Package: tesseract-ocr
Version: 3.03.02-3
This is unexpected. The build dependency is on libleptonica-dev (= 1.70~)
which is leptonlib4. I don't see how or where a leptonlib3 could be
sneaking in.
Thank you for the problem report.
I will adjust the dependency.
Upstream has looked at compatibility and decided to
not bump soname for this package. I'll give things a week
to settle down and then this bug is ready for closure.
I would be happy to cede this package to someone with the
energy to make the switch.
Thank you, Julien. I'll talk to upstream and get a few more
details. They definitely bumped the soname for their
release, and probably for a good reason. The libwebp
upstream folks generally have their act together.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Leptonica upstream is releasing a new version that will
have an increased soname (liblept3 - liblept4). No exotic
challenges expected.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Tesseract upstream is releasing a new version that will
have an increased soname (libtesseact3 - libtesseract4).
No exotic challenges expected.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Thanks. Fixing debian/copyright today. Upstream is cleaning up the oddball
headers
in three files and that will be part of the version 1.70 final, to be
released next week.
Thank you for this report.
I talked to upstream. First, the grep you used is incorrect; sometimes
the help info is in the library but in main(). Second, we'll tone down the
level of confidence in the manpage and increase the ratio of help in
the next release, which is coming soon.
Ping.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Upstream is releasing a new version of webp soon that has an expanded
API, and therefore will bump soname and package from libwebp4 to
libwebp5. Reverse dependency list appended; I think
Sounds reasonable to me. Checking if upstream has any thoughts
on the matter.
I'm shocked, shocked that someone is forking PIL! Unless they
add CCITT Group4 TIFF support, in which case I'm delighted.
Package: sdl-image1.2
Version: 1.2.12-3
By uploading libwebp 0.3.0-3 to Debian unstable a few weeks ago, I
started a transition since libwebp2 is no longer built and has been
replaced by libwebp4.
This is a request binNMU (or just a regular maintainer upload)
of sdl-image1.2.
Fixed upstream, not yet shipping with Debian.
Sounds reasonable to me.
Sorry for the slow reply. I talked with upstream, and I think the
language files are DFSG compliant both in letter and spirit.
The language files are the product of machine learning, against
a few hundred fonts and a bunch of symbolic text. The machine
learning program already ships with
Patched as per upstream bug
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?32987
Thanks for reminder, I'll have a new package uploaded shortly.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Tomas Forsman st...@cs.umu.se wrote:
Package: mhonarc
Version: 2.6.18-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Ran mhonarc
* What exactly did you do (or not
Attaching some files. Everything goes in debian/ except for
Makefile.am which goes in progs/
I think I need to call to ./autobuild in front of ./configre in
debian/rules, but I have not yet gotten this to work.
Makefile.am
Description: Binary data
leptonica-progs.files
Description: Binary
Should be fixed in experimental within 24 hours. Not sure what to do
about Ubuntu / Wheezy / etc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Thanks, we will fix this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
This is all very helpful. Well get an updated man page with the next
Leptonica release. It almost sounds like you are interested in being a
co-maintainer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Upstream says:
I think this might be a known issue that we have fixed in our
[unreleased] version.
Could do to get the svn repository up to date.
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Jeff Breidenbach j...@jab.org wrote:
I don't understand what you mean by hardly trackable. The backtrace
I don't understand what you mean by hardly trackable. The backtrace
is helpful,
thank you. But also having an easy, guaranteed way to reproduce the problem
is also helpful. Is there some reason you do not wish to supply the images?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Thank you for the report. Please supply data and a simple
command that reproduces the problem. The following command
(with the standard tesseract-ocr-deu-frak Debian package
installed) does not segfault for me.
-Jeff
$ while true; do tesseract img028.tif img028.txt -l deu-frak; done
Tesseract
I can't remember what I did for the libpng dependency.
One used to be able to pull the package out of NEW and
take a look, but maybe that is not possible anymore. I
definitely changed the soname.
