Package: ncurses
Version: 5.7+20090613-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
when ncurses is built by a buildd, it is needlessly built twice.
See e.g. the ia64 buildd log, where there are 8 occurences of
configure: creating ./config.status
while there should be only 4 (normal, wide, normal-dbg, wide-dbg).
Hi,
I'm porting Debian to Interix. See http://www.debian-interix.net
for details.
While porting ncurses I hit this bug.
Looking at the buildd logs for kfreebsd-i386 also shows it's appearing
there:
Hi,
on Interix (see http://www.debian-interix.net for details) /usr/bin is
symlinked to /bin. In this scenario the new less package fails to
install correctly as the symlink overwrites the binary.
Would it be possible to take care of this situation?
Thanks
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: xutils-dev
Version: 1:7.4+4
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm porting Debian to Interix. See http://www.debian-interix.net
for details.
While porting xutils-dev I overlooked to
#define MkdirHierCmd mkdir -p
so the default Debian version of mkdirhier.sh was used. With
mkdirhier.sh it is
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Frédéric Brière wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 09:48:32PM +0100, Martin Koeppe wrote:
The behaviour still hasn't changed. time_1.7-23 can't still be built
Hmm, me thinks Jonas mistook r269 for something else. :)
with debhelper's dh_testroot, instead the hardcoded
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the cdbs package:
#489430: cdbs: debhelper usage
It has been closed by Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk.
The behaviour still hasn't changed. time_1.7-23
Package: quixote
Version: 2.5-3
Severity: normal
When building quixote with sbuild, it reports:
ERROR: Package builds python-quixote-doc_2.5-3_all.deb when
binary-indep target is not called. This is a bug in the packaging.
See e.g. ia64 buildd log for verification.
Martin
--
To
Package: freespeak
Version: 0.3.0-2
Severity: normal
Is there a reason why the binary package from src pkg freespeak is
not arch:all? I can't see any arch specific files in the package.
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Package: cddlib
Version: 094b.dfsg-4
Severity: normal
When building cddlib a warning is printed:
/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk:92: WARNING: The following
patches are modifying auto-updated files. This can result in serious
trouble:
Package: libmcrypt
Version: 2.5.7-5.1
Severity: wishlist
There is a new upstream version available (2.5.8).
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
reassign 309405 linux-2.6
thanks
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:50:48PM +0200, Martin Koeppe wrote:
Hello,
in between I managed to work around the problem.
With cifs 1.34 compiled into 2.6.11 (and probably 2.6.12, too),
a acceptable performance can
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Michael Piefel wrote:
Martin Koeppe schrieb:
Attached you find the log from sbuild. Maybe you see the problem
immediately from that. I don't have more details currently, as the
unpacked source has already been deleted automatically.
The log looks very innocent to me
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Michael Piefel wrote:
kimwitu++ should build-dep on bison, as it uses it during build.
No, it doesnt normally. Apart from src/kimwy.y, Kimwitu++ comes with
src/Gen.boot/kimwy.{cc,h,output}, all of which are 5 minutes younger
than their source. Bison is not called if
Package: kimwitu++
Version: 2.3.12-1
Severity: normal
kimwitu++ should build-dep on bison, as it uses it during build.
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have done some more grepping in my buildd logs and found the
following packages having problems with debhelper.mk not being
included first, just for information. There are probably much more,
but I haven't built all packages used as Build-Deps yet for my
debian-interix port, see
Package: debian-edu
Version: 0.836
Severity: normal
Is there a reason why the binary packages from src pkg debian-edu are
not arch:all? I can't see any arch specific files in the packages.
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:25:38PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Samstag, 5. Juli 2008 schrieb Martin Koeppe:
See package time 1.7-21 as example. Its rules says:
include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk
include /usr/share/cdbs/1
Package: libppd
Version: 2:0.10-6
Severity: normal
Extracting the orig.tar.gz gives:
libppd-0.10/src
libppd-0.10/doc
After unpacking the debian source package there is another dir
libppd-0.10 which also contains src and doc:
libppd-0.10/src
libppd-0.10/doc
Package: cdbs
Version: 0.4.52
Severity: normal
In bug #416018 I requested to use debhelper's dh_testroot in cdbs.
This has been done now, thank you. I encountered a problem with this
implementation however:
See package time 1.7-21 as example. Its rules says:
include
Package: argtable2
Version: 9-1
Severity: normal
When building argtable2 with sbuild, it reports:
ERROR: Package builds libargtable2-docs_9-1_all.deb when binary-indep
target is not called. This is a bug in the packaging.
See any buildd log for verification.
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: giflib
Version: 4.1.6-4
Severity: normal
When building giflib with sbuild, it reports:
ERROR: Package builds libungif-bin_4.1.6-4_all.deb when binary-indep
target is not called. This is a bug in the packaging.
