On 15 Aug 2009, at 14:21, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
On 15-Aug-2009, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 01:24:07PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
I have exactly the same problem on upgrading to version 3.17-27,
with this output:
Can you reproduce this problem?
I don't
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 01:24:07PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
I have exactly the same problem on upgrading to version 3.17-27, with
this output:
Can you reproduce this problem?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On 15 Aug 2009, at 14:21, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
On 15-Aug-2009, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 01:24:07PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
I have exactly the same problem on upgrading to version 3.17-27,
with this output:
Can you reproduce this problem?
I don't
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 10:17:40PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
is there any news on this bug (zlib.h only defining a prototype for
gzopen64 if _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE is defined)? I noticed some warnings
related to gzopen64 when building libpciaccess on some archs, and just
found this bug.
I
Package: tftpd-hpa
Version: 5.0-3
Severity: serious
In an earlier response to this report you write:
running tftpd-hpa through inetd is no longer supported (in debian).
however, will include a check into the initscript to fail gracefully
when user decides to run it through inetd.
however
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 01:03:03PM +0530, Bhavani Shankar wrote:
In Ubuntu, we've applied the attached patch to achieve the following:
* Have nis Suggest nscd. LP: #345137
We thought you might be interested in doing the same.
If you're going to do things like forward on changes like
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 01:00:11PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
In this case a Pre-Depends is overkill, a simple Conflicts is enough.
Please find a patch below to fix the problem.
Please confirm this with the amd64 porters. This whole transitions has
been plagued with problems; the
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 01:41:51PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Note that this solution (suggested by one of the dpkg maintainers) is
the one that has been tested and implemented for libc6-dev-i386. No
problem have been reported so far, contrary to the Pre-Depends version
which sometimes
Package: tftpd-hpa
Version: 5.0-3
Severity: minor
The postinst says:
| tftpd user (tftp) is already existing, doing nothing.
This should read something like:
| tftpd user (tftp) already exists, doing nothing.
instead.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
Package: libbotan1.8.2
Version: 1.8.4-1
Severity: serious
Attempting to install libbotan-1.8.2 results in the following error:
| Unpacking libbotan-1.8.2 (from .../libbotan-1.8.2_1.8.4-1_amd64.deb) ...
| dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libbotan-1.8.2_1.8.4-1_amd64.deb (--unpack):
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
gob is obsolete, having being replaced by gob2 for current glib
versions.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 02:28:24PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
--- ypserv-2.19/scripts/match_printcap.in.orig2009-07-05
14:19:14.0 -0500
+++ ypserv-2.19/scripts/match_printcap.in 2009-07-05 14:19:32.0
-0500
Debian patches are, of course, traditionally
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 03:39:08PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
On Monday 06 July 2009 15:24:29 Mark Brown wrote:
Debian patches are, of course, traditionally generated against the
package...
Of course:
--- ypserv-2.19/etc/ypserv.conf.5.orig 2003-12-13 20:27:44.0 +0100
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm looking for an adopter for Leafnode since I no longer use it. The
package is in fairly good shape, pretty static and upstream is very
responsive.
To be honest what's really needed here is more upstream effort rather
than more Debian effort - there has been a
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 03:55:24PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
On Monday 06 July 2009 15:47:23 Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 03:39:08PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
--- ypserv-2.19/etc/ypserv.conf.5.orig 2003-12-13 20:27:44.0
+0100 +++ ypserv-2.19/etc
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 09:49:16AM +0200, Thomas Cataldo wrote:
The attached patch should fix it
I already have a very similar patch. I'm not rushing to upload it given
that the transition (for the initial mail on) appears to be a bit of a
shambles and I don't want the hassle of sorting out the
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:04:04AM -0700, Randall Donald wrote:
Yes the kdist target is still missing. The changelog mentions that
module-assistant is still the only working build method.
How is one supposed to do this? As I have previously reported,
module-assistant doesn't actually work
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 08:54:10PM +0200, Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
I had the same problem, but first doing:
$ m-a clean nvidia
helped!
OK, that worked - thanks!
I guess some cleaning up is missing in the scripts still, because
usually I don't need to do this.
Indeed, it shouldn't be
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 06:12:28PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
Package: lib32z1
Version: 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-13
On amd64, files in /emul/ia32-linux should be moved to /usr/lib32.
