Bug#494348: [epiphany-browser] edit->personal data->Passwords -> crash

Package: epiphany-browser Version: 2.22.3-1 Severity: important --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Going to Edit -> Personal Data and then clicking on the Passwords tab, epiphany crashes. --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 Debian Rele

Bug#494126: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#494126: [paraview] paraview sometimes kills xserver

On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Christophe Prud'homme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ondrej > > I never experienced that > does it do it all the time, or just once ? > I would suspect a problem with X, openGL and your card driver rather > than paraview itself It happened 3 times already. But I have

Bug#494126: [paraview] paraview sometimes kills xserver

Package: paraview Version: 3.2.3-2 Severity: important --- Please enter the report below this line. --- I experienced that paraview killed my xserver. This is extremely annoying, because I lost all my windows, terminals and running calculations by this. It killed the X when moving the window wi

Bug#494031: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#494031: paraview_3.2.3-2(sparc/unstable): FTBFS on sparc, bus error

Hi Martin, > usualy that is the sign that you used some non-clean code here. bus > error on sparc is a nice error finder in your code. Best you ask for > the build-depends to be installed on sperger.debian.org, or if you are > not a debian developer (so you do not have access to sperger.d.o) ask >

Bug#494031: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#494031: paraview_3.2.3-2(sparc/unstable): FTBFS on sparc, bus error

On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: paraview > Version: 3.2.3-2 > Severity: serious > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > >> Automatic build of paraview_3.2.3-2 on spontini by sbuild/sparc 99.99 >> Build started at 2008

Bug#492869: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#492869: Bug#492869: [paraview] saving topng kills paraview

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Damien Caliste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:53:06 +0200, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Let's leave this bug open, because clearly there is a stupid bug >> somew

Bug#492869: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#492869: [paraview] saving to png kills paraview

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Christophe Prud'homme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ondrej > I experience similar behavior with the former versions too. Could you try this > > > see http://openfoam.cfd-online.com/forum/messages/1/4438.html > > add the following line in /etc/X11/xorg.conf file

Bug#492869: [paraview] saving to png kills paraview

Package: paraview Version: 3.2.3-1 Severity: important --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Paraview segfaults when opening any .vtk file and doing File -> Save Screenshot. This is quite annoying, because one then cannot save images to png. $ paraview --data=mesh.vtk X Error: GLXBa

Bug#465714: Shows "error loading bug" even after doing a refresh

On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Chris Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > tags 465714 + unreproducible > thanks > > Gah, I forgot to Cc you when I wrote this before (in Feb): > >> Hi Ondrej, >> >> Alas, I can't seem to reproduce your bug at the moment. >> >> However, I wonder if you could determine

Bug#491855: [svn-buildpackage] fails to import the atlas package

Package: svn-buildpackage Version: 0.6.23 Severity: important --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Steps to reproduce: $ wajig source atlas $ svn-inject -o atlas_3.6.0-21.5.dsc svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/pkg-scicomp/ [...] Can't exec "/bin/sh": Argument list too long at /usr/s

Bug#491794: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#491794: arpack: DFSG-incompatible license

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:54 PM, Timothy G Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: arpack > Severity: serious > > I believe the Rice BSD Software License of arpack violates the Debian Free > Software guidelines (I've included it below for convenience of reference). > > Both parts of the fourt

Bug#487969: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#487969: Bug#487969: Can't reproduce this

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 05:50:31PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: > >> Please read the bug I sent the link to, it was discussed in there. >> It's an openmpi's problem. > > Well

Bug#487969: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#487969: Bug#487969: Can't reproduce this

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 05:29:27PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Sat, Jul 19, 200

Bug#487969: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#487969: Bug#487969: Can't reproduce this

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 03:21:17PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Ólafu

Bug#487969: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#487969: Bug#487969: Can't reproduce this

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:16:20AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: >> >>> I don't have

Bug#487969: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#487969: Bug#487969: Can't reproduce this

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:16:20AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > >> I don't have this problem with ex2, or any other example. Unfortunately >> the shlib is stripped so there are no symbols to check. :-( >> >> W

Bug#491382: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#491382: libmesh: Please add SLEPc support

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: libmesh > Severity: wishlist > > Using libMesh to solve Eigen problems, such as example 16, requires > linking with SLEPc. SLEPc is in Debian, so please link to it. Please don't. SLEPc is in non-free. The goo

Bug#489253: Fw: should numpy be built with atlas?