ERROR: Package builds libungif4g_4.1.6-4_all.deb when binary-indep
Package: ample
Version: 0.5.7-4
Severity: normal
When building ample and compilation fails for some reason, then make
ignores that and the package is built nevertheless, even if the binary
hasn't been built.
Makefile.in says:
all:
@for i in $(SUBDIRS); do \
echo Making all in
Package: libpng
Version: 1.2.27-1
Severity: normal
When building libpng with sbuild, it reports:
ERROR: Package builds libpng3_1.2.27-1_all.deb when binary-indep
target is not called. This is a bug in the packaging.
See any buildd log for verification.
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: lzma
Version: 4.43-13
Severity: normal
When building lzma with sbuild, it reports:
ERROR: Package builds lzma-source_4.43-13_all.deb when binary-indep
target is not called. This is a bug in the packaging.
See any buildd log for verification.
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: libxmu
Version: 2:1.0.4-1
Severity: normal
When building libxmu with sbuild, it reports:
ERROR: Package builds libxmu-headers_1.0.4-1_all.deb when binary-indep
target is not called. This is a bug in the packaging.
See any buildd log for verification.
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi,
sorry, I overlooked your message.
The attached license file doesn't seem to apply to the attached
magic file; rather, it mentions the file program.
I'm not a lawyer, I only thought that the magic file is part of the
file program, and the file program package is responsible for
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.14.19
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
I'm using dpkg on Interix, without glibc. See:
http://www.debian-interix.net/
So I'm happy that libcompat has been created/fixed recently,
it still has a bug, however:
lib/tarfn.c uses strnlen(), so libcompat/libcompat.a, which
Package: nrg2iso
Version: 0.4-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
nrg2iso now uses quilt for patches, so it should Build-Depends:
quilt, which it does. But it need not and should not Depends: quilt, IMO.
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Hi listmasters, hi Cord,
I just want to refresh my wish for a new mailing list
for debian-interix, see bug #441094.
Are there still any missing preconditions from my side?
Thanks for consideration
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Package: dictionaries-common
Version: 0.98.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
I'm porting Debian to Interix, see http://debian-interix.net/
Unfortunately, on Interix, the root user doesn't have UID 0 (which
isn't a POSIX requirement AFAIK). So installing dictionaries-common
fails, because
Package: libsmi
Version: 0.4.5+dfsg0-0.1
Severity: normal
When building libsmi with sbuild, it reports:
ERROR: Package builds libsmi2-common_0.4.5+dfsg0-0.1_all.deb when
binary-indep target is not called. This is a bug in the packaging.
See any buildd log for verification.
Martin
--
To
Package: dialign-t
Version: 0.2.2.dfsg-1
Severity: normal
When building dialign-t with sbuild, it reports:
ERROR: Package builds dialign-t-data_0.2.2.dfsg-1_all.deb when
binary-indep target is not called. This is a bug in the packaging.
See any buildd log for verification.
Martin
--
To
Package: t-coffee
Version: 5.05-1
Severity: normal
When building t-coffee with sbuild, it reports:
ERROR: Package builds t-coffee-examples_5.05-1_all.deb when
binary-indep target is not called. This is a bug in the packaging.
ERROR: Package builds t-coffee-doc_5.05-1_all.deb when
Package: bashdb
Version: 3.1.0.8-2
Severity: normal
Is there a reason why bashdb is not arch:all? I can't see any arch
specific files in the package.
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: icu
Version: 3.6-7
Severity: normal
I wanted to apply a local patch to icu and put it into debian/patches.
But then I had to see that it is only partly applied (see any buildd
log for verify):
- first the source in extracted into
build-tree/icu/source
- then debian/rules target
Package: libaprutil1
Version: 1.2.7+dfsg-2
Severity: wishlist
There is a new upstream version available (1.2.10).
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libt1-dev
Version: 5.1.0-3
Severity: normal
Please remove the Depends: libc6-dev. libc6-dev is not available on
every architecture and also it is in build-essentials, so no need to
mention it. If you wish to mention it nevertheless, please use
libc-dev instead.
Martin
--
To
Package: libgc
Version: 1:6.8-1.1
Severity: wishlist
There is a new upstream version available (7.0).
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Forgot to CC the bug. Sorry.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:09:31 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Bug#442878: coreutils: please guard the who-ips extension
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Michael Stone wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 05:33:52PM +0200, Martin Koeppe wrote
Package: coreutils
Version: 6.10~20070907-3
Severity: wishlist
Please guard your who-ips extension so that it at least can be built
on systems without IPv6. I successfully used the patch below, but it
may unnecessarily remove too much.
