Bug#1040566: let logol be removed

2023-07-19 Thread olivier sallou
Le mer. 19 juil. 2023, 06:58, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Hi Olivier, > > Am Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 12:13:30PM +0200 schrieb olivier sallou: > > logol is not maintained anymore for quite some time now > > > > effort to keep in line with swi-prolog updates (need to reco

Bug#1040566: biojava not shipping biojava.jar anymore

2023-07-17 Thread olivier sallou
seems biojava now ships several jar files (core, biosql, ...) and not a bundle anymore, used by logol, see list of jar files available: https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/libbiojava1.9-java/filelist would need to patch logol to import/load expected jar files (and find which ones are needed...)

Bug#1040566: let it be removed

2023-07-17 Thread olivier sallou
logol is not maintained anymore for quite some time now effort to keep in line with swi-prolog updates (need to recompile on each ABI break of swi-prolog) AND biojava requires frequent work for an old software with low usage. I would let it be removed -- gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438

Bug#1039562: package install error is "fine"

2023-07-10 Thread olivier sallou
Installation shows an "error" because it tries to connect to database with configuration defaults (will fail at first install if default user/password does not exists in database, and this is fine). In case of "failure" using found configuration (/usr/share/gmod/chado/conf/gmod-chado.conf) , it

Bug#1026492: seqan2: FTBFS: TypeError: a bytes-like object is required, not 'str'

2022-12-21 Thread olivier sallou
On Wed, 2022-12-21 at 19:39 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 12:32:25 +0100 olivier sallou > wrote: > > On Wed, 2022-12-21 at 11:02 +0100, olivier sallou wrote: > > > looks like a python3 issue (though was already adapter to py3...) > > > > &

Bug#1026492: seqan2: FTBFS: TypeError: a bytes-like object is required, not 'str'

2022-12-21 Thread olivier sallou
upstream, in develop branch has disabled mason2 testing for gcc > 10 , don't know why, but let's do the same as it is the one failing now with indeed superior gcc I am adapting the patch and testing again. gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438  (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9

Bug#1026492: seqan2: FTBFS: TypeError: a bytes-like object is required, not 'str'

2022-12-21 Thread olivier sallou
I pushed a patch d/patches/fix_python3_tests whic fixes almost all test issues(python3 related) BUT remains a failing test with mason2 which is not related to py3 issue (no bytes-like error) after build, can be reproduced with in a temp dir: python3 /<>/apps/mason2/tests/run_tests.py

Bug#1026492: seqan2: FTBFS: TypeError: a bytes-like object is required, not 'str'

2022-12-21 Thread olivier sallou
On Wed, 2022-12-21 at 11:02 +0100, olivier sallou wrote: > looks like a python3 issue (though was already adapter to py3...) > > will have a look and reproduce I could reproduce and found an issue with demo_checker.py handling with python3 I have a patch. will test it and upload >

Bug#1026492: seqan2: FTBFS: TypeError: a bytes-like object is required, not 'str'

2022-12-21 Thread olivier sallou
looks like a python3 issue (though was already adapter to py3...) will have a look and reproduce Olivier -- gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438  (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335  D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438

Bug#1026056: swi-prolog breaks logol autopkgtest: Program exited with wrong status code

2022-12-14 Thread olivier sallou
after investigation, logol does not find anymore libswipl.so.8, need version providing .so.9 compiled program link to .so.x versions, forcing package recompilation Le mar. 13 déc. 2022 à 22:03, Paul Gevers a écrit : > Source: swi-prolog, logol > Control: found -1 swi-prolog/9.0.2+dfsg-1 >

Bug#1026056: swi-prolog breaks logol autopkgtest: Program exited with wrong status code

2022-12-13 Thread olivier sallou
Tests need to be run as root, or use a specific config file and use non root writable directories. Will try to change tests to do so. Regarding issue itself, programs compiled by swi prolog usually require recompilation on swi prolog updates. Will try to rebuild and check Le mar. 13 déc.