Happy to sponsor.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
You aren't getting off that easy! Please add your name as an Uploader.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I'm not sure why experimental would be faster. In any case,
since you packaged it, why not go ahead and upload? You
have my blessing.
I wanted to locally build a newer tesseract package of upstreams current
SVN
What's wrong with uupdate? It took me about five minutes to build today's
3.02.02 point release.
May I help you setting up a git repo?
Sounds scary. I'm comfortable with the current setup; will I get confused
going to
Chromium people can take this up with Release Team directly if interested.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Luca Falavigna ftpmas...@debian.org wrote:
Hi!
this is a quick update on what's going on with your package in NEW.
We're holding it due to a library transition which would affect some
Working on packaging. Hit a small snag, most likely something on my end.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Okay, I worked it out. New files uploaded to Debian. I assume/hope the
chromium folks who filed this bug are on top of any freeze related
issues that are in effect.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: python-pygame
Version: 1.9.1release+dfsg-6
The copyright file says the following:
Files: lib/freesansbold.ttf
Copyright: 2002-2009 Free Software Foundation
License: GPL-3.0+
However, that is incomplete. The actual license is GPL 3+ with
an important exception. Please update the
As mentioned, we're going to do 0.2.0 very soon after...
Well, should we wait for 0.2.0 ? ETA?
Pascal,
libwebp-0.1.99 bumps the soname from 2 to 3.
Are you SURE you want that and are ready for this to ship?
Soname changes are a big deal out here in packaging land.
Shawn,
I have the package built and ready, awaiting response from
Pascal before submitting.
-Jeff
I'll try to get to it this weekend. NMUs happily accepted also.
Pascal, please comment.
http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg1053655.html
Looks like an untar problem on my end when I rebuilt the package. Let me
try again.
Okay, root cause was running patch -p0 in the wrong directory. That's
resolved and running a clean build in pbuilder. Let's see if I managed to
do the same thing in Leptonica.
-Jeff
Okay, done. Want to double check this diff.gz file?
tesseract_3.02.01-5.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
I think we are finally in good shape...
$ zcat tesseract_3.02.01-5.diff.gz | grep control
--- tesseract-3.02.01.orig/debian/control
+++ tesseract-3.02.01/debian/control
$ tar tzf tesseract_3.02.01.orig.tar.gz | grep control
tesseract-3.02/ccmain/control.h
tesseract-3.02/ccmain/control.cpp
Good catch. Running dch without the -i option put in
the [ Jonathan Nieder ] text; it looks like a mechanism
for letting two people collaborate on a single changelog
entry.
Fixing and uploading soon. Fingers crossed.
I did not get the confirmation for the upload...
Still hasn't picked up. Maybe I should try a -6 package release?
Sending in 3.02.01-6
That did the trick.
Hi. I noticed that there are a lot of useful programs in the prog/
subdirectory of the leptonica lib. It would be nice to include more of
those [...]
The author of Leptonica chose the program list. His goal is to
ship the good stuff but not spam us with stuff nobody will
use.
This list can
See also:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/leptonlib/+bug/988112
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Leptonica upload commencing now. Tesseract coming.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Tesseract uploading now. We'll see how this goes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Just for background information, Leptonica has a big hulking
API, something on the order of a thousand calls. Upstream
is constantly making tweaks around the periphery, often just
adding more stuff.
In retrospect, it was possibly a mistake for upstream to bump
the soname up to 3 in one of the
I am also okay with you doing an NMU on Leptonica/Tesseract.
Note that Jakub Wilk was fantastically helpful during the great
Tesseract renaming a few months ago, although I probably
drove him crazy in the process.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Yes, I can sponsor. My goal is to not get in the way of your energy,
but also be careful to keep the level of chaos under control. The
inclusion of Leptonica and Tesseract must not be jeopardized.
Jakub, you are welcome to weigh in on this bug if you wish.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Wow, that's crazy and news to me. I used pbuilder during the upload. Maybe
the compiler got more strict about something. Let me reproduce and consult
with upstream.