Martin
--- coreutils-6.10~20070907/src/who.c.orig
Package: libapr1
Version: 1.2.7-8.2
Severity: wishlist
There is a new upstream version available (1.2.11).
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Name: debian-interix
Rationale: This list would be used for porting Debian to the Interix
Unix-like kernel (MS Services for Unix, now available for free), so
it's a project similar to Debian kFreeBSD/GNU. More details about
Interix and the
Package: refblas3-dev
Version: 1.2-8
Severity: normal
refblas3-dev should not Depends: libc6-dev. libc6-dev is in
build-essentials anyway, and not every architecture has a libc6 at
all. That's what buils-essential takes care of. If you really must
depend on a libc dev package, use the
Package: dpatch
Version: 2.0.27
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
dpatch fails when $HOME contains spaces. Consider the patch below.
Martin
--- dpatch.orig 2007-08-03 14:32:04.0 +0200
+++ dpatch 2007-08-29 13:22:49.0 +0200
@@ -15,12 +15,12 @@
SYSCONFDIR='/etc'
-if [ -e
Package: expat
Version: 1.95.8-4
Severity: wishlist
In this version configure was generated with a wrong aclocal.m4, which
contains libtool.m4 version 47, but with libtool 1.5.22 there comes
libtool.m4 version 48, which even is included in the package. Only
aclocal.m4 has not been generated
Package: libtool
Version: 1.5.22-4
Severity: wishlist
There is a new upstream version available (1.5.24).
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: bash
Version: 3.1dfsg-8
Severity: wishlist
There is a new upstream version available (3.2).
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libpng
Version: 1.2.15~beta5-2
Severity: wishlist
There is a new upstream version available (1.2.18).
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: rrdtool
Version: 1.2.19-1
Severity: wishlist
There is a new upstream version available (1.2.23).
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc-4.2-base
Version: 4.2-20070528-1
Severity: normal
When I look at the content of gcc-4.2-base I wonder if it should
better be arch: all instead of arch: any. Are there reasons for arch:
any? I'm porting to a new architecture and for me it would be useful
to have it arch: all,
Package: sbuild
Version: 0.53
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
The definition of %alternatives in the conf file doesn't work.
I resolved this by adding %alternatives to @EXPORT
in /usr/share/perl5/Sbuild/Conf.pm.
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: sbuild
Version: 0.53
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
To increase portability, could you please consider using
du -k -s instead of just du -s when determinating needed build
space? I use a du which by default outputs the number of blocks, not
kilobytes. You might apply the following
Hello,
I now have prepared a patch to increase the portability of apt. I
have built apt against a non-gnu libc, and this patch was necessary.
To further increase portability, you might also want to consider to
replace (not in the patch)
#include stdint.h
by
#include inttypes.h
in
Package: arc
Version: 5.21m-1
Severity: wishlist
There is arc-5.21o available.
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: cdbs
Version: 0.4.48
Severity: wishlist
To increase portability, I would like to suggest to use 'dh_testroot'
instead of 'test `id -u` = 0'. cdbs currently only Recommends:
debhelper, then it would probably Depends: on it. OTOH, how many
packages are there which Build-Depends: cdbs,
Package: groff
Version: 1.18.1.1-12
Severity: wishlist
There is groff 1.18.1.4 available.
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Michael Piefel wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 14.03.2007, 00:09 +0100 schrieb Martin Koeppe:
I have attached the whole magic file for reference, but I think only
lines 11 - 104 are interesting for a possible inclusion in file's magic.
Well, certainly I cannot include
Package: tcl8.4
Version: 8.4.12-1.1
Severity: wishlist
There is a new upstream version available (8.4.14).
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: quinn-diff
Version: 0.65.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
The attached patch allows to link quinn-diff against glib2 instead of
glib1 which is now in section oldlibs.
The patch also updates automake usage from 1.4 to 1.9.
(The new automake is called from debian/rules, just to make
Package: libgpg-error
Version: 1.4
Severity: normal
libgpg-error Build-Depends: on automake1.7; however, in debian/rules
there are calls to aclocal-1.8. There are also calls to
autoheader2.50, and autoconf isn't in Build-Depends:.
