Probably related to https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41436
Package: wine64-development
Version: 3.12-1
Severity: normal
I installed wine64-development, then when I tried to install the
wine-development metapackage it failed due to requiring version >= 3.12-2.
That's the current version of wine32-development, but wine64-development is
still at 3.12-1
Ondřej, could you confirm you're still actively maintaining this package?
> On Sep 14, 2016, at 03:22, Evgeni Golov <evg...@debian.org> wrote:
>
> control: tag -1 moreinfo
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:29:39PM -0700, Michael Gardner wrote:
>> I created an unpriviliged Ubuntu (xenial, amd64) container using &quo
Package: lxc
Version: 1:2.0.4-1
Severity: important
I created an unpriviliged Ubuntu (xenial, amd64) container using "lxc-create -n
foo -t download", and it seemed to complete with no problems. But when I try to
start this container using "lxc-start -n foo", I get this error:
>lxc-start:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:00:26 + debian.mic...@gmail.com (Miguel A. Colón
Vélez) wrote:
> Source: soundtouch
> Source-Version: 1.9.2-1
>
> We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
> soundtouch, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
When will
What's the status of the autohint relicensing?
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Read Roberts rrobe...@adobe.com wrote:
I am working on this now, and the major legal hurdles have been cleared.
It may still be several months for all the paperwork to get done, but I
will have finished the
Arthur: if the bug is still unresolved, you should reopen this report.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Any progress on this? I think I’m running into the same issue. If my debug info
might help, just let me know what to provide.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Ron, what's your basis for stating that Opus 1.1 should be Coming Soon? I
know there's a beta, but I don't see anything from Xiph about when the full
release will be.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Is anybody working on this?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Nov 10, 2009, at 7:40 AM, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
* Michael Gardner gardne...@gmail.com [2009-11-10 00:15:16 CET]:
Did you try re-installing quodlibet-plugins *after* your most recent
QL upgrade?
Erm, no - I wouldn't have any idea why I should, and wouldn't that
be a
case for a required
Did you try re-installing quodlibet-plugins *after* your most recent
QL upgrade?
On Nov 9, 2009, at 4:37 PM, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
* A. Christine Spang sp...@mit.edu [2009-11-09 22:40:02 CET]:
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 10:24:52PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
I have no clue why, but since
Yes, after I upgraded QL and reinstalled quodlibet-plugins, it works
again. Thanks!
-Michael
On Nov 8, 2009, at 11:10 AM, A. Christine Spang wrote:
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 04:04:13PM -0600, Michael Gardner wrote:
Package: quodlibet-plugins
Version: 20091024-1
Severity: important
After
Package: quodlibet-plugins
Version: 20091024-1
Severity: important
After upgrading to the latest version of quodlibet-plugins, QL no longer sees
any plugins at all.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64
15 matches
Mail list logo
