Bug#1060413: src:emacs-posframe: fails to migrate to testing for too long: uploader built arch:all binary

Source: emacs-posframe Version: 1.1.7-3 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.4.2-1 Tags: sid trixie pending User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more

Bug#1060412: src:emacs-wgrep: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression

Source: emacs-wgrep Version: 3.0.0-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 3.0.0-2 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days

Bug#1060202: glibc - autopkgtest flacky on arm64

Hi, On 08-01-2024 01:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote: I am still not sure why it got killed on arm64 and not on other debci workers, there as still swap available. Actually looking at the munin plot, it seems that the arm64 debci workers stopped using swap around September 2023 contrary to the other

Bug#1060202: glibc - autopkgtest flacky on arm64

Hi all, On 08-01-2024 19:50, Paul Gevers wrote: Can you tell me how you saw that? I neither spotted that, nor is not having swap a conscious act, so rather a mistake. I just checked and it seems that on ci-worker-arm64-08 was not having swap. We did have /swap created as our other workers

Bug#1060202: glibc - autopkgtest flacky on arm64

Hi, On 08-01-2024 01:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote: I am still not sure why it got killed on arm64 and not on other debci workers, there as still swap available. Actually looking at the munin plot, it seems that the arm64 debci workers stopped using swap around September 2023 contrary to the other

Bug#1060202: glibc - autopkgtest flacky on arm64

Hi, On 07-01-2024 18:21, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Timeout while building: https://ci.debian.net/packages/g/glibc/unstable/arm64/41516611/ There are indeed many failures with cc1 getting killed, it seems that it started around 2024-01-02. I haven't spotted any change to the toolchain nor kernel

Bug#1060190: src:pyflakes: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC issue

Source: pyflakes Version: 2.5.0-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 3.1.0-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Control: block -1 by 1058335 Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and

Bug#1060189: lazarus-src-3.0: diversion handling seems wrong (it works, but after an error)

Package: lazarus-src-3.0 Version: 3.0+dfsg1-5 Severity: normal Hi, I just did my daily update of my trixie system and spotted the error below. The fallback works, but that "error" is highlighted in red, so it catches the eye. Paul Unpacking lazarus-src-3.0 (3.0+dfsg1-5) over (3.0+dfsg1-3)

Bug#1060149: src:extrepo: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression

Hi Wouter, On 06-01-2024 20:51, Wouter Verhelst wrote: The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as having a Release Critical bug in testing [1]. Your package src:extrepo has been trying to migrate for 33 days [2]. This should

Bug#1060151: src:compyle: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest issues

Source: compyle Version: 0.8.1-4 Severity: serious Control: close -1 0.8.1-6 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as

Bug#1060149: src:extrepo: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression

Source: extrepo Version: 0.11 Severity: serious Control: close -1 0.12 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as having a

Bug#1060148: src:liblouis: fails to migrate to testing for too long: triggers autopkgtest failures

Source: liblouis Version: 3.27.0-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 3.28.0-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Control: block -1 by 1058514 Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and

Bug#1060147: src:libei: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on amd64/i386

Source: libei Version: 1.1.0-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.2.0-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Control: block -1 by 1058218 Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable

Bug#1059929: release.debian.org: gobject-introspection_1.78.1-9 is said to have an unsatisfiable dependency

Hi Simon On 06-01-2024 12:48, Simon McVittie wrote: On Sat, 06 Jan 2024 at 10:16:28 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: If an explicit dependency on steam-libs:i386 would be valid, I'd be happy to use that, and remove the steam-libs-i386 binary package as redundant. We're not there yet, so please hold

Bug#1059929: release.debian.org: gobject-introspection_1.78.1-9 is said to have an unsatisfiable dependency

Hi, On 06-01-2024 08:21, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: I think it's a bit more complicated than that. Currently, the tool creates 8624 package relationships. If I remember correctly, britney is unable to analyze cross-architecture relationships? At least by lack of implementation.