automake is probably not required at all, either, as it is only
Package: libarchive
Version: 1.2.53-2
Severity: wishlist
There are new upstream versions available:
1.2.57, 1.3.1, 2.0a1
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: bsdtar
Version: 1.2.53-2
Severity: normal
/usr/bin/bsdtar doesn't seem to depend on libarchive.so, at least on i386:
$ ldd /usr/bin/bsdtar
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000)
libz.so.1 = /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0xb7fce000)
libbz2.so.1.0 = /lib/libbz2.so.1.0
Package: diffstat
Version: 1.43-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
I just encountered an error while building diffstat. I could correct
it by adding a , to debian/control Depends: line:
old Depends: ${shlibs:Depends} ${misc:Depends}
new Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
Martin
--
To
Hello,
as I just saw,
# define bindtextdomain(a, b)
should also be added to the non-NLS section.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.46
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When configuring apt with --disable-nls, textdomain(3)
should not be called. This can be achived by modifying
buildlib/apti18n.h.in to read:
#ifdef USE_NLS
// apt will use the gettext implementation of the C library
# include
Wake on lan seems to work again since 2.6.17,
i.e. I successfully tested:
linux-image-2.6.17-2-686_2.6.17-8_i386.deb
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: kernel
Severity: normal
Hello,
when upgrading from
linux-image-2.6.12-1-686_2.6.12-10_i386.deb
to any of
- linux-image-2.6.14-2-686_2.6.14-7_i386.deb
- linux-image-2.6.15-1-686_2.6.15-8_i386.deb
- linux-image-2.6.16-2-686_2.6.16-14_i386.deb
- vanilla 2.6.15
wake on lan (wol)
Hello Michael,
But what if I resync my mirror afterwards? I didn't change the chroot
then, but the stored package lists would become invalid, wouldn't they?
Indeed, but this is the same for ftp.debian.org. It used to be a
fundamental thing of how sbuild works: You give it a package and a
Package: cdebootstrap
Version: 0.3.8
Severity: important
When issuing
# cdebootstrap -f build etch /chroot/etch http://mirror/debian
the chroot is created. However, the device files below
/chroot/etch/dev are all missing, only /dev/null is created,
but as a regular file with size 0.
With
#
Package: sbuild
Version: 0.35
Severity: normal
Hello,
I use sbuild together with schroot, but after a build,
for checking the space needed du -s is run,
but as sudo instead of within schroot.
Martin
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing
Architecture: i386 (i686)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: sbuild
Version: 0.36
Severity: normal
When running sbuild with schroot, and giving a .dsc file to sbuild,
it should run apt-get update before trying to install the Build-Depends.
I did:
# debootstrap --resolve-deps --variant=buildd --include=fakeroot etch
/chroot/etch
Package: schroot
Version: 0.1.5-1
Severity: minor
Both the man pages schroot(1) and schroot.conf(5) begin at
DESCRIPTION with the word sbuild instead of schroot.
Martin
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing
Architecture: i386 (i686)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I believe it is not sbuild's job to maintain your chroots. In
your case, you created a new chroot and then changed it's behaviour (by
modifying sources.list), at which point you should have run apt-get
update yourself.
This is not that easy, because the creation of the chroot is done
Hello,
in between I managed to work around the problem.
With cifs 1.34 compiled into 2.6.11 (and probably 2.6.12, too),
a acceptable performance can be achieved with mount option direct.
For further plans and (hopefully) the final fix for the problem see:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.2.15.9-6
Severity: normal
Updating one package with complex dependencies fails:
I tried to update from slang1a-utf8 (1.4.9dbs-8) to
libslang1-utf8 (1.4.9dbs-10).
The following dependencies exist:
slang1a-utf8 (1.4.9dbs-8)
Conflicts: slang1-utf8
libslang1-utf8
Hello,
Quoting Andrew Bartlett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
None of this is a samba issue. mount.cifs is a simple helper binary
that starts the in-kernel cifs filesystem, the same results may be
obtained with a very simple 'mount' command.
The correct package for this bug is the kernel, and the
Package: libdbd-sybase-perl
Version: 1.00-1
Severity: normal
the subject already says it...
Martin
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Versions of packages libdbd-sybase-perl depends on:
ii libc6
Package: smbfs
Version: 3.0.14a-1
Severity: normal
I run a Linux box within a VMware, a Windows Server 2003 and a
Windows 2000 Server (both not in VMware).
When copying a CD image file from within Linux to a cifs mounted
Win2003 share, I see a very poor performance and high CPU load
(about 90%
in between)
Another advantage for this scenario would be that the script need only
to be run once, and not for each mailbox entry specified.
Martin Koeppe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin, can you please download 1.17 from
http://www.colonel-panic.org/cobalt-mips/colo/colo-1.17.tar.gz and see
if that works (there's a binary in binaries/colo-chain.elf).
Yes, with this version DHCP from Win2K server is ok.
Thank you for your quick response.
I won't upload 1.17 to Debian
Package: colo
Version: 1.16-1
Severity: normal
When typing net in the colo shell, it does not receive an
IP address when connected to a Win2000 DHCP server. I traced
the network traffic during the DHCP phase:
frame source IPdestination IP content
source MAC
81 matches
Mail list logo
