On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 11:45:18AM +0200, Sandro Knauß wrote:
Hey,
would it be possible to make available qtwebengine 5.9 in experimental with
the rest of the Qt stack? This package seems to be the only one omitted.
well we try to update it as fast as possible, but QtWebEngine is not very eas
Package: libqt5webengine5
Version: 5.7.1+dfsg-6.1
Severity: wishlist
Dear all,
would it be possible to make available qtwebengine 5.9 in experimental with the
rest of the Qt stack? This package seems to be the only one omitted.
I'd like to test my app in debian with Qt 5.9.
Cheers,
Jiri
-- Sy
Thanks. The new build fixed the issue for me. All the styling is working.
Cheers,
Jiri
Package: libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37
Version: 2.12.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #820309
Hi guys,
gtk 3.20 finally made it to sid. Exactly as described above, webkit have
issues, when built on gtk <3.20 but running on 3.20. Scrollbars are not
rendering for me at all under gtk 3.20 with default Adwaita.
Could
Yes, I forgot to mention that, but it's the same with xdg-open. `xdg-open`
under
bash doesn't have this issue.
$ xdg-open exploit.jpg
exploit succeeded exploit.jpg
$ bash xdg-open exploit.jpg
(works as expected)
As _local_ is not in POSIX, it would be great if xdg-open was not using
_local_ at
Package: xdg-utils
Version: 1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-7.3
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Justification: user security hole
Hi,
there is a long-standing issue with xdg-open on debian -- it parses all files
it is trying to open. This is easily exploitable. Requirements are similar as
in last RC
Having those files back upstream would be great. It doesn't make much sense to
me why specificaly this files must be closed sourced.
Have a good luck with Oracle.
Jiri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm
Package: xdg-utils
Version: 1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-7.1
Followup-For: Bug #758842
Dear maintainer,
xdg-open is broken, and using it for big files effectively makes xdg-open
unusable for generic case (ie. no DE).
There is also **security issue** since xdg-open could be manipulated to run any
execut
Yes, that should do the trick. I've checked that with oracle java, and that
seems to be the only difference.
Diff is result of `diff -u <(unzip -l
/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/lib/ant-javafx.jar | awk '{ print $4 }' |
sort) <(unzip -l /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-8-oracle-x64/lib/ant-javafx.jar | awk
Package: openjfx
Version: 8u20-b26-3
Severity: important
Hi,
deployment with fxpackager is broken. Resource files were removed upstream by
[0] (they are now using closed source version of deployment toolkit). If I
provide these resource files in ant class path deployment works just fine.
I guess
Package: libcairo2
Version: 1.12.16-3
Followup-For: Bug #739262
Hi,
this bug was patched upstream as
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81699.
Relevant commits are 3bb80aa2c3f97c071f434e0fbb6704fbef963352 and
4b65497231d1859e03762949896da94ffde389b5 (already in upstream 1.12 branch).
11 matches
Mail list logo