Bug#1022253: swi-prolog breaks logol autopkgtest on s390x

2022-10-23 Thread olivier sallou
Le dim. 23 oct. 2022, 19:21, Lev Lamberov a écrit : > Hi Paul, > > Вс 23 окт 2022 @ 10:10 Paul Gevers : > > > Hi Lev, > > > > On 23-10-2022 09:40, Lev Lamberov wrote: > >> I'm not sure it is the solution, it needs testing. The change in > >> swi-prolog concerns pre-compiled prolog source code,

Bug#1014797: FTBFS: test failures with new libgd3

2022-09-30 Thread olivier sallou
Le ven. 30 sept. 2022 à 07:20, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Am Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 02:20:26AM +0200 schrieb olivier sallou: > > Will try to have a look, but i have no perl knowledge and software is > quite > > old now... > I have a patch. With this patch, tests are ok, but

Bug#1014797: FTBFS: test failures with new libgd3

2022-09-29 Thread olivier sallou
Will try to have a look, but i have no perl knowledge and software is quite old now... Le jeu. 29 sept. 2022, 19:44, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Control: tags -1 help > > Hi Aaron and Olivier, > > do you have some idea how to fix this bug? > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > -- >

Bug#1013577: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1013577: picard-tools: FTBFS: PicardHelpDocWorkUnitHandler.java:6: error: cannot find symbol

2022-06-24 Thread olivier sallou
mentalTaskAction.java:46) > > at > > org.gradle.api.internal.project.taskfactory.StandardTaskAction.exec > > ute(StandardTaskAction.java:39) > > at > > org.gradle.api.internal.project.taskfactory.StandardTaskAction.exec > > ute(StandardTaskAction.

Bug#1006384: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Olivier Sallou ) (Bug#1006384: fixed in logol 1.7.9+dfsg-2)

2022-03-03 Thread olivier sallou
Le jeu. 3 mars 2022, 20:51, Paul Gevers a écrit : > Hi Lev, > > On 03-03-2022 08:46, dogs...@riseup.net wrote: > > swi-prolog package (namely, swi-prolog-core) provides an easy way to > > require some particular ABI since 8.2.0+dfsg-2 uploaded on Jun 9, 2020. > > Specifically, in this case logol

Bug#1006384: swi-prolog breaks logol autopkgtest: Program exited with wrong status code

2022-03-01 Thread olivier sallou
Le lun. 28 févr. 2022 à 06:37, a écrit : > Dear Olivier, > > sorry for the delay with my message and thanks for your input. > > olivier sallou писал 2022-02-25 12:12: > > ok, > > after a quick look, issue is Logol is compiled against swi-prolog, and > > there

Bug#1006384: swi-prolog breaks logol autopkgtest: Program exited with wrong status code

2022-02-24 Thread olivier sallou
ok, after a quick look, issue is Logol is compiled against swi-prolog, and there is an ABI issue I think, getting error: incompatible version (file: 67, Prolog: 68)] Recompiling logol in sid against swi-prolog 8.4.2+dfsg-2 results in correct execution/tests. So, 2 things: * As swi-prolog is

Bug#1006384: swi-prolog breaks logol autopkgtest: Program exited with wrong status code

2022-02-24 Thread olivier sallou
Hi, Logol is not maintained for quite a long time now, i will try to have a look, but i am ok to get logol removed from testing to avoid blocking swi prolog Olivier Le jeu. 24 févr. 2022, 19:36, Paul Gevers a écrit : > Source: swi-prolog, logol > Control: found -1 swi-prolog/8.4.2+dfsg-2 >

Bug#1005457: biomaj3-download: FTBFS: ValueError: Error while parsing stop condition: stop_after_attempt(3) doesn't yield a stop condition

2022-02-13 Thread olivier sallou
Seems that a dependency (tenacity) has been changed with broken api Need to change code to use new tenacity version Le dim. 13 févr. 2022, 08:21, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > Source: biomaj3-download > Version: 3.2.4-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs > User:

Bug#1005279: ncbi-plus+ uses "phone home" to send reports by default

2022-02-10 Thread olivier sallou
Package: ncbi-blast+ Version: 2.12.0+ds-2 By default, software sends over internet some usage reports. It uses optout strategy (sends data unless you specify by config the contrary) Should use optin strategy (user accepts to send report)

Bug#988650: logol: broken symlink: /usr/share/logol/lib/xml-apis.jar -> ../../java/xml-apis.jar

2021-05-17 Thread olivier sallou
like to forward this to Debian Java list for comments. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 01:50:01PM +0200, olivier sallou wrote: > > Issue seems to be related to xml-apis.jar not being symlinked itself > > > > /usr/share/java# ls *xml-api* &g

Bug#988650: logol: broken symlink: /usr/share/logol/lib/xml-apis.jar -> ../../java/xml-apis.jar

2021-05-17 Thread olivier sallou
Issue seems to be related to xml-apis.jar not being symlinked itself /usr/share/java# ls *xml-api* xml-apis-1.4.01.jar xml-apis-ext-1.4.01.jar xml-apis-ext.jar Usually, java libs have a versioned file and an unversionned file which is a symlink to versioned one (see above). xml-apis here is

Bug#988650: logol: broken symlink: /usr/share/logol/lib/xml-apis.jar -> ../../java/xml-apis.jar