Bug#1059929: release.debian.org: gobject-introspection_1.78.1-9 is said to have an unsatisfiable dependency

Control: tags -1 pending Hi, On 03-01-2024 20:40, Paul Gevers wrote: On 03-01-2024 20:22, Simon McVittie wrote: I think all of those are correct? I think that if apt allows you to install it, chances are that it's a britney2 bug. I'll try to debug it tomorrow. I have a first proposal

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

Hi Steve, On 05-01-2024 17:36, Rene Engelhard wrote: Also a problem is that experimental also might already contain totally unrelated updates like new upstream versions... I share this worry. Have you thought about how to handle the cases where you don't have experimental to upload to? How

Bug#1059929: release.debian.org: gobject-introspection_1.78.1-9 is said to have an unsatisfiable dependency

Hi, Thanks for reaching out. On 05-01-2024 07:45, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: It would generate the following two stubs (shortened here for brevity): Package: pkga Version: 1 Architecture: amd64 Depends: pkgc:any Multi-Arch: no Package: pkgb Version: 1 Architecture: amd64

Bug#1059995: pdns: flaky autopkgtest (host dependent): pdns.service: Failed to set up IPC namespacing: Resource temporarily unavailable

Hi, On 04-01-2024 17:28, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 03:37:21PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi, On 04-01-2024 15:08, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: It would seem that the host runs out of IPC space? What is IPC space? https://manpages.debian.org/bookworm/manpages/sysvipc.7

Bug#1059995: pdns: flaky autopkgtest (host dependent): pdns.service: Failed to set up IPC namespacing: Resource temporarily unavailable

Hi, On 04-01-2024 15:08, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: It would seem that the host runs out of IPC space? What is IPC space? And when does a host run out of it? As I said, this is one of our most powerful hosts, so I would expect it to run out of things last. Does it run more tests in

Bug#1059995: pdns: flaky autopkgtest (host dependent): pdns.service: Failed to set up IPC namespacing: Resource temporarily unavailable

Source: pdns Version: 4.8.3-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: flaky Dear maintainer(s), I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package. I noticed that it regularly fails. The failures seem related on the host that runs the test. ci-worker13 is a beefy

Bug#1050024: upgrade-reports: Massive lags in X, apt, writing to disk, starting applications

Hi Benjamin, Sorry for the tremendous delay. On 18-08-2023 14:56, Benjamin Lotter wrote: - Did any packages fail to upgrade? KDE as always kind of broke, but could be reinstalled I guess you don't have more details? If you do, you might want to file that information against kde-baseapps.

Bug#1056594: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#1056594: mat2: test failure

Hi, On 03-01-2024 14:02, Georg Faerber wrote: Thanks for the upload, although I would have appreciated communication about this upfront. Of course. As a Release Manager, I would have appreciated a more timely handeling of an RC issue that blocks other packages. I followed DevRef guidance:

Bug#1059898: unblock: steam-installer/1:1.0.0.78~ds-4

Hi Simon, On 03-01-2024 10:34, Simon McVittie wrote: In the HTML output, under "Additional info" (which if I understand correctly is meant to be for notes that do not affect migration), That's the idea, yes. it says: - Additional info: - uninstallable on arch amd64, not running

Bug#1059929: release.debian.org: gobject-introspection_1.78.1-9 is said to have an unsatisfiable dependency

Hi Simon, On 03-01-2024 20:22, Simon McVittie wrote: I think all of those are correct? I think that if apt allows you to install it, chances are that it's a britney2 bug. I'll try to debug it tomorrow. Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1059903: autopkgtest: Add Incus support

Hi On 03-01-2024 12:44, Colin Watson wrote: While at some point you might want to do a bit more abstraction to reduce code duplication, I think the simplest approach would be to copy autopkgtest-{build,virt}-lxd to autopkgtest-{build,virt}-incus and do a little bit of search-and-replace. I've

Bug#1059840: please bump --ram-size for qemu

Hi, On 03-01-2024 12:55, Antonio Terceiro wrote: I think that sound reasonable, but I don't know how to sufficiently judge this. Maybe my co-maintainers have ideas about it? I think we can use use the smaller of [4GB, 50% of the host RAM], to avoid killing a host where 4GB is more than what

