Bug#821268: Not fixed

2016-07-29 Thread Jean Brefort
Hi, Things are worse than before, pxlib became unusable for gnumeric, see h ttps://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=832827 This issue is that HAVE_GSF in paradox-gsf.h is always undefined. Best regards, Jean

Bug#822398: gnumeric: FTBFS: error: implicit declaration of function 'PX_open_gsf'

2016-04-24 Thread Jean Brefort
Have a look to #821268. I applied a patch upstream last weak (resulting to the paradox plugin not built anymore because pxlib is currently not usable). Here is the patch: diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index cb09b70..abcaba7 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -499,7 +499,11

Bug#821268: pxlib-dev 0.6.6-1 breaks gnumeric build

2016-04-17 Thread Jean Brefort
Package: pxlib-dev Version: 0.6.6-1 Severity: normal Tags: upstream libgsf detection is not correct (the code is actually weird, it should use pkg-config, imho). I suppose I should also report upstream. -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy:

Bug#757611: Confirmation

2014-08-10 Thread Jean Brefort
I can reproduce the bug. Please report upstream. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#757611: Fixed upstream.

2014-08-10 Thread Jean Brefort
Don't care about reporting upstream, this one has been fixed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#718594: Old file format

2013-08-03 Thread Jean Brefort
This file seems to have been generated by gnumeric-1.0.x or earlier. The current code accepts a Type node but not graph:Type. This is just weird. One way to turn around: uncompress the file using gunzip if it is compressed, then edit with any text editor and replace graph:Type by just Type , and

Bug#718594: Patch

2013-08-03 Thread Jean Brefort
Attached patch might solve the issue if you are able to apply and rebuild. I'd like it to be tested before committing. diff --git a/src/sheet-object-graph.c b/src/sheet-object-graph.c index d85bd98..32942d6 100644 --- a/src/sheet-object-graph.c +++ b/src/sheet-object-graph.c @@ -1074,6 +1074,7 @@

Bug#718594: New patch

2013-08-03 Thread Jean Brefort
Please forget previous patch, it just does not work. This one does (will be in next gnumeric). All samples I have use Type node, and none use graph:Type. Thanks for reporting. Jean diff --git a/src/sheet-object-graph.c b/src/sheet-object-graph.c index d85bd98..05ec570 100644 ---

Bug#718594: Fixed upstream.

2013-08-03 Thread Jean Brefort
Fixed in gnumeric 1.12.5. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#638876: Fixed upstream

2013-03-07 Thread Jean Brefort
This works at least in 1.12.0 and later. Regards, Jean -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#660996: absolute versus relative addresses

2012-02-24 Thread Jean Brefort
I don't think it's a bug. As long as the addresses used are absolute, they will not change if you move your cells, insert rows or anything else. Looks like what you want is relative addressing, that is A5:A10 instead of $A$5:$A$10. You might also use $A5:$A10 if you don't insert columns. --

Bug#653061: libgs9 exports symbols conflicting with the same symbols in libjpeg8

2011-12-23 Thread Jean Brefort
Package: libgs9 Version: 9.04~dfsg-3 Severity: important Three symbols are concerned: jpeg_mem_init, jpeg_mem_term and jpeg_mem_available. Building an executable using the two libraries might crash. This happens for me with gnumeric (from git) when goffice is built with eps support and when I

Bug#653061: libgs9 exports symbols conflicting with the same symbols in libjpeg8

2011-12-23 Thread Jean Brefort
/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 Le vendredi 23 décembre 2011 à 23:27 +0100, Bill Allombert a écrit : On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 03:46:59PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Hi, Jean Brefort wrote: Three symbols are concerned: jpeg_mem_init, jpeg_mem_term and jpeg_mem_available. Building

Bug#629141: Fixed upstream

2011-06-04 Thread Jean Brefort
This has been fixed in 1.10.9. See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=626648 Regards, Jean -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#569251: libjpeg-dev does not exist anymore

2011-05-22 Thread Jean Brefort
Things are worse, seems the initial bug was fixed, since libwmf-dev now requests libjpeg-dev (at least in unstable) but libjpeg-dev is unknown, only libjpeg62-dev, libjpec7-dev and libjpeg8-dev are listed. Currently, libwmf-dev can't be installed in unstable at all. Best regards, Jean -- To

Bug#613453: Fixed upstream

2011-02-15 Thread Jean Brefort
This is gnome bug #626484 which is fixed since 1.10.9. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org