Hello,
Today I installed a Debian Box with selinux enabled. I found that I'm
affected by this bug. Is there any activity to solve this bug?
The referenced Redhat Bug 1676923 is closed.
Links:
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1676923
sincerely yours
Mario Koppensteiner
urs
Mario Koppensteiner
diff -Naur 4.2.27-1+b8_i386/usr/bin/apt-move work/usr/bin/apt-move
--- 4.2.27-1+b8_i386/usr/bin/apt-move 2013-08-20 19:25:56.0 +0200
+++ work/usr/bin/apt-move 2013-08-21 14:24:21.0 +0200
@@ -137,6 +137,20 @@
exit 64
}
+apt_move_sha1() {
+while read l
7-3
libapt-pkg4.12 Version: 0.9.7.2
libc6 Version: 2.13-33
libgcc1 Version: 1:4.7.1-2
libstdc++6 Version: 4.7.1-2
Please find the patch attached to this post.
sincerely yours
Mario Koppensteiner
diff -Naur 4.2.27-3_i386/usr/bin/apt-move work/usr/bin/apt-move
--- 4.2.27-3_i386/usr/bin/apt-move 2013
the bug #559109 because the bug seems not to be fixed in
the version installed in wheezy.
Thanks
Mario Koppensteiner
diff -Naur orig/etc/default/snmpd new/etc/default/snmpd
--- orig/etc/default/snmpd 2011-01-05 12:12:04.0 +
+++ new/etc/default/snmpd 2012-08-13 11:24:14.0
:23.0 +0200
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
# Copyright (c) 1999 Michael Merten
# Copyright (c) 1999-2000 Gregory T. Norris
# Copyright (c) 2000-2003 Herbert Xu
+# Copyright (c) 2012 Mario Koppensteiner
#
# License: This script is distributed under the terms of version 2
#of the GNU GPL
Hi,
I created a patch to solve the issue and attached it to that email.
After the patch is applied the apt-move supports MD5, SHA1 and SHA256
sums.
This patch includes the changed of my old patch attached to the bug so
only this patch needs to be applied.
I think this is a huge step forward. Ma
Hi
I created a patch for apt-move to solve the SHA256 issue. After I
applied my patch to apt-move, debootstrap accepts the local mirror as
expected.
For reference please have a look at the bug [1].
Links:
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/662003
sincerely yours
Mario
signature.asc
Description: D
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 05:35:36PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Mario Koppensteiner wrote:
> Am I correct in deducing that this mirror is one that was actually
> generated with apt-move, and that's why it's missing the SHA256 fields?
Yes, you are correct.
> > Can
otstrap: arithmetic
expression: expecting primary: "0 + "
Can somebody please implement a parameter which tells debootstrap not
to relly on SHA256sums and use MD5sums instead?
About my issue with no SHA256Sums in Packages.gz I already opend
another bug [1].
Links:
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/662003
sincerely yours
Mario Koppensteiner
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
uot;aa.bb.cc.dd",
"/pub/debian/squeeze/dists/squeeze/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz", 740149 bytes,
9509.55Kbyte/sec
Please help me to fix the issue.
sincerely yours
Mario Koppensteiner
--- apt-move.origin 2012-03-03 11:12:53.0 +
+++ apt-move 2012-03-03 11:13:11.
10 matches
Mail list logo