2021-05-17 Thread olivier sallou
need to check, but I suppose referenced lib changed its path or name in dependencies... Le lun. 17 mai 2021 à 13:33, Andreas Beckmann a écrit : > Package: logol > Version: 1.7.9-2 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts

Bug#976174: Made an itp

2020-12-23 Thread olivier sallou
licensed, and does not download anything as part of > > the install process. It has two dependencies: Python and the lynx > > browser. Python 2 and 3 versions are included in the tarball but it is > > presumed that the preferred Python version is now Python 3, so that is > > the defaul

Bug#976174: Made an itp

2020-12-22 Thread olivier sallou
You created an itp so an intent to package. If not willing to propose a apckage should be an rfp request for package. Ideally you package your app and propose it for review and upload. Requirements are an open source license and package install should not download anything. Only its execution can

Bug#972250: vienna-rna binaries upload

2020-11-06 Thread olivier sallou
Hi, andreas, thanks for binaries upload, but I do not see on tracker any upload/change, is it expected? Graham, if binaries have been uploaded why do you set bug level back to serious? Should not be an issue anymore (but my action to allow for autobuild for further uploads) thanks Olivier

Bug#972250: autobuild request sent

2020-11-06 Thread olivier sallou
I just asked to allow for package autobuild, waiting for answer If accepted will check for builds, else upload with binaries Olivier -- gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438

Bug#973070: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#973070: Help needed: Bug#973070: libsis-base-java: FTBFS: Could not delete the directory targets/unit-test-wd/ch.systemsx.cisd.base.unix.UnixTests because: 1 exc

2020-10-28 Thread olivier sallou
e to delete file: > targets/unit-test- > wd/ch.systemsx.cisd.base.unix.UnixTests/someDanglingLink] > Exception in thread "main" org.apache.commons.io.IOExceptionList: 1 > exceptions: [java.io.IOException: Unable to delete file: > targets/unit-test- > wd/ch.systemsx.cisd.b

Bug#673724: Relicensing done by upstream

2020-08-07 Thread olivier sallou
Good news, upstream license has been modified after some rewriting (see issue closed https://github.com/jshint/jshint/issues/1234), so should fit for debian now

Bug#963430: Any volunteer to spent some time on the new version of artemis (Was: Bug#963430: artemis: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: /usr/share/java/j2ssh-core.jar: Permission denied)

2020-06-23 Thread olivier sallou
denied > > > > make[2]: *** [Makefile:48: uk/ac/sanger/artemis/Action.class] > > Error 126 > > > > > > The full build log is available from: > > > > > http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/06/20/artemis_17.0.1+dfsg-2_unstable.log > > > >

Bug#960756: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#960756: python-biopython FTBFS on 32bit: test_NCBI_BLAST_tools.BlastDB failures

2020-06-09 Thread olivier sallou
Le mar. 9 juin 2020 à 16:47, Aaron M. Ucko a écrit : > Andreas Tille writes: > > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 02:25:58PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: > >> My current impression is that makeblastdb is unable to work > >> properly on most 32 bits machines, because the amount of memory > >> needing

Bug#961700: picard-tools build depends on the removed libguava-java-doc

2020-05-29 Thread olivier sallou
Le jeu. 28 mai 2020 à 13:00, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Hi Olivier and Vincent > > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:47:37AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > picard-tools build depends on libguava-java-doc, > > which is no longer built by src:guava-libraries. > Hi andreas, looking at issue, where did

Bug#961700: picard-tools build depends on the removed libguava-java-doc

2020-05-28 Thread olivier sallou
Le jeu. 28 mai 2020 à 13:00, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Hi Olivier and Vincent > > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:47:37AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > picard-tools build depends on libguava-java-doc, > > which is no longer built by src:guava-libraries. > > I've tried to simply leave out

Bug#961013: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#961013: diamond-aligner: Diamond faill with the error: Assertion `index >= 0 && index < size()' failed.

2020-05-19 Thread olivier sallou
gner recommends: > ii med-config 3.5.1 > > diamond-aligner suggests no packages. > > -- no debconf information > > ___ > Debian-med-packaging mailing list > debian-med-packag...@alioth-lists.debian.net > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging -- Olivier Sallou Univ Rennes, Inria, CNRS, IRISA Irisa, Campus de Beaulieu F-35042 RENNES - FRANCE Tel: 02.99.84.71.95 gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438

Bug#960654: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#960654: src:biojava4-live: Please add support to build against libjson-simple-java >= 3