Bug#1059881: autopkgtest: Automatically parsing the summary file in error conditions

Hi Stefano, On 02-01-2024 21:54, Stefano Rivera wrote: It would be great if you could provide a specification for this file format, so tools like Debusine can have some confidence that they're parsing it correctly. $(man autopkgtest) has a section on OUTPUT FORMAT, isn't that what you're

Bug#1059840: please bump --ram-size for qemu

Control: reassign -1 autopkgtest Hi Michael, On 02-01-2024 22:27, Michael Biebl wrote: You raise an interesting point though by framing this as an autopkgtest issue: Maybe the default in autopkgtest-virt-qemu should be bumped. This value was set in 2014 and systems have significantly more RAM

Bug#1059875: src:rjava: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on i386

Hi Dirk, On 02-01-2024 20:42, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing | and unstable for more than 30 days as having a Release Critical bug in I noticed that too over the last few weeks as I tend to keep an eye on my aggregation at

Bug#1059878: src:devicexlib: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on ppc64el

Source: devicexlib Version: 0.1.0-2 Severity: serious Control: close -1 0.8.2-1 Tags: sid trixie ftbfs User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30

Bug#1059876: src:mopac: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on i386

Source: mopac Version: 22.0.6+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 22.1.0-1 Tags: sid trixie ftbfs User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30

Bug#1059875: src:rjava: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on i386

Source: rjava Version: 1.0-6-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.0-10-1 Tags: sid trixie ftbfs User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days

Bug#1059840: please bump --ram-size for qemu

Hi Michael, On 02-01-2024 11:04, Michael Biebl wrote: we are currently trying to get the systemd upstream autopkgtest suite pass in Debian sid/trixie with qemu and I'm thrilled to see that qemu support for debci is currently evaluated. I think you mean for ci.debian.net (debci is a source

Bug#1059765: linux: isolation-machine autopkgtest fails for multiple reasons

Hi On 01-01-2024 22:33, Bastian Blank wrote: Do we have serial of the machines? Do you mean of the system where the VM's run, or of the VM itself? IIRC the qemu backend of autopkgtest is talking to the VM over serial, but if you want to be sure, I'll need to check. Paul

Bug#1059808: ocfs2-tools: isolation-machine autopkgtest fails: Internal logic failure while mounting /dev/loop0 on /mnt

Source: ocfs2-tools Version: 1.8.7-1 Severity: important User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: isolation-machine Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. I recently added support for isolation-machine tests on ci.debian.net for amd64 and added your package to the list

Bug#1057911: mark libjs-jquery-tablesorter Multi-Arch: foreign

Control: tags -1 pending Hi Helmut, On 10-12-2023 16:15, Helmut Grohne wrote: Packages (such as erlang-cowboy) that have libjs-jquery-tablesorter in their dependency tree cannot satisfy their cross Build-Depends, because Architecture: all packages can never satisfy cross Build-Depends unless

Bug#1057205: systemtap: version 5.0-1 FTBFS on i386, ppc64el, riscv64

Control: found -1 4.9-1 Control: severity -1 important On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 16:53:50 +0100 Emanuele Rocca wrote: Package: systemtap Version: 5.0-1 Severity: serious I have lowered the severity to enable migration, given that 5.0-2 works around the problem. The builds on r-b [1] show that

Bug#1059788: src:tracker-miners: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS

Source: tracker-miners Version: 3.4.6-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 3.4.6-2 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Control: block -1 by 1057617 Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and

Bug#1059787: src:xfce4-power-manager: fails to migrate to testing for too long: uploader built arch:all binaries

Source: xfce4-power-manager Version: 4.18.2-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 4.18.3-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than

Bug#1055370: debci setup should include security repositories

Control: reassign -1 lxc-templates Control: retitle -1 consider adding security repos by default Control: affects -1 debci autopkgtest Hi all, On 05-11-2023 03:41, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: Is there any reason why `debci setup ...` doen't configure the security repostories inside the lxc

Bug#1056594: mat2: test failure

Control: tags -1 pending On 01-01-2024 09:50, Paul Gevers wrote: I'm going to NMU with this patch shortly. @gregor, any reason why you didn't the upload to DELAYED after you built it already? I have uploaded the attached changes. Paul diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index

