On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:45:54AM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> > this pretty much sounds like this should go into contrib, rather than
> > Debian main. Or is there free server code as well?
>
> There is no requirement for the "other side", be it firmware, network
> services, ... of communication
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 08:41:38AM +, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro
wrote:
> > this pretty much sounds like this should go into contrib, rather than Debian
> > main. Or is there free server code as well?
> as Alex replied, there is a source https://github.com/elisescu/tty-server and
> from
control: tags -1 patch
On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 11:11:22AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/policy-rcd-declarative
> is a good solution to this: install that package, then instead of
> dropping that file into /usr/local/sbin/policy-rc.d, do
> echo ".* .* deny"
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 06:27:28AM +, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro
wrote:
> * Package name: tty-share
> Version : 0.6.2
> Upstream Author : Vasile Popescu
> * URL : https://github.com/elisescu/tty-share
> * License : Expat
> Programming Lang: Go
>
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 04:25:56PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > thanks for that info! maybe dpkg could treat /usr/local not as tainted if
> > the
> > only file in /usr/local is /usr/local/sbin/policy-rc.d ?
> While we could perhaps add an exception in the Debian vendor profile.
> It does look
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.19.5+deb10u1
Severity: normal
User: devscri...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: debrebuild
Hi,
Sometimes debrebuild fails to download some packages from snapshot.d.o
even though they exist:
"cannot find dash/0.5.10.2-5/amd64 in dumpavail"
hi,
adding Guillem to the loop (and preserving a full quote for him).
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 03:00:43PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2020-08-27 13:25, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Package: buildd.debian.org
> > Severity: wishlist
> > User: reproducible-bui
Package: buildd.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: environment
Dear buildd maintainers,
since a while dpkg adds a small note to a .buildinfo if /usr/local/sbin
is populated (which I'm not sure I agree is sensible, but it's what dpkg
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:50:42AM +0200, Lukas Puehringer wrote:
> in-toto 0.5.0-1 [1] and python-securesystemslib 0.16.0-1 [2] fix this issue.
> Any
> chance we can get these accepted before in-toto is autoremoved from testing on
> 2020-09-01?
yes, I plan to upload until then. sorry for the
hey Lukas,
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 02:03:00PM +0200, Lukas Puehringer wrote:
> FYI: https://github.com/secure-systems-lab/securesystemslib/pull/264 fixes the
> issue upstream.
nice. once it's released we should get this new version into unstable!
--
cheers,
Holger
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 03:19:49PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> debian-edu-config (2.10.65+deb10u6) buster; urgency=medium
I've uploaded now too (as it's Sunday afternoon already...)
--
cheers,
Hol
.
+ (It would otherwise happen at first DHCP lease renewal ~15 minutes later.)
+- Adjust Makefile and debian/dirs.
+
+ -- Holger Levsen Sun, 26 Jul 2020 15:13:43 +0200
+
debian-edu-config (2.10.65+deb10u5) buster; urgency=medium
[ Wolfgang Schweer ]
diff -Nru debian-edu-config-2.10.65+deb10u5
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 08:07:53PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Ideally it could check the version of diffoscope used and pass the
> appropriate argument...
>
> On closer look, the --exclude-directory-metadata=yes|no syntax was
> introduced in 112 (present in buster at least), so it might be
Hi Patrice,
fixed now. & thanks for your bug report and patience in the first place!
--
cheers,
Holger
---
holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:24:53PM +0200, Alexis Murzeau wrote:
> I'm getting this new lintian warning for language_data.js,
> but I can't find which binary package I should depend on.
>
> "sphinx" (as suggested by lintian) is a virtual package provided by
> python3-sphinx
> which doesn't
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 07:55:09PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > I'd like to update debian-security-support in stretch to
> > 2020.06.21~deb9u1
> Please go ahead.
thanks, uploaded.
--
cheers,
Holger
---
* Mark xen as end-of-life for Stretch (DSA 4602-1).
