Bug#887555:

2019-04-23 Thread Pacho Ramos
Current version is really really old. Would it be possible to update to current one? http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parallel/parallel-20190422.tar.bz2 Thanks a lot

Bug#923711:

2019-04-10 Thread Pacho Ramos
Please take into account that upstream is completely against applying that patch: https://github.com/plougher/squashfs-tools/issues/60

Bug#923711:

2019-03-18 Thread Pacho Ramos
The real culprit is only 0016-remove-frag_deflator_thread.patch

Bug#923711:

2019-03-18 Thread Pacho Ramos
Dropping 0016-remove-frag_deflator_thread.patch and 0017-add-zstd-support.patch stops the memory leak

Bug#784289: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#784289: gnupg 2.1 and gnome-keyring no longer interoperate

2015-05-15 Thread Pacho Ramos
Looks like pinentry upstream implemented a replacement integrating on gnome3: http://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=pinentry.git;a=commit;h=be87785005d256b7f3dacc607ba5ea0a14de8593 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#727708: The tech ctte isn't considering OpenRC at all

2014-01-19 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 19-01-2014 a las 17:11 +0800, Thomas Goirand escribió: On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 20:41:32 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: I should point out that I have not extensively examined openrc I have to say that I'm really disappointed by the tech ctte attitude toward OpenRC in general. I pointed

Bug#727708: On diversity

2014-01-19 Thread Pacho Ramos
Have you think in having a Systemd team in Debian taking care of providing support for its packages? That way, people should be able to run it in some weeks and, as soon as existing init.d files are not dropped, people won't lose support for that (apart of the cases like GNOME that needs systemd

Bug#538916:

2013-10-03 Thread Pacho Ramos
Is this still valid in Debian? At least on Gentoo with glibc it's still valid, but I am not sure if maybe eglibc provides a fix for this, in that case, would be nice if you could point me to that fix Thanks a lot -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#629359: epiphany-browser: ignores proxy settings

2012-01-17 Thread Pacho Ramos
I guess you are suffering the same bug as us on Gentoo: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327595 In summary, epiphany is using proxy set via dconf instead of gconf and, as gnome-control-center-2.32 still only sets it via gconf, settings are ignored. This could probably be solved