Paul…
Many thanks for the review.
> On Apr 23, 2016, at 00:34, Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2016-04-22 at 16:20 -0300, Pavel Kalian wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately I still did not receive any useful feedback from
>> anybody, neither on Debian GIS ma
Antoine…
Unfortunately I still did not receive any useful feedback from anybody, neither
on Debian GIS mailing list, or any information on where I should submit
something for review.
If you know what to look at, you may have a look at the launchpad sources at
opencpn_4.2.0.orig.tar.xz
Hi...
On 03/21/2015 07:47 AM, anarcat wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 08:52:55PM -0600, Pavel Kalian wrote:
Hi...
Hi Pavel,
I'm an upstream developer and managing the PPA on Launchpad.
Thanks for chiming in! It's certainly a good way to try to resolve this
in the long run. :)
(and sorry
On 03/21/2015 07:18 PM, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
Maybe we can have the two packages diverge (between ubuntu and Debian)
at that level. Eventually, those differences would go away as 3.0 gets
propagated everywhere...
Maybe with some macros and ifdefs you could default to wx 3.0 but allow
Hi...
I'm an upstream developer and managing the PPA on Launchpad.
It certainly is more messy than needs to be, but it serves it's purpose,
which is to get the packages to the user in a way he can digest...
With the upcoming 4.0 release I have modularized the packages to certain
extent, separating
5 matches
Mail list logo