Might be worth putting a reference to the decision making process or
something in these reports - this change doesn't
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 12:02:55AM +0200, nicolas.franc...@centraliens.net
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:54:47AM +0200, harald.dun...@aixigo.de wrote:
The new user john is added _before_ the first NIS compat entry,
instead of being appended to passwd. /var/yp/Makefile ignores
merge 531542 531541
kthxbye
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 10:18:44AM +0200, Viktor Matys wrote:
Package: nis
Version: 3.17-20
Severity: wishlist
I forgot to attach the translation. I hope I'll be more succesful
now.:o)
Viktor Matys
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 04:41:13PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
d) and it is easier and faster to fix it than to reply to the bug report :)
If this is the case please submit patches.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
In the ITP for evolution-mapi you asked for testing. I just tried with
the current version 0.26.1-1 (binaries from your site) but find that
when attempting to authenticate during account creation I get prompted
for my password and then Evolution crashes immediately after I click OK.
Attempting to
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 01:30:08PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
You???d need to rebuild the packages with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt
nostrip and install evolution-dbg and evolution-data-server-dbg, after
which you can run evolution in a gdb session.
Hrm. That's failing to rebuild in unstable
Package: nvidia-kernel-source
Version: 180.44-2
Severity: normal
The bug log for this bug states that build of the modules works when
using module-assistant. I'm finding that when I attempt to build the
modules with:
module-assistant build -l 2.6.29-2-amd64 nvidia-kernel
the build fails
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 11:59:36AM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
The source of this problem is the following missing entry in the
texinfo source:
@dircategory Package short info
@direntry
* menu item 1: (infofile). Description.
* menu item 2:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 09:40:54PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009, Mark Brown wrote:
This looks like entirely inappropriate advice for this and most packages
since it will lead to a category per package, which seems both pointless
and excessive. It'd seem more sensible
Package: bzr-gtk
Version: 0.95.0+bzr631-1
Severity: normal
When bzr starts it displays the following error message, complaining
that the gtk plugin uses an out of date GTK version:
Unable to load plugin 'gtk'. It requested API version (1, 13, 0) of module
module 'bzrlib' from
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:58:37AM +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote:
Since ypbind is able to discover servers automatically
What needs to be set up to make that work ?
Getting that configured (presumably on the local network) would indeed
make this a non-problem, at least for me. Describing
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 07:29:22PM +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote:
binding ... message that reminds me that I need to hold this
package's hand because it doesn't think to ask me for information it
absolutely must have before its init.d/ script can succeed.
That's not quite correct; the init
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 09:55:04AM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
Aye, I probably broke the patch when I ripped out all of the
autogenerated files. Do you want the whole debdiff? It's a pretty
small change before the autoreconf.
No, it's fine.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 01:47:05PM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
Now that Gtk1.2 is removed we are also looking to remove glib1.2 from
the archive. Gob currently fails to build with glib2.0 as it uses
AM_PATH_GLIB. Here is a patch that makes it build, though it probably
needs more testing.
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 04:29:28PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
I think there are people that think that a stream should no longer
return anything after end of file was reached until clearerr was called,
so the behaviour in this bug might actually be intended behaviour.
Yes, the behaviour
Package: dput
Version: 0.9.3
Severity: wishlist
It's been quite some time since Debian let people run dinstall against
uploaded packages to verify uploads and the other big distribution that
uses dput (Ubuntu) doesn't have this either but dput prints a mesage
saying that it hasn't run dinstall by
notfound 1.11.7.rc2-1
found 2.0.0.alpha20070602a-2
kthxbye
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 05:43:49PM +0100, Alban Browaeys wrote:
Version: 1.11.7.rc2-1
You've filed this against the current unstable version which doesn't
contain such a manual page...
Preparing to replace leafnode 1.11.7.rc2-1
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.69
Severity: normal
Since lenny logcheck now reports vast numbers of messages such as:
| Feb 25 17:02:18 cassiel named[21606]: client 62.109.4.89#40033: query (cache)
'./NS/IN' denied
from BIND.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers
Package: debian-installer
Version: 5.0
Severity: important
When attempting to install on my Dell XPS M1330 partitioning correctly
detects my disk but only offers me the option of creating an entirely
new partition table (either manually or via guided install). It does
not offer me the ability to
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 02:46:11PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Please verify if parted sees the partition table.
How would I go about doing this?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 02:46:11PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Please verify if parted sees the partition table.
Parted reports Error: Cannot have overlapping partitions.
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: exim4-config
Version: 4.69-9
Severity: normal
By default exim4-config includes all certificates ca-certificates installs
in /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt. This causes interoperability with
a number of mail clients, primarily Microsoft ones, which get upset when
a very large number
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please remove the powertweak package from unstable - it uses GTK 1 and
has been unmaintained upstream for years.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux
On 15 Feb 2009, at 19:51, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@debian.org wrote:
Package: powertweak-gtk
Severity: serious
powertweak build-depends on libgtk1.2-dev, which will be removed for
Squeeze.