On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Tiziano Zito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Ondrej, > >> $ ./test_atlas.py >> Using ATLAS: >> 0.53141283989 >> $ wajig remove atlas3-base libatlas3gf-base >> $ ./test_atlas.py >> Using ATLAS: >> 1.64572000504 >> >> So it seems to work, even though the difference is

Bug#489253: should numpy be built with atlas?

On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Tiziano Zito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/8/08, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> thanks for the update. Looking at the blas package, I see that the >> cblas library is included in libblas3. So it looks like the numpy >> check is wrong, testing fo

Bug#489253: should numpy be built with atlas?

On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: python-numpy > Version: 1:1.1.0-2 > Severity: serious > > python-numpy now has an unconditional dependency on libatlas3gf-base, > needing the "specialized" atlas libraries as a runtime > dependency. Users still sho

Bug#489568: FTBFS: build-depends on unavailable atlas on armel

On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: python-numpy > Version: 1:1.1.0-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > > atlas is not available on armel, and after a quick look neither on alpha. > I'd also suggest dropping > libatlas-sse-dev|libatlas-sse2-dev|liba

Bug#489253: python-numpy: enable ATLAS support?

; === > --- debian/control (revision 5836) > +++ debian/control (working copy) > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ > Priority: optional > Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Uploaders: Marco

Bug#489291: mplayer segfaults on opening any *.flv file

On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Reimar Döffinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 08:05:57PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: >> Looking into the source code, the problem is with this line: >> >> ((URLContext*)(priv->pb.opaque))->priv_data= dem

Bug#487638: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#487638: fixing with CVS files

Hi Nicolau! On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Nicolau Werneck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there. I downloaded the Debian source, substituted the files > cvcap_ffmpeg.cpp and cvcap_dc1394.cpp for the versions in the > project's CVS, compiled the packages successfully, and now I was > finally abl

Bug#489253: python-numpy: enable ATLAS support?

le <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, José Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.43), python-all-dev, python-all-dbg, python-central (>= 0.6), gfortran (>

Bug#489291: mplayer segfaults on opening any *.flv file

Package: mplayer Version: 1.0~rc2-14 Severity: important $ gdb mplayer GNU gdb 6.8-debian Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO W

Bug#489149: python-scipy Numeric/Numpy

On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Chris Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: python-scipy > Version: 0.6.0-11 > > The package description says: > > SciPy supplements the popular Numeric module, gathering a variety of > high level science and engineering modules together as a single > packa

Bug#488941: python-gmpy: Please upload gmpy 1.03 (patch attached)

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Martin Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Watch file can only download the .zip file, but then you need to >> repackage it. You can do it by hand, or you can call my target, that I >> implemented. > > Yes I suppose that is useful. > svn+ssh://[EMAIL PRO

Bug#488941: python-gmpy: Please upload gmpy 1.03 (patch attached)

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Martin Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> No, the version is there just to create an original tarball. Use it like >> this: > > Isn't this what the watch file is for? Watch file can only download the .zip file, but then you need to repackage it. You can do it by ha

Bug#488941: python-gmpy: Please upload gmpy 1.03 (patch attached)

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Martin Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have no problem with joining DPMT; I at a student and during the school > year I often have very little time to maintain packages. If someone wants to > help me with this, I have no problem with it. Great. I will help you

Bug#488941: python-gmpy: Please upload gmpy 1.03 (patch attached)