+
+ -- Holger Levsen Fri, 10 Jul 2020 19:58:12 +0200
+
debian-security-support (2019.12.12~deb9u2) stretch-security; urgency=medium
* Rebuild for stretch-security.
diff -Nru
debian-security-support-2019.12.12~deb9u2/security-support-e
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 07:00:58PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Minor nitpick. Shouldn't that be 2020.06.21~deb10u1 ?
> Yes, it should. (As it's the first stable update based on that upstream
> version.)
> With that fixed, please go ahead.
thanks, uploaded with that change.
--
cheers,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 07:46:59PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > -debian-security-support (2020.04.16~deb10u2) buster; urgency=medium
> > +debian-security-support (2020.06.21~deb10u3) buster; urgency=medium
> Minor nitpick. Shouldn't that be 2020.06.21~deb10u1 ?
no, it's the 3rd update
19:29:25.0 +0200
@@ -1,8 +1,45 @@
-debian-security-support (2020.04.16~deb10u2) buster; urgency=medium
+debian-security-support (2020.06.21~deb10u3) buster; urgency=medium
- * Re-upload for buster.
+ * Rebuild for buster.
- -- Holger Levsen Sat, 02 May 2020 12:00:57 +0200
+ -- Holger
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.20.4
Severity: wishlist
User: devscri...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: debrebuild
Dear Maintainer,
currently srebuild creates output which is ment to (be parsed and) executed,
thus it would be really nice if the output was easily parsable, IOW this
should be added
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.20.4
Severity: wishlist
User: devscri...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: debrebuild
Dear Maintainer,
please add an option (--rebuild-in-same-path?) for rebuilding in the same path
as the .buildinfo specified. Thus the generated sbuild call needs to call sbuild
using
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 11:02:50AM +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> Surely the right thing is:
> > At the beep, the time will be ... three forty seven and sixteen seconds ...
> > BEEP.
that actually sounds like a good and doable idea, thanks!
do you think you could maybe also provide a
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.30.1-4
Severity: wishlist
x-debbugs-cc: Russell Weber
submitter: Russell Weber
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 02:43:43PM -0600, Russell Weber wrote:
> Package: busybox
> Version: 1:1.30.1-4
> Severity: wishlist
> lsblk is a very useful tool for understanding your current
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 03:52:08PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Holger, as I mentioned some days ago, I consider this case a
> regression which I was planning on fixing. This fix was already
> included earlier today in the dpkg 1.20.4 upload. :)
yup, I've seen this today. Thank you!
--
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 09:08:43PM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> > not sure if this is the same bug or just a similar one:
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 user user 9 Jul 3 16:07 debian/munin.service -> /dev/null
> As for Holger's package, Lintian also flags that condition. Source
> packages can be unpacked
control: retitle -1 'grml-debootstrap: provide predictable network device names'
control: severity -1 wishlist
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 02:58:18PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> i'm trying to setup stretch images, and while the same commandline works
> for jessie, it fails with stretc
control: severity -1 important
On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 05:42:01PM +0200, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:
> while working on Debian Edu Bullseye, I noticed that it is no longer
> possible to log into the GOSa² web interface after a main server
> upgrade.
this pretty much sounds like a 'serious' bug ( =
Hi,
not sure if this is the same bug or just a similar one:
[...]
dpkg-source: info: extracting munin in munin-2.0.63
dpkg-source: info: unpacking munin_2.0.63.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: info: unpacking munin_2.0.63-1.debian.tar.xz
dpkg-source: error: pathname 'munin-2.0.63/debian/munin.service'
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 07:07:50PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> It's my understanding, that there is no clear consensus what should
> happen on package purge. Some packages do manually remove system users
> and go to some length to find files/directories owned by a system
> user/group and remove
Package: lintian
Version: 2.82.0
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
running lintian on developers-reference 11.0.12 from bullseye results in two
warnings:
W: developers-reference-ru: embedded-javascript-library
usr/share/developers-reference/ru/_static/jquery.js please use libjs-jquery
W:
package: release-notes
x-debbugs-cc: Timo Weingärtner , Jan Luca Naumann
, 963...@bugs.debian.org, debian-de...@lists.debian.org
in #963191 on Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:06:33AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 09:32:09AM +0200, Timo Weingärtner wrote:
> > 20.06.20 13:26
hi,
I'm not fully sure if people really intend to change the 1.0 format, but if so,
I'm against it. If you do it, please call it 1.1 or whatever, but please don't
change 1.0, too many tools rely on it's decade old behavior.
