eyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=aflplusplus
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Source: adios
Version: 1.13.1-34
Severity: normal
While looking into infrastructure issues on ci.debian.net I noticed that
we have both src:adios and src:adios2 in the archive. Should we migrate
the only reverse dependency of adios to adios2 and remove it from the
archive?
Paul
ect
testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and trixie, so
it doesn't affect (old-)stable.
If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/d
to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=dt-schema
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ng, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/la
iles). From our conversation on IRC I take it that that
wouldn't solve *your* case as you're using aptly and apparently that
builds the Sources (with or without a Package-List) from what's in the
archive so it would still run into this issue.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
eyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=breezy
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
or a later version migrates, this bug will no longer affect
testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and trixie, so
it doesn't affect (old-)stable.
If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the
ntrol, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gnome-keyring
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
packages to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I will
shortly do a no-changes source-only upload to DELAYED/15, closing this
bug. Please let me know if I should delay or cancel that upload.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excu
e
doesn't allow arch:all packages to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I will
shortly do a no-changes source-only upload to DELAYED/15, closing this
bug. Please let me know if I should delay or cancel that upload.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg
Hi Bastian,
On 21-02-2024 13:21, Bastian Germann wrote:
I am uploading a NMU to DELAYED/10 in order to fix this.
The debdiff is included.
Maybe you care to explain *why*?
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 19:41 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Maybe that is true for the Linux console, but we are talking about xterm here.
It is actually gnome-terminal, but I guess that doesn't change things,
I presume gnome-terminal emulates xterm faithfully enough.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.de
your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=endless-sky
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Descriptio
Package: colorized-logs
Version: 2.6-1
Severity: normal
ansi2txt/ansi2html turn sgr0 into 'B' instead of an empty string.
$ echo $TERM
xterm-256color
$ tput sgr0 | hd
1b 28 42 1b 5b 6d |.(B.[m|
0006
$ tput sgr0 | ansi2txt ; ech
ge is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=python-pamqp
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenP
on migrates, this bug will no longer affect
testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and trixie, so
it doesn't affect (old-)stable.
If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
esitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=rust-async-task
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: offpunk
Version: 2.2-1
Severity: minor
Usertags: warnings
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
I got a warning when upgrading offpunk:
Preparing to unpack .../archives/offpunk_2.2-1_all.deb ...
Unpacking offpunk (2.2-1) over (2.1-1) ...
Setting up offpunk (2
verse (build) dependencies are fixed or
removed, but there are key packages among them so removal is not an
option in all cases.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ou'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/la
grate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=r-cran-bigmemory
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
. (Closes: 1064018)
+ * d/control: Build-Depend-Arch on debhelper (>= 13.12~) when
+build profile is active because the BUILD_TESTING CMake variable is
+automatically set to OFF for nocheck builds starting with
+debhelper 13.12.
+
+ -- Plasma (David Paul) Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:46
on in testing now fails too.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 15-02-2024 15:56, Dirk Hünniger wrote:
So could you Paul please post some information on
how to do that. Maybe an example.
See [1] after the first example. Replace [2] with
chromium [!armel !mips64el !s390x],
Paul
[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html
[2
n all
architectures, but the the dependency to chromium is only needed on all
architectures but s390x armel and mips64el
That's what I had in mind indeed.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
nd testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/la
stable and testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/la
nd testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/la
workaround and we're not even sure whether
the bug is in the kernel or glibc, it's not been pushed upstream yet.
Adrian
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/sparclinux/fe5cc47167430007560501aabb28ba154985b661.ca...@physik.fu-berlin.de
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
:
be installed (so would
benefit from the architecture qualifier).
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
e binaries in a clean environment (I've
done so, pasted below).
Paul
root@autopkgtest-lxc-vtalsf:/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.c47fu43n/downtmp/build.Nel/src#
apt install mediawiki2latex
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
Some packag
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 08:11:41 +0100 Christian Marillat wrote:
> speedtest-cli is also unable to list remote server
Please try to download the lists with curl/wget/browser:
curl http{,s}://{www,c}.speedtest.net/speedtest-servers{,-static}.php
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
sign
Control: severity -1 important
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:46:15 +0100 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 08:35:40 +0100 cuboid_06_wavers wrote:
> > running speedtest
> >
> > * What was the outcome of this action?
> >
> > ERROR: Unable to connect to servers to test latency
: invalid escape sequence '\s'
"`{ nft -a list chain inet f2b-table f2b-chain | grep -oP
'@addr-set-j-w-nft-ap\s+.*\s+\Khandle\s+(\d+)$'; } | while read -r hdl;
do`",
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/fail2ban/tests/servertestcase.py:1424:
SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence '\s' "`{ nft -a list chain inet
f2b-table f2b-chain | grep -oP
'@addr6-set-j-w-nft-ap\s+.*\s+\Khandle\s+(\d+)$'; } | while read -r hdl;
do`",
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
nd testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/la
to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=mediawiki2latex
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: python3-binwalk
Version: 2.3.4+dfsg1-3
Severity: minor
Usertags: warnings
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
I got a Python SyntaxWarning when upgrading python3-binwalk:
Selecting previously unselected package python3-zombie-imp.