Bug#1056594: mat2: test failure

Dear all, On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 18:03:45 +0100 gregor herrmann wrote: Currently mat2's test suite fails, maybe due to newer libimage-exiftool-perl releases. This can be seen on ci.debian.net, but the same failures occur during the build tests, so the package FTBFS. I've locally added upstream

Bug#1059785: benchmark breaks ABI without SONAME bump

Source: benchmark Control: found -1 benchmark/1.8.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid trixie Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of benchmark the autopkgtest of pytorch fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of benchmark from unstable. It passes when run with

Bug#1059765: linux: isolation-machine autopkgtest fails for multiple reasons

Hi Bastian, On 31-12-2023 18:33, Bastian Blank wrote: Do you have a handy script available to try this by hand? I was just looking at this test (to unravel the loop logic and replace it with one test per kernel), but I'm not sure if this ever worked before. It was nearly completely attached

Bug#1059767: aptfs: isolation-machine autopkgtest fails: find: ‘target/bash’: Invalid argument

Source: aptfs Version: 2:1.0.1 Severity: important User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: isolation-machine Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. I recently added support for isolation-machine tests on ci.debian.net for amd64 and added your package to the list to use

Bug#1052557: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#1052557: Bug#1052557: fpc: Compiler bootstrap for more release architectures

Hi, On 30-12-2023 11:17, Abou Al Montacir wrote: I've checked support of both architecture by FPC and it seems they are only supported in non released development branch.* As Debian is shipping 3.2.2, there is no support for any of these architectures there. So we will need to wait until new

Bug#1059765: linux: isolation-machine autopkgtest fails for multiple reasons

Source: linux Version: 6.6.8-1 Severity: normal Dear linux maintainers, Recently I added some isolation-machine support to ci.debian.net and one of the first packages I tried to run the test for is src:linux. Unfortunately, the isolation-machine based test (selftests) fails (the reboot that

Bug#1059725: autopkgtest: isolation-machine test fails: nearly all tests in podman-init fail

Source: autopkgtest Version: 5.31.2 Severity: important User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: isolation-machine Hi, I recently added support for isolation-machine testing on ci.d.n and when I ran the autopkgtest of src:autopkgtest, it failed. It failed the podman-init test and out of 44

Bug#1059444: LXD: cython3 autopkgtest hangs forever due to stall in copyup

Hi Stefano, On 29-12-2023 02:26, stefa...@debian.org wrote: Hi Debian (2023.12.25_17:20:25_+) This reproduces reliably, but I haven't got to the bottom of it. It looks like a stalled pipeline somewhere. Caught it again, the tee from lib/in-testbed/wrapper.sh is trying to write to stdout,

Bug#1059559: runit: isolation-machine autopkgtest fails: this is a protected package; it should not be removed

Source: runit Version: 2.1.2-54+usrmerge Severity: important User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: isolation-machine Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. I recently added support for isolation-machine tests on ci.debian.net for amd64 and added your package to the

Bug#1059555: src:rust-wasmtime: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS

Source: rust-wasmtime Version: 10.0.1+dfsg-7 Severity: serious Control: close -1 15.0.0+dfsg-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Control: block -1 by 1057198 Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between

Bug#1059553: minicoredumper: isolation-machine autopkgtest fails: stdio.h: No such file or directory

Source: minicoredumper Version: 2.0.3-1 Severity: important User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: isolation-machine Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. I recently added support for isolation-machine tests on ci.debian.net for amd64 and added your package to the

Bug#1059552: bilibop: isolation-machine autopkgtest (lockfs) fails on bookworm and newer

Source: bilibop Version: 0.6.3 Severity: important User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: isolation-machine Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. I recently added support for isolation-machine tests on ci.debian.net for amd64 and added your package to the list to use

Bug#1058018: libadios2-common-core-dev has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/adios2/adios2-config.cmake

Hi Drew, On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 20:24:01 +0100 Drew Parsons wrote: Control: severity -1 important Helmut disagreed with your call here and asked the Release Team on IRC to have a check. Call it teething issues. This is a new package, so I'm trying to avoid making debian/control more verbose

Bug#1059509: release-notes: script -t is deprecated, should we recommend --log-timing?