2020-05-15 Thread olivier sallou
> Debian-med-packaging mailing list > debian-med-packag...@alioth-lists.debian.net > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging -- Olivier Sallou Univ Rennes, Inria, CNRS, IRISA Irisa, Campus de Beaulieu F-35042 RENNES - FRANCE Tel: 02.99.84.71.95 gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438

Bug#937177: obitools: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-03-06 Thread olivier sallou
Le sam. 7 mars 2020 à 06:12, Sergio Durigan Junior a écrit : > On Sunday, January 12 2020, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 07:27:59AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 07:28:59 + Matthias Klose > wrote: > >> This > >> package is blocking several

Bug#952208: python-ftputil

2020-03-04 Thread olivier sallou
Le mer. 4 mars 2020 à 16:38, eamanu a écrit : > Hi olivier, > > On 04/03/2020 12:13, olivier sallou wrote: > > Hi, > > I saw you started some work on python-ftputil to fix #952208. > > > > I just pushed to git repo a fix for that. > > I am a litt

Bug#952208: python-ftputil

2020-03-04 Thread olivier sallou
Hi, I saw you started some work on python-ftputil to fix #952208. I just pushed to git repo a fix for that. Will you push new patch release soon? Or should I do? I wonder however why you pushed a gbp.conf (not really expected usually) setting branch as debian/master , which does not exists and

Bug#925797: pushed patch to git

2020-02-09 Thread olivier sallou
I pushed to git a patch that seems to fix the undefined ref to InitGoogle... Still need to test full build (very long...) Olivier

Bug#936797: cannot find way to use pbcommand API

2020-02-09 Thread olivier sallou
pbcommand in debian (latest from github) provide a different API, but pbcommand doc and README all show previous API example and show usage of get_pbparser function, but this method is not present anymore. It is not possible to *guess* what should be used instead. -- gpg key id:

Bug#936797: depends on pbcommand with a different api

2020-02-09 Thread olivier sallou
Tried to look at python3 port. However it depends on pbcommand, and pbcommand api is different from expected by kinetictools (means py2 version is broken). Trying to see how to use current pbcommand api, but looks quite different. Olivier

Bug#937258: ported and uploaded

2020-02-09 Thread olivier sallou
py3 fix sent and uploaded, by introduces new py3 packages, so in NEW queue for the moment

Bug#950914: python3-biomaj3: Depends on python-influxdb wich ftbs, patch to remove dependency

2020-02-08 Thread olivier sallou
Package: python3-biomaj3 Version: 3.1.14-1 Severity: minor Due to #950063 "influxdb-python FTBFS with pandas 0.25.3", biomaj3 cannot use influxdb. Patch software to remove influxdb python dependency waiting for fix of package.

Bug#939832: chado-utils: installation error

2019-12-05 Thread Olivier Sallou
atch Olivier > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > -- Olivier Sallou Univ Rennes, Inria, CNRS, IRISA Irisa, Campus de Beaulieu F-35042 RENNES - FRANCE Tel: 02.99.84.71.95 gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438

Bug#939832: chado-utils: installation error

2019-12-05 Thread Olivier Sallou
t CHADO_DB_USERNAME=chado next to export CHADO_DB_NAME > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > -- Olivier Sallou Univ Rennes, Inria, CNRS, IRISA Irisa, Campus de Beaulieu F-35042 RENNES - FRANCE Tel: 02.99.84.71.95 gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438

Bug#938521: Issues to build latest spades

2019-11-13 Thread Olivier Sallou
open(corrected_dataset_yaml_filename, 'r')) > make[1]: *** [debian/rules:61: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1 > > > > Please note: In commit 54bc9d00e8638f0ab350c620e9b5446f776340e7 > I tried to address exactly this issue but failed obviously. > > Any help would be really appreciated. > > Kind re

Bug#937059: Removing mobyle from Debian? (Was: mobyle: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2019-11-08 Thread Olivier Sallou
- Mail original - > De: "andreas" > À: 937...@bugs.debian.org, "debian-med" , > "Olivier Sallou" > Envoyé: Vendredi 8 Novembre 2019 14:07:32 > Objet: Removing mobyle from Debian? (Was: mobyle: Python2 removal in > sid/bullseye) >

Bug#942404: discosnp: flaky autopkgtest: discoRes_k_31_c_auto_D_100_P_1_b_0_coherent.fa: No such file or directory

2019-10-16 Thread Olivier Sallou
fa: No such file or > directory > *** Test: FAILURE on diff .fa > autopkgtest [08:02:15]: test run-unit-test: -------] > > > ___ > Debian-med-packaging mailing list > debian-med-packag...@alioth-lists.debian.net > ht

Bug#905206: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#905206: Seems to crash in fortran lib

2019-10-08 Thread Olivier Sallou
On 10/4/19 3:07 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 02:14:02PM +0200, olivier sallou wrote: >>> Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory >>> reference. >> I really do not see what error could be. Maybe a

Bug#941805: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#941805: hmmer: autopkgtest regression: hmmpgmd_ga] ... FAILED [crash!]