Maintainer: Martin Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +Uploaders: Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.38), python-all-dev (>= 2.3.5-11), python-central (>= 0.5.6), libgmp3-dev (>= 4.0.1) -Standards-Version: 3.7.3 +Standards-Version: 3.8.0 Homepage

Bug#488928: --ui text works

Hi, '--ui text' works, but this is a very serious bug. Not being able to report bugs is very bad. Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#488453: [python-scipy] python-scipy-core transition package

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Chris Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 01:51:42AM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: >> See here: >> >> http://wiki.debian.org/python-scipy >> >> it's deprecated, but there are more packages that nee

Bug#488671: confirmed

Hi Thomas, thanks for the bug report, yes, that's one problem that still remains to solve. It has something to do with the qt 4.4 I think, but I don't know where the problem is exactly. Any help is appreciated. Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscri

Bug#488451: Python-scipy-core obsolete

python-scipy-core is currently unmaintained. We maintain python-scipy and python-numpy in DPMT and we make sure those two work well. Unfortunately, I don't have time to fix all the other old and deprecated numpy/scipy packages, there are plenty of them as can be seen here: http://wiki.debian.org/

Bug#488453: [python-scipy] python-scipy-core transition package

Hi Chris, On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 2:44 AM, Chris Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: python-scipy > Version: 0.6.0-11 > Severity: > > There is a package python-scipy-core in the archive that python-scipy > conflicts and replaces. I have filed Bug#48845 to ask that You probably meant #48

Bug#486329: Please also ship Numpy documentation

On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: python-numpy-doc > Version: 1:1.1.0-1 > Severity: minor > Tags: patch > > Hi, > > python-numpy-doc currently ships f2py documentation, but not numpy's. This > patch > against python-modules SVN makes it s

Bug#486331: closing a tab with gmail kills epiphany (no flash installed)

Package: epiphany-gecko Version: 2.22.2-2 Severity: important I closed epiphany with the gmail loaded and it crashed. Backtrace below. Any ideas what is wrong? Ondrej Distribution: Debian lenny/sid Gnome Release: 2.22.2 2008-05-29 (Debian) BugBuddy Version: 2.22.0 System: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 #1

Bug#486125: debugging output

On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le samedi 14 juin 2008 à 13:49 +0200, Ondrej Certik a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> I haven't run epiphany in a debugger yet, but I did have >> epiphany-browser-dbg installed and below is wh

Bug#486125: debugging output

Hi, I haven't run epiphany in a debugger yet, but I did have epiphany-browser-dbg installed and below is what I got. It's a serious problem, epiphany keeps crashing all the time now (around 15x in the last two days). Unfortunately I haven't yet figure out the exact sequence of commands to kill ep

Bug#455670: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] patch

On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 06:29 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Hello again, >> > &g

Bug#485755: [offlineimap] aborts (stacktrace) on imap problems

Package: offlineimap Version: 6.0.0 Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Hi, offlineimap aborted when syncing with my gmail account: Thread 'Copy message 1143 from [Gmail]/All Mail' terminated with exception: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/pytho

Bug#475819: same on alpha

Probably the same problem is on alpha: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=freej&a=alpha Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#479300: same for alpha

It's probably a similar problem on alpha: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=as31&a=alpha Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#459752: same on alpha

Probably the same problem on alpha: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=specimen&a=alpha Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#474407: the same on alpha

the same problem seems to be on alpha: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=monotone&a=alpha Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#477231: the same for alpha

the same problem seems to be on alpha: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=aegis&a=alpha Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#469896: the same on alpha

The same problem seems to be on alpha: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=cl-geodesics&a=alpha Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#475809: the same on alpha

The same problem seems to happen on alpha: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=iaxclient&a=alpha Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#479158: the same on alpha

The same problem seems to happen on alpha: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=perlftlib&a=alpha Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#479885: the same on alpha

The same problem seems to happen on alpha: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=php-clamavlib&a=alpha Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#473212: the same for alpha

