On 2010-03-02 3:04 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 12:45:26PM +0100, Jürgen Strobel wrote:
Ok here we are at the root of the problem. I do *not* want another
python interpreter inside OOo. I fully understand there's only one, and
that's the debian default version
On 2010-03-03 2:19 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 02:14:56PM +0100, Jürgen Strobel wrote:
From my understanding of upstream I disagree. See
Then you didn't read close enough. Upstream only ships a module
inside its tree. Not being in the system at all. The system
On 2010-03-01 7:23 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Besides the factthat basing a important project on *unstable* is questionable
anyway, I'd very much buiild against 2.6, too - if it was default python.
Ask the python guys why this isn't yet and when it will be. Not me.
The project spans at least
Package: python-uno
Version: 1:3.1.1-16
Severity: wishlist
I am aware of #476213. This is not a request to fix temporary unstable problems.
I would very much like to have an additional python2.6-uno. After glancing
at debian/rules I feel unable to provide patches though.
Regards,
Jürgen
On 2010-03-01 2:09 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
tag 572064 + wontfix
forcemerge 476213 572064
thanks
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 01:35:23PM +0100, Jürgen Strobel wrote:
I am aware of #476213. This is not a request to fix temporary unstable
problems.
Then you should not have filed a new bug
Package: ruby1.8
Version: 1.8.7.22-1
Severity: wishlist
n/t
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
regards,
Jürgen Strobel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (850, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-zerberos-2
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
-- no debconf information
7 matches
Mail list logo