Package: release-notes Severity: minor Note to self. I just stumbled upon $(man script): """ -t[file], --timing[=file] Output timing data to standard error, or to file when given. This option is deprecated in favour of --log-timing where the file argument is not

Bug#1059506: /u/s/d/ovmf/NEWS.Debian.gz: link misses compression extension

Package: ovmf Version: 2023.11-2 Severity: minor File: /usr/share/doc/ovmf/NEWS.Debian.gz Hi, I just got the NEWS flashed by apt-listchanges, copy/pasted the link and noticed the file mentioned in NEWS.Debian.gz to not exist. On disk, the file is compressed, so ideally the link should point

Bug#1059495: src:corectrl: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: libtrompeloeil-cpp-dev

Source: corectrl Version: 1.3.8+ds-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid trixie User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: edos-uninstallable Dear maintainer(s), Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be

Bug#1059494: src:python-refurb: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: python3-fastapi

Source: python-refurb Version: 1.24.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid trixie User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: edos-uninstallable Dear maintainer(s), Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be

Bug#1059493: src:python-docx: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: python3-behave

Source: python-docx Version: 1.1.0+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid trixie User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: edos-uninstallable Dear maintainer(s), Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be

Bug#1059487: src:django-oauth-toolkit: fails to migrate to testing for too long: uploader built arch:all binaries

Source: django-oauth-toolkit Version: 2.3.0-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 2.3.0-2 Tags: sid trixie pending User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for

Bug#1059484: rasdaemon: autopkgtest failure: cannot access '/var/lib/rasdaemon/ras-mc_event.db'

Source: rasdaemon Version: 0.8.0-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: fails-always Dear maintainer(s), You recently added an autopkgtest to your package rasdaemon, great. However, it fails. Currently this failure is blocking the migration to testing [1]. Can you

Bug#1059478: src:vectorscan: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression on ppc64el

Source: vectorscan Version: 5.4.10.1-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 5.4.11-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30

Bug#1059477: src:patool: fails to migrate to testing for too long: new test depends on amd64/i386 only binary

Source: patool Version: 1.12-5 Severity: serious Control: close -1 2.0.0-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as

Bug#1059447: src:lz4-java: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on i386

Source: lz4-java Version: 1.8.0-3 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.8.0-4 Tags: sid trixie ftbfs User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30

Bug#1052838: [debian-mysql] Bug#1052838: mariadb: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:161: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1

Hi, On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 10:59:50 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi, On 02/10/23 at 21:59 -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Hi! > > The relevant lines from log seems to be: > > > main.bind_address_resolution w4 [ fail ] > ... > > 2023-09-26 6:31:03 0 [ERROR] Can't start server: Bind

Bug#1059352: src:apt: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression on armhf

Hi Julian, On 23-12-2023 20:40, Julian Andres Klode wrote: I know this is automated but I feel lije it would be sensible to scan It's *mostly* automated. the logs for well known bugs so that you don't end up filing bugs against every package broken by valgrind's missing support for the new

Bug#1059352: src:apt: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression on armhf

Source: apt Version: 2.7.6 Severity: serious Control: close -1 2.7.7 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as having a

Bug#1059286: cacti: CVE-2023-46490

Hi, On 22-12-2023 13:17, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: There's also a reference for https://github.com/Cacti/cacti/security/advisories/GHSA-f4r3-53jr-654c but it's noin-public for two months now, might be worth checking with upstream for the status. Upstream confirmed they are working on an

Bug#1059226: release.debian.org: Help doris migrate to testing

Control: retitle -1 britney2 wrong installability block in autopkgtest Hi Bas, On 21-12-2023 14:06, Bas Couwenberg wrote: doris (5.0.3~beta+dfsg-17) is not migrating to testing, the excuses suggest this is due to superficial autopkgtests: https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=doris

Bug#1059223: src:meson: fails to migrate to testing for too long: fails autopkgtest on arm64 and i386