Preparing to unpack .../pytho
Package: ognibuild
Version: 0.0.18+git20230208.1.9b890a2-1
Severity: normal
Usertags: crash
With hexchat, `ogni build` crashes because meson prints a warning
to stderr and that gets parsed as JSON by ognibuild/buildsystem.py.
https://github.com/hexchat/hexchat/
Probably the right fix would be to
affect (old-)stable.
If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/ex
sting due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=snapd-glib
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ntrol, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=spaln
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
and trixie, so
it doesn't affect (old-)stable.
If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.
s bug will no longer affect
testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and trixie, so
it doesn't affect (old-)stable.
If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] h
Package: reportbug
Severity: wishlist
I have been working on an enhancement[1] to reportbug that would allow
interactive selection of port/arch usertags[2] and automatically set
them in code paths that currently already ask for an architecture.
I could use some design advice around the data for t
ebian patches?
sudo cp -a /var/lib/cyrus/mailboxes.db /path/to/backup/
./imap/ctl_cyrusdb -r
How did you remove this version?
Then install the new Debian packages?
Bye,
Paul
--
Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer Groningen
https://vandervlis.nl/
Hi,
With debugging on (-ddd to autopkgtest and -d to autopkgtest-virt-qemu):
Unpacking libc6:amd64 (2.37-15~deb13u1) over (2.37-14) ...
Setting up libc6:amd64 (2.37-15~deb13u1) ...
autopkgtest: DBG: timed out on ['/tmp/autopkgtest-qemu.r683hlu9/runcmd']
['su', '-s', '/bin/bash', 'debci', '-c',
setup the testbed for the next test is
actually a generic autopkgtest problem (maybe of the qemu backend). What
do people think?
I'm going to disable the podman-init test completely until somebody
looks into this and for the short term I've put autopkgtest on the
reject_list of ci.
knows
about the package and both the `-b` and `-x` option work, but not together.
paul@mulciber ~ $ reverse-depends src:zfs-linux -b
Reverse-Build-Depends
=
* py-libzfs (for libzfslinux-dev)
paul@mulciber ~ $ reverse-depends src:zfs-linux -x -d10
Reverse
sting due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=389-ds-base
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ontact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gjs
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
sting due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=linux-apfs-rw
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
le to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=r-cran-future.apply
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenP
ntrol, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=seqan-needle
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=node-websocket
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ntrol, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=iwyu
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
esitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=nng
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
te to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=rust-gdk-pixbuf-sys
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
g due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=syncthing
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
stable and testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/la
n.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=linux
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/n/nvidia-cuda-samples/42760273/log.gz
1664s I: Testing binary package nvidia-fs-dkms
1664s I: Trying to install build dependency nvidia-cu
n.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=linux
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers/42760274/log.gz
810s # MODPOST /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel/Module.symvers
810sscripts/mod/modpost
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=linux
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla/42735533/log.gz
202s # MODPOST /usr/src/modules/nvidia-tesla-kernel/Module.symvers
found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=linux
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470/42735534/log.gz
320s # MODPOST
/var/lib/dkms/nvidia-tesla-470/470.2
Package: python3-extruct
Version: 0.16.0-2
Severity: normal
File: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/extruct/rdfa.py
Usertags: warnings
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
I got a syntax warning when upgrading python3-extruct:
Preparing to unpack .../python3-extruct_0.16.0-2_
all packages to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I will
shortly do a no-changes source-only upload to DELAYED/15, closing this
bug. Please let me know if I should delay or cancel that upload.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org
sting due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=libfreemarker-java
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=phosh-osk-stub
OpenPGP_signature.asc
D
e
doesn't allow arch:all packages to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I will
shortly do a no-changes source-only upload to DELAYED/15, closing this
bug. Please let me know if I should delay or cancel that upload.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg
On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 19:25 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I think for English at least I'd prefer to offer both A4 and letter, for eg
> the German translation I think it's enough to only provide A4.
Looks like that info can be gotten from the locales on glibc systems:
$ LANG=en_AU.utf8 loc
Package: ca-certificates
Version: 20240203
Severity: normal
File: /usr/share/ca-
certificates/mozilla/Security_Communication_Root_CA.crt
I noticed that there is one expired certificate in ca-certificates:
$ cat test
now=$(date -u)
date -d "$now"
now="$(date -d "$now" +%s)"
for f in
g due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=olive-editor
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=ruby-semver-dialects
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: reassign -1 src:lfortran 0.36
Mea culpa, I made a mistake in calling my tools and filed the issue
against the wrong package.
