohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: picon-unknown
Version: 2004.01.02-1
Severity: normal
It's been a couple of years, so it would be nice to have an update. Have
you thought about regular updates? Quarterly? Twice a year? Annually?
Just before a release?
Well the
Hi,
thanx for the patch. I'll make sure to included it in the next release
and I have forwarded it upstream as bug 16260:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=16260
On 4/4/06, Glenn Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1:1.4.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
thanx for the info, I'll upgrade...
On 3/6/06, Carrick Detweiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1.4.3-1
There is a bug in avr/boot.h which causes the wrong macro to be used by
the preprocessor with some processors. This is fixed in the upstream
version as per bug:
Hi,
this is a good idea, but won't we need multiple version of avr-libc
then aswell, or will a avr-libc compiled with gcc 4.0 work with gcc
3.4?
On 2/17/06, Lars Noschinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: gcc-avr
Version: 1:4.0.2-1
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice, if you could install
On 2/17/06, Lars Noschinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: gcc-avr
Version: 1:4.0.2-1
Severity: minor
gcc-avr suggests the gcc-3.2 package which isn't available in neither
stable, testing or unstable.
Yes, it should be gcc-4.0 now...
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Hi,
thanx for the fix, but the patch were missing...
On 2/15/06, Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I uploaded. Please respond if
you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key
Hi,
thanx for all the pacthes, I'll make a new release during this weekend...
On 2/3/06, Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
retitle 349015 compface: no longer reads XBM files
tag 349015 patch
thanks
The Debian-specific patch that allowed compface(1) to read XBM images
got lost between
Hi,
thanx for the patch, I can do the upload today.
On 1/18/06, Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
package xfaces
tag 346812 patch
thanks
I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA
group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and
produced
On 1/16/06, Didier Verna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: compface
Version: 1:1.5.2-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
since the last upgrade, compface doesn't do its job anymore, but generates
unjustified warnings instead. Here is a testcase on the xbm file attached
below (that looks ok to
Hi,
I've handed over this package into the hands of Daniel Widenfalk. Any
progress Daniel?
On 12/28/05, Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
what are your current plans involving this package? At present, the gdb
packages built from it cannot be compiled on modern gcc at least for ARM
Package: siptoolbox
Version: 0.3.99rc2alpha3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
it is compiled agains libanimal-0.14.0.so.0, which is no longer availkible
as animal0 is updated. Pleas recompile.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT
Package: xfaces
Version: 3.3-20
Severity: wishlist
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 30, 2005 4:25 AM
Subject: xlibs-dev Transition
To: debian-devel-announce@lists.debian.org
Hi all,
This mail is being written to let you all know about a
Package: libcompface
Version: 1989.11.11-24
Severity: wishlist
-- Forwarded message --
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 22, 2005 11:37 PM
Subject: possible freetype transition; improved library handling
needed for all C/C++ packages
To:
get
the rest working.
I appreciate your help and understanding in that I might stumble in
the beginning...
By all means!
Regards
/Daniel
Hakan Ardo wrote:
On 10/29/05, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 10:20:03AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote
On 10/29/05, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 10:20:03AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
Daniel: my experience of GCC development is non-existant but I am
rather good at Debian packaging and I happen to need an updated set of
cross-compilers. If you
On 10/20/05, Daniel Widenfalk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, that seems managable. I'll do it if you're willing to help me get
Great!
started and pointed in the right direction. Required tools and so on...
By all means.
Also, any logs and documentation (or pointers to) of what has been done
On 10/20/05, Daniel Widenfalk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I saw at debian.org that you feel you don't have the time needed to
maintain the toolchain-source binutils and gcc package. I might be
interested in helping out depending on the amount and resources of
work needed.
I'm maintaining
Package: wnpp
I've relised that I don't have the time required to maintain this
package. There are currently quite a few bugs and gcc needs to be
upgraded to 4.0.
On 9/22/05, Tom Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any status updates/ETA on this one?
Sorry, no. I've got too little time to handle this, and I've put up
the package for adoption...
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tevp.net
Illegitimus non carborundum
an updated toolchain-source to match. Thanks!
Will do...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCzUuTeXr56x4Muc0RAkiaAJ9rIaxPHUlEslBNZalowO+g6kQ6wwCgpBMF
0pRqgQfN0uk9qllbALpIS6o=
=UmK7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Hakan Ardo
/gcc/gthr-posix.h:43:21: pthread.h: No such file or directory
../../src/gcc/gthr-posix.h:44:20: unistd.h: No such file or directory
Seems like you are missing the libc headders. Did you install them? See the
README for more info.
--
Hakan Ardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
from the web
-- no debconf information
--
Hakan Ardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
filed this as minor because it's easy to work around by undefining
ADC again after including the header.
--
Hakan Ardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 06:39:41PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
My system is unstable as of today.
Is there a missing build-depends: netpbm or something?
Probably, I'll look into it...
--
Hakan Ardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 11:48:10AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Hakan Ardo wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 06:39:41PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
My system is unstable as of today.
Is there a missing build-depends: netpbm or something?
Probably, I'll look
-
--
Hakan Ardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
101 - 147 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