2019-10-07 Thread Olivier Sallou
- Mail original - > De: "Olivier Sallou" > À: "941805" <941...@bugs.debian.org> > Envoyé: Lundi 7 Octobre 2019 17:09:50 > Objet: Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#941805: hmmer: autopkgtest regression: > hmmpgmd_ga] ... FAILED [crash!] >

Bug#941805: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#941805: hmmer: autopkgtest regression: hmmpgmd_ga] ... FAILED [crash!]

2019-10-07 Thread Olivier Sallou
After a quick look, seems test is looking for hmmc2 executable, that I do not found in binaries - Mail original - > De: "Paul Gevers" > À: "submit" > Envoyé: Samedi 5 Octobre 2019 22:01:21 > Objet: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#941805: hmmer: autopkgtest regression: > hmmpgmd_ga] ...

Bug#941805: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#941805: hmmer: autopkgtest regression: hmmpgmd_ga] ... FAILED [crash!]

2019-10-07 Thread Olivier Sallou
- Mail original - > De: "Olivier Sallou" > À: "941805" <941...@bugs.debian.org> > Envoyé: Lundi 7 Octobre 2019 17:00:13 > Objet: Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#941805: hmmer: autopkgtest regression: > hmmpgmd_ga] ... FAILED [crash!] &g

Bug#905206: Seems to crash in fortran lib

2019-10-04 Thread olivier sallou
jct_ > at ./snapfun_dir/prof.f:876 > #5 0x55a7ca3b0967 in prof > at ./snapfun_dir/prof.f:108 > #6 0x55a7ca39f25e in main > at ./snapfun_dir/prof.f:179 > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 12:35 PM olivier sallou wrote: > >> >> >> Le je

Bug#905206: Seems to crash in fortran lib

2019-10-03 Thread olivier sallou
Le jeu. 3 oct. 2019 à 12:08, Michael Crusoe a écrit : > On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 17:44:02 +0100 olivier sallou > wrote: > > Looking at core generated file and using gdb we see that it fails in > > fortran lib. > > > > Either program tries something wrong in a fortran u

Bug#925745: Bug#925745: [Help] libgtextutils: ftbfs with GCC-9

2019-09-25 Thread Olivier Sallou
ave non  :-( was expecting something from debian mentors which was in cc... > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > -- Olivier Sallou Univ Rennes, Inria, CNRS, IRISA Irisa, Campus de Beaulieu F-35042 RENNES - FRANCE Tel: 02.99.84.71.95 gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438

Bug#923731: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#923731: Any volunteer to fix the "usual" issues when upgrading to new version of igv?

2019-09-16 Thread Olivier Sallou
If I try to remove "module" related stuff as debian required libs do not seem to declare libs as modules: dependencies {     compile fileTree(dir: 'lib', include: '*.jar')     compile "commons-io:commons-io:debian"     compile "org.apache.ant:ant:debian";     compile

Bug#923731: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#923731: Any volunteer to fix the "usual" issues when upgrading to new version of igv?

2019-09-16 Thread Olivier Sallou
^ > 10 errors > :compileJava FAILED > :compileJava (Thread[Task worker for ':',5,main]) completed. Took 4.782 secs. > > FAILURE: Build failed with an exception. > > > The failures are looking like missing Build-Depends at first look but these > should be OK. Any

Bug#939894: Minia is lacking symbol from gatb-core (Was: Bug#939894: minia: autopkgtest regression: X.contigs.fa: No such file or directory)

2019-09-13 Thread Olivier Sallou
stream projects. Would you be able to teach them about a sensible > release strategy with some API the depending projects could rely on? As > far as I can see the depending projects rely on Git submodules with a > specific commit which is not really helpful. unfortunatly, there is n

Bug#939832: chado-utils: installation error

2019-09-09 Thread olivier sallou
Package: chado-utils Version: 1.31-5 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, installation fails with error at postinstall step dpkg: error processing package libchado-perl (--configure): installed libchado-perl package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 2

Bug#920545: python-intervaltree breaks python-intervaltree-bio autopkgtest

2019-08-21 Thread olivier sallou
Le mer. 21 août 2019 à 15:21, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Control: tags -1 help > > Hi, > > I removed Python2 support from this package in Git[1]. Unfortunately the > autopkgtest failure is for Python3. Graham, I understood your > mail that you've found a solution - but I do not understand what