Besides that it's also my opinion that we should get rid off native
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.20.3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
debrebuild creates wrong commandlines for binNMU, because the source field
in .buildinfo files looks different for binNMUs than normal uploads.
Normal uploads have these entries:
Source: libqcow
Version: 20181227-1.1
package: devscripts
Version: 2.20.3
Severity: normal
x-debbugs-cc: reproducible-bui...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Dear Maintainer,
TTBOMK currently there is no tool to assemble the source for a binNMU. The
source for a binNMU has do be assembled like this:
- take the normal source package and
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.20.3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
even though current .buildinfo files in Debian don't contain the hashes of the
source package (as we mandated in our original design) it would be great if
debrebuild could, at least optionally also download the source
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.20.3
Severity: normal
x-debbugs-cc: reproducible-bui...@alioth-lists.debian.net
hi,
reproducible-check should not show any results on Ubuntu as Ubuntu is not
involved in Reproducible Builds and not doing any efforts. TTBOMK they also
don't publish their
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.20.3
Severity: normal
hi,
reproducible-check shows how many of the installed binary packages are
(un)reproducible in our current CI framework, that is these results only
show the theoretical reproducibility of these Debian pacakges, they
*do not* however show any
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.20.3
x-debbugs-cc: reproducible-bui...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Hi,
on a sid system I get this when running reproducible-check from devscripts:
$ reproducible-check
alsa-lib (1.2.2-2.1) is unreproducible (libasound2)
Package: lintian-brush
Version: 0.68
Severity: normal
hi,
$ apt source debian-edu-doc
$ cd debian-edu-doc*
$ lintian-brush --dry-run --diff
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 03:24:22PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> The topic came up on IRC, and for me it is about removing bloat from
> ("default") installs.
cool, thanks.
> I have also heard about concerns of the quality of haveged
> randomness, but personally did not investigate.
ack.
Hi,
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 01:06:49PM +, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> your package currently Recommends: haveged. On modern kernels, so
> whatever will ship in bulleye, the kernel will provide enough entropy,
> so there should be no need for haveged, except in exceptional
> situations.
>
>
Package: lintian-brush
Version: 0.68
Severity: normal
hi,
lintian-brush 0.68 fails on git:debian-cd like this:
Fixer 'debian-changelog-line-too-long' failed to run.
Script /usr/share/lintian-brush/fixers/debian-changelog-line-too-long.py failed
with exit code: 1
Traceback (most recent call
Hi Lucas,
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 09:47:18PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> At least the good thing is that I discovered that DMD actually has users ;)
I look at my DMD page every day, so many thanks for all the work on it!
(I have a script which opens a bunch of Debian & Reproducible Builds
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:01:43PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> please remove pdns-recursor with the next/last point release of stretch.
> Security support has ended upstream, and it'd be better if people
> wouldn't run DNS servers that have known security bugs (and we are
> unable to
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:17:49AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> the paths do not include "x86_64-linux-gnu" on other architectures,
I was aware of this...
> you should write these as
> usr/lib/*/libt4k_common.a
> usr/lib/*/libt4k_common.la
but not that I could use wildcards here. Thank you!
Hi Adrian,
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 09:41:16AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: t4kcommon
> Version: 0.1.1-8
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=t4kcommon=sid
>
> ...
>dh_missing -a
> dh_missing: warning:
control: retitle -1 reprotest: should not default to vary time and date
thanks
Hi James,
thanks for your bug report!
