This is a near-duplicate of bug 661485.
I have already submitted it as a reply there.
Assuming that is OK with everybody, this incarnation (bug 988384) can be closed.
Here is a replacement for bug 988384.
This is a better place for it.
*** Expected, documented, and desired behavior:
In /etc/smartd.conf it is permitted to specify multiple email recipients.
Here is the relevant snippet:
#
Package: smartmontools
Version: 7.1-1build1
*** Origin and context:
I'm using an ubuntu package.
The ubuntu guys asked me to push this report upstream, so here it is.
A patch is included.
*** Expected, documented, and desired behavior:
In /etc/smartd.conf it is permitted to specify multiple ema
The following patch replaces the previous patch.
Works the same for Linux, works slightly better for kFreeBSD.
>From cbd6063ff8f0df65bae3d1dac47fd6830268f864 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Denker
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 10:04:48 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Include date and time when seeding
This replaces the previous patch.
No change in meaning, just rebase the patch in light of
changes to prior patches.
>From 4f8cc6788f804fcd1b99dbda22aadafdc497b43e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: root
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:49:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Do not rm -f $SAVEDFILE
because that is a
The attached patch should apply cleanly to the Debian urandom.
My apologies for attaching the wrong patch previously. I picked
up the Ubuntu patch instead of the Debian patch.
>From 8d1f17feef351aa397d17bd4515f2d304be73393 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Denker
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11
The attached patch should apply cleanly to the Debian urandom.
My apologies for attaching the wrong patch previously. I picked
up the Ubuntu patch instead of the Debian patch.
>From c45b19d323d5e30473d254f1d0f87f33cb86ca3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Denker
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 10
The attached patch should apply cleanly to the Debian urandom.
My apologies for attaching the wrong patch previously. I picked
up the Ubuntu patch instead of the Debian patch.
>From ef7dda4ef592758a845ad28d0795743ac9677371 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: root
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 15:27:05 -070
The attached patch should apply cleanly to the Debian urandom.
My apologies for attaching the wrong patch previously. I picked
up the Ubuntu patch instead of the Debian patch.
>From 7cafdbe365e0ce93014fd88c0f465777d4610a2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: root
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 15:23:20 -070
The attached patch should apply cleanly to the Debian urandom.
My apologies for attaching the wrong patch previously. I picked
up the Ubuntu patch instead of the Debian patch.
>From 65227bb7a4a335f7ef1332b2b19aada059502238 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Denker
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010
on:
Debian Release: 5.0.5
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26.5 (PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
>From 9f7283cb1bfc4747dc53984fc97cd2838146c194 Mon Sep 17 0
386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26.5 (PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
>From fb548b0a752ce676d193c71ceff1321b1d894def Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Denker
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 10:04:48 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] Include date
Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Denker
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:56:08 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] Explain why we /write/ the seed at boot time. Upgrade comments by removing question and inserting answer. Also document assumptions about persistence of $SAVEDFILE
---
urandom | 21 +++
bash
>From 45e354973831aa3e50d230f98b25853660a42f39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Denker
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:22:36 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] Calculate POOLBYTES correctly. Note that /proc/sys/kernel/random/poolsize reports the number of bits, not bytes, so a conversion factor is needed.
---
urandom | 13 +++
le: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
>From dd1a2a7c4fbe58f60b46e739d5a7c78fc2dde03d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Denker
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:17:32 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Remove code that tried to write to the read-only file /proc/sys/
On 03/21/05 02:06, GOTO Masanori wrote:
In this bug report, we don't know which vi is used. Your vi links a
lot of libraries. I don't know what the problem is, but I guess (1)
you use non-debian vi which is not linked correctly (2) you use
invalid dynamic linker setting: for example, LD_PRELOAD o
On 03/20/05 02:18, GOTO Masanori wrote:
2) As a tangential issue: Many programs (even ones like "vi", for
which it doesn't make much sense) now issue the warning
/usr/lib/libpng12.so.0: no version information available (required by ...)
which is pretty weird; why does "vi" depend on libpng anyw
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-20
Severity: normal
1) I compiled /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 aka libpng12.so.0.1.2.8 from
sources and installed it. Symptoms are the same using the Debian
source package or the tarball from libpng.org.
2) As a tangential issue: Many programs (even ones like "vi",
18 matches
Mail list logo