Bug#935287: uglu patch proposal

2019-08-21 Thread Olivier Sallou
not supported and clean step is ran before patches So feel free to use this patch, but I do not really like it  :-( From 4b07d43ce328690fac4965aafc4d3252c72b95ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Olivier Sallou Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 12:03:31 + Subject: [PATCH] remove sphinx related doc

Bug#935287: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#935287: obitools: FTBFS on amd64

2019-08-21 Thread Olivier Sallou
kage.php?p=obitools > > Cheers, > > Ivo > > ___ > Debian-med-packaging mailing list > debian-med-packag...@alioth-lists.debian.net > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging -- Olivier Sallou Un

Bug#925745: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#925745: [Help] libgtextutils: ftbfs with GCC-9

2019-08-20 Thread Olivier Sallou
turn line_string() ; } do the job and test pass but I would prefer a c++ friend to acknowledge this It works but I do not if there are side effects Olivier > > Thanks for your analysis anyway > > Andreas. > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 03:36:48PM +0200, Olivier S

Bug#925745: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#925745: [Help] libgtextutils: ftbfs with GCC-9

2019-08-20 Thread Olivier Sallou
aits, _Alloc>&&) > [with _CharT = char; _Traits = std::char_traits; _Alloc = > std::allocator]' > 732 | operator=(basic_string&& __str) > | ^~~~ > make[3]: *** [Makefile:781: test_text_reader.o] Error 1 > > > Kind regards > >

Bug#933390: ITP: python-ftputil -- high level library for python ftp

2019-07-30 Thread olivier sallou
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Olivier Sallou X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org * Package name: python-ftputil Version : 3.4 Upstream Author : Stefan Schwarzer * URL : https://ftputil.sschwarzer.net/trac

Bug#925902: unblock: cnvkit/0.9.5-3

2019-03-28 Thread olivier sallou
hes/controldir.patch + + -- Olivier Sallou Wed, 27 Mar 2019 08:00:39 + + cnvkit (0.9.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium [ Jelmer Vernooij ] diff -Nru cnvkit-0.9.5/debian/patches/controldir cnvkit-0.9.5/debian/patches/controldir --- cnvkit-0.9.5/debian/patches/controldir 1970-01-01 00:00:00.00

Bug#925568: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#925568: cnvkit: FTBFS: FileExistsError: [Errno 17] File exists: 'build/'

2019-03-27 Thread Olivier Sallou
ces, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every > failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures. > > ___ > Debian-med-packaging mailing list > debian-med-packag...@alioth-lists.debian.net > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/c

Bug#923637: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#923637: 923637 is pending

2019-03-09 Thread Olivier Sallou
- Mail original - > De: "Andrius Merkys" > À: 923...@bugs.debian.org > Envoyé: Samedi 9 Mars 2019 16:50:28 > Objet: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#923637: 923637 is pending > control: tags -1 + pending > > Hello, > > the patch is applied in the VCS and the fixed version of the package

Bug#923637: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#923637: 923637 is pending

2019-03-09 Thread Olivier Sallou
there is a remaining warning: W: libffindex0: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libffindex2.0.2 so this not a big issue by itself, but why packgae is named libffindex0 while lib version is 2.x ? Olivier

Bug#905206: Seems to crash in fortran lib

2019-03-09 Thread olivier sallou
Looking at core generated file and using gdb we see that it fails in fortran lib. Either program tries something wrong in a fortran updated lib version, either the fortran lib is itself buggy. I have no fortran knowledge to debug this however. And it lacks debug info to find calling line in

Bug#920545: Fixed in git repo

2019-03-09 Thread olivier sallou
Hi, I have pushed a fix to get autopkgtests done in python-intervaltree-bio I have not uploaded package, as we are in freeze transition, so patch is in git only Commit: 4f67ea8b607fa47520b553ce8776a37cf62a1713 Link:

Bug#924086: ITP: python-irodsclient -- python3 API module for iRODS

2019-03-09 Thread olivier sallou
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Olivier Sallou X-CC: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org * Package name: python-irodsclient Version : 0.8.1 Upstream Author : The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill * URL : https://github.com/irods/python

Bug#923756: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#923756: libhac-java: FTBFS in buster/sid

2019-03-04 Thread Olivier Sallou
- Andreas Tille a écrit : > Hi Debian Java team, > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 12:19:40AM +, Santiago Vila wrote: > > jh_build -J hac.jar src > > find src -name *.java -and -type f -print0 | xargs -s 512000 -0 > > /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/javac -g -cp :debian/_jh_build.hac -d > >

Bug#923731: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#923731: igv depends on packages which were removed in picard-tools

