In case it's helpful for someone else, here's the steps I used to work
around this. Note that I'll probably need to manually clear the
alternatives entry later when the checksum file is available.
This is just a dirty approximation of what the update-flashplugin-nonfree
script does. Don't do
> Please try again with the 15.12 driver that is now available in
> unstable, testing, and jessie-backports.
This bug had occurred on my testing/sid machine during a large upgrade.
At that point, the Xorg dependencies on my system were in such a state
that apt-get successfully installed
> The bug is still around now in Sid after the upgrade to kernel
> 4.3.0.1-amd64
Hopping on to confirm. Catalyst 15.9 and Linux 4.3.0 caused Xorg to have
a canary. Falling back to radeon worked just fine. I haven't tried the
AMD installer yet, but I'm hoping it's actually fixed in the latest
I have noticed that the issue occurs fairly consistently, but not
always. If it does not occur at first, logging out and in again, or
rebooting, is sufficient to cause the problem to occur.
Thanks,
James Wagner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
workaround I have found for this bug yet, is for
the user to logout and log back in to thier X11 session.
Thanks,
James Wagner
-- Package-specific info:
Debian version: wheezy/sid
Architecture: i386
Package version: 1:2.8.3
Adobe Flash Player version: LNX 10,2,152,27
MD5 checksums
Subject: sauerbraten: Sauerbraten maps fail checksum check on some servers.
Package: sauerbraten
Version: 0.0.20100728.dfsg-1
Severity: important
Sauerbraten is a game that features online play. However, the developer
did not include any form of anti-cheating protection. As such, many
servers run
There is no way around it.
Fair enough. Have a nice day Bill. Thank you for the clarification.
James.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
such, only libjpeg62-dev can be installed unless the user wishes to
break the dependencies of certain packages.
Well they are all development packages, no ?
Yes Bill, they are all development packages. I'm just not sure how that
matters in this case. I'd just imagine that Debian doesn't want
Package: libjpeg-dev
Severity: normal
Although newer versions of libjpeg are available
(libjpeg7 and libjpeg8), only libjpeg62-dev provides libjpeg-dev. As
such, only libjpeg62-dev can be installed unless the user wishes to
break the dependencies of certain packages. This is not ideal as it
I was having the same problem as you describe in bug #316711 at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2005/07/msg6.html only the
system I found it on is RedHat 7.3 and OO 1.1.4. I found a solution for
it, which is to turn off accounting in the cups filter. vi
10 matches
Mail list logo