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 02:49:58PM -0400, James Valleroy wrote:
> time(): 1631998736
> touch($cacheFile);
> clearstatcache(); // has no effect
> filemtime($cacheFile):
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 03:46:05PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > I'd appreciate a quick review and possible corrections from you!
> Fine for me.
:) thanks!
--
cheers,
Holger
---
) 2015 - 2020 Hideki Yamane
+ (c) 2019 - 2020 Holger Levsen
This manual is free software; you may redistribute it and/or modify it
under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
diff --git a/source/index.rst b/source/index.rst
index a3d04b9..08922c1 100644
Package: lintian-brush
Version: 0.64
Severity: normal
Dear Jelmer,
from #-qa:
jelmer: new lintian-brush works nicely on src:tuxmath, thanks!
however, it seems (now?) it doesnt use the email address from
$DEBEMAIL anymore and instead writes $USER@HOSTNAME into d/changelog.
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 02:52:27AM +, Paul Wise wrote:
> It sounds like something like this is what is wanted in the links panel?
>
> buildd: logs, ... href="https://buildinfos.debian.net/buildinfo-pool/libf/libfakekey/;
> title=".buildinfo files for official builds">info
yes, that would be
n-security-support-2020.04.16/debian/changelog 2020-04-16 02:16:25.0 +0200
+++ debian-security-support-2020.04.16~deb10u2/debian/changelog 2020-05-02 12:00:57.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+debian-security-support (2020.04.16~deb10u2) buster; urgency=medium
+
+ * Re-upload for buster.
+
;;
limited)
gettext \
"Limited security support for one or more packages"
-echo "\n"
+echo; echo
gettext \
"Unfortunately, it has been necessary to limit security support for some packages." | $FOLD
-
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.20.2
Severity: wishlist
x-debbugs-cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
debrebuild expects a working sbuild setup, which is a sensible expectation.
It would however also be nice if it had a --standalone mode or --one-shot-mode
which would
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 07:49:36PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Excellent! Thanks for doing this. :)
indeed so! :)
--
cheers,
Holger
---
holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
control: tags -1 + pending
thanks
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 05:46:06AM +0700, Judit Foglszinger wrote:
> Added a patch for clarifying removability from upload queue.
thank you very much! merged to master and updated .po files. (I vaguely plan an
upload before the end of the month.)
> Subject:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 10:22:22AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > definitly, yes, filing this bug now.
> As mentioned elsewhere, this was already fixed yesterday in fd8ee67d.
ah, cool! & thanks for the quick fix!
--
cheers,
Holger
package: lintian
version: 2.67.0
x-debbugs-cc: Debian Med Project List , Debian
Developers , Debian Lintian Maintainers
, reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 09:56:24AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> today I've seen the first time this new lintian warning:
>
>
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 01:21:42PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 07:41:00 + Niels Thykier wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 11:25:23 -0400 Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > Please drop transitional package dh-systemd for Buster, as it has been
> >
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 07:16:45PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please go ahead; thanks.
thanks, uploaded.
--
cheers,
Holger
---
holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
PGP
control: retitle -1 buster-pu: package opam/2.0.3-1+deb10u1
thanks
hi,
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:56:15AM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> It has been brought to my attention that opam doesn't work in buster
> out of the box. This has been tracked in [1] (fixed in testing) and
> [2]. See in
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 02:41:35AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> we would like the following two 'important' bugs in buster:
-> we would like *to fix* the following two 'important' bugs in buster,
*which have been fixed in unstable already*...
--
cheers,
/distribution/policies.json (Closes: #955978).
+- Adjust Makefile accordingly.
+
+ -- Holger Levsen Thu, 16 Apr 2020 02:34:38 +0200
+
debian-edu-config (2.10.65+deb10u4) buster; urgency=medium
[ Dominik George ]
diff -Nru debian-edu-config-2.10.65+deb10u4/lib/thunderbird/distribution/policies.json
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 06:33:29PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > In section 5.6.1, it is mentioned that the dcut command can be used to
> > remove packages from the upload queue.
> > However, section 5.9.2.1 states that it is no longer possible to remove
> > packages from incoming.