The same problem seems to happen on alpha: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=drscheme&a=alpha Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#477659: the same on alpha

The same problem seems to happen on alpha. http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=vnc4&a=alpha Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#461998: The same on alpha

The same problem seems to happen on alpha: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=mailutils&a=alpha Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#476013: the same for alpha

The same problem seems to happen on alpha: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=owl&a=alpha Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#478314: the same on alpha

There seems to be the same problem on alpha: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=linux-modules-extra-2.6&a=alpha Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#479043: the same on alpha

The same problem seems to happen on alpha: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=brdesktop-flavours&a=alpha Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#471217: the same on alpha

The same problem seems to happen on alpha: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=xml-to-sexp&a=alpha Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#479888: the same on alpha

The same seems to happen on alpha: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=avscan&a=alpha Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#477353: the same on alpha

It seems the same problem happens on alpha: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=openscenegraph&a=alpha Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#471223: the same on alpha

The same problem happens on alpha: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=ecl&a=alpha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#480892: the same on alpha

The same problem seems to happen on alpha: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=apt&a=alpha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#475458: the same on alpha

The same problem seems to be on alpha: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=aspectc%2B%2B&a=alpha Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#455670: patch

On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 12:56 AM, Maximiliano Curia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hola Adam C Powell IV! > > El 06/05/2008 a las 15:28 escribiste: >> Apologies for the delay in getting back to you all. It looks like this >> bug is still open. Is this something I can help with, now that I'm part >>

Bug#477539: please remove this transitional package

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > merge 477539 322068 > thanks > > There was already a bug report about this. > > On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 21:14:57 +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: > > package: svgalibg1-dev > > ver

Bug#477530: please remove this transitional package

On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > this binary package seems to be a transitional package used to > > upgrade from sarge to etch, that can now be safely remove

Bug#477550: Bug#477547: please remove this transitional package

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 21:33:16 +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: > > > package: xlibs-data > > version: 1:7.3+10 > > Usertags: etch-transitional-packages > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008

Bug#477557: please remove this transitional package

package: libpgjava version: 8.2-504-1 Usertags: etch-transitional-packages Hi, this binary package libpgjava seems to be a transitional package used to upgrade from sarge to etch, that can now be safely removed. If that is so, please fix the source package not to produce this binary package anymo

Bug#477550: please remove this transitional package

package: xlibs-static-dev version: 1:7.3+10 Usertags: etch-transitional-packages Hi, this binary package seems to be a transitional package used to upgrade from sarge to etch, that can now be safely removed. If that is so, please fix the source package not to produce this binary package anymore.

Bug#477547: please remove this transitional package

package: xlibs-data version: 1:7.3+10 Usertags: etch-transitional-packages Hi, this binary package seems to be a transitional package used to upgrade from sarge to etch, that can now be safely removed. If that is so, please fix the source package not to produce this binary package anymore. You c

Bug#477546: please remove this transitional package

package: xfont-nexus version: 0.0.2-12 Usertags: etch-transitional-packages Hi, this binary package seems to be a transitional package used to upgrade from sarge to etch, that can now be safely removed. If that is so, please fix the source package not to produce this binary package anymore. You

Bug#477545: please remove the transitional package

package: wxvlc version: 0.8.6.e-2 Usertags: etch-transitional-packages Hi, this binary package seems to be a transitional package used to upgrade from sarge to etch, that can now be safely removed. If that is so, please fix the source package not to produce this binary package anymore. You can t

Bug#477541: please remove this transitional package

package: tethereal version: 1.0.0-2 Usertags: etch-transitional-packages Hi, this binary package seems to be a transitional package used to upgrade from sarge to etch, that can now be safely removed. If that is so, please fix the source package not to produce this binary package anymore. You can

Bug#477543: please remove this transtitional package

package: vlc-plugin-alsa version: 0.8.6.e-2 Usertags: etch-transitional-packages Hi, this binary package seems to be a transitional package used to upgrade from sarge to etch, that can now be safely removed. If that is so, please fix the source package not to produce this binary package anymore.