Please port it to GTK 2 or drop the powertweak-gtk binary package.
The package will be removed from
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 09:42:10PM +0200, Didier Roche wrote:
Please consider applying the attached patch.
Please check your MUA configuration - your patch has been sent HTML
encoded which means that it is difficult to apply using standard tools.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:10:44PM +1100, George Kirkham wrote:
There is an issue, however which library/program is the cause of the issue ?
This is a bug in the application.
If I understand what your saying, I guess that I should raise this issue
against Hard Info, not zlib1g
Yes. It has
Package: hardinfo
Version: 0.4.2.3-5
Followup-For: Bug #457703
Please fix this bug for lenny. This bug is causing users to believe
that there is a problem in the zlib1g package - I would really rather
see this fixed before release, it's just going to make work for me as
zlib maintainer and it's
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 07:44:02AM +1100, George Kirkham wrote:
The System Profiler and Benchmark is a program which provides
information about the installation of Debian and the PC on which it is
Can you provide any references to this software?
run. When I run System Profiler and
On 1 Jan 2009, at 03:32, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 17:48 +, Mark Brown wrote:
Does that make sense to you?
I'm not familiar with the code of either gzrecover or zlib, so it
didn't
make heaps of sense. It sounds like this is a bug in gzrecover rather
than
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 03:26:38PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
gzrecover (from gzrt) crashes with a SIGSEGV in inflate from zlib when
trying to recover the attached flasm_1.61-1.diff.gz (corrupted with 1
bit - byte 0xB41 should be 0x02 not 0x12). It crashes half way through
the output of the
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 08:27:36AM +, Marco Rodrigues wrote:
Mark Brown wrote:
Rolf was working in cooperation with upstream when he produced those
packages.
He was responsible for the packaging.. now I am. You can talk with
upstream about this.
I don't really case either way, just
Package: subdownloader
Version: 2.0.8.1-1
Severity: serious
subdownloader 2.0.8.1-1 has at least an undeclared conflict with the
previous subdownloader-cli package:
| Preparing to replace subdownloader 2.0.5.1-1 (using
.../subdownloader_2.0.8.1-1_all.deb) ...
| Unpacking replacement
On 28 Dec 2008, at 23:34, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote:
[Mark Brown, 2008-12-29]
subdownloader 2.0.8.1-1 has at least an undeclared conflict with the
previous subdownloader-cli package:
was subdownloader-cli ever in Debian?
I don't recall it ever being removed during the review
On 29 Dec 2008, at 00:31, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote:
sorry, what version did you upload? What review process? Did I miss
something?
I reviewed (and thought I'd eventually uploaded) some earlier versions
of the package for Rolf based on 2.0.5. It's possible the problems
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 09:54:01PM +0200, Török Edwin wrote:
The last number is obviously wrong (I wish such a CPU would exist!).
Attached is full x86info -a output
Please retest both bugs you've reported with version 1.23-1 which I have
just uploaded to experimental.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 04:34:04PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 09:11:28PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
The enclosed bug report was submitted against the Debian x86info
package. I've not looked at it yet myself.
I reworked the code that estimates this for 1.22, so
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 12:20:06PM +0100, Lo??c Fejoz wrote:
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+ programme memain
+ write (*,*) 'Hello, world!'
+ end
Better to stick with program here. Other than that this looks good -
I was going to go with the same fix myself.
--
You grabbed my hand and we
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:42:53PM +1100, Alex Samad wrote:
I understand it needs to be done for it to work, but I was hoping to
have the ability to schedule it at a later time (during my off peak
downloads), don't want to have to get up at 4 am to install this !
As I say, this feature is
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:03:55PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 02:13:33PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
if you can reproduce it with 2.6.25 or newer snapshots.
i'm all ears unless so it is assumed fixed.
Mark, does the problem still exist for you with the
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 12:52:57AM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 03:46:58PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
Since the manual lists no way of disabling the warning and the garbage
collection which is suggested by the dialog doesn't actually resolve the
problem this is highly
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 09:42:10PM +0200, Didier Roche wrote:
Package: nis
Version: 3.17
Please ensure that you fill in the full package version when reporting
bugs, including the Debian revision.
Please consider applying the attached patch.
Looks reasonable. Due to the current release
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 07:25:05PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
to ensure that it will always match the version exactly. Without that
the lib64z1 can be uninstalled (which doesn't hurt as then you would
not have anything to debug) or more importantly have a different
version.