> > This
Hi Moritz,
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 08:32:58AM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> The current version in unstable (11.0.10) again reads:
> | If it's an upstream problem, you have to forward it to the upstream author.
> | Forwarding a bug is not enough, you have to check at each release if the
> |
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear ftp masters,
please remove desktop-profiles from unstable, it's unneeded today (as it has
been replaced by XDG), the last user was src:debian-edu-config which stopped
depending on it in November 2019 with it's 2.11.8 upload.
(It probably has not
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 10:20:37PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Possibly an option for Debian Edu? Maybe even for Chromium in Debian?
yes, I'd suggest to close this bug and file a new one against chromium...
--
cheers,
Holger
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 11:22:01AM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > I'd prefer if this bug could be kept open.
> Is this still present with Debian/buster?
I believe so, yes.
--
cheers,
Holger
---
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
please integrate information from buildinfos.debian.net into tracker.d.o,
which is a different view/aspect of reproducible builds of Debian packages than
the one currently integrated.
The current one is about the results from
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.20.2
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
debrebuild uses snapshot.d.o to install packages and it also gives some hints
how to set up sbuild. However it doesn't tell that apt has to be instructured
to ignored expires signatures, as else snapshot.d.o is not usuable
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.20.2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
this bug report is a bit premature, as currently debrebuild does not setup
the chroot debrebuild (or rather the sbuild command generated by debrebuild),
but anyway, let's file a bug to track this problem and improve upon:
I
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.19.5+deb10u1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Subject says it all: debrebuild should suggest (or run, see #955123) to use
the --no-run-lintian switch for sbuild.
--
cheers,
Holger
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.19.5+deb10u1
Severity: wishlist
x-debbugs-cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
please switch from using httpredir.debian.org to deb.debian.org:
$ grep httpredir /usr/bin/debrebuild
deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ $base_dist
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.20.2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
$ grep reproducible /usr/bin/debrebuild
my $armored_key = "$tempdir/etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/reproducible.asc";
my $dearmored_key = "$tempdir/etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/reproducible.gpg";
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 08:47:38AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 29-03-2020 08:45, Paul Gevers wrote:
> >> I would suggest putting it at a per-release URL:
> >> https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze-and-release-dates.yaml
> > But wouldn't that be harder to find for tracker and other
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.20.2
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
when running debrebuild it produces output, first instructions how to rebuild
manually and second, how to rebuild using sbuild.
For automating this it would be very useful to have a --sbuild-output-only
switch, which would
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.20.2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
$ debrebuild bash_5.0-6_amd64.buildinfo
Use of uninitialized value in split at /usr/bin/debrebuild line 55.
need Build-Architecture field at /usr/bin/debrebuild line 70.
$
It seems that debrebuild needs a Build-Architecture
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.20.2
Severity: normal
x-debbugs-cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
debrebuild has no manpage and no --help option, so it's a bit hard to get
started using it.
Please add both.
--
cheers,
Holger
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.20.2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
please make debrebuild not fail on signed .buildinfo files:
$ debrebuild bash_5.0-6_amd64.buildinfo
debrebuild: error: syntax error in bash_5.0-6_amd64.buildinfo at line 1:
OpenPGP signature not allowed here
--
cheers,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 05:37:48PM +0100, Steve Schnepp wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 5:22 PM Holger Levsen wrote:
> > yes, sure, so let me rephrase: why not 5min for the default timeout?
> That's a question that you should send to the systemd team, as simplicity
> advocate
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 05:16:31PM +0100, Steve Schnepp wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 3:39 PM Holger Levsen wrote:
> > why not 5min?
>
> It is the delay for munin-node *startup*, not during runtime execution of
> plugins.
> Therefore, simplicity would be to just use the
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:51:00PM +0100, de...@sumpfralle.de wrote:
> Sixty seconds sounds more reasonable. I will change it with the next release.
why not 5min?