2019-03-04 Thread Olivier Sallou
- Mail original - > De: "Matthias Klose" > À: "submit" > Envoyé: Lundi 4 Mars 2019 17:40:08 > Objet: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#923731: igv depends on packages which were > removed in picard-tools > Package: src:igv,src:picard-tools > Severity: serious > Tags: sid buster > >

Bug#919559: picard-tools: autopkgtest regression

2019-01-17 Thread Olivier Sallou
- Andreas Tille a écrit : > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 06:49:14PM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote: > > > > > > I tested against a local build of the package though local build (which > > runs tests) works fine. (both are run on the same machine)! > &g

Bug#919559: picard-tools: autopkgtest regression

2019-01-17 Thread Olivier Sallou
On 1/17/19 1:24 PM, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > On 17-01-2019 12:12, Olivier Sallou wrote: >> I tested in buster with updated libbarclay-java (2.1.0-3 pushed today to >> allow migration to testing) and could rebuild picard-tools from source >> (with tests) with

Bug#919559: picard-tools: autopkgtest regression

2019-01-17 Thread Olivier Sallou
On 1/17/19 1:24 PM, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > On 17-01-2019 12:12, Olivier Sallou wrote: >> I tested in buster with updated libbarclay-java (2.1.0-3 pushed today to >> allow migration to testing) and could rebuild picard-tools from source >> (with tests) with

Bug#919559: picard-tools: autopkgtest regression

2019-01-17 Thread Olivier Sallou
On 1/17/19 10:07 AM, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > On 17-01-2019 09:38, Olivier Sallou wrote: >> On 1/17/19 9:25 AM, Paul Gevers wrote: >>> autopkgtest [04:38:35]: test run-unit-test: [--- >>> Error: Unable to initialize main class

Bug#919559: picard-tools: autopkgtest regression

2019-01-17 Thread Olivier Sallou
ils. I wonder however Previous picard-tools in testing did not depend on this library. Migration of picard-tools is currently blocked by this libbarclay-java bug (#906973) Olivier > > > ___ > Debian-med-packaging mailing list > debian-m

Bug#916942: additional info

2018-12-20 Thread olivier sallou
/#!topic/swi-prolog/PJTBwNMGmo8 Le ven. 21 déc. 2018 à 07:53, olivier sallou a écrit : > By the way, > I see that version 7.7 is the development version. > Stable version is still the 7.6 version. > > See http://www.swi-prolog.org/ChangeLog?branch=development and > http://

Bug#916942: additional info

2018-12-20 Thread olivier sallou
, olivier sallou a écrit : > I could reproduce with simple code example from swi-prolog > > Running following on attached example raise the error: > > swipl-ld -o test.exe test.c test.pl > ./test.exe pi/2 > > Running the same on an Ubuntu with swi-prolog 7.6.4 works. > &g

Bug#916942: additional info

2018-12-20 Thread olivier sallou
I could reproduce with simple code example from swi-prolog Running following on attached example raise the error: swipl-ld -o test.exe test.c test.pl ./test.exe pi/2 Running the same on an Ubuntu with swi-prolog 7.6.4 works. Le jeu. 20 déc. 2018 à 19:26, olivier sallou a écrit : > Execut

Bug#916953: logol FTBFS with swi-prolog 7.7.25+dfsg-2

2018-12-20 Thread olivier sallou
Hi, I am aware of the issue. I discovered issue yesterday while trying to update package with latest version. I was about to add info in changelog this morning... I created an issue in swi-prolog. This dependency update seems to introduce the error, failing to load a library. Related issue is

Bug#916942: additional info

2018-12-20 Thread olivier sallou
Executing cmd directly seems to work: swipl Welcome to SWI-Prolog (threaded, 64 bits, version 7.7.25) SWI-Prolog comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software. Please run ?- license. for legal details. For online help and background, visit http://www.swi-prolog.org For built-in help,

Bug#916942: swi-prolog: fails to load process library

2018-12-20 Thread olivier sallou
Package: swi-prolog Version: 7.7.25+dfsg-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Trying to recompile logol package, tests are failing with error: /usr/lib/swi-prolog/library/process.pl:57: Initialization goal raised In process.pl this is related to :

Bug#893409: pixelmed FTBFS with openjdk-9

2018-12-19 Thread Olivier Sallou
On 12/19/18 11:46 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:39:55AM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote: >>> The missing class is in libjaxb-api-java. Just make sure it's on the >>> CLASSPATH. >> yeap, an other issue at java migration to openjdk 10