Seems
severity 487104 important
kthxbye
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 05:12:43PM +0100, Jonathan H N Chin wrote:
The problem causes data loss, so it is grave at minumum:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
(At my site at least, the data loss is serious, as I explained in my
previous
Package: git-gui
Version: 1:1.5.6.5-1
Severity: normal
When git gui starts it does a check to see how many loose objects are in
the repository and displays a warning if this is over a certain number,
offering to do a gc. Since I track trees like linux-next that are
rebased and do a lot of local
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# via tagpending
#
# nis (3.17-17) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * Force locale for ypcat to C in order to work around errors from
#fprintf() with multi-byte characters (closes: #487104).
#
package nis
tags 487104 + pending
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 01:05:19PM +0200, Johan Walles wrote:
2008/8/28 Giacomo A. Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
auth.log was invented for this reason, and separated to standard log:
it should be readable only by root, because users do errors.
It's readable by anybody with physical access
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 04:40:36PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 03:15:21PM +0100, Jonathan H N Chin wrote:
- Could you please run the ypcat command using:
'LC_ALL=en_GB.ISO-8859-1 LANG=en_GB.ISO-8859-1 ypcat'
(note that you may have to generate the
severity 487104 important
thanks
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 05:08:37PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
No as Jonathan just confirmed, this actually does not prevents login, this
only prevents the entries from being displayed with ypcat.
Downgrading the bug, then - as I said, the original
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 04:42:39PM +0100, Jonathan H N Chin wrote:
I still silently lose accounts when I run ypcat on the linux server.
(Apparently the locale setting is the culprit, so there is a workaround.)
I consider that this to be serious data loss. At the very least it
is data loss, so
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 06:20:04PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I don't expect ypcat to print a correct string when the encoding of the
NIS server and the locale of the client do not match, but at least it
should not drop the line, and either print the line with broken
characters or print an
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 05:42:00PM +0100, Jonathan H N Chin wrote:
If I put data into the database, I expect exactly the same data
to come back when I perform a query. If not, an error must be
returned. Silent data loss is not acceptable.
I'm not saying that this a great thing, just that it's
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 10:20:16PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
--- debian/control~ 2008-08-02 21:56:11.0 +
+++ debian/control 2008-08-02 21:56:11.0 +
Please also note that patches should always be supplied in a format
suitable for application with patch -p1.
severity 493471 wishlist
retitle 493471 x86info: Please implement kfreebsd-amd64 support
kthxbye
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 10:20:16PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
the current version fails to build on kfreebsd-amd64.
It have to be listed in Architecture line.
If you're filing bugs like this it
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 01:20:22PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 10:41:11AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
Oh, good - I think that's the last Ubuntu diff here.
According to the changelog in Ubuntu, there's one other:
+- remove stop links from rc0 and rc6
But perhaps
severity 492426 wishlist
tag 492426 + pending
thanks
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 05:44:22PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
So the latest upstream version of Linux-PAM, which I'm now merging into
Debian, has split out the selinux password updating functionality into a
Oh, good - I think that's the
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:52:14AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:56:56PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
Given the function of the package I'd really expect to be able to throw
any random upstream tarball at it and have it fail only in the face of
insurmountable errors
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 09:40:19PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
In order for us to have a chance of tracking it down, we need to know
about it within a week (preferably 24 hours!) of it happening.
We also need to know the message id, and any and all logs you have
available.
OK, same position
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 05:04:27AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
Yeah; most likely it's your spamfilters that are eating the message.
[If you really wanted to check that it's not the BTS screwing up, you
can check to see if it hit one of the gmane groups tracking
debian-bugs-dist.]
Hrm.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:33:08PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
| CLC-INTERCAL-Base-1.-94.-2$ dh_make
| Package name CLC-INTERCAL-Base-1.-94. is not in a valid format.
| Debian policy manual states:
| Package names must only consist of lower case letters, digits (0-9),
|
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: normal
I don't appear to have received any e-mail from the BTS regarding bug
489643 which was filed against the NIS package. Unfortunately it's
taken long enough for me to notice this that I no longer have any logs
for the relevant period, though my archiving
Package: dh-make
Version: 0.46
Severity: normal
Attempting to use dh_make on the CLC-INTERCAL base release I find:
| CLC-INTERCAL-Base-1.-94.-2$ dh_make
| Package name CLC-INTERCAL-Base-1.-94. is not in a valid format.
| Debian policy manual states:
| Package names must only consist of lower
Package: debtorrent
Version: 0.1.8
Severity: important
As far as I can tell all packages I attempt to download with debtorrent
result in a 404 being returned to apt and messages such as:
2008-07-08 18:48:50,467 MainThread DebTorrent.BT1.AptListener WARNING Unable to
find the file in any
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:01:43PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
there was no patch provided nor any proof of any trouble by your
side, so tagging with moreinfo and willl close in 10 days
unless something substantial comes up.