--
cheers,
Holger
---
Hi Daniel,
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 06:14:02PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> The documentation of the "Closes: #NN" changelog syntax describes
> the syntax in terms of a Perl regular expression. However, not all
> readers know Perl. I suggest to describe the semantics in English,
> in
is:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 01:39:18PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Commits:
> 7b316679 by Holger Levsen at 2020-03-13T14:39:02+01:00
> d/rules: add workaround to fix (unreported) issue in blends-dev. Closes:
> #953359.
>
> - - - - -
>
>
> 2 changed file
Hi Simon, everyone:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:32:00AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> To be completely clear about this for those using this bug report as a
> stand-in for the requested documentation in devref (like me), it's now at:
> https://auth.buildd.debian.org/auth/giveback.cgi?pkg===
I'd
Hi Jelmer,
On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 01:21:06PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> The configuration file lives in the package itself - there is
> currently no global configuration file.
in each source package?
> Would a global configuration
> file also be useful, in addition to
Hi Jelmer,
On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 11:06:46AM +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Thanks, glad to hear lintian-brush is useful.
very much so!
> There is actually already a --dry-run option (useful in combination
> with --diff), but it's currently hard to discover since it's
> missing from the
Package: lintian-brush
Version: 0.58
Severity: normal
Dear Jelmer,
man lintian-brush.conf explains the "per-package configuration for
lintian-brush"
and says lintian-brush.conf is a lintian-brush per-package configuration file,
which contains of a series of single key/value pairs.
However
Package: lintian-brush
Version: 0.58
Severity: wishlist
Dear Jelmer,
many thanks for lintian-brush, I love it and would like to run it in my
'prepare-a-debian-package-release'-script in --dry-run mode to improve my
release processes...
Please add such a mode.
--
cheers,
Holger
Hi Steve,
thanks for your bug report with patch, much appreciated! However...
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 11:54:19PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> This is not testing a property of the vrms package, but of the environment
> the test is run in, and therefore I don't think this is appropriate in an
>
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 09:46:21PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Currently, it seems that pacparser has not been orphaned, yet. There was
> this salvage procedure discussed earlier. I'll check if that is common
> practice these days and start the process of friendly take over.
salvaging is a thing
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 04:06:23PM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > so for the record: while I can easily workaround the above problem by using
> > a
> > Fedora based VM to download updates for my Qubes dom0, I'd be glad to help
> > people to get yum, dnf and rpm back into Debian, eg
control: tags 952283 -pending
control: tags 952383 +pending
thanks
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 05:21:22PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Correction: #952383.
oh! sorry for the noise, Pirate!
Daniel, 952383 is fixed in git with the following changelog entry:
* check-support-status.in:
- Don't
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 03:51:58PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > all merged except that one case, fixing the error code.
> Thanks!
thanks for your patches! much appreciated!
> Alternatively, how about deleting the «exit 0» line entirely? That
> would effectively downgrade the error message
Hi Daniel,
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 03:38:15PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Following up on #951772, here are a few more bugfixes:
> Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Clarify an error message
> Subject: [PATCH 2/4] Fix --version output: used an undefined variable.
> Subject: [PATCH 3/4] Print errors and
Package: debian-edu-doc
Version: 2.11.1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
the new bullseye manuals (checked the german PDF and HTML versions) there are
no images included, while they are in the stretch and buster manuals.
--
cheers,
Holger
Package: debian-edu-doc
Version: 2.11.1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
on at least the html and pdfs versions of the Debian Edu manuals there's an
empty publication date on the frontpage.
Better would be to include the date of the last change to the manual :)
--
cheers,
Holger
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the html2text package.
The package description is:
html2text is a converter from HTML to plain text.
.
html2text reads HTML documents supplied in the command line (or from standard
input), converts each of them into a stream of plain text
hi Guillem,
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 11:55:38AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Actually, I guess the other option that might be an option for stable is
> to make dpkg-buildpackage generate the buildinfo file itself, and on
> source-only uploads force the name to be _source.buildinfo regardless
> of
701 - 800 of 6832 matches
Mail list logo