Dmitry,
Pylucene is an incredibly useful package. The very best thing is for me to
no longer be involved as a maintainer for pylucene. But in the short term,
if you want or need me to sponsor an upload, I can do so as early as
tomorrow. Let me know.
You can package a modern pylucene and take over as the maintainer. Nothing
would make me happier.
On Apr 20, 2012 6:21 AM, Dmitry Nezhevenko d...@dion.org.ua wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking to pylucene package that I need as a dependency for other
pkg. Unfortunately currently it still depends on
This report is valid. Having gone through a package rename with
Tesseract, I am a little bit scared to tackle this - it took me a half
dozen attempts to get it right.
Fortunately, users are not be suffering - bug #664175 was
addressed through another mechanism.
Bottom line, it may take some
Thank you, Guido.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
The dummy transitional package I am uploading right now will still not
allow Ocropus to build or run; that awaits a future upstream Ocropus
release. The other dependency, Sikuli, has already been ported and
should be good to go.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Sorry, I missed integrating this patch. Can you let me know if the
problem still exists with perceptualdiff 1.1.1 ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I think it is time to take me off the list as well.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
recognition
program) transitions from verion 2 to version 3.
Jeff Breidenbach
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659587
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFPQqcHazfo3TSzaFYRAkSJAJ48h7NCblXSnwed28Kl66Rem7RAyQCfQ2dN
35bAX36yMEeVPngwmL+ZiyA=
=M1ma
-END
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear ftp-master,
Please remove the tesseract-ocr-dev binary package. It has been
replaced by libtesseract-dev during the transition from Tesseract
version 2 to verion 3. I apologize that this transition has
module for
discriminating latin derviced languages. So specialized that it is
completely useless outside upstream's compute environment. To reduce
confusion I request its removal.
Jeff Breidenbach
j...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux
Reproduced. Trying to remember how to coax GDB into showing line numbers.
===
$ gdb tesseract
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.3-debian
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
This is free software: you are free to change and
Is this still relevant with the 3.0.x packages? We've stripped the .la
files as per bug 658102.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658102
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
$ grep-dctrl -FSource:Build-Depends -s Package,Build-Depends
tesseract-ocr-dev
/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_sid_main_source_Sources
Package: ocropus
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7.0.50~), dpkg-dev (= 1.15.7),
autotools-dev, autoconf, automake1.9, libtool, liblua5.1-0-dev,
Statement from Sikuli upstream
Sikuli has an experimental tesseract 3 branch
https://github.com/sikuli/sikuli/tree/feature/tesseract3.
The main reason we aren't not switching to tesseract 3 in an official
release is that its recognition performance is worse than 2.04 in our
dataset.
(Not
First, sorry for closing bug earlier; it must have gotten lost in the shuffle.
I think I'm going to simplify the situation. Upstream has asked every Tesseract
to include dependency on equ which is equations, osd which is orientation
and script detection. I'm going to add a direct dependency on
And it won't be worse that what we have now. ;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Upstream says: Yes, we know.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libtesseract-dev_3.02-3_amd64.deb: package says section is libdevel, override
says graphics.
Reason: Lintian wants it there.
--
To
Doing this
Package: libtesseract3
Breaks: tesseract-ocr ( 3.01~)
Replaces: tesseract-ocr ( 3.01~)
...
Because of this
7.6.1 Overwriting files in other packages
It is usually an error for a package to contain files which are on the
system in another package. However, if the
1) There's no mention of this rename in the changelog.
Fixed (will upload shortly)
2) There are packages that build-depend on tesseract-ocr-dev, which you
now left unbuildable.
What are they? What should I do about this aside from contacting
the maintainers?
$ apt-rdepends -r -b
2) There are packages that build-depend on tesseract-ocr-dev, which you
now left unbuildable.
Also, I strongly suspect the build will break anyway; Tesseract 3.0.x is a big
jump from 2.0.4. If you are thinking about Ocropus in particular, let me point
you to some relevant discussion.
Hello Alvaro,
I am aware of the recent upstream report, and also the CVE entry that
was fixed in 2.6.18.