Bug#893409: pixelmed FTBFS with openjdk-9

2018-12-19 Thread Olivier Sallou
On 12/19/18 11:46 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:39:55AM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote: >>> The missing class is in libjaxb-api-java. Just make sure it's on the >>> CLASSPATH. >> yeap, an other issue at java migration to openjdk 10

Bug#893409: pixelmed FTBFS with openjdk-9

2018-12-19 Thread Olivier Sallou
k 10/11 Adding this lib to deps should fix the pb > Regards, > > Markus > > > > ___ > Debian-med-packaging mailing list > debian-med-packag...@alioth-lists.debian.net > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf

Bug#906371: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#906371: Changes in alter-sequence-alignment break build of jmodeltest (Was: Bug#906371: jmodeltest: FTBFS in buster/sid)

2018-12-17 Thread Olivier Sallou
1.10+dfsg/src/main/java/es/uvigo/darwin/jmodeltest/exe/Distributor.java:23: >> warning: [deprecation] Observable in java.util has been deprecated >> [javac] import java.util.Observable; >> [javac] ^ > Any more hints? > > Kind regards > >Andreas. > -- Olivier Sallou Univ Rennes, Inria, CNRS, IRISA Irisa, Campus de Beaulieu F-35042 RENNES - FRANCE Tel: 02.99.84.71.95 gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438

Bug#916000: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#916000: ncbi-blast+: FTBFS - Makefile.flat: No such file or directory

2018-12-10 Thread Olivier Sallou
9929 > > Olivier, will you have time to integrate these changes, or should I? no time for the moment, if you can do it,  I would appreciate thanks Olivier > -- Olivier Sallou Univ Rennes, Inria, CNRS, IRISA Irisa, Campus de Beaulieu F-35042 RENNES - FRANCE Tel: 02.99.84.71.95 gpg key

Bug#913839: not internet access

2018-11-16 Thread olivier sallou
issue is not related to an internet access. it tries to get local host name or address : java.net.InetAddress.getLocalHost(..) and result in java.net.UnknownHostException: profitbricks-build15-amd64: profitbricks-build15-amd64: Temporary failure in name resolution According to Java: This is

Bug#895765: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#895765: IGV FTBFS with Java 11

2018-11-10 Thread Olivier Sallou
additional remark: igv will in this case need to depend on java >= 11 as this modification for build and runtime will work only for jdk11 and above this jdk module/deprecation transition is quite a pain and make it difficult to get packages work for different jdk versions - Mail

Bug#912235: activation and corba removed from jdk

2018-11-06 Thread Olivier Sallou
the problem is those packages are deprecated and cannot be used with jdk 11. Forcing use of a previous jdk will work will this jdk is available in debian. the problemis to get something working both for "old" jdk and "new" jdks I think upstream focused on older versions (installed in

Bug#912385: rdp-classifier FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

2018-10-31 Thread Olivier Sallou
- Mail original - > De: "andreas" > À: 912...@bugs.debian.org, "Debian Java List" > Envoyé: Mercredi 31 Octobre 2018 07:07:36 > Objet: Re: Bug#912385: rdp-classifier FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 > Control: tags -1 help > > Hi, > > I'm afraid I need help for this bug from the Debian Java

Bug#912386: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#912386: rdp-readseq FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

2018-10-31 Thread Olivier Sallou
- Mail original - > De: "andreas" > À: 912...@bugs.debian.org > Envoyé: Mercredi 31 Octobre 2018 07:10:01 > Objet: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#912386: rdp-readseq FTBFS with OpenJDK 11 > Control: tags -1 help > > Hi, >

Bug#895765: IGV

2018-10-19 Thread Olivier Sallou
On 10/18/2018 08:25 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 06:18:58PM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote: >> testing with your removals, you only need to add to build gradle file >> the ref to htsjdk > I've now pushed the freshly stripped upstream

Bug#895765: IGV

2018-10-18 Thread Olivier Sallou
On 10/18/2018 04:06 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 01:05:12PM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote: >>> I tried a patch to use Debian htsjdk, and pushed it. IGV ui starts, but >>> fails with other X11 errors >>> >>> 2018-10

Bug#895765: IGV

2018-10-18 Thread Olivier Sallou
On 10/18/2018 04:06 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 01:05:12PM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote: >>> I tried a patch to use Debian htsjdk, and pushed it. IGV ui starts, but >>> fails with other X11 errors >>> >>> 2018-10

Bug#895765: IGV

2018-10-18 Thread Olivier Sallou
On 10/18/2018 12:15 PM, Olivier Sallou wrote: > > On 10/18/2018 12:03 PM, Olivier Sallou wrote: >> On 10/18/2018 11:42 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> Hi Olivier, >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:13:31AM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote: >>>>> Un

  1   2   3   4   5   >