Bug#989029: info: prev-line and scroll-backward are buggy on gnuplot.info

2022-11-12 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 12:40:11PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > But "down" is the reverse of "up". So, if you know all the "up" > relations, you can deduce all the "down" relations, i.e. all the > children. Then the issue is to sort the children, but I suppose > that this could be done by loo

Bug#989029: info: prev-line and scroll-backward are buggy on gnuplot.info

2022-11-12 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 09:27:34AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > See that "Bugs" at the end? This is the problem: since "Bugs" is a > top-level node, its presence in a level-1 node's menu makes the node > tree not really a tree, so Backspace loops. > > Thus, the problem is in the way Gnuplot prod

Bug#790065: Make output of texinfo index deterministic

2015-07-05 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 07:36:26AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > Dear all, > > This appears to happen because the index sort is not stable with respect > to the line number, resulting in output non-determinstically changing > from:

Bug#790065: Make output of texinfo index deterministic

2015-06-29 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 07:36:26AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > Dear all, > > down here at Debian there is an activity to create reproducible > buillds, absolutely reproducible. Thus we try to remove > indetermancy as far as possible. In this case, texinfo indices > are not deterministic. Th

Bug#697353: binutils: FTBFS with texinfo from experimental

2013-01-07 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 12:09:29PM +, nick clifton wrote: > Hi Patrice, > > >Here is a patch for the binutils cvs that should solve all warnings and > >errors. > > > >In my opinion, it falls in the 'minor changes' case with respect to > >copyright. > > Thanks. I have applied your patch along

Bug#697353: binutils: FTBFS with texinfo from experimental

2013-01-04 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 11:34:26PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > HI Karl, hi all, > > I just came back from Paris, so I cannot provide more details now, > but it seems that binutils has a problem with the .92 pretest: From > the build error log (excerpt) > > > ../../../binutils/doc/binutils.te

Bug#697353: binutils: FTBFS with texinfo from experimental

2013-01-04 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 10:27:52AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi Patrice, > > > Here is a patch for the binutils cvs that should solve all warnings and > > errors. > > Core of the patch is >s/itemx/item/ > right? Everything else seems to be unrelated changes. The patch handles errors/w

Bug#617492: [SPAM] Xdm no longer reads Xresources

2011-05-29 Thread Patrice Dumas
I also had this issue when I used dash as /bin/sh, and from gdm. In .xsession-errors there were some error messages about spurious "(". My guess is dash is not happy with bashisms in scripts, certainly $(. In any case I think that using bashisms in system scripts is a very bad idea. -- Pat

Bug#579988: [Pkg-acpi-devel] Bug#579988: acpitool: segfault when battery.patch is applied

2010-05-03 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 08:37:54AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > Am Sonntag 02 Mai 2010 22:52:00 schrieb Patrice Dumas: > > Package: acpitool > > Version: 0.5.1-1 > > ... > > Please try 0.5.1-2 which is in unstable for a week or so. It doesn't segfault any

Bug#579988: acpitool: segfault when battery.patch is applied

2010-05-02 Thread Patrice Dumas
Package: acpitool Version: 0.5.1-1 Severity: important When I start the debian acpitool, without argument, I get an immediate segfault. Upstream pristine acpitool doesn't segfault. It segfaults after applying battery.patch. Here is the backtrace (when only battery.patch is applied, not the oth

Bug#542855: closed by Marco Rodrigues (Package gtkdialog has been removed from Debian)

2009-12-27 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 09:51:21AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > For more information about this package's removal, read > http://bugs.debian.org/543945. That bug might give the reasons why > this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. I may be blind, but I d

Bug#547282: libgrib2c-dev: new upstream version 1.1.9

2009-09-18 Thread Patrice Dumas
Package: libgrib2c-dev Version: 1.1.8-1 Severity: wishlist There is a new version upstream. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC

Bug#542855: gtkdialog: non portable shell builtin `source' used instead of `.'

2009-08-21 Thread Patrice Dumas
Package: gtkdialog Version: 2:0.7.20-4 Severity: important When dash is the shell, one gets, with gtkdialog -e: ./90.00-event_driven sh: source: not found According to http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1144067#4 the non-portable `source' builtin is used instead of `.'. . is in POSIX, and a

Bug#509112: boolstuff: version 0.1.12 is available

2008-12-18 Thread Patrice Dumas
Package: boolstuff Severity: wishlist Version 0.1.12 is available, some patches for gcc are included, and there is a change in a constant name (but no change in ABI, as far as I can tell). I am very new with debian, but I guess that it should go to sid first and dependent packages rebuilt. -- S

Bug#321586: texi2html images licence

2005-08-10 Thread Patrice Dumas
> Personally, I feel that this could be better: > * Just use GPL in Debian for these images (solve problem immediately). > * Work out what programs use texi2html with the images (I do not > believe very many do). These images are not to be automatically used, they are there only for the conven