Bug#477542: please remove this transitional package

package: tcsh-kanji version: 6.14.00-7 Usertags: etch-transitional-packages Hi, this binary package seems to be a transitional package used to upgrade from sarge to etch, that can now be safely removed. If that is so, please fix the source package not to produce this binary package anymore. You

Bug#477539: please remove this transitional package

package: svgalibg1-dev version: 1:1.4.3-25 Usertags: etch-transitional-packages Hi, this binary package seems to be a transitional package used to upgrade from sarge to etch, that can now be safely removed. If that is so, please fix the source package not to produce this binary package anymore.

Bug#477538: please remove this transitional package

package: libpng3 version: 1.2.26-1 Usertags: etch-transitional-packages Hi, this binary package seems to be a transitional package used to upgrade from sarge to etch, that can now be safely removed. If that is so, please fix the source package not to produce this binary package anymore. You can

Bug#477532: please remove this transitional package

package: ethereal-dev version: 1.0.0-2 Usertags: etch-transitional-packages Hi, this binary package seems to be a transitional package used to upgrade from sarge to etch, that can now be safely removed. If that is so, please fix the source package. You can track the progress of this and other tr

Bug#477533: please remove this transtitional package

package: netkit-ping version: 3:20071127-1 Usertags: etch-transitional-packages Hi, this binary package seems to be a transitional package used to upgrade from sarge to etch, that can now be safely removed. If that is so, please fix the source package not to produce this binary package anymore.

Bug#477535: please remove this transitional package

package: powstatd-crypt version: 1.5.1-5.1 Usertags: etch-transitional-packages Hi, this binary package seems to be a transitional package used to upgrade from sarge to etch, that can now be safely removed. If that is so, please fix the source package not to produce this binary package anymore.

Bug#477536: please remove this transitional package

package: scim-chinese version: 0.5.0-4.1 Usertags: etch-transitional-packages Hi, this binary package seems to be a transitional package used to upgrade from sarge to etch, that can now be safely removed. If that is so, please fix the source package not to produce this binary package anymore. Yo

Bug#477534: please remove this transitional package

package: ethereal-common version: 1.0.0-2 Usertags: etch-transitional-packages Hi, this binary package seems to be a transitional package used to upgrade from sarge to etch, that can now be safely removed. If that is so, please fix the source package. You can track the progress of this and other

Bug#477529: please remove this transitional package

package: ethereal version: 1.0.0-2 Usertags: etch-transitional-packages Hi, this binary package seems to be a transitional package used to upgrade from sarge to etch, that can now be safely removed. If that is so, please fix the source package. You can track the progress of this and other transi

Bug#477530: please remove this transitional package

package: libpcap-dev version: 0.9.8-3 Usertags: etch-transitional-packages Hi, this binary package seems to be a transitional package used to upgrade from sarge to etch, that can now be safely removed. If that is so, please fix the source package not to produce this binary package anymore. You c

Bug#477522: please remove this transitional package

package: apache2-mpm-perchild version: 2.2.8-3 Usertags: etch-transitional-packages Hi, this binary package seems to be a transitional package used to upgrade from sarge to etch, that can now be safely removed. If that is so, please fix the package. You can track the progress of this and other t

Bug#470318: i387 versus SSE versus MPFR (gcc "bug")

Hi Alexei! On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Alexei Sheplyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > I'd like to trace this bug down and figure out if it's a bug in gcc, or > > somewhere else. > > I don't think it's a bug. Rather, it's a wrong expectation from the user > side. > You are compar

Bug#476235: Fixed in r4143.