With respect to the latter, when I last talked to Debian's security
team years ago on the topic, they were not enthusiastic about bringing
the entire 2.6.18 into older Debian releases. As
Very sorry, did not mean to close this bug prematurely.
[tesseract-ocr-eng] does break ocropus directly (too?).
ocropus is statically linked to Tesseract libraries.
If ocropus is depending on tesseract-ocr-eng, shoudn't the
ocropus package declare a dependency? Are you sure the
right fix isn't
I double checked - lintian doesn't complain.
Ocropus unsurprising fails to build from source in its current state.
$ apt-get source -b ocropus
checking for err_exit in -ltesseract_full... no
configure: error: Could not find tesseract! Choose --without-tesseract
if you do not want to use it.
Bug report is slightly mistaken. Ocropus does not depend
on tesseract-eng. Tesseract-eng broke the older tesseract-ocr, and
then tesseract-ocr broke ocropus.
Fundamentally, new language data doesn't work with older binaries.
I'll try this in the language packs:
Breaks: tesseract-ocr (
Looks good to me. No need for delay.
I didn't realize Ubuntu synchronized from testing instead of unstable. Will you
please consider a high priority upload to reduce the delay to 3 days?
If it helps
influence your decision, I am a Debian Developer myself. Also, I have appended
python test snippets as requested.
from pygame import *
Also, I have appended python test snippets as requested.
Besides that small snippet (which may not really hit SDL much) I've written a
real application that also exercises all sort of pygame stuff; sound, windows,
blitting, full-screen mode, etc. Works fine for me.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
I'll help as best I can, but let us please get what we have now in
unstable. Do you want me to NMU?
Vincent, I'm concerned about timing. Ubuntu will snapshot Debian on January
12th for their next long term release. If faster scaling is not in place
before then, it will take two extra years to percolate to a derivative
distribution that I care about. Please consider having Debian deploy ahead
of
it will take two extra years to percolate to a derivative distribution that I
care about
To clarify, I care a lot about Debian. I also care about a particular
derivative distribution.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
I tried submitting a bug first, messed it up somehow, then resorted
to direct email instead of figuring it out. I have not contacted upstream,
but that is a very good idea. I'll leave that in your hands since Debian
package maintainers invariably have a great working relationship with their
Julien, thanks for the education, Mehdi, thanks for the NMU. Luk
thanks for being helpful.
And yes, I ... oddly enough ... knew about the SONAME bump in libwebp.
I'll see what I can improve during my next Leptonica upload, maybe at
end of year or early January.
NMUs are always welcome for my
Feel free to NMU.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
After extensive discussion, upstream is preparing a new release of mhonarc
(the security and related bug fixes are more extensive than the patch
supplied to Debian). I prefer to ship the new release as the security
update, rather than attempt a backport. Happy to discuss if security team
has any
Based on discussion with Earl so far, I think the correct fix is disabling
HTML mail support by default.
I talked to the author of Leptonica and this is not a bug.
Leptonica is designed to be all or nothing with respect to
headers. He says:
When including headers, use
#include allheaders.h
This includes all the headers for the library.
You must also precede this with stdio.h and stdlib.h.
So the
ACK, will apply patch as is when I have a chance. Leptonica author agrees.
Non-maintainer-upload in Debian ok as well.
WONTFIX
This version of PyLucene is old (depends on gcj) and new versions will
require a reworked package. Not worth patching this up. Help with packaging
a new PyLucene appreciated.
Hmmm works on Ubuntu Hardy.
$ python
Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Jul 22 2009, 15:33:10)
[GCC 4.2.4 (Ubuntu 4.2.4-1ubuntu3)] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
from lucene import Document
Document()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1,
Patch sent to upstream; will make a new package next point release.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Since Lucene has long been superceded by Lucene2, maybe the right
thing to do is kill off this package entirely. What does the
dependency tree look like these days?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Forwarding to upstream.
Thanks! NMU uploads are fine, or I'll get to this when I can.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks! NMU uploads are fine, or I'll get to this when I can.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help appreciated.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
101 - 200 of 271 matches
Mail list logo