On Sun, 4 Feb 2024 19:59:33 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
You
iling autopkgtest on amd64 and arm64
are considered RC.
I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report.
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debia
er version migrates, this bug will no longer affect
testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and trixie, so
it doesn't affect (old-)stable.
If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Tea
to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=yt-dlp
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=ruby-re2
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ation/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=python-anyio
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/arm64/p/python-watchgod/42699299/log.gz
=== FAILURES
===
mation
from our infrastructure.
Paul
E.g.
https://ci.debian.net/packages/o/orthanc-python/testing/amd64/42028712/
https://ci.debian.net/packages/o/orthanc-python/testing/s390x/42546158/
https://ci.debian.net/packages/o/orthanc-python/testing/ppc64el/42417046/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
people unrelated to your package to spend time on these
tests.
Don't hesitate to reach out if you need help and some more information
from our infrastructure.
Paul
PS: are you sure you're testing the as-installed packages? I strongly
suspect you're actually testing freshly built
his package is owned by the installer-team, I would suggest sending
a pull request on salsa instead [1].
Adrian
> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/discover
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
depends on it. This was not caught by the
migration tests, as the binary was available from testing.
Paul
https://ci.debian.net/packages/libp/libproxy/testing/amd64/42548169/
55s Broken autopkgtest-satdep:amd64 Depends on python3-libproxy:amd64
< none @un H >
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Descr
out if you need help and some more information
from our infrastructure.
Paul
[1] https://metal.equinix.com/product/servers/m3-large/
[2] https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/m5/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 1/31/24 06:06, Pádraig Brady wrote:
To my mind the most protective option takes precedence.
That's not how POSIX works with mv -i and mv -f. The last flag wins. I
assume this is so that people can have aliases or shell scripts that
make -i the default, but you can override by specifying -f
On 2024-01-30 03:18, Pádraig Brady wrote:
So we now have the proposed change as:
- revert -n to old silent success behavior
- document -n as deprecated
- Leave --update=none as is (will be synonymous with -n)
- Provide --update=none-fail to diagnose and exit failure
Thanks, that's
Hi,
Has there been any progress towards fixing this? Looking at the changelogs, I
haven't seen anything mentioning the current ticket, nor any update for some
time. Just trying to see if I can update my shim installation without breaking
my machine again.
Thanks in advance,
Paul.
other workaround, potentially more lightweight, is therefore to either add
at least one benign configuration key and value in the `redfish` and
`uefi_capsule` sections taken from the man page or the `*.conf.old` files of
the
same name, or to simply remove them entirely.
Cheers,
Paul.
Hello,
On Mon, 2024-01-29 at 23:41 +, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 11:57:31PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > src:webkit2gtk is currently BD-Uninstallable on m68k [1] since
> > libseccomp is currently not available yet.
>
> I guess that the
h4. I assume this also
applies to the build dependencies bubblewrap and xdg-dbus-proxy.
Adrian
> [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=webkit2gtk&suite=sid
> [2] https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/pull/397
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debi
On 1/29/24 08:11, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Right, that's why I'm still leaning towards my proposal in the last mail.
Well, I won't insist on doing nothing; however, the proposal needs
ironing out and now's a good time to do it before installing changes.
- revert to previous exit success -n
On 2024-01-28 05:22, Pádraig Brady wrote:
At this stage it seems best for us go back to the original Linux
behiavor (use case 3),
and to silently deprecate -n in docs to document the portability issues
with it.
I'm not sure reverting would be best. It would introduce more confusion,
and woul
te to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=obs-studio
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ssues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=graph-tool
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
all packages to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I will
shortly do a no-changes source-only upload to DELAYED/15, closing this
bug. Please let me know if I should delay or cancel that upload.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.de
Package: qbrz
Version: 0.23.2+bzr1663-1
Severity: normal
File: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/breezy/plugins/qbrz/lib/diff.py
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
When upgrading qbrz I got a Python syntax warning:
Preparing to unpack .../qbrz_0.23.2+bzr1663-1_all.deb ...
sting due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=golang-github-hanwen-go-fuse
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
gtest as
it helps the migration software to figure out the right versions to
combine in the tests.
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?pa
s the migration software to figure out the right versions to
combine in the tests.
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gcc-12
Hi,
On 27-01-2024 15:41, Paul Gevers wrote:
Indeed, autopkgtest doesn't look at d/control at all. Both
autopkgtest-pkg-python and autopkgtest-pkg-pybuild are things that
autodep8 deals with and it needs to do the right thing. Reassigning.
This seems to be problematic (note the "^&q
801 - 900 of 12687 matches
Mail list logo