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fixed in r4143: > > http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/scipy/changeset/4143 Thanks a lot Stefan for fixing this. Ondrej

Bug#476235: python-scipy: useless print statement in special.sph_yn()

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: python-scipy > Version: 0.6.0-10 > Severity: minor > Tags: patch > > A useless "print z" appears in the definition of sph_yn() > (/usr/lib/python2.[45]/site-packages/scipy/special/basic.py). It seems to be > left f

Bug#475990: python-scipy: FTBFS: _fftpackmodule.c:863: undefined reference to `PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords'

On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Lucas Nussbaum > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > /build/user/python-scipy-0.6.0/build/src.linux-i686-2.4/fortranobject.c:27: > undefined r

Bug#475990: python-scipy: FTBFS: _fftpackmodule.c:863: undefined reference to `PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords'

On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > /build/user/python-scipy-0.6.0/build/src.linux-i686-2.4/fortranobject.c:27: > undefined reference to `PyDict_SetItemString' > > > /build/user/python-scipy-0.6.0/build/src.linux-i686-2.4/fortranobject.c:21: > und

Bug#474930: python-scipy: docstring for leastsq (in scipy.optimize) incorrectly describes 'ier'

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 1:24 AM, Andrzej Novak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: python-scipy > Version: 0.6.0-5.1 > Severity: minor > > > Docstring for leastsq incorrectly describes the returned variable > ier. It states, > > ier -- an integer flag. If it is equal to 1 the solution was

Bug#475017: python-numpy: missing parentheses in /usr/share/pyshared/numpy/f2py/rules.py line 1222 (fixed upstream)

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Ludovic Aubry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: python-numpy > Version: 1:1.0.4-7 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > f2py fails while building module without this fix. Thanks for the bug report. Upstream is going to release a new version by the end of the

Bug#441931: "py.test -d" fails but "py.test" works

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 1:29 AM, Chris Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > forwarded 439956 https://codespeak.net/issue/py-dev/issue53 > thanks > > Hi Ondrej, > > I don't believe this is a packaging issue, so I have forwarded it upstream: > > https://codespeak.net/issue/py-dev/issue53 Thanks! O

Bug#455670: patch

On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Maximiliano Curia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hola Ondrej Certik! > > El 31/03/2008 a las 02:07 escribiste: > > > OK, I checked it and your changes are very good indeed. The package > > builds. Here are lintian warnigs: > >

Bug#455670: patch

On 3/30/08, Maximiliano Curia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hola Ondrej Certik! > > El 26/03/2008 a las 16:03 escribiste: > > If you commit it into our svn, sure I'll upload it. Otherwise I need > > to find time for this first - maybe Adam will do it before me. :) &g

Bug#455670: patch

Thanks so much! I'll look at it this evening. Ondrej On 3/30/08, Maximiliano Curia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hola Ondrej Certik! > > El 26/03/2008 a las 16:03 escribiste: > > If you commit it into our svn, sure I'll upload it. Otherwise I need > > to find

Bug#455670: patch

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Maximiliano Curia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hola Adam C Powell IV! > > El 23/03/2008 a las 12:43, Ondrej Certik nos dijo: > > > > thanks a lot for the patch. I don't have time to fix this. But Adam > > showed interest

Bug#455670: patch

Hi Maximiliano, thanks a lot for the patch. I don't have time to fix this. But Adam showed interest in this - could you please coordinate efforts with him? There is a new upstream that should be packaged - maybe they fixed the 4.3.0 build issues. But so far I was the main maintainer of libmesh a

Bug#470579: cython: python setup.py sdist doesn't include *.pxd

On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 2:49 AM, Greg Kochanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: cython > Version: 0.9.6.12-1 > Severity: normal > > > > I have a project in a directory with > .../lib/muscle.pyx > .../lib/muscle.pxd > et cetera > > My setup.py is attached below.When I make a source

Bug#468550: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#468550: libmesh: Add second derivative support to un-break ex15

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 14:48 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 19:04 +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: > > > Hi Adam, > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2

<    1   2   3   4   5   >