Source: meson Version: 1.2.3-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.3.0-2 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as

Bug#1059222: src:pv: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armhf

Source: pv Version: 1.8.0-3 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.8.5-1 Tags: sid trixie ftbfs User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as

Bug#1059220: src:restic: fails to migrate to testing for too long: new Build-Depends is no migration candidate

Source: restic Version: 0.16.0-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 0.16.2-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as

Bug#1059168: Bug#1059165: src:zlib: fails to migrate to testing for too long: triggers autopkgtest issues

retitle 1059168 flaky autopkgtest user debian...@lists.debian.org usertag 1059168 flaky thanks BCC: control@b.d.o Hi, On 21-12-2023 10:04, Jérémy Lal wrote: Thank you for https://bugs.debian.org/1059168 I noticed "Marked as found in versions

Bug#1059165: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1059165: src:zlib: fails to migrate to testing for too long: triggers autopkgtest issues

Hi, On 20-12-2023 23:08, Jérémy Lal wrote: I did the one for burp. Thanks for that. Dolfin has active maintainers, though. I think I need to file a "flaky autopkgtest" bug report against dolfin. Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1058696: bugs.debian.org: Can we change the mail address of the release.debian.org pseudo package?

Hi all, On 20-12-2023 05:17, Don Armstrong wrote: On Tue, 19 Dec 2023, Cord Beermann wrote: So I need some examples. :0 * 1^0 ^X-Debian-PR-Package:.*release.debian.org $junkdir/debbugs.$YEARMONTH should be sufficient to get most (if not all of them). Please hold. Some of the members of

Bug#1059166: src:pelican: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC issue and non-migrating B-D

Source: pelican Version: 4.8.0+dfsg-3 Severity: serious Control: close -1 4.9.1+dfsg-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Control: block -1 by 1057484 Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing

Bug#1059165: src:zlib: fails to migrate to testing for too long: triggers autopkgtest issues

Source: zlib Version: 1:1.2.13.dfsg-3 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1:1.3.dfsg-3 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Control: affects -1 src:burp src:dolfin src:nodejs Control: block -1 by 1057880 Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team

Bug#1058696: bugs.debian.org: Can we change the mail address of the release.debian.org pseudo package?

Hi Cord, On 19-12-2023 19:38, Cord Beermann wrote: Hallo! Du (Don Armstrong) hast geschrieben: On Sat, 16 Dec 2023, Cord Beermann wrote: However: if we implement this, i'd consider this as a workaround as mails that should not be distributed, should not be sent out in the first place. That

Bug#1054657: Transition ready? (Was: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics))

Hi On 18-12-2023 10:07, Andreas Tille wrote: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/r-bioc-megadepth d/tests/control has Architecture: !s390x Why is it considered failing on s390x anyway? The log has this at the end: 127s run-unit-testSKIP Test declares architecture as not supported:

Bug#1058889: src:openjdk-22: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armhf

Source: openjdk-22 Version: 22~22ea-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 22~25ea-1 Tags: sid trixie ftbfs User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than

Bug#1058866: cacti: Cacti package does not include spine.conf.sample

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Control: tags -1 confirmed On 17-12-2023 10:00, Paul Gevers wrote: On 17-12-2023 09:15, Piotr Górski wrote: Cacti package does not include file spine.conf.sample needed during installation of cacti-spine: I confirmed it doesn't contain the file, see https

Bug#1058866: cacti: Cacti package does not include spine.conf.sample

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Piotr, Thanks for reporting issues that you encounter. On 17-12-2023 09:15, Piotr Górski wrote: Cacti package does not include file spine.conf.sample needed during installation of cacti-spine: I confirmed it doesn't contain the file, see

Bug#1058811: src:python-diagrams: fails to migrate to testing for too long: not installable

Source: python-diagrams Version: 0.21.1-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 0.23.4-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Control: block -1 by 1057174 Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing

Bug#1058810: src:wordpress: fails to migrate to testing for too long: uploader built arch:all binaries

Source: wordpress Version: 6.3.2+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 6.4.1+dfsg1-1 Tags: sid trixie pending User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for