Uh, message 10 of the bug report contains the updated version of
reopen 436260
thanks
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 03:48:07PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
closing as this general assumption seems not true
quite a bunch of external modules is build.
As far as I remember (this was all quite some time ago) the external
module packages were all using
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:32:05AM +0100, Jonathan H N Chin wrote:
I have a webserver running sarge. I'm building a replacement using etch.
It's not an upgrade, it's a fresh install. So, everything is different.
You say this but...
When I used ypcat to retrieve the map, both entries were
reassign 487104 libc6
thanks
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 05:02:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Solaris 10 and Debian nis package 3.13-2 both accept non-ascii
characters in maps:
However, 3.17-6 does not:
This breaks login access to the system.
As Jonathan said, ypcat is just a thin
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 03:01:38PM +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote:
- the expectation is that your network administrator will tell
you what it is
Failing that, the documentation should at least say Ask your network
administrator what it is if you don't know. The fact that network
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 01:03:58PM +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote:
1. HOW TO SETUP A LOCAL NIS CLIENT
1.1 Install the netbase, portmap and nis packages
1.2 The installation procedure will ask for your NIS domainname. This
is just a name which describes the group of systems that use
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 06:53:31PM +0300, Marko Lindqvist wrote:
- SFLAGS=${CFLAGS--O3} -fPIC
+ SFLAGS=${CFLAGS--O3}
+
+ if ! $CC -c $CFLAGS -fPIC $test.c 21 |
+ grep all code is position independent /dev/null
+ then
+SFLAGS=$SFLAGS -fPIC
+ fi
This patch is too specific to
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 06:06:28PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With these gtk-doc files, it's not so much that the tmpl/*.sgml files
are generated but that a tool essential to the build modifies them in a
way that cannot be patched because the results
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 01:07:56PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
So I am running the relevant autotools at build time but I still get the
warning.
If you run autotools at build time you should also ensure that the
changes which autotools makes are reverted in the clean target. This
means that
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 08:59:23PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
can we have an update on a recent linux image aka 2.6.25 from sid
installs just fine in testing.
thanks
I do not currently run Linux on the affected machine. I could test with
a d-i image?
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: important
If I view http://bugs.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED], select Options
then change Categorise bugs by to staus and severity and select
Reload page then a page is displayed saying:
An error occurred. Dammit. Error was: You have to choose something to
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 01:46:51AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
humm is that reproducible with a recent Lenny kernel?
thanks for update.
I left the job where I had access to the hardware about seven months
ago. I seem to remember we were able to avoid the issue by using 2.6.22
or so so
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 10:58:10AM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
We can set up a team and a repository, both Alioth + SVN or Launchpad +
bzr can go. I'm more confident with the latter because Ubuntu does wide
use of it to manage projects, but the former is ok too.
There was some talk of moving
Since both of you e-mailed at roughly the same time about taking over
the Debian SCons packages I thought the best thing to do would be to
put you both in touch with each other and suggest forming a team to take
over the package in order to pool the availible expertise - I don't know
what you
reassign 476976 python-central 0.6.6
kthxbye
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:36:33PM +0200, Andreas Tscharner wrote:
Package: scons
Version: 0.98.2-3
Followup-For: Bug #476976
Sorry, but the bug is still not fixed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ scons
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
sorry, will need another rebuild with 0.6.6 (or you remove the
directory manually). Will upload python-central tonight.
No problem, thanks for the fix.
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever.
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.9.6
Severity: important
In bug #477930 a bug was reassigned with a fairly long explanation by
the reassigner. Unfortunately the BTS does not send the reassigned
maintainer a complete copy of the mail doing the reassignment so all
that reached me was:
#
This should be fixed by SCons 0.98.2-2 which was uploaded to unstable
this afternoon, please let me know if that's not the case.
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
the scons package:
#476976: scons: Doesn't work at all
It has been closed by Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED].
| Changes:
| scons (0.98.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
| .
|* New upstream release.
|* Build against new python-central, picking up new generated code which
| fixes
against the scons package:
#476976: scons: Doesn't work at all
It has been closed by Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED].
| Changes:
| scons (0.98.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
| .
|* New upstream release.
|* Build against new python-central, picking up new generated code which
401 - 500 of 947 matches
Mail list logo
