On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 01:08 +0300, Timo Lindfors wrote:
> Mark Seaborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > X11 access is not quite innocuous. :-) X is a big can of worms that
> > will require a lot of work to make safe. [2]
>
> Indeed. I today noticed that even with &
Package: mew
Version: 1:4.2-1
When I invoke mew-draft-send-message to send an e-mail using Mew under
XEmacs, it fails with an error saying that cancel-timer is not
defined. A little investigation shows that this is a GNU Emacs
function, and the XEmacs equivalent is delete-itimer. Using the
follo
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Having looked into this, one problem is that it won't work with the
> > "libc" and "nptl" builds of glibc that Debian does, because these use
> > "int $0x80" directly. It would only work with the "i686" build. So
> > this won't work with Linux 2.4
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 06:51:19PM +0100, Mark Seaborn wrote:
> > Package: glibc
> > Version: 2.3.5-6
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > Usually, glibc inlines calls to non-cancellab
Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.5-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
This patch changes rules.d/debhelper.mk to copy various files from the
glibc build tree into the libc6-pic package.
This allows Plash to build its modified version of glibc from
libc6-pic.
Background: Plash is a secure, restricted ex
Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.5-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Usually, glibc inlines calls to non-cancellable versions of some
system calls, such as open_not_cancel. The macro definitions are in
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/not-cancel.h.
This patch prevents those definitions from being inlined. It
6 matches
Mail list logo
