Package: emacs-goodies-el
Version: 35.12
Tags: patch
This is a quilt patch for minibuf-electric.el. It won't work right without
it.
--
karl.hegbl...@gmail.com
http://karlhegbloom.blogspot.com
Index: emacs-goodies-el-35.12ubuntu1/elisp/emacs-goodies-el/minibuf-electric.el
This patch fixes the problem. RTFM!
--
Karl Hegbloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- contents.cgi 2008/10/25 14:37:48 1.1
+++ contents.cgi 2008/10/25 14:29:55
@@ -12,7 +12,10 @@
hdr=0
if len(sect):
- matcher=re.compile(sect+/, re.IGNORECASE)
+ try:
+ matcher=re.compile(sect+/, re.IGNORECASE
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 14:12 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2007, Karl Hegbloom wrote:
But what if DEB_BUILDDIR is the the top-level directory
Yeah, it shouldn't rm -rf in this case indeed.
It should only remove that if it created it, right?
Yes, it does mkdir though
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 16:28 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
cdbs doesn't rm -rf DEB_BUILDDIR or DEB_BUILDDIR_package; it will
only rmdir them (it mkdir them too).
But what if DEB_BUILDDIR is the the top-level directory, like:
package-1.0.1/
Makefile
src/
debian/
control
bin/setup-plt instead.
finished
Building DrScheme zo files. (DrScheme Specific Only)
finished.
Press return to continue.
--
Karl Hegbloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A year in the laboratory often saves an hour at the library.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 07:49 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is not the Ubuntu bug tracker.
Have you verified that the bug does not exist in Debian? Perhaps the
bug was inherited by Ubuntu from Debian?
--
Karl Hegbloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
.
--
Karl Hegbloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XEmacs, and it is GPL, this
code is also GPL. I believe that it already belongs to the FSF; I've
signed papers for that, and thus my changes are also, hereby, Free.
minibuf-electric.el
Description: XEmacs \electric\ behavior for Emacs minibuffer.
--
Karl Hegbloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: apcupsd
Severity: minor
apt-cache search apc
... lists several choices. I found that the 'apcd' provides the
virtual package 'ups-monitor', but that 'apcupsd' does not. It seems
that it really should, so perhaps you can add that before your next
upload.
--
Karl Hegbloom [EMAIL
^
new
The word new is missing there.
--
Karl Hegbloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, defeating the purpose of
pkgconfig. (See the gnome CVS 'anjuta' for example.)
I have also reported this on the Ubuntu Launchpad. Do you need me to
close that ticket if you close the DBTS one first, or will you do that?
https://launchpad.ubuntu.com/malone/bugs/1019
--
Karl Hegbloom [EMAIL
/,$//'| \
--
Karl Hegbloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the XEmacs packages that works
fine, and the one in dictionaries-common shadows it. When I remove
the file /usr/share/xemacs21/site-lisp/dictionaries-common/ispell.elc
and reload ispell with M-x load-library ispell, it starts working fine
again.
--
Karl Hegbloom [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 21:50 -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
reportbug in Ubuntu is explicitly and brutally patched to submit bugs to
Ubuntu rather than to Debian, in order to avoid exactly this problem. You
must be mixing packages from Debian and Ubuntu; perhaps you have Debian's
reportbug
Package: grub
Version: 0.95+cvs20040624-12ubuntu1
Severity: minor
Presently, the memtest86 menu item is getting the same 'savedefault'
option as the Linux kernel entries are. I don't think it needs that,
and that an unattended boot after a memtest ought to go to the default
saved previously.
Package: doc-base
Version: 0.7.20ubuntu5
Severity: normal
Please see Debian BTS bug #290846
Is it a Ubuntu problem, or a Debian Sid problem?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-lucgm.2
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
Package: acpi-support
Version: 0.13
Severity: normal
Looks like a simple paste-oh with a forgot-to-edit.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-lucgm.2
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages
Package: mit-scheme
Version: 7.7.90-4
Severity: normal
Is it deliberate that mit-scheme is not build-dependant on x-dev? When
I run (edit), it runs in the terminal, not as an X application the way
I'd like... I've rebuilt it with X support simply by having the x-dev
package installed. I think
18 matches
Mail list logo