Bug#1058809: src:yash: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS

Source: yash Version: 2.52-2 Severity: serious Control: close -1 2.55-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Control: block -1 by 1058530 Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for

Bug#1058696: bugs.debian.org: Can we change the mail address of the release.debian.org pseudo package?

that (and do you think it makes sense)? Paul [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1058696 On 15-12-2023 06:02, Don Armstrong wrote: On Thu, 14 Dec 2023, Paul Gevers wrote: Does it make sense to you to use the tracker as the canonical point where e-mail is send, it's already send there anyways? I'm OK

Bug#1058697: fonts-fork-awesome: expected files missing?

Package: fonts-fork-awesome Version: 1.2.0+ds1-1 Control: affects -1 cacti Hi, For src:cacti (of which I'm de-facto the only maintainer) I received a bug report in Ubuntu (#2046431) about missing files. As cacti doesn't ship these files, but Depends on fonts-fork-awesome I was wondering if

Bug#1058696: bugs.debian.org: Can we change the mail address of the release.debian.org pseudo package?

Package: bugs.debian.org Severity: normal Control: affects -1 release.debian.org Hi, The Release Team has discussed its ways of working at the Cambridge mini DebConf and as part of that the volume and purpose of our mail list (debian-de...@lists.debian.org). We recognize that that list mostly

Bug#1058676: bugs.debian.org: Please disable mips64el as release architecture

Package: bugs.debian.org Severity: normal Control: affects -1 release.debian.org Hi don, I have created a merge request [1] to drop mips64el from the list of release architectures. """ The Release Team has put mips64el on the OUTOFSYNC list which means that versions in testing can be

Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable

Hi Soren, On 14-12-2023 08:45, Soren Stoutner wrote: How do you recommend we change that? I think you're having the right discussion. I'm not a Stable Release Manager so I don't feel authoritative about stable. However, in my *personal* opinion and reflected in a proposal [1] I'm driving

Bug#1058663: django-invitations: autopkgtest failure suggest missing *versioned* dependency

Source: django-invitations Version: 2.0.0-2 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: django-alla...@packages.debian.org Tags: sid trixie User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: needs-update Control: affects -1 src:django-allauth Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of django-allauth the

Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable

Hi Soren, On 14-12-2023 04:49, Soren Stoutner wrote: Currently there is no real security support for Qt WebEngine in stable, which is an oversight that might surprise many Debian users. It's explicitly documented in the release notes:

Bug#1057934: libjs-jquery-jstree: FTBFS: dh_debputy: error: debputy internal-command dh-integration-generate-debs -p libjs-jquery-jstree .. returned exit code 1

Control: reassign -1 debputy Control: affects -1 src:libjs-jquery-jstree Hi Niels, I think this one is for you. Paul On 10-12-2023 20:18, Santiago Vila wrote: Package: src:libjs-jquery-jstree Version: 3.3.16+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all

Bug#1058640: src:lintian-brush: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: ognibuild (>= 0.0.18)

Source: lintian-brush Version: 0.152 Severity: serious Tags: sid trixie User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: edos-uninstallable Dear maintainer(s), Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be

Bug#1054657: Transition ready? (Was: Transition seems to be blocked (Was: Bug#1054657: transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics))

Hi, On 13-12-2023 17:08, Andreas Tille wrote: Not built on buildd: arch all binaries uploaded by tille, a new source-only upload is needed to allow migration I do not understand this line. What exact package needs a source-only upload? You uploaded binaries together with the source.

Bug#1058635: src:mes: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armhf

Source: mes Version: 0.24.2-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 0.25-1 Tags: sid trixie ftbfs User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as

Bug#1058630: src:coreutils: fails to migrate to testing for too long: triggers autopkgtest failure

Source: coreutils Version: 9.1-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 9.4-2 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as

Bug#1058629: src:starjava-votable: fails to migrate to testing for too long: triggers autopkgtest failure

Source: starjava-votable Version: 2.0+2023.04.14-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 2.0+2023.10.31-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable

Bug#1058628: src:r10k: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression

Source: r10k Version: 3.15.4-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 4.0.0